Advances in Mathematical Physics

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 450262, 6 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/450262

## Field Equations in the Complex Quaternion Spaces

School of Physics and Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China

Received 7 May 2014; Accepted 19 July 2014; Published 6 August 2014

Academic Editor: Shao-Ming Fei

Copyright © 2014 Zi-Hua Weng. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

The paper aims to adopt the complex quaternion and octonion to formulate the field equations for electromagnetic and gravitational fields. Applying the octonionic representation enables one single definition to combine some physics contents of two fields, which were considered to be independent of each other in the past. J. C. Maxwell applied simultaneously the vector terminology and the quaternion analysis to depict the electromagnetic theory. This method edified the paper to introduce the quaternion and octonion spaces into the field theory, in order to describe the physical feature of electromagnetic and gravitational fields, while their coordinates are able to be the complex number. The octonion space can be separated into two subspaces, the quaternion space and the -quaternion space. In the quaternion space, it is able to infer the field potential, field strength, field source, field equations, and so forth, in the gravitational field. In the -quaternion space, it is able to deduce the field potential, field strength, field source, and so forth, in the electromagnetic field. The results reveal that the quaternion space is appropriate to describe the gravitational features; meanwhile, the -quaternion space is proper to depict the electromagnetic features.

#### 1. Introduction

J. C. Maxwell described the physical feature of electromagnetic field with the vector as well as the quaternion. In 1843 W. R. Hamilton invented the quaternion, and J. T. Graves invented the octonion. Two years later, A. Cayley reinvented the octonion independently in 1845. During two decades from that time on, the scientists and engineers separated the quaternion into the scalar part and vector part, to facilitate its application in the engineering. In 1873 Maxwell mingled naturally the quaternion analysis and vector terminology to depict the electromagnetic feature in his works. Recently some scholars begin to study the physics feature of gravitational field with the algebra of quaternions.

The ordered couple of quaternions composes the octonion (Table 1). On the contrary, the octonion can be separated into two parts. This case is similar to the complex number, which can be separated into the real number and the imaginary number. The octonion is able to be divided into two parts as well, the quaternion and the -quaternion (short for the second quaternion), and their coordinates are able to be complex numbers. For the convenience of description, the quaternion described in the following context sometimes includes not only the quaternion but also the -quaternion.

Since the vector terminology can describe the electromagnetic and gravitational theories, the quaternion should be able to depict these two theories also. In the paper, the quaternion space is suitable to describe the gravitational features, and the -quaternion space is proper to depict the electromagnetic features. And it may be one approach to figure out some puzzles in the electromagnetic and gravitational theories described with the vector.

In recent years applying the quaternion to study the electromagnetic feature has been becoming one significant research orientation, and it continues the development trend of gradual deepening and expanding. Increasingly, the focus is being placed on the depiction discrepancy of electromagnetic features between the quaternion and vector. The related research into the discrepancy is coming out all the time.

Some scholars have been applying the quaternion analysis to study the electromagnetic and gravitational theories, trying to promote the further progress of these two field theories. Majernik [1] described the electromagnetic theory with the complex quaternion. Honig [2] and Singh [3] applied, respectively, the complex quaternion to deduce directly Maxwell’s equations in the classical electromagnetic theory. Demir et al. [4] studied the electromagnetic theory with the hyperbolic quaternion. Morita [5] researched the quaternion field theory. Grudsky et al. [6] utilized the quaternion to investigate the time-dependent electromagnetic field. Anastassiu et al. [7] applied the quaternion to describe the electromagnetic feature. Winans [8] described the physics quantities with the quaternion. Meanwhile the complex quaternion has certainly piqued scholars’ interest in researching the gravitational theory. Edmonds [9] utilized the quaternion to depict the wave equation and gravitational theory in the curved space time. Doria [10] adopted the quaternion to research the gravitational theory. Rawat and Negi [11] discussed the gravitational field equation with the quaternion treatment. Moreover a few scholars applied the octonion analysis to study the electromagnetic and gravitational theories. Gogberashvili [12] discussed the electromagnetic theory with the octonion. V. L. Mironov and S. V. Mironov [13] applied the octonion analysis to represent Maxwell’s equations and relevant physics features. Tanisli et al. [14] applied the algebra of octonions to study the gravitational field equations. In the paper, we will focus on the application of the complex quaternion on the electromagnetic and gravitational theory field.

At present there are mainly three description methods for the electromagnetic theory. * Vector Analysis*. The electromagnetic theory described with the three-dimensional vector is ripe enough. However the theory has a questionable logicality, because the deduction of Maxwell’s equations dealt with the participation of the current continuity equation. Logically, the electromagnetic strength determines the electromagnetic source via Maxwell’s equations, and then the electromagnetic source concludes the current continuity equation. On the contrary, the electromagnetic source decides the displacement current in Maxwell’s equations via the current continuity equation. This description method results in the problem of logic circulation. The puzzle urges other scholars to look for the new description method. * Real Quaternion Analysis*. In the electromagnetic theory described with the real quaternion, it is able to deduce directly the electromagnetic field equations. But its displacement current’s direction and the gauge condition of field potential are, respectively, different from that in the classical electromagnetic theory. The limited progress arouses the scholar’s enthusiasm to reapply the complex quaternion to depict the electromagnetic theory. * Complex Quaternion Analysis*. In the electromagnetic theory described with the complex quaternion, it is able to deduce directly Maxwell’s equations in the classical electromagnetic theory, without the help of the current continuity equation. Similarly some scholars have been applying the complex quaternion to research the gravitational theory. A comparison of the two description methods indicates that there are quite a number of sameness between the field theory described by the complex quaternion and the classical field theory described by the vector terminology, except for a little discrepancy.

In the existing studies that dealt with the quaternion field theory up to now, most of researches introduce the quaternion to rephrase simplistically the physics concept and deduction in the classical field theory. They considered the quaternion as one ordinary substitution for the complex number or the vector in the theoretical applications. This is a far cry from the expectation that an entirely new method can bring some new conclusions. In the past, the application of one new mathematic description method each time usually enlarged the range of definition of some physics concepts, bringing in new perspectives and inferences. Obviously the existing quaternion studies in the field theory so far have not achieved the expected outcome.

Making use of the comparison and analysis, a few primal problems from the preceding studies are found. The preceding studies were not able to describe simultaneously the electromagnetic and gravitational fields. These existing researches divide the electromagnetic and gravitational fields into two isolated parts and then describe, respectively, the two fields. In the paper, the electromagnetic field and gravitational field can combine together to become one unitary field in the theoretical description, depicting the physics features of two fields simultaneously. The preceding studies were difficult to unify similar physics quantities of two fields into the single definition. In the existing researches, the field potential (or field strength, field source) of gravitational field is different from that of electromagnetic field, and it is not able to unify them into the single definition. But the paper is able to unify the field potential (or field strength, field source) of electromagnetic and gravitational fields into the single definition.

In the paper, the author explores one new description method, introducing the complex quaternion space into the field theory, to describe the physical feature of electromagnetic and gravitational fields. This method’s inferences cover the most of conclusions of electromagnetic and gravitational fields described with the vector.

#### 2. Field Equations

The octonion space can be separated into two orthogonal subspaces, the quaternion space and the -quaternion space . And the quaternion space is independent of the -quaternion space . The quaternion space is suitable to describe the feature of gravitational field, while the -quaternion space is proper to depict the property of electromagnetic field.

In the quaternion space for the gravitational field, the basis vector is , the radius vector is , and the velocity is . The gravitational potential is , the gravitational strength is , and the gravitational source is . In the -quaternion space for the electromagnetic field, the basis vector is , the radius vector is , and the velocity is . The electromagnetic potential is , the electromagnetic strength is , and the electromagnetic source is . Herein . The symbol denotes the octonion multiplication. , and are all real. and are the complex numbers. is the imaginary unit. . . .

These two orthogonal quaternion spaces, and , compose one octonion space, . In the octonion space for the electromagnetic and gravitational fields, the octonion radius vector is and the octonion velocity is , with being one coefficient. Meanwhile the octonion field potential is ; the octonion field strength is . From here on out, some physics quantities are extended from the quaternion functions to the octonion functions, according to the characteristics of octonion. Apparently , , and their differential coefficients are all octonion functions of .

The octonion definition of field strength is where and . The gauge conditions of field potential are chosen as and . The operator is . ; . is the speed of light.

The octonion field source of the electromagnetic and gravitational fields can be defined as where , , and are coefficients. , and . denotes the conjugation of octonion. In general, the contribution of the tiny term, , in the above could be neglected.

According to the coefficient and the basis vectors, and , the octonion definition of the field source can be separated into two parts, where (3) is the definition of gravitational source, while (4) is the definition of electromagnetic source.

The octonion velocity is defined as where in the case for single one particle, a comparison with the classical electromagnetic (and gravitational) theory reveals that and . is the mass density, while is the density of electric charge.

##### 2.1. Gravitational Field Equations

In the quaternion space , the gravitational potential is , the operator is , and the gravitational strength is . The definition of gravitational strength can be expressed as where ; , with being the scalar potential of gravitational field.

For the sake of convenience the paper adopts the gauge condition (Table 2), . Further the above can be written as , with . One component of gravitational strength is the gravitational acceleration, . The other is , which is similar to the magnetic flux density.

In the definition of gravitational source equation (3), the gravitational source is . Substituting the gravitational source and gravitational strength into the definition of gravitational source can express the definition as where the gravitational coefficient is , and , with being the gravitational constant. The density of linear momentum is .

The above can be rewritten as

Comparing both sides of the equal sign in the above will yield where . ; .

Equations (9)–(12) are the gravitational field equations. Because the gravitational constant is weak and the velocity ratio is tiny, the gravity produced by the linear momentum can be ignored in general. When and , (11) can be degenerated into Newton’s law of universal gravitation in the classical gravitational theory.

By all appearances the quaternion operator , gravitational potential , gravitational source , radius vector , velocity , and so forth are restricted by the component selection in the definitions. That is, the coordinates with the basis vector are the imaginary numbers, while the coordinates with the basis vector are all real. In the paper they can be written as the preceding description form in the context, in order to deduce the gravitational field equations. Those restriction conditions are the indispensable components of the classical gravitational theory.

The deduction approach of the gravitational field equations can be used as a reference to be extended to that of electromagnetic field equations.

##### 2.2. Electromagnetic Field Equations

In the electromagnetic theory described with the complex quaternion, it is able to deduce directly Maxwell’s equations in the classical electromagnetic theory. In this approach, substituting the -quaternion for the quaternion, one can obtain the same conclusions still.

In the -quaternion space , the electromagnetic potential is ; the electromagnetic strength is . The definition of electromagnetic strength can be expressed as where the vector potential of electromagnetic field is . ; , with being the scalar potential of electromagnetic field.

For the sake of convenience the paper adopts the gauge condition, . Therefore the above can be written as . Herein the electric field intensity is , meanwhile the magnetic flux density is . . .

In the definition of electromagnetic source equation (4), the electromagnetic source is . Substituting the electromagnetic source and electromagnetic strength into the definition of electromagnetic source can separate the definition as where the electromagnetic coefficient is , with being the permittivity.

The above can be rewritten as

Comparing the variables on both sides of the equal sign in the above will reason out Maxwell’s equations as follows: where and . and . The density of electric current is . For the charged particles, there may be . And the unit is one function of , with .

In a similar way the electromagnetic potential , electromagnetic source , radius vector , velocity , and so forth are restricted by the component selection of the definitions. That is, the coordinates with the basis vector are the imaginary numbers, while the coordinates with the basis vector are all real. In the paper they can be written as the preceding description form in the context, in order to deduce Maxwell’s equations. Those restriction conditions are the indispensable components of the classical electromagnetic theory.

On the analogy of the coordinate definition of complex coordinate system, one can define the coordinate of octonion, which involves the quaternion and -quaternion simultaneously. In the octonion coordinate system, the octonion physics quantity can be defined as . It means that there are the quaternion coordinate and the -quaternion coordinate for the basis vector , while being the quaternion coordinate and the -quaternion coordinate for the basis vector . Herein and are all real.

#### 3. Equivalent Transformation

##### 3.1. Gravitational Field Equations

Making use of the transforming of the basis vectors of in the quaternion operator , it is able to translate further the gravitational field equations, (9)–(12), from the quaternion space into that in the three-dimensional vector space. In the three-dimensional vector space , the operator is , with .

In the gravitational field equations, the operator should be substituted by the operator . Meanwhile , , and are substituted by , , and , respectively. The cross and dot products of quaternion are substituted by that of vector, respectively. And the gravitational field equations, (9)–(12), can be transformed into where and . .

Expressing the above into the scalar equations will reveal that (9)–(12) and (17) are equivalent to each other. And the definition of (6) requires substituting by , in order to approximate to Newton’s law of universal gravitation in the classical gravitational theory as near as possible. Therefore the gravitational field equations, (17), are able to be transformed into that in the three-dimensional vector space,

Comparing (20) with Poisson equation for Newton’s law of universal gravitation reveals that those two equations are the same formally. In case the gravitational strength component is weak and the velocity ratio is quite tiny, (20) will be reduced into Newton’s law of universal gravitation in the classical gravitational theory.

##### 3.2. Electromagnetic Field Equations

By means of the transformation of basis vectors of in the quaternion operator, it is able to translate further the electromagnetic field equations, (16), from the -quaternion space into that in the three-dimensional vector space . In the electromagnetic field equations, the operator is substituted by . And , , and are substituted by , , and , respectively. Therefore the electromagnetic field equations, (16), can be transformed into where and . and .

Expressing the above into the scalar equations will reveal that (16) and (22) are equivalent to each other. And the definition of (13) requires substituting and by and , respectively, in order to approximate to Maxwell’s equations in the classical electromagnetic theory as near as possible. Therefore the electromagnetic field equations, (22), are able to be transformed into that in the three-dimensional vector space,

Comparing (23) with Maxwell’s equations in the classical electromagnetic theory states that those two field equations are equivalent to each other. It means that in the electromagnetic theory described with the quaternion, without the participation of the current continuity equation, it is still able to reason out Maxwell’s equations in the classical electromagnetic theory.

#### 4. Conclusions and Discussions

Applying the complex quaternion space, the paper is able to describe simultaneously the electromagnetic field equations and the gravitational field equations. The spaces of gravitational and electromagnetic fields both can be chosen as the quaternion spaces. Furthermore some coordinates of those two quaternion spaces and relevant physics quantities may be the imaginary numbers.

In the definitions of the quaternion operator, field potential, field source, radius vector, velocity, and so forth, the coordinates with the basis vector or are all imaginary numbers. However this simple case is still able to result in many components of other physics quantities to become the imaginary numbers, even the complex numbers. In the definitions, only by means of the confinement of the component selection can we achieve the quaternion field theory approximating to the classical field theory, enabling it to cover the classical field theory. Therefore it can be said that the component selection is the essential ingredients for the field theory too.

In the quaternion space, it is able to deduce the gravitational field equations as well as the gauge condition of gravitational potential and so on. Newton’s law of universal gravitation in the classical gravitational theory can be derived from the gravitational field equations described with the quaternion. Two components of the gravitational strength are the counterpart of the linear acceleration and of the precession angular velocity. In general, the component of the gravitational strength, which is corresponding to the precession angular velocity of the gyroscopic torque which dealt with the angular momentum, is comparatively tiny.

In the -quaternion space, it is able to reason out directly