Research Article

Comparison of Three Statistical Downscaling Methods and Ensemble Downscaling Method Based on Bayesian Model Averaging in Upper Hanjiang River Basin, China

Table 4

Different methods precipitation simulation results comparison.

Stations SVMBCC/RCG-WGSDSMBMASA
NSCRCNSCRCNSCRCNSCRCNSCRC

Hanzhong0.320.58−1.10.070.310.570.290.620.20 0.46
Foping0.310.56−0.80.110.290.540.240.590.22 0.47
Shangxian0.140.39−0.750.060.260.510.200.550.15 0.40
Xixia0.190.44−0.980.040.220.490.190.520.09 0.32
Shiquan0.280.54−0.780.040.250.510.220.550.16 0.40
Ankang0.210.48−0.740.070.230.480.190.520.16 0.40
Yunxian0.230.52−1.210.020.310.570.270.620.16 0.41
Fangxian0.250.51−0.920.040.240.490.250.570.14 0.38
Laohekou0.230.48−0.870.020.270.540.260.590.13 0.37
Mean values0.240.50−0.910.050.260.520.230.570.16 0.40