Research Article

Short-Term Daily Univariate Streamflow Forecasting Using Deep Learning Models

Table 5

Performance comparison of the proposed models for different input time lags in Gummera station.

GummeraT + 1T + 2T + 3T + 4
RMSEMAEMAPER2TTPE (sec)RMSEMAEMAPER2TTPE (sec)RMSEMAEMAPER2TTPE (sec)RMSEMAEMAPER2TTPE (sec)

MLP17.677.840.180.900.8817.687.870.190.900.7517.437.760.180.900.6117.569.730.780.900.95
GRU17.668.390.410.900.5117.767.820.160.901.4317.478.290.350.901.2417.9910.541.030.890.53
S-LSTM17.668.290.390.901.5417.718.040.220.900.7517.698.510.320.902.9917.698.410.350.903.31
Bi-LSTM17.637.980.270.900.9217.938.390.290.892.3417.839.180.560.892.7717.568.560.390.901.84

TTPE(training time per epochs).The bold values indicate the best performance score for each time lag.