Review Article

Predicting Surface Runoff from Catchment to Large Region

Table 2

Summary of regionalization approaches conducted using large datasets.

MethodComparingModelRegion/countryReferences

AM
Reg
Average of nested neighbors is better than Reg (global or regional) HBV308 catchments in Austria[19]

PS
Reg
Output averaging based on PS is better than RegPDM127 catchments in UK[103]

AM
SP
PS
Reg
SP (Kriging) and PS perform best; all regionalization methods perform similarly in simulating snow coverHBV320 catchments in Austria[96]

PS
Reg
For PDM, PS performs slightly better than the Reg, whereas for TATE Reg performs bestPDM
TATE
119 catchments in the UK[104]

Reg
PS
The regression-based approach is better than the nearest neighbor based approachPDM260 catchments in UK[14]

SP
PS
Reg
SP is the best, Reg is the least satisfactory, and PS is intermediary GR4J, TOPMO913 catchments in France [15]

SP
PS
SP is better than PSXinanjiang210 catchments in southeast Australia[97]

SP
PS
Reg
An optimized averaging method (based on PS) is superior to Reg and SP approachesSIMHYD184 catchments in Australia[98]

SP
PS
SP performs slightly better than PS and the integrated similarity approach performs only very marginally better than SPXinanjiang
SIMHYD
210 catchments in southeast Australia[12]

SP
PS
Reg
HS
The index model that establishes relationships between hydrological signatures and catchment attributes is the best, followed by Reg, HS, and SPThree-parameter FDC227 catchments in southeast Australia[101]

HSHS based on FDC produces better runoff simulation compared to the others (drainage area and spatial proximity)HBVKarkheh river basin, western part of Iran[100]

SP
PS
Reg
An approach coupling the SP (IDW) and the PS is better than SP, PS, and RegMAC-HBVThe main watersheds across the province of Ontario[93]

SP
PS
SP is better than PSSIMHYD and GR4J8 catchments in the southeastern Tibetan Plateau[105]

SP
Reg
An index model that establishes relationships between hydrological signatures and catchment attributes is better than SP for getting salient flow characteristicsAn index model and GR4J228 catchments in southeast Australia[106]

AM: arithmetic mean method; SP: spatial proximity method; PS: physical similarity method; Reg: regression methods; HS: hydrological similarity method.