Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Meteorology
Volume 2017, Article ID 5638289, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5638289
Research Article

Optimal Configuration Method of Sampling Points Based on Variability of Sea Surface Temperature

1College of Automation, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
2Ship Research and Design Center of China, Wuhan 430064, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Feng Gao; nc.ude.uebrh@91gnefoag

Received 13 August 2017; Accepted 21 November 2017; Published 19 December 2017

Academic Editor: Peng Yu

Copyright © 2017 Chang Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. J. Donlon, M. Martin, J. Stark, J. Roberts-Jones, E. Fiedler, and W. Wimmer, “The Operational Sea Surface Temperature and Sea Ice Analysis (OSTIA) system,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 140–158, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. J. Martin, A. Hines, and M. J. Bell, “Data assimilation in the FOAM operational short-range ocean forecasting system: A description of the scheme and its impact,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol. 133, no. 625 B, pp. 981–995, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K.-H. Seo, J.-K. E. Schemm, W. Wang, and A. Kumar, “The boreal summer intraseasonal oscillation simulated in the NCEP climate forecast system: The effect of sea surface temperature,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 135, no. 5, pp. 1807–1827, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. Wang, D. Dommenget, and C. Frauen, “An evaluation of the CMIP3 and CMIP5 simulations in their skill of simulating the spatial structure of SST variability,” Climate Dynamics, vol. 44, no. 1-2, pp. 95–114, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. H. Chen, E. K. Schneider, and Z. Wu, “Mechanisms of internally generated decadal-to-multidecadal variability of SST in the Atlantic Ocean in a coupled GCM,” Climate Dynamics, vol. 46, no. 5-6, pp. 1517–1546, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Thiébaux, E. Rogers, W. Wang, and B. Katz, “A new high-resolution blended real-time global sea surface temperature analysis,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 645–656, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  7. C. Guan and M. J. McPhaden, “Ocean processes affecting the twenty-first-century shift in ENSO SST variability,” Journal of Climate, vol. 29, no. 19, pp. 6861–6879, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Alvarez and B. Mourre, “Optimum sampling designs for a glider-mooring observing network,” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 601–612, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. X. Zhu, J. Yu, and X. Wang, “Optimization of large scales ocean sampling for minimization of the kriging variance,” in Proceedings of the 2010 8th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, WCICA 2010, pp. 7050–7054, July 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. Guestrin, A. Krause, and A. P. Singh, “Near-optimal sensor placements in gaussian processes,” in Proceedings of the ICML 2005: 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 265–272, August 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. B. Zhang and G. S. Sukhatme, “Adaptive sampling for estimating a scalar field using a robotic boat and a sensor network,” in Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA'07, pp. 3673–3680, IEEE, April 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. E. J. Candes, J. Romberg, and T. Tao, “Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information,” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 489–509, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. D. L. Donoho, “Compressed sensing,” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1289–1306, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  14. S. Poduri, G. Marcotte, and G. S. Sukhatme, 2010, Compressive sensing based lightweight sampling for large robot groups, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary.
  15. R. Hummel, S. Poduri, F. Hover, U. Mitra, and G. Sukhatme, “Mission design for compressive sensing with mobile robots,” in Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2011, pp. 2362–2367, IEEE, May 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. B. Chen, P. Pandey, and D. Pompili, “An adaptive sampling solution using autonomous underwater vehicles,” in Proceedings of the 9th IFAC Conference on Manoeuvring and Control of Marine Craft, MCMC 2012, vol. 45, pp. 352–356, September 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. Wang, “Quantitative Analysis of Spatial Heterogeneity Based on Variogram,” Statistics & Decisions, vol. 4, pp. 26-27, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  18. H. Wu and S. Wang, “Adaptive sparsity matching pursuit algorithm for sparse reconstruction,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 471–474, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus