A Comparison of Three Gap Filling Techniques for Eddy Covariance Net Carbon Fluxes in Short Vegetation Ecosystems

<div>Frequency distribution of bias error with different methods for 65% artificial gaps at three sites, separated into daytime (a) and nighttime (b) data.</div>

Advances in Meteorology

fig3

Figure 3

Figure 3: A Comparison of Three Gap Filling Techniques for Eddy Covariance Net Carbon Fluxes in Short Vegetation Ecosystems 