Research Article
Improving Accuracy of River Flow Forecasting Using LSSVR with Gravitational Search Algorithm
Table 6
Comparison of the LHLGSA, LMARS, LM5RT, and LCMLR methods: Shyok catchment.
| Indexes | Cross validation data sets | Input combinations | Methods | LHLGSA | LMARS | LM5RT | LCMLR |
| | DS1 | IC1 | 165.03 | 224.25 | 240.12 | 395.55 | IC2 | 142.12 | 160.35 | 163.1 | 195.03 | IC3 | 153.55 | 157.09 | 171.48 | 167.49 | DS2 | IC1 | 154.19 | 210.33 | 224.47 | 470.32 | IC2 | 133.53 | 172.82 | 183.1 | 201.85 | IC3 | 134.43 | 155.31 | 174.73 | 171.76 | DS3 | IC1 | 146.79 | 186.3 | 207.49 | 370.18 | IC2 | 109.41 | 120.66 | 141.03 | 162.35 | IC3 | 117.29 | 122.36 | 124.84 | 138.19 | DS4 | IC1 | 207.08 | 243.15 | 259.96 | 512.25 | IC2 | 161.58 | 171.43 | 185.77 | 208.59 | IC3 | 163.91 | 168.28 | 209.68 | 191.93 |
| | DS1 | IC1 | 77.85 | 101.03 | 131.89 | 212.74 | IC2 | 65.08 | 73.75 | 78.02 | 85.02 | IC3 | 66.44 | 66.09 | 102.13 | 66.82 | DS2 | IC1 | 83.19 | 99.06 | 111.59 | 230.22 | IC2 | 78.05 | 82.59 | 94.03 | 88.69 | IC3 | 78.8 | 80.38 | 92.82 | 86.81 | DS3 | IC1 | 75.99 | 90.21 | 101.15 | 190.72 | IC2 | 59.01 | 64.28 | 72.03 | 76.79 | IC3 | 65.47 | 69.9 | 71.92 | 74.58 | DS4 | IC1 | 102.66 | 124.59 | 138.56 | 240.1 | IC2 | 76.67 | 82.41 | 84.61 | 93.64 | IC3 | 76.89 | 80.77 | 105.49 | 84.59 |
| | DS1 | IC1 | 0.845 | 0.721 | 0.738 | 0.677 | IC2 | 0.896 | 0.884 | 0.879 | 0.869 | IC3 | 0.89 | 0.888 | 0.842 | 0.873 | DS2 | IC1 | 0.896 | 0.819 | 0.818 | 0.694 | IC2 | 0.91 | 0.898 | 0.861 | 0.856 | IC3 | 0.904 | 0.901 | 0.884 | 0.896 | DS3 | IC1 | 0.921 | 0.782 | 0.899 | 0.721 | IC2 | 0.959 | 0.947 | 0.923 | 0.911 | IC3 | 0.953 | 0.938 | 0.930 | 0.920 | DS4 | IC1 | 0.823 | 0.752 | 0.736 | 0.625 | IC2 | 0.89 | 0.887 | 0.88 | 0.832 | IC3 | 0.873 | 0.895 | 0.782 | 0.855 |
|
|