Research Article  Open Access
ShortTerm Wind Power Interval Forecasting Based on an EEMDRTRVM Model
Abstract
Accurate shortterm wind power forecasting is important for improving the security and economic success of power grids. Existing wind power forecasting methods are mostly types of deterministic point forecasting. Deterministic point forecasting is vulnerable to forecasting errors and cannot effectively deal with the random nature of wind power. In order to solve the above problems, we propose a shortterm wind power interval forecasting model based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD), runs test (RT), and relevance vector machine (RVM). First, in order to reduce the complexity of data, the original wind power sequence is decomposed into a plurality of intrinsic mode function (IMF) components and residual (RES) component by using EEMD. Next, we use the RT method to reconstruct the components and obtain three new components characterized by the finetocoarse order. Finally, we obtain the overall forecasting results (with preestablished confidence levels) by superimposing the forecasting results of each new component. Our results show that, compared with existing methods, our proposed shortterm interval forecasting method has less forecasting errors, narrower interval widths, and larger interval coverage percentages. Ultimately, our forecasting model is more suitable for engineering applications and other forecasting methods for new energy.
1. Introduction
Industrialization practices are rapidly depleting fossil fuel reserves. Moreover, widespread use of fossil fuels produces large amounts of greenhouse gases and dust particles, both of which have significant negative effects on human society and the environment [1–3]. In order to address the energy crisis and alleviate environmental pressures, many countries are researching and utilizing forms of renewable energy [4–6]. Wind power has become especially prominent in the field of renewable clean energy because it is pollutionfree, reserverich, and readily renewable [5]. Continuous improvements in wind power technology have led to an increase in the number of windpowered grids. However, wind power is also random and volatile, and any serious power disturbances can affect the safety and stability of windpowered grids. As such, accurate wind power forecasting is necessary for creating reasonable generation plans and system backup arrangements [7–9]. Ultimately, the key to increasing the number of windpowered grids is to improve the wind power penetration limit of power grids.
Recent research and studies have greatly improved shortterm wind power forecasting. Many methods, such as the time series method [7, 10–12], Kalman filtering [13], model structure selection [14], fuzzy logic method [15], the artificial neural networks (ANNs) method [16–19], wavelet transformation [20], and support vector machines [21] have been utilized for wind power forecasting. Additionally, other combined methods have become popular in recent years [22–25].
The stochastic volatility of natural wind and its effects on windpowered grids cannot be ignored. Interval forecasting can effectively reflect the uncertainties in the forecasting results. Deterministic point forecasting methods have some deficiencies in characterizing the randomness of actual wind power [26]. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a forecasting method that is capable of efficiently providing accurate information. If we can establish a forecasting method capable of providing accurate interval forecasting, we will better understand potential fluctuations in wind power, which will allow for the creation of standby arrangements for power systems [27, 28]. Compared to deterministic point forecasting, interval forecasting is still in its infancy. Interval forecasting has become more studied in recent years, and various interval forecasting methods have been proposed. The existing interval forecasting methods include the bootstrap method, the quantile regression method, the mixed structure interval method, and the probability interval forecasting method. The bootstrap method [29] constructs a sample set based on computer resampling technology, which requires a large amount of original data processing, and consumes much time and computation. The quantile regression method [30–32] utilizes a rigorous theoretical background and yields reliable results; however, it requires a predetermined regression model and subsites, complicated calculations, and its forecasting accuracy is significantly reduced when the predicting samples increase. The mixed structure interval method [33, 34] is usually based on point forecasting results, with the interval result being determined by the calculation of coefficients and error analysis. The probability interval forecasting method [35–38] constructs a load distribution so as to directly obtain the expectations and forecasting distribution of the load. The forecasting interval can then be drawn under an arbitrarily determined confidence level.
In order to establish a more simplistic and accurate shortterm interval forecasting method, we propose a combined model based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) and a relevance vector machine (RVM). As part of our model, we use the framework of the probabilistic interval forecasting method, specifically the runs test reconstruction method, in order to achieve shortterm interval wind power forecasts. First, RVM (a relatively new machine learning algorithm) combines the Markov Native theory, the Bayesian theorem, and the autorelated decisions a priori and maximum likelihood theory. Compared with ANN and SVM, not only does RVM have the advantages of higher model sparsity, fewer kernel function limits, and stronger generation ability, it can also obtain probabilistic forecasting results within the framework of the Bayesian theory and the statistical learning theory [39]. Second, in order to improve the forecasting accuracy of our model and narrow its width of interval range, we altered and improved two aspects of data decomposition preprocessing, as well as model parameter optimization. The EEMD is used to decompose the original wind power sequence into a series of IMF components and RES component in order to reduce its complexity. The RT method is then used to reconstruct these IMF components and RES component into a trend component, a detailed component, and a random component. Finally, a combination of the typical local kernel of the RBF kernel and the global kernel of the polynomial kernel is used to obtain better forecasting results.
Our proposed EEMDRTRVM model is used to achieve the onepointahead 15 min ahead shortterm wind power interval forecasting. We used a variety of evaluation indexes to conduct comparative analyses and impact assessments for both our proposed model and other existing models. The results show that our combined model obtains higher forecasting accuracy and narrower interval widths than other existing methods. As such, our proposed model has high research significance and practical value.
2. Methodologies
2.1. Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD)
EMD is an efficient signal decomposition method that does not rely on any predefined basis function. The EMD reflects the dynamics of signals more accurately than other models. The modes extracted by the EMD, named the intrinsic mode functions (IMF), are defined by the following criteria: () the number of extrema and zero crossings must be equal or differ by no more than one and () the local mean of the envelope defined by the local maxima and local minima must be zero [40, 41]. These two criteria ensure that each IMF has a physically meaningful phase definition; however, the time invariant frequency does not necessarily have a meaningful phase definition.
Given a signal , the EMD algorithm can be summarized as follows.
Step 1. Initialize the loop variable , , where is the given original data.
Step 2. Initialize the loop variable , .
Step 3. Find out all the local minima and maxima of , and interpolate between the local minima and maxima, respectively, in order to get an upper envelope and a lower envelope . The mean value of these envelopes is described asNext, compute the minis of the original data and the envelope mean value as
Step 4. Check whether satisfies the two criteria for an IMF (as defined above). If it is not satisfied, make , , and repeat Step 3. If it is satisfied, the first IMF can be given asThe residual can be computed by
Step 5. Treat as a new signal and repeat Steps 1–4 (in order to find more IMFs) until the residual is a constant or a monotonic function. Finally, the given can be decomposed into IMFs and a final residual as follows:
2.2. Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD)
Mode mixing is the most significant drawback of EMD. Mode mixing implies either a single IMF consisting of signals of dramatically disparate scales or a signal of the same scale appearing in different IMF components. This causes intermittency when analyzing signals.
In order to solve the problem of mode mixing in EMD, Wu and Huang proposed a new noiseassisted data analysis method called ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) [42]. The EEMD method utilizes recent studies on white noise which showed that the EMD method is an effective selfadaptive dyadic filter bank when applied to white noise. The results demonstrate that noise can help data analysis in the EMD method [22, 43].
Two important parameters used in the EEMD method are () the amplitude of white noise and () the total repeat number of the EMD. At present, the determination of and is based on the structural characteristics of the data. Generally, the taken is 100, and is chosen from a range of 0.05~0.5. Based on previous tests, we set and in this paper.
The specific steps of the EEMD can be described as follows:(1)Set the value of the amplitude and the total repeat number M.(2)Add a white noise series to the signal.(3)Decompose the signal with the added white noise into IMFs by using EMD.(4)Repeat steps () and () using different levels of white noise each time and obtain corresponding IMF components of the decomposition. Calculate the mean of all the corresponding IMF components. Take the mean as the final result for each IMF. Calculate the mean of all the residual (RES) components and take the mean as the final result for the RES component:(5)Take the () and as the IMF components and RES component, respectively.
2.3. Runs Test (RT)
The runs test method [44] is defined in the following.
Assume the time series corresponds to and RES as , where is the label of IMF, is label of samples, and is the total number of samples. The mean value of the samples is defined as
Then, the timing symbol can be defined aswhere consists of a series of statistically independent randomly arranged sequences of 0 and 1.
Define each sequence with successive symbols (0 or 1) as a runs test. The total runs test number of each can be used to detect the fluctuation of each component obtained by the EEMD. Next, the high and low runs test thresholds can be set according to the runs test, and the components decomposed by the EEMD will be reconstructed into three new components (with typical characteristics based on the finetocoarse order) [44]. This ensures the decomposition effect and significantly reduces the run time of the model. Moreover, the similar components are reconstructed, strengthening the inherent laws of these data, to improve the prediction accuracy.
2.4. Relevance Vector Machine (RVM)
Compared with other forecasting algorithms, the RVM not only has high sparsity, less optimized parameters, flexible kernels, and strong generalization abilities, but also directly implements interval forecasting [45, 46]. Therefore, in this study, the RVM is used to establish the interval forecasting model for the new components reconstructed by RT.
For a given set of input training samples and the corresponding output sets , the relevance vector machine regression model can be defined as follows: where is the error of the independent sample (which follows the Gaussian distribution with the variance ), is the model weights, is a nonlinear kernel function, is relevance vector, and is the length of the data.
In the RVM, a priori probability distribution for each model weight is given aswhere is the hyperparameter of a priori distribution of model weight .
Given a training sample set , assume the target value is independent and the noise in the data follows the Gaussian distribution with the variance . Then, the likelihood function of the training sample set can be represented bywhere , , and is the design matrix given by
Based on a priori probabilities distribution and the likelihood distribution, the posterior distribution over the weight forms Bayes rule and can be written aswhere ; ; .
The marginal likelihood distribution of the hyperparameters can be obtained bywhere .
Finally, the hyperparameter and the variance can be estimated by using the maximum likelihood algorithm.
If the input value is , then the corresponding output probability distribution obeys the Gaussian distribution, and the corresponding forecasting value can be derived by
The RVM model can give both the mean value and the variance. As such, this model reflects the uncertainty of forecasting results and provides accurate interval forecasting (within the range of certain confidence levels).
Under the confidence level of , the interval forecasting results are as follows:where Lb denotes the lower bound of the forecasting value and Ub denotes the upper bound of the forecasting value.
3. Model Construction
3.1. Using EEMD to Decompose an Original Wind Power Sequence
In order to verify the effectiveness of the forecasting model, the whole year wind power sequence (96 point one day) obtained from a wind farm in Jiangsu province is used as the research object. The installed capacity of this wind farm in Jiangsu province is 49.5 MW, which contains 33 wind turbines. In this study, actual wind power data (5 days ago) is taken as the training sample. Then we establish wind power interval forecasting model for the next day in advance 15 minutes’ forecast.
As is shown in Figure 1(a), the actual wind power is random and volatile. In order to improve the forecasting effect, it is necessary to reduce the complexity of the data. Compared with other decomposition algorithms, the EEMD exhibits better noise robustness and decomposing effects. In this study, we use the EEMD to decompose actual wind power and to establish specific components, in which the periodicity, randomness, and the trends of the actual wind power can be clearly seen in the components. The decomposition results of EEMD are shown in Figure 1.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
3.2. Using RT to Reconstruct the New Components
By the definition of RT, the RT value is greater, the volatility of time series is stronger, the RT value is closer, and the overall trend of time series is more similar. The RT values of each component (in Figure 1) are calculated and shown in Table 1. From Figure 1 and Table 1, the RT values of IMF1 and IMF2 are significantly large and relatively close, while the RT values of IMF6–IMF8 and RES are too small and very close. Also, the RT values of IMF3–IMF5 are found between the two. This shows that the dispersion of IMF1 and IMF2 series is strong, while the general trend of IMF6–IMF8 and RES is similar. Moreover, the fluctuation trend of IMF3–IMF5 is between the two. Based on the above analyses and studies, we set the high runs test threshold as 100 and the low runs test threshold as 10. The composition of the three new components is shown in Table 2.


The trend graph of the new components after reconstruction is shown in Figure 2. It is evident from Figure 2 that the trend component, the detailed component, and the random component each have typical features. The trend component roughly reflects the overall fluctuation of the original data; the detailed component characterizes the details of the fluctuations of the original data; and the random component represents the fluctuations caused by other factors that cannot to be explicitly described. All three of the components meet the composition standard of actual wind power.
In order to further simplify the calculation and narrow the forecasting interval, we established a point forecasting for the trend component and obtained the interval forecasting for the detailed component and the random component. We obtained the overall optimal interval forecasting results (under a certain confidence level) from the superposition of each component’s forecasting results.
3.3. Sample Data Normalization
Since poor and missing data affect forecasting accuracy, it is necessary to pretreat load data obtained from measurements. In this study, we primarily used transverse and longitudinal comparisons methods for data pretreatment. In addition, we used the normalization method in order to simplify the calculation and standardization of loads, prices, and weather data (a necessary measure since the input variables have different units and values). By doing so, the value of the data can be limited to . The specific calculation formula iswhere is the normalized value of the data and and represent the maximum value and the minimum value of the data, respectively.
3.4. Kernel Function Determination of RVM
RVM is a pattern recognition and regression forecasting method based on kernel functions. The kernels implement nonlinear transformations among a plurality of feature spaces. The basic idea of hybrid kernels is to combine a plurality of kernels with different characteristics (in a certain proportion) in order to ensure that the combined kernel function has better performance. Importantly, RVM is less limited in kernel function selection. Moreover, RBF kernels are wellsuited to solving local fluctuations, while polynomial kernels are wellsuited to dealing with global fluctuations. A combination of typical RBF local kernels and the global kernels (of polynomial kernels) is used for improved shortterm wind power interval forecasting. The hybrid kernel is shown as follows:where ) is the RBF kernel; ) is the binomial kernel function; is the weight of the kernel function; is the kernel width; and and are the parameters to be optimized. We employed the grid search method in order to obtain the optimal values of and .
3.5. Evaluation Indexes of the Model
There are many indexes used to evaluate the errors of point forecasting results, such as APE (absolute percentage error), MAPE (mean absolute percentage error), and RMSE (root mean square error) [47–49]. The smaller the error, the higher the forecasting accuracy. The assessment methods of interval forecasting differ from point forecasting (except when using the MAPE index). Other indexes used to evaluate the efforts of interval forecasting results are FICP (forecasting interval coverage percentage) [50] and FIAW (forecasting interval average width). The definitions of these methods are as follows.
() MAPEwhere represents the forecasting result of the th forecasting sample; represents the true value of the th forecasting sample; and represents the number of the sample. MAPE is used to evaluate the error between the expected forecasting value and the actual value. The smaller the value, the higher the forecasting accuracy.
() FICPwhere represents the interval coverage; and is the number of the actual value falling within the confidence interval (at the confidence level). The index of FICP evaluates the credibility of the interval. The greater its value, the higher its credibility.
() FIAWwhere represents the average width of the confidence interval under the level ; and are, respectively, the upper and lower bounds of the th forecasting sample; and refers to the actual value of the th forecasting sample. The index of FIAW is based on its ability to evaluate the uncertain degree of the forecasting results.
3.6. Overall Procedures of the EEMDRTRVM Model
In this study, we propose a shortterm wind power interval forecasting method based on the EEMDRTRVM model. The flow chart of our proposed forecasting model is shown in Figure 3.
4. Analysis Results of the Demonstration
In order to verify the interval forecasting effects of an EEMDRTRVM model that uses different confidence levels, we chose to use confidence levels of 90% and 60% in our example. The interval forecasting results are shown in Figures 4 and 5. The indexes of MAPE, FICP, and FIAW are used to assess the effects of the interval forecasting. Table 3 shows portions of the forecasting results and the indicator analysis results.

To prove the superiority of our model, we used the same wind power to obtain shortterm interval forecasting from the RVM model, the EMDRVM model, and the EEMDRVM model. We used the indexes of MAPE, FICP, and FIAW, and their running times to assess their effects on interval forecasting. Table 4 shows the comparison results of the models (under the 90% confidence level).

Moreover, in order to further evaluate the adaptability of this proposed model, the wind power data of the actual wind farm in the other days of different seasons are chosen for the research. For example, the dates of February 12, July 22, October 15, and December 17, 2009, are chosen randomly. Based on the time scale of the original wind power data, the 15 min ahead shortterm wind interval forecasting results under the 90% confidence level for these days are shown in Figure 6. The indicator analysis results with MAPE, FICP, and FIAW are organized in Table 5. In Figure 6, the interval width is narrower in July than October. It means the data fluctuation of October is stronger than the data of July. It is found in Figure 6 and Table 5 that the MAPE indicator can reflect the effectiveness of the proposal method. The smaller the MAPE, the better the forecasting accuracy, illustrating the forecasting expected value is closer to actual result. Further, the MAPE of different days are all within 6.5% and meet the actual project requirements. The interval width becomes narrower with the smaller FIAW value due to the better MAPE results and this decreases the model uncertainty. Meanwhile, the credibility of forecasting results may reduce with the smaller FICP value.

(a) February 12, 2009
(b) July 22, 2009
(c) October 15, 2009
(d) December 17, 2009
Based on the above analysis, we drew the following five conclusions: () the forecasting results of our proposed model effectively follow the actual wind power value, and the fluctuations are consistent with changes in actual wind power. () Most of the actual wind power falls within the forecasting interval with confidence levels of 90% and 60%; however, the number of forecasts falling outside the forecasting interval of the 60% confidence level is significantly larger than those falling outside the interval of the 90% confidence level. This accurately depicts the characteristics of the actual situation and reflects the effectiveness of our interval forecasting results. () The interval width of the 90% confidence level is significantly greater than that of the 60% confidence level. Decreases in the confidence level also decrease the interval width and the interval coverage. () Overall, our proposed model had minimum forecasting errors, narrower interval widths, and higher interval coverages than any of the other models. () The EEMD has a better theoretical foundation and noise robustness than our model; however, we overcome this weakness by using the mode mixing phenomenon of EMD. Moreover, the use of runs tests uncovers the correlation among the components and reduces the complexity of our model (which contributes to improved forecasting effects and enhanced running efficiency).
In summary, our EEMDRTRVM model had the better performance results in forecasting shortterm wind power interval. Furthermore, our model is applicable to other practical engineering applications.
5. Conclusions
Owing to the volatility and randomness of the nature wind, the deterministic wind power forecasting is a difficult and complex task. In this study, we proposed an EEMDRTRVM model to achieve more accurate shortterm interval wind power forecasting. The EEMD was used to decompose wind power sequences into IMF components and RES component, which reduced the inherent volatility of the wind power sequences. We then used runs tests to reconstruct new components. Overall, our methods improved the forecasting performance and enhanced running efficiency. The actual wind power data from November 20, 2009, to November 25, 2009 (15 min/one point), are used to verify the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed VMDRTRVM model, and quantitative evaluation is conducted based on comprehensive error evaluation criteria and interval evaluation criteria. Simulation results and analysis demonstrate that the volatility and randomness of wind power are reduced by the EEMD method, and the proposed EEMDRTRVM model performs better than conventional single models and other combined models. Our proposed EEMDRTRVM model not only improves forecasting accuracy, but also significantly reduces the width of the forecasting interval (under the premise of guaranteed interval coverage). Ultimately, our model is suitable for numerous practical applications, and it also serves as a good reference value for the output forecasting of other new energy sources.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
The research is financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Program no. 51507052), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2015M571653), the 111 Project (B14022), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2015B02714, 2016B20914).
References
 S. Kheradmand, O. Nematollahi, and A. R. Ayoobi, “Clearness index predicting using an integrated artificial neural network (ANN) approach,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 58, pp. 1357–1365, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Teke, H. B. Yıldırım, and Ö. Çelik, “Evaluation and performance comparison of different models for the estimation of solar radiation,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 50, pp. 1097–1107, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Onea, A. Raileanu, and E. Rusu, “Evaluation of the wind energy potential in the coastal environment of two enclosed seas,” Advances in Meteorology, vol. 2015, Article ID 808617, 14 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. S. Xue, C. Yu, K. Li et al., “Adaptive ultrashortterm wind power prediction based on risk assessment,” CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 59–64, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Kulkarni and H.P. Huang, “Changes in surface wind speed over North America from CMIP5 model projections and implications for wind energy,” Advances in Meteorology, vol. 2014, Article ID 292768, 10 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Mohammadi, S. Shamshirband, D. Petković, and H. Khorasanizadeh, “Determining the most important variables for diffuse solar radiation prediction using adaptive neurofuzzy methodology; case study: city of Kerman, Iran,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 53, pp. 1570–1579, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. W. Taylor, P. E. McSharry, and R. Buizza, “Wind power density forecasting using ensemble predictions and time series models,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 775–782, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Wan, Z. Xu, P. Pinson, Z. Y. Dong, and K. P. Wong, “Optimal prediction intervals of wind power generation,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1166–1174, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E.M. Giannakopoulou and R. Nhili, “WRF model methodology for offshore wind energy applications,” Advances in Meteorology, vol. 2014, Article ID 319819, 14 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Doucoure, K. Agbossou, and A. Cardenas, “Time series prediction using artificial wavelet neural network and multiresolution analysis: application to wind speed data,” Renewable Energy, vol. 92, pp. 202–211, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Yan, K. Li, E. Bai, Z. Yang, and A. Foley, “Time series wind power forecasting based on variant Gaussian Process and TLBO,” Neurocomputing, vol. 189, pp. 135–144, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Yan, Y. Liu, S. Han, Y. Wang, and S. Feng, “Reviews on uncertainty analysis of wind power forecasting,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 52, pp. 1322–1330, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Cassola and M. Burlando, “Wind speed and wind energy forecast through Kalman filtering of numerical weather prediction model output,” Applied Energy, vol. 99, pp. 154–166, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Wei, H. Shao, and X. Deng, “Using a model structure selection technique to forecast shortterm wind speed for a wind power plant in North China,” Journal of Energy Engineering, vol. 142, no. 1, Article ID 04015005, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Kukolj and E. Levi, “Identification of complex systems based on neural and TakagiSugeno fuzzy model,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 272–282, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Noorollahi, M. A. Jokar, and A. Kalhor, “Using artificial neural networks for temporal and spatial wind speed forecasting in Iran,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 115, pp. 17–25, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Ata, “Artificial neural networks applications in wind energy systems: a review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 49, pp. 534–562, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Saberivahidaval and S. Hajjam, “Comparison between performances of different neural networks for wind speed forecasting in Payam airport, Iran,” Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1191–1196, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Liu, H.Q. Tian, Y.F. Li, and L. Zhang, “Comparison of four Adaboost algorithm based artificial neural networks in wind speed predictions,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 92, pp. 67–81, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Cui, X. Deng, and H. Shao, “Shortterm wind speed forecasting using the wavelet decomposition and AdaBoost technique in wind farm of East China,” IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 2585–2592, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. A. Mohandes, T. O. Halawani, S. Rehman, and A. A. Hussain, “Support vector machines for wind speed prediction,” Renewable Energy, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 939–947, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Q. Wu and C. Peng, “Wind power generation forecasting using least squares support vector machine combined with ensemble empirical mode decomposition, principal component analysis and a bat algorithm,” Energies, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 261, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Wang and J. Hu, “A robust combination approach for shortterm wind speed forecasting and analysis—combination of the ARIMA (Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average), ELM (Extreme Learning Machine), SVM (Support Vector Machine) and LSSVM (Least Square SVM) forecasts using a GPR (Gaussian Process Regression) model,” Energy, vol. 93, pp. 41–56, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Yuan, C. Chen, Y. Yuan, Y. Huang, and Q. Tan, “Shortterm wind power prediction based on LSSVMGSA model,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 101, pp. 393–401, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Yang, M. He, J. Zhang, and V. Vittal, “Supportvectormachineenhanced markov model for shortterm wind power forecast,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 791–799, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Zhang, K. Liu, L. Qin, and X. An, “Deterministic and probabilistic interval prediction for shortterm wind power generation based on variational mode decomposition and machine learning methods,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 112, pp. 208–219, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. KavousiFard, A. Khosravi, and S. Nahavandi, “A new fuzzybased combined prediction interval for wind power forecasting,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 18–26, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Zhang, Y. Song, F. Liu, and J. Liu, “Daily average wind power interval forecasts based on an optimal adaptivenetworkbased fuzzy inference system and singular spectrum analysis,” Sustainability, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 125, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. ÁlvarezMiranda, C. CamposValdés, and C. Rahmann, “Twostage robust UC including a novel scenariobased uncertainty model for wind power applications,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 101, pp. 94–105, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Juban, H. Ohlsson, M. Maasoumy, L. Poirier, and J. Z. Kolter, “A multiple quantile regression approach to the wind, solar, and price tracks of GEFCom2014,” International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1094–1102, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. B. Bremnes, “Probabilistic wind power forecasts using local quantile regression,” Wind Energy, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 47–54, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. A. Nielsen, H. Madsen, and T. S. Nielsen, “Using quanti le regression to extend an existing wind power forecasting system With probabilistic forecasts,” Wind Energy, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 95–108, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Guan, P. B. Luh, L. D. Michel, and Z. Chi, “Hybrid Kalman filters for very shortterm load forecasting and prediction interval estimation,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 3806–3817, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Guan, P. B. Luh, L. D. Michel, M. A. Coolbeth, and P. B. Friedland, “Hybrid Kalman algorithms for very shortterm load forecasting and confidence interval estimation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PES '10), Minneapolis, Minn, USA, July 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Khosravi, S. Nahavandi, and D. Creighton, “Prediction intervals for shortterm wind farm power generation forecasts,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 602–610, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Charytoniuk and J. Niebrzydowski, “Confidence interval construction for load forecast,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 97–103, 1998. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Pinson, “Wind energy: forecasting challenges for its operational management,” Statistical Science, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 564–585, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 P. Pinson, C. Chevallier, and G. N. Kariniotakis, “Trading wind generation from shortterm probabilistic forecasts of wind power,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1148–1156, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S.W. Fei and Y. He, “Wind speed prediction using the hybrid model of wavelet decomposition and artificial bee colony algorithmbased relevance vector machine,” International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 73, pp. 625–631, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Wang, W. Zhang, Y. Li, J. Wang, and Z. Dang, “Forecasting wind speed using empirical mode decomposition and Elman neural network,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 23, pp. 452–459, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y.Y. Hong, T.H. Yu, and C.Y. Liu, “Hourahead wind speed and power forecasting using empirical mode decomposition,” Energies, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 6137–6152, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Wu and N. E. Huang, “Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: a noiseassisted data analysis method,” Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–41, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Wang, N. Zhang, L. Wu, and Y. Wang, “Wind speed forecasting based on the hybrid ensemble empirical mode decomposition and GABP neural network method,” Renewable Energy, vol. 94, pp. 629–636, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Nakaram and T. Leauhatong, “A new contentbased medical image retrieval system based on wavelet transform and multidimensional waldwolfowitz runs test,” in Proceedings of the 5th Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON '12), IEEE, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand, December 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Bao, H. Wang, and B. Wang, “Shortterm wind power prediction using differential EMD and relevance vector machine,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 283–289, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Sun, Y. Chen, Z. Wei, X. Li, and K. W. Cheung, “Dayahead wind speed forecasting using relevance vector machine,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2014, Article ID 437592, 6 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Zang, Q. Xu, and H. Bian, “Generation of typical solar radiation data for different climates of China,” Energy, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 236–248, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Bulut and O. Büyükalaca, “Simple model for the generation of daily global solarradiation data in Turkey,” Applied Energy, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 477–491, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Zang, Q. Xu, P. Du, and K. Ichiyanagi, “A modified method to generate typical meteorological years from the longterm weather database,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2012, Article ID 538279, 9 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Wan, Z. Xu, and P. Pinson, “Direct interval forecasting of wind power,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 4877–4878, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Haixiang Zang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.