Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Meteorology
Volume 2015, Article ID 260580, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/260580
Research Article

A Comparison of Three Gap Filling Techniques for Eddy Covariance Net Carbon Fluxes in Short Vegetation Ecosystems

1Key Laboratory of Watershed Geographic Sciences, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
2State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China

Received 9 March 2015; Accepted 17 May 2015

Academic Editor: Marcos Heil Costa

Copyright © 2015 Xiaosong Zhao and Yao Huang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. Baldocchi, E. Falge, L. Gu et al., “FLUXNET: A New Tool to Study the Temporal and Spatial Variability of Ecosystem-Scale Carbon Dioxide, Water Vapor, and Energy Flux Densities,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 82, no. 11, pp. 2415–2434, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. Papale, M. Reichstein, M. Aubinet et al., “Towards a standardized processing of Net Ecosystem Exchange measured with eddy covariance technique: algorithms and uncertainty estimation,” Biogeosciences, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 571–583, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. E. Falge, D. Baldocchi, R. Olson et al., “Gap filling strategies for defensible annual sums of net ecosystem exchange,” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 43–69, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. R. Desai, P. V. Bolstad, B. D. Cook, K. J. Davis, and E. V. Carey, “Comparing net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide between an old-growth and mature forest in the upper Midwest, USA,” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, vol. 128, no. 1-2, pp. 33–55, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Noormets, J. Chen, and T. R. Crow, “Age-dependent changes in ecosystem carbon fluxes in managed forests in northern Wisconsin, USA,” Ecosystems, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 187–203, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Reichstein, E. Falge, D. Baldocchi et al., “On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and ecosystem respiration: review and improved algorithm,” Global Change Biology, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1424–1439, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Hui, S. Wan, B. Su, G. Katul, R. Monson, and Y. Luo, “Gap-filling missing data in eddy covariance measurements using multiple imputation (MI) for annual estimations,” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, vol. 121, no. 1-2, pp. 93–111, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. B. H. Braswell, W. J. Sacks, E. Linder, and D. S. Schimel, “Estimating diurnal to annual ecosystem parameters by synthesis of a carbon flux model with eddy covariance net ecosystem exchange observations,” Global Change Biology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 335–355, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. M. Moffat, D. Papale, M. Reichstein et al., “Comprehensive comparison of gap-filling techniques for eddy covariance net carbon fluxes,” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, vol. 147, no. 3-4, pp. 209–232, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. Papale and R. Valentini, “A new assessment of European forests carbon exchanges by eddy fluxes and artificial neural network spatialization,” Global Change Biology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 525–535, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Schmidt, T. Wrzesinsky, and O. Klemm, “Gap filling and quality assessment of CO2 and water vapour fluxes above an urban area with radial basis function neural networks,” Boundary-Layer Meteorology, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 389–413, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. W. Knorr and J. Kattge, “Inversion of terrestrial ecosystem model parameter values against eddy covariance measurements by Monte Carlo sampling,” Global Change Biology, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1333–1351, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. K. Morgenstern, T. A. Black, E. R. Humphreys et al., “Sensitivity and uncertainty of the carbon balance of a Pacific Northwest Douglas-fir forest during an El Niño/La Niña cycle,” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, vol. 123, no. 3-4, pp. 201–219, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Y.-Y. Chen, C.-R. Chu, and M.-H. Li, “A gap-filling model for eddy covariance latent heat flux: estimating evapotranspiration of a subtropical seasonal evergreen broad-leaved forest as an example,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 468, pp. 101–110, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. D. Richardson and D. Y. Hollinger, “A method to estimate the additional uncertainty in gap-filled NEE resulting from long gaps in the CO2 flux record,” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, vol. 147, no. 3-4, pp. 199–208, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. X. Zhao, Y. Huang, Z. Jia et al., “Effects of the conversion of marshland to cropland on water and energy exchanges in northeastern China,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 355, no. 1–, pp. 181–191, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. W. J. Massman and X. Lee, “Eddy covariance flux corrections and uncertainties in long-term studies of carbon and energy exchanges,” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, vol. 113, no. 1–4, pp. 121–144, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. I. J. M. van Dijk and A. J. Dolman, “Estimates of CO2 uptake and release among European forests based on eddy covariance data,” Global Change Biology, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1445–1459, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. M. Wilczak, S. P. Oncley, and S. A. Stage, “Sonic anemometer tilt correction algorithms,” Boundary-Layer Meteorology, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 127–150, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. E. K. Webb, G. I. Pearman, and R. Leuning, “Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer,” Quarterly Journal Royal Meteorological Society, vol. 106, no. 447, pp. 85–100, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. D. Blanken, T. A. Black, H. H. Neumann et al., “Turbulent flux measurements above and below the overstory of a boreal aspen forest,” Boundary-Layer Meteorology, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 109–140, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. L. Gu, E. M. Falge, T. Boden et al., “Objective threshold determination for nighttime eddy flux filtering,” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, vol. 128, no. 3-4, pp. 179–197, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. Y. Hollinger, J. Aber, B. Dail et al., “Spatial and temporal variability in forest—atmosphere CO2 exchange,” Global Change Biology, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1689–1706, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. G. Wohlfahrt, C. Anfang, M. Bahn et al., “Quantifying nighttime ecosystem respiration of a meadow using eddy covariance, chambers and modelling,” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, vol. 128, no. 3-4, pp. 141–162, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. V. J. Stauch and A. J. Jarvis, “A semi-parametric gap-filling model for eddy covariance CO2 flux time series data,” Global Change Biology, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1707–1716, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus