Research Article  Open Access
Wallop Jiwlong, Anongrit Kangrang, "Wavelet Filter Approach and  Relationship in Meteorological Forecasting", Advances in Meteorology, vol. 2015, Article ID 858717, 12 pages, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/858717
Wavelet Filter Approach and  Relationship in Meteorological Forecasting
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the  relationship for computing rainfall using conventional and wavelet filters technique. Wavelet filter technique was applied to data filtration process. The proposed model was applied to determine the rainfall of five rain gauge meteorological stations in Thailand. The threehourly rainfall and radar reflectivity data were used in this study. The results indicated that the accumulative rainfall of wavelet filters technique was close to the observed rainfall data more than the results of conventional practice for both calibration and validation processes. Consequently, we are confident that a wavelet filters technique is a useful tool for estimating the rainfall.
1. Introduction
One of the most important attributes to flood mitigation and water resources management is accurate computation of precipitation over the given areas. Rainfall data is the most important meteorological parameter in hydrological studies and the cropwater requirement, because it constitutes the base of all the computations in water resources management and decision making problems. The obtained rainfall data from rain gauge is the point of rainfall that has been recorded in a particular time scale.
Therefore, the lack of necessary climatological data made it difficult to obtain the reliable rainfall. In addition, the meteorological radar is a very powerful and useful tool for hydrological applications, since it can provide estimates of rainfall fields with a high spatial and temporal resolution over large areas. In the recent past, a few research studies have attempted to forecast the occurrence of precipitation. In measuring rainfall by radar, relationships are widely used to convert radar measured reflectivity to rainfall intensity; hence the accuracy of the estimation of relationship is important [1, 2]. In [3] applied a regression analysis technique to determine the relationship of synchronous datasets between measured rainfall intensity by rain gauge and measured or effective reflectivity by weather surveillance radar (Ze) at the pixel over the rain. However, in reality perfect synchronization between Ze and is unachievable, except at the closest range and nearest to the ground [4].
Wavelet analysis has been developed in order to provide a performing analysing tool for this kind of signal. It effectively renders possible a timescale localisation of the process thanks to a projection on a class of functions which in turn makes it possible to extract data within a local neighbourhood. Being a signal’s timescale analysis method, wavelet transform is better than Fourier transform due to its highresolution features, good localization both in time and scale domains, and its capacity of analyzing signals at multitime scales [5, 6]. In addition, wavelet analysis also has the capability of diagnosing the jump features of signals. Therefore, wavelet analysis has been applied to the studies of climate multitime scales analysis. In the previous studies, wavelet transform is mainly used to analyze the multitime scales characteristics of annual temperature and rainfall, and many interesting results have been found [7–9]. Basically, the wavelet decomposition uses a pair of filters to decompose iteratively the original time series such as rainfall and reflectivity. It results in a hierarchy of new time series that are easier to model and predict. These filters must satisfy some constraints such as causality and information lossless [10].
In this study, the rainfall events of five meteorological stations in Thailand were analyzed for relationship. The Buffer Probability Technique (BPT) was developed based on GIS basic function and Probability Matching Method. The pairs can be analyzed for empirical power relationship. The main objective of this study is the comparison between conventional and wavelet filter technique in estimating rainfall using relationship; the focus was on two different models compared with observed data.
2. Materials and Methods
The selected threehourly rainfall data of five rain gauge stations from Thai Meteorological Department and the radar reflectivity data from the Department of Royal Rainmaking and Agricultural Aviation at radar Pimai station, Nakhon Ratchasima province, were used in the study. The meteorological stations were sta.387401 Mahasarakham, sta.403201 Chaiyaphum, sta.405201 Roiet, sta.431201 Nakhon Ratchasima, and sta.436201 Buriram, most of which are located over ChiMun basin in the Northeastern region of Thailand. These locations are presented in Table 1 and Figure 1. As the radar reflectivity, (mm^{6}/mm^{3}), commonly varies across many orders of magnitude, therefore used in this study is the reflectivity expressed in terms of dBz:

Radar reflectivity was obtained by an image analysis process from rainfall events that occurred in Northeastern region of Thailand, from June to August 2009 for long rainfall. The reflectivity was recorded from the Department of Royal Rainmaking and Agricultural Aviation at Pimai station, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, which corresponds to 2.5 km of CAPPI radar products at Pimai site from Sband polarmetric radar that transmits radiation with a wavelength of 10.7 cm and produces a beam width of 1.2 degrees with a maximum range of 480 km, as illustrated in Table 2. The CAPPI products have six minutes and 1 sq.km temporal and spatial resolutions, respectively. This study assumes that there is no bias caused by the bright band effect and different observation altitudes at 1.5 km [11]. The CAPPI data lies within 240 km from the radar and the reflectivity values less than 10 dBz and greater than 50 dBz were excluded from the analysis to avoid the effect of noise in the measured radar reflectivity [12].

2.1. Relationship
The widely accepted relationship of the radar reflectivity factor and rainfall rate is given by the empirical power law relationship [13] which can be defined by , where and are coefficients that depend on location and difference in climatology such as season and type of rain. The parameters and are related to the intercept and slope of the bestfit line through a plot of versus on a loglog plot. Thus, if value can be measured and thus known, then value can be found. Many researchers suggested that parameter does not need to be varied as much as the parameter [14, 15]. The most common values for and are 200 and 1.6, respectively. Reference [11] found that the existing relationship that has been used for the Pimai radar site is .
2.2. Matching Technique
In this study, matching analysis of Buffer Probability Technique (BPT) was developed based on GIS buffer technique and the concept of Probability Matching Method (PMM) to estimate relationship; however, this matching technique assumes that the raindrops fall absolutely vertical from the atmosphere to the rain gauge and radar reflectivity () at time is related to ground rainfall intensity () at time too. The principal of relationship between radar reflectivity and ground surface rainfall diagram is shown in Figure 2(a). And the probability of cumulative density function between radar reflectivity and ground surface rainfall is matched as Figure 2(b); this means that the radar reflectivity has the same probability of occurrence as the gauge measured rain intensity [2, 16]. From past researches, several matching processes between reflectivity () and rainfall () had been proposed such as Traditional Matching Method (TMM), Probability Matching Method (PMM), Window Probability Matching Method (WPMM), and Window Correlation Matching Method (WCMM). In all processes except TMM, PMM is the process that the sampling volume timing and location problem are not taken into account [1]. The matching is done between the Cumulative Distribution Functions (CDFs) of and , described by the following formula:where is the probability density function of rainfall from gauge measurement and is the probability density function of radar reflectivity. The matching of and is done at the same probability level. According to the fact that the analysis is done on frequency domain, the timing errors are then eliminated in this method.
(a)
(b)
2.3. Wavelet Transform for Signal Decomposition
Generally, a signal or function can be expressed in linear decomposition by [17]where is an integer index for the finite or infinite sum, are the real valued expansion coefficients, and are the set of real valued functions of called the expansion set. For the wavelet transform, the twoparameter system is constructed and (3) becomeswhere both and are integer indices and are the wavelet expansion functions that usually form an orthogonal basis. The set of expansion coefficients are called the discrete wavelet transform (DWT) of and it is the inverse transform. The wavelet system is a twodimensional expansion set (basis) for some class of onedimensional signal. The wavelet expansion provides a timefrequency localization of the signal. First generation wavelet systems are generated from a single scaling function (wavelet) by simple scaling and translation. The twodimensional parameterization is achieved from the function (mother wave) bywhere is the set of all integers and the factor maintains a constant norm independent of scale . This parameterization of the time or space location by and the frequency or the logarithm of scale by turns out to be extraordinarily effective.
2.4. Haar Scaling Function and Wavelets
The multiresolution formulation needs two closely related basic functions. In addition to the wavelet that has been discussed and another basic function called the scaling function . The simplest possible orthogonal wavelet system is generated from the Haar scaling function and wavelet. These are shown in Figure 3.
(a)
(b)
In order to generate a set of expansion functions, the signal can be represented by the series inor using (5), as where the twodimensional set of coefficients is called the discrete wavelet transform (DWT) of .
An efficient way to implement DWT is to use a filter process. Normally, the low frequency content of the signal (approximation, A) is the most important part. It demonstrates the signal identity. The high frequency component (detail, D) is nuance. The original signal, S, passes through two complementary filters and emerges as two signals of A and D.
The concept of the wavelet filters technique can be easily applied for signal analysis; this study used the technique to decompose the details (D) from the approximations (A) of rainfall records (y). In wavelet analysis, the approximations are the highscale, low frequency components of the signal, and the details are lowscale, high frequency components. The decomposition process can be iterated with successive approximation being decomposed in turn, so that one signal is broken down into many lower resolution components. The wavelet decomposition can yield valuable information about signal. The approximations components are processed by the relationship for rainfall prediction.
In this study the 1D Haar wavelet filters were applied to a rainfall and radar reflectivity series in order to denoise the original signal into the low frequency approximations (A) and the high frequency details (D). The approximations which are the smoothed signal represent the trend of the rainfall and radar reflectivity series whereas the details represent the nuance of them.
3. Methodology
The methodologies for this research were as follows:(1)The quality control of radar image was performed; the errors due to radial anomality, ANAPROP, and other signals that did not represent reflectivity and errors caused by electronic problems investigation that had been done for both conventional and wavelet filter technique were removed from the measured reflectivity data.(2)Buffer over rain gauge by Buffer Probability Technique transform process based on the buffer basic function of GIS is constructed to estimate the radar reflectivity over the rain gauge station at the same time.(3)Average value in Buffer zone and defined nonzero pairs are determined.(4)The radar reflectivity was normalized into threehourly data with the same time interval as rainfall measurement.(5)From Cumulative Distribution Functions (CDFs), the radar reflectivity and rain rate at the same percentile can be obtained. These matching pairs were then used for relationship evaluation by conventional and wavelet filter technique.(6)Calibration model by using rainfall event during 1 June–31 August 2009 and verification model by using rainfall event during 1 June–31 October 2011 were obtained.
The relationship with the studied process is shown in Figure 4.
4. Results
Threehourly rainfall data and radar reflectivity at five stations in the upper ChiMun basin of Thailand during the period from June to August 2009 are filtered by Haar wavelet function as shown in Figures 5 and 6.
(a) Sta.387401 Mahasarakham
(b) Sta.403201 Chaiyaphum
(c) Sta.405201 Roiet
(d) Sta.431201 Nakhon Ratchasima
(e) Sta.436201 Buriram
(a) Sta.387401 Mahasarakham
(b) Sta.403201 Chaiyaphum
(c) Sta.405201 Roiet
(d) Sta.431201 Nakhon Ratchasima
(e) Sta.436201 Buriram
4.1. Model Calibration
The results of model calibration showed in Table 3 and Figure 7 that the coefficients of relationship from the conventional technique were in the range from 218.50 to 376.00, being larger at sta.436201 Buriram and sta.403201 Chaiyaphum. The coefficient did not vary significantly, remaining in the range from 1.025 to 1.491. The highest values occurred at sta.405201 Roiet and sta.431201 Nakhon Ratchasima. The coefficients of determination were all above 0.834. For the data filtration by wavelet technique, the values of the coefficient varied widely from 132.82 to 156.02 whereas the coefficient values were high, ranging from 1.183 to 1.558. The coefficients of determination were all above 0.951 suggesting a good relationship. However, this accepted model is necessary for verification with other data for evaluating the performance of the model.

4.2. Model Verification
The calibrated model parameter from the previous section was further validated using another climatological data set that occurred from 1 June 2011 to 31 October 2011, which were not considered in calibrating process. These data of five stations were used to calculate the rain rate; if value can be measured and thus known, then rain rate or value can be found. The verification results and performance statistics for relationship at each station were presented in Table 4. The correlation coefficients for conventional and wavelet filters technique were all above 0.892 and 0.926, respectively, whereas the standard error of estimate (SEE) values were ranging from 1.723 to 4.464 for conventional technique and 1.393 to 3.745 for wavelet filters technique. However, the cumulative observed rainfall data are more closed to wavelet filters technique than the conventional technique as show in Figures 8 to 17.

This clearly indicates that the relationship by wavelet filter technique developed in the present study can be used with confidence in estimating rainfall for this study area. The results show that the overall correlation coefficients between the estimated and observed rainfall for all station were high range, which are acceptable.
5. Discussion
This paper applied a wavelet filter technique to signify the data preprocessing as an important step in the construction of relationship for rainfall estimation. The wavelet filters can extract the chaotic signal components from the original rainfall and dBz data for the calibration. Therefore, this study demonstrates that the importance of wavelet filters technique is a practical tool for the prediction of threehourly rainfall in Upper ChiMun basin of Thailand.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
References
 D. Rosenfeld, D. B. Wolff, and E. Amitai, “The window probability matching method for rainfall measurements with radar,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 682–693, 1994. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Atlas, D. Rosenfeld, and D. B. Wolff, “Climatologically tuned reflectivityrain rate relations and links to areatime integrals,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1120–1135, 1990. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. V. Catheiros and I. Zawadzki, “Reflectivity rain rate relationships for radar hydrology in Brazil,” Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, vol. 16, pp. 118–132, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
 T. Piman, M. S. Babel, A. D. Gupta, and S. Weesakul, “Development of a window correlation matching method for improved radar rainfall estimation,” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1361–1372, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Mallat, A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 1998.
 P. Abry, D. Veitch, and P. Flandrin, “Longrange dependence: revisiting aggregation with wavelets,” Journal of Time Series Analysis, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 253–266, 1998. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K.M. Lau and H. Y. Weng, “Climate signal detection using wavelet transform: how to make a time series sing,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 76, no. 12, pp. 2391–2402, 1995. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Torrence and G. P. Compo, “A practical guide to wavelet analysis,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 61–78, 1998. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Wang and J. Ding, “Wavelet network model and its application to the prediction of hydrology,” Nature and Science, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 67–71, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Skander, “On the use of the wavelet decomposition for time series prediction,” Neurocomputing, vol. 48, pp. 267–277, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Compliew and B. Kwuanyuen, “Hydrologic models with radar precipitation data input,” Kasetsart Journal—Natural Science, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 782–791, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Chumchean, P. Aungsuratana, A. Khommuang, and R. Hanchoowong, “Study of raincloud characteristics using weather radar data,” in Proceedings of the 18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress, Cairns, Australia, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
 J. S. Marshall and W. M. Palmer, “The distribution of raindrops with size,” Journal of Meteorology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 165–166, 1948. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. W. Seed, J. Nicol, G. L. Austin, C. D. Stow, and S. G. Bradley, “The impact of radar and rain gauge sampling errors when calibrating a weather radar,,” Meteorological Applications, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 43–52, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Steiner, J. A. Smith, S. J. Burges, C. V. Alonso, and R. W. Darden, “Effect of bias adjustment and rain gauge data quality control on radar rainfall estimation,” Water Resources Research, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 2487–2503, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Rosenfeld, D. B. Wolff, and D. Atlas, “General probabilitymatched relations between radar reflectivity and rain rate,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 50–72, 1993. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. S. Burrus, R. A. Gopinath, and H. Gao, Introduction to Wavelet and Wavelet Transform, PrenticeHall, 1998.
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 Wallop Jiwlong and Anongrit Kangrang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.