Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Meteorology
Volume 2017, Article ID 1762137, 14 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1762137
Research Article

Effects of the Representation of Convection on the Modelling of Hurricane Tomas (2010)

CIMA Research Foundation, Savona, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to Antonio Parodi; gro.noitadnuofamic@idorap.oinotna

Received 11 February 2017; Revised 4 May 2017; Accepted 15 May 2017; Published 26 July 2017

Academic Editor: Olivier P. Prat

Copyright © 2017 Irene Marras et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. O. Fierro, R. F. Rogers, F. D. Marks, and D. S. Nolan, “The Impact of horizontal grid spacing on the microphysical and kinematic structures of strong tropical cyclones simulated with the WRF-ARW model,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 137, no. 11, pp. 3717–3743, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. X. Zhang, K.-S. Yeh, T. S. Quirino et al., “HWRFx: improving hurricane forecasts with high-resolution modeling,” Computing in Science and Engineering, vol. 13, no. 1, Article ID 5601668, pp. 13–21, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. Davis, W. Wang, J. Dudhia, and R. Torn, “Does increased horizontal resolution improve hurricane wind forecasts?” Weather and Forecasting, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1826–1841, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. Chandrasekar and C. Balaji, “Sensitivity of tropical cyclone Jal simulations to physics parameterizations,” Journal of Earth System Science, vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 923–946, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. K. Biswas, L. Bernardet, and J. Dudhia, “Sensitivity of hurricane forecasts to cumulus parameterizations in the HWRF model,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 41, no. 24, pp. 9113–9119, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D.-L. Zhang, L. Zhu, X. Zhang, and V. Tallapragada, “Sensitivity of idealized hurricane intensity and structures under varying background flows and initial vortex intensities to different vertical resolutions in HWRF,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 143, no. 3, pp. 914–932, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. D. Torn, “Performance of a mesoscale ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) during the NOAA high-resolution hurricane test,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 138, no. 12, pp. 4375–4392, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S.-Y. Hong, J. Dudhia, and S.-H. Chen, “A revised approach to ice microphysical processes for the bulk parameterization of clouds and precipitation,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 103–120, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. J. Pasch and T. B. Kimberlain, “Tropical Cyclone Report Hurricane Tomas (AL212010),” 2011, http://www.NHC.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL212010_Tomas.pdf.
  10. M. A. Bender and I. Ginis, “Real-case simulations of hurricane-ocean interaction using a high-resolution coupled model: effects on hurricane intensity,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 917–946, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. B. Goldenberg, S. G. Gopalakrishnan, V. Tallapragada et al., “The 2012 triply nested, high-resolution operational version of the hurricane weather research and forecasting model (HWRF): track and intensity forecast verifications,” Weather and Forecasting, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 710–729, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. Rogers, S. Aberson, M. Black et al., “The intensity forecasting experiment: A NOAA multiyear field program for improving tropical cyclone intensity forecasts,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 87, no. 11, pp. 1523–1537, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. X. Li and Z. Pu, “Sensitivity of numerical simulations of the early rapid intensification of Hurricane emily to cumulus parameterization schemes in different model horizontal resolutions,” Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 403–421, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Y. Sun, L. Yi, Z. Zhong, Y. Hu, and Y. Ha, “Dependence of model convergence on horizontal resolution and convective parameterization in simulations of a tropical cyclone at gray-zone resolutions,” Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, vol. 118, no. 14, pp. 7715–7732, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. X. Sun and A. P. Barros, “High resolution simulation of tropical storm Ivan (2004) in the Southern appalachians: role of planetary boundary-layer schemes and cumulus parametrization,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol. 140, no. 683, pp. 1847–1865, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. S. Gentry and G. M. Lackmann, The Sensitivity of WRF Simulations of Hurricane Ivan to Choice of Cumulus Parameterization, North Carolina State University, 2006. View at Scopus
  17. S. A. Braun, R. Kakar, E. Zipser et al., “NASA's genesis and rapid intensification processes (GRIP) field experiment,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 345–363, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. Shamir, K. P. Georgakakos, C. Spencer, T. M. Modrick, M. J. Murphy Jr., and R. Jubach, “Evaluation of real-time flash flood forecasts for Haiti during the passage of hurricane tomas,” Natural Hazards, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 459–482, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. W. C. Skamarock, J. B. Klemp, J. Dudhia et al., 2005, A description of the Advanced Research WRF version 2. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-468+STR.
