Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Meteorology
Volume 2015, Article ID 174196, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/174196
Research Article

Modeling Spatiotemporal Precipitation: Effects of Density, Interpolation, and Land Use Distribution

1U.S. Geological Survey, Utah Water Science Center, 2329 W. Orton Circle, Salt Lake City, UT 84119, USA
2Flow Apportionment Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
3Directorate of Boundary Conditions, Department of Hydrology, University of Bayreuth, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany
4Department of Soil Physics, University of Bayreuth, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany

Received 3 July 2014; Accepted 3 November 2014

Academic Editor: Francisco J. Tapiador

Copyright © 2015 Christopher L. Shope and Ganga Ram Maharjan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. Sun, P. S. Cornish, and T. M. Daniell, “Spatial variability in hydrologic modeling using rainfall-runoff model and digital elevation model,” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 404–412, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. B. Wilson, J. B. Valdes, and I. Rodriguez-Iturbe, “On the influence of the spatial distribution of rainfall on storm runoff,” Water Resources Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 321–328, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. W. F. Krajewski, G. J. Ciach, and E. Habib, “An analysis of small-scale rainfall variability in different climatic regimes,” Hydrological Sciences Journal, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 151–162, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. St-Hilaire, T. B. M. J. Ouarda, M. Lachance, B. Bobée, J. Gaudet, and C. Gignac, “Assessment of the impact of meteorological network density on the estimation of basin precipitation and runoff: a case study,” Hydrological Processes, vol. 17, no. 18, pp. 3561–3580, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. E. A. Meselhe, E. H. Habib, O. C. Oche, and S. Gautam, “Sensitivity of conceptual and physically based hydrologic models to temporal and spatial rainfall sampling,” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 711–720, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. Obled, J. Wendling, and K. Beven, “The sensitivity of hydrological models to spatial rainfall patterns: an evaluation using observed data,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 159, pp. 305–333, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J.-M. Faurès, D. C. Goodrich, D. A. Woolhiser, and S. Sorooshian, “Impact of small-scale spatial rainfall variability on runoff modeling,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 173, no. 1–4, pp. 309–326, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. V. L. Lopes, “On the effect of uncertainty in spatial distribution of rainfall on catchment modelling,” Catena, vol. 28, no. 1-2, pp. 107–119, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. W. F. Krajewski, V. Lakshmi, K. P. Georgakakos, and S. C. Jain, “A Monte Carlo study of rainfall sampling effect on a distributed catchment model,” Water Resources Research, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 119–128, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Matheron, The Theory of Regionalized Variables and Its Applications, École Nationale Supérieure des Mines, 1971.
  11. W. Buytaert, R. Celleri, P. Willems, B. D. Bièvre, and G. Wyseure, “Spatial and temporal rainfall variability in mountainous areas: a case study from the south Ecuadorian Andes,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 329, no. 3-4, pp. 413–421, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. Campling, A. Gobin, and J. Feyen, “Temporal and spatial rainfall analysis across a humid tropical catchment,” Hydrological Processes, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 359–375, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. Drogue, J. Humbert, J. Deraisme, N. Mahr, and N. Freslon, “A statistical-topographic model using an omnidirectional parameterization of the relief for mapping orographic rainfall,” International Journal of Climatology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 599–613, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. M. Laslett, A. B. McBratney, P. J. Pahl, and M. F. Hutchinson, “Comparison of several spatial prediction methods for soil pH,” Journal of Soil Science, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 325–341, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. Goovaerts, “Geostatistics in soil science: state-of-the-art and perspectives,” Geoderma, vol. 89, no. 1-2, pp. 1–45, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. N. Dirks, J. E. Hay, C. D. Stow, and D. Harris, “High-resolution studies of rainfall on Norfolk Island Part II: interpolation of rainfall data,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 208, no. 3-4, pp. 187–193, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. I. A. Nalder and R. W. Wein, “Spatial interpolation of climatic Normals: test of a new method in the Canadian boreal forest,” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 211–225, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. Weber and E. Englund, “Evaluation and comparison of spatial interpolators,” Mathematical Geology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 381–391, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C. A. Gotway, R. B. Ferguson, G. W. Hergert, and T. A. Peterson, “Comparison of kriging and inverse-distance methods for mapping soil parameters,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 1237–1247, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. A. Schloeder, N. E. Zimmerman, and M. J. Jacobs, “Comparison of methods for interpolating soil properties using limited data,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 470–479, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  21. C. A. Velasco-Forero, D. Sempere-Torres, E. F. Cassiraga, and J. Jaime Gómez-Hernández, “A non-parametric automatic blending methodology to estimate rainfall fields from rain gauge and radar data,” Advances in Water Resources, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 986–1002, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. Otieno, J. Yang, W. Liu, and D. Han, “Influence of rain gauge density on interpolation method selection,” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, vol. 19, no. 11, Article ID 04014024, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. J. T. Abatzoglou, “Development of gridded surface meteorological data for ecological applications and modelling,” International Journal of Climatology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 121–131, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. Caracciolo, E. Arnone, and L. V. Noto, “Influence of spatial precipitation sampling on hydrological response at the catchment scale,” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 544–553, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Bárdossy and T. Das, “Influence of rainfall observation network on model calibration and application,” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 77–89, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. V. A. Bell and R. J. Moore, “The sensitivity of catchment runoff models to rainfall data at different spatial scales,” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 653–667, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. M. Schuurmans and M. F. P. Bierkens, “Effect of spatial distribution of daily rainfall on interior catchment response of a distributed hydrological model,” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 677–693, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. C. L. Shope, S. Bartsch, K. Kim et al., “A weighted, multi-method approach for accurate basin-wide streamflow estimation in an ungauged watershed,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 494, pp. 72–82, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. C. L. Shope, G. R. Maharjan, J. Tenhunen et al., “Using the SWAT model to improve process descriptions and define hydrologic partitioning in South Korea,” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 539–557, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. Y.-S. Kwon, H.-H. Lee, U. Han et al., “Terrain analysis of Haean Basin in terms of earth science,” Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, vol. 11, pp. 236–241, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  31. S. Arnhold, M. Ruidisch, S. Bartsch, C. L. Shope, and B. Huwe, “Simulation of runoff patterns and soil erosion on mountainous farmland with and without plastic-covered ridge-furrow cultivation in South Korea,” Transactions of the ASABE, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 667–679, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. K.-W. Jo and J.-H. Park, “Rapid release and changing sources of Pb in a mountainous watershed during extreme rainfall events,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 44, no. 24, pp. 9324–9329, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. Tenhunen, B. Seo, and B. Lee, “Spatial setting of the TERRECO Soyang, project in the Haean catchment of Yanggu-gun and the watershed in Gangwan-do, Seoul, South Korea,” in Asia Flux Training Course on Flux Monitoring: From Theory to Application, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  34. A. H. Thiessen, “Precipitation averages for large areas,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 39, no. 7, p. 1082, 1911. View at Google Scholar
  35. B. Ahrens, “Distance in spatial interpolation of daily rain gauge data,” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 197–208, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. B. D. Ripley, Spatial Statistics, Wiley, 2004.
  37. P. A. Burrough and R. A. McDonnell, Principles of Geographical Information Systems, Oxford University Press, 1998.
  38. S. Ly, C. Charles, and A. Degré, “Geostatistical interpolation of daily rainfall at catchment scale: the use of several variogram models in the Ourthe and Ambleve catchments, Belgium,” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 2259–2274, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. E. H. Isaaks and R. M. Srivastava, An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1989.
  40. H. Wackernagel, Multivariate Geostatistics: An Introduction with Applications, Springer, 1998.
  41. J. G. Arnold, R. Srinivasan, R. S. Muttiah, and J. R. Williams, “Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development,” Journal of the American Water Resources Association, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 73–89, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. S. L. Neitsch, J. G. Arnold, J. R. Kiniry, R. Srinivasan, and J. R. Williams, Soil and Water Assessment Tool Input/Output File Documentation Version 2009, Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service and Blackland Research Center, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, College Station, Tex, USA, 2010.
  43. S. L. Neitsch, J. G. Arnold, J. R. Kiniry, and J. R. Williams, Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2009, Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service and Blackland Research Center, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, College Station, Tex, USA, 2011.
  44. USDA, “Soil conservation survey SCS,” in National Engineering Handbook, Section 4: Hydrology, USDA, Ed., USDA, Washington, DC, USA, 1972. View at Google Scholar
  45. H. Green and G. A. Ampt, “Studies on soil physics: part II—the permeability of an ideal soil to air and water,” Journal of Agricultural Science, vol. 5, pp. 1–26, 1912. View at Google Scholar
  46. J. H. Singh, V. Knapp, and M. Demissie, “Hydrologic modeling of the Iroguois River watershed using HSPF and SWAT,” Tech. Rep. ISWS CR 2004-08, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  47. C. Santhi, J. G. Arnold, J. R. Williams, W. A. Dugas, R. Srinivasan, and L. M. Hauck, “Validation of the SWAT model on a large river basin with point and nonpoint sources,” Journal of the American Water Resources Association, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1169–1188, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. M. W. van Liew, J. G. Arnold, and J. D. Garbrecht, “Hydrologic simulation on agricultural watersheds: choosing between two models,” Transactions of the ASAE, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1539–1551, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. H. V. Gupta, S. Sorooshian, and P. O. Yapo, “Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: comparison with multilevel expert calibration,” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 135–143, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. K. Eckhardt, “How to construct recursive digital filters for baseflow separation,” Hydrological Processes, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 507–515, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. M. Ruidisch, J. Kettering, S. Arnhold, and B. Huwe, “Modeling water flow in a plastic mulched ridge cultivation system on hillslopes affected by South Korean summer monsoon,” Agricultural Water Management, vol. 116, pp. 204–217, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus