Research Article

Analysis of the Changes in the Water Yield Coefficient over the Past 50 Years in the Huang-Huai-Hai River Basin, China

Table 3

Comparison of the six interpolation methods.

CityNumberMethodMeanValueErrorCityNumberMethodMeanValueErrorCityNumberMethodMeanValueError

1- Huangnan(1)IDW0.360 0.353 0.020 5- Ping liangIDW0.1410.1240.1399- BinzhouIDW0.1780.184−0.034
Kriging0.3090.353−0.123Kriging0.2040.1240.651Kriging0.1550.184−0.161
Natural0.3620.3530.027(3)Natural0.136 0.124 0.098 Natural0.1710.184−0.074
Spline0.3450.353−0.022Spline0.0740.124−0.400(4)Spline0.184 0.184 −0.003
Topo0.3650.3530.034Topo0.1170.124−0.053Topo0.1640.184−0.112
Trend0.3220.353−0.086Trend0.2960.1241.394Trend0.2520.1840.369

2- DatongIDW0.0910.099−0.0856- YantaiIDW0.2170.2040.06810- Xining(1)IDW0.275 0.275 0.002
Kriging0.0840.099−0.156Kriging0.2180.2040.072Kriging0.2690.275−0.019
Natural0.0890.099−0.097Natural0.2260.2040.109Natural0.2700.275−0.019
(4)Spline0.096 0.099 −0.026 Spline0.2310.2040.137Spline0.2710.275−0.013
Topo0.0780.099−0.208(5)Topo0.208 0.204 0.023 Topo0.2700.275−0.018
Trend0.2140.0991.160Trend0.2520.2040.240Trend0.2890.2750.052

3- Anyang(1)IDW0.151 0.188 −0.201 7- OrdosIDW0.0600.0550.09411- Yan’an(1)IDW0.061 0.056 0.093
Kriging0.1270.188−0.324Kriging0.0640.0550.165Kriging0.1100.0560.978
Natural0.1320.188−0.299Natural0.0610.0550.118Natural0.0640.0560.151
Spline0.1500.188−0.201(4)Spline0.050 0.055 −0.080 Spline0.0500.056−0.102
Topo0.1340.188−0.287Topo0.0400.055−0.273Topo0.0420.056−0.251
Trend0.2870.1880.526Trend0.2310.0553.219Trend0.2850.0564.118

4- Bengbu(1)IDW0.144 0.137 0.054 8- Qinhuangdao(1)IDW0.139 0.137 0.018 12- XinyangIDW0.1780.203−0.127
Kriging0.1450.1370.057Kriging0.1330.137−0.027Kriging0.1760.203−0.134
Natural0.1230.137−0.098Natural0.1430.1370.042Natural0.1840.203−0.096
Spline0.1230.137−0.101Spline0.1410.1370.033(4)Spline0.192 0.203 −0.057
Topo0.1060.137−0.225Topo0.1430.1370.043Topo0.1570.203−0.230
Trend0.3340.1371.442Trend0.2030.1370.479Trend0.3560.2030.752