Research Article

A Comparison of Three Gap Filling Techniques for Eddy Covariance Net Carbon Fluxes in Short Vegetation Ecosystems

Table 5

The sum relative error (SRE) for NEE in different gap levels, at marsh, rice, and soybean site.

Gap %DaytimeNighttime ( corrected)All time
MDV %LUT %NLR %MDV %LUT %NLR %MDV %LUT %NLR %

Marsh site352.830.854.92na(a)nana2.830.854.92
45−3.610.15−0.702.511.360.83−4.46−0.02−0.92
55−4.98−3.60−2.33−1.462.542.49−5.93−5.23−3.67
65−1.740.823.484.605.506.11−3.67−0.612.66

Rice site350.053.372.284.382.842.43−0.283.412.27
450.08−0.81−1.593.97−2.271.79−0.33−0.66−1.94
550.581.382.73−5.67−1.380.601.521.793.05
65−1.40−4.89−5.68−0.691.290.08−1.51−5.86−6.59

Soybean site352.21−1.677.01−22.99−9.94−9.285.16−0.379.58
451.82−1.752.201.574.092.941.92−4.041.91
555.803.5610.481.470.161.028.495.6716.36
651.741.9710.11−2.880.27−2.294.933.620.28

No measurements were available due to large gaps.