Research Article

Development and Application of Urban Landslide Vulnerability Assessment Methodology Reflecting Social and Economic Variables

Table 6

Criteria for ranking of proxy variables of PRI.

Proxy variable Ranking criteria
RankDescription

Disasters frequency [20, 24, 26]1Over 1000 cases are disasters
2800–1000 cases are disasters
3600–800 cases are disasters
4400–600 cases are disasters
5Less than 400 are cases disasters

Internet penetration rate [20, 24]1Internet penetration rate is over 80%
2Internet penetration rate is 76–80%
3Internet penetration rate is 73–76%
4Internet penetration rate is 70–73%
5Internet penetration rate is less than 70%

Number of disaster prevention facilities [20]1There are over 200 disaster prevention facilities
2There are 150–200 disaster prevention facilities
3There are 100–150 disaster prevention facilities
4There are 50–100 disaster prevention facilities
5There are less than 50 disaster prevention facilities

Perceived safety [20, 24]1Over 20% of people feel very safe or safe regarding natural disaster
218–20% of people feel very safe or safe regarding natural disaster
316–18% of people feel very safe or safe regarding natural disaster
414–16% of people feel very safe or safe regarding natural disaster
5Less than 14% of people feel very safe or safe regarding natural disaster

Number of medical doctors [19, 20]1There are over 8 medical doctors per 1,000 people
2There are 6–8 medical doctors per 1,000 people
3There are 4–6 medical doctors per 1,000 people
4There are 2–4 medical doctors per 1,000 people
5There are less than 2 medical doctors per 1,000 people

Financial independence of the borough [4, 20]1Financial independence is over 30%
2Financial independence is between 25 and 30%
3Financial independence is between 20 and 25%
4Financial independence is between 15 and 20%
5Financial independence is less than 15%