  20. S. G. Gopalakrishnan, S. Goldenberg, T. Quirino et al., “Toward improving high-resolution numerical hurricane forecasting: influence of model horizontal grid resolution, initialization, and physics,” Weather and Forecasting, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 647–666, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. S. Kain, “The kain-fritsch convective parameterization: an update,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 170–181, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. Rogers, “Convective-scale structure and evolution during a high-resolution simulation of tropical cyclone rapid intensification,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 44–70, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. K. Betts, “A new convective adjustment scheme. part I: observational and theoretical basis,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol. 112, no. 473, pp. 677–691, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. K. Betts and M. J. Miller, “A new convective adjustment scheme. part II: single column tests using GATE wave, BOMEX, ATEX and arctic air-mass data sets,” Quarterly Journal of Royal Meteorological Society, vol. 112, no. 473, pp. 693–709, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. G. A. Grell and D. Dévényi, “A generalized approach to parameterizing convection combining ensemble and data assimilation techniques,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 29, no. 14, pp. 38-1–38-4, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. W. Skamarock, J. B. C, J. Dudhia et al., “A description of the advanced research WRF version 3. NCAR technical note, NCAR/TN∖u2013475?STR,” 2008, http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/docs/arw_v3.pdf.
  27. G. Thompson, R. M. Rasmussen, and K. Manning, “Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme, part I: description and sensitivity analysis,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 519–542, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. G. Thompson, P. R. Field, R. M. Rasmussen, and W. D. Hall, “Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme. part II. implementation of a new snow parameterization,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 136, no. 12, pp. 5095–5115, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. W. K. Tao, J. J. Shi, S. S. Chen et al., “The impact of microphysical schemes on hurricane intensity and track,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  30. R. G. Fovell, Y. P. Bu, K. L. Corbosiero et al., Influence of Cloud Microphysics And Radiation on Tropical Cyclone Structure and Motion, vol. 56, Meteorological Monographs, 2016.
  31. S. Hong, Y. Noh, and J. Dudhia, “A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 134, no. 9, pp. 2318–2341, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. D. Kepert, “Choosing a boundary layer parameterization for tropical cyclone modeling,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 140, no. 5, pp. 1427–1445, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. A. J. Simmons, D. M. Burridge, M. Jarraud, C. Girard, and W. Wergen, “The ECMWF medium-range prediction models development of the numerical formulations and the impact of increased resolution,” Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, vol. 40, no. 1-3, pp. 28–60, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. D. P. Dee, S. M. Uppala, A. J. Simmons et al., “The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system,” Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol. 137, no. 656, pp. 553–597, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. A. Simmons, C. Uppala, D. Dee, and S. Kobayashi, “ERA-Interim: New ECMWF reanalysis products from,” ECMWF Newsl, vol. 110, pp. 25–35, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  36. C. A. Davis, W. Wang, S. S. Chen et al., “Prediction of landfalling hurricanes with the advanced hurricane WRF model,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 136, no. 6, pp. 1990–2005, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M. Xue, J. Schleif, F. Kong, K. W. Thomas, Y. Wang, and K. Zhu, “Track and intensity forecasting of hurricanes: impact of convection-permitting resolution and global ensemble Kalman filter analysis on 2010 Atlantic season forecasts,” Weather and Forecasting, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1366–1384, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. W. Mei, C. Pasquero, and F. Primeau, “The effect of translation speed upon the intensity of tropical cyclones over the tropical ocean,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 39, no. 7, Article ID L07801, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. T. Iguchi, T. Kozu, R. Meneghini, J. Awaka, and K. I. Okamoto, “Rain-profiling algorithm for the TRMM precipitation radar,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 2038–2052, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. T. Kubota, S. Shige, H. Hashizume et al., “Global precipitation map using satellite-borne microwave radiometers by the GSMaP project: production and validation,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 2259–2275, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. H. Ashouri, K.-L. Hsu, S. Sorooshian et al., “PERSIANN-CDR: daily precipitation climate data record from multisatellite observations for hydrological and climate studies,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 69–83, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. Z. Chen, Y. Qin, Y. Shen, and S. Zhang, “Evaluation of global satellite mapping of precipitation project daily precipitation estimates over the Chinese mainland,” Advances in Meteorology, vol. 2016, Article ID 9365294, 15 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. J. Liu, Z. Duan, J. Jiang, and A. Zhu, “Evaluation of three satellite precipitation products TRMM 3B42, CMORPH, and PERSIANN over a subtropical watershed in China,” Advances in Meteorology, vol. 2015, Article ID 151239, 13 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. B. G. Brown, J. H. Gotway, R. Bullock et al., “The model evaluation tools (MET): community tools for forecast evaluation,” in Proceedings of the 25th Conference on International Interactive Information and Processing Systems (IIPS) for Meteorology, Oceanography, and Hydrology, vol. January 9, p. 6, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 2009, Meteor. Soc.
  45. C. A. Davis, B. Brown, and R. Bullock, “Object-based verification of precipitation forecasts. part I: methodology and application to mesoscale rain areas,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 134, no. 7, pp. 1772–1784, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. C. Davis, B. Brown, and R. Bullock, “Object-based verification of precipitation forecasts. part II: application to convective rain systems,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 134, pp. 1785–1795, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. C. A. Davis, B. G. Brown, R. Bullock, and J. Halley-Gotway, “The method for object-based diagnostic evaluation (MODE) applied to numerical forecasts from the 2005 NSSL/SPC Spring Program,” Weather and Forecasting, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1252–1267, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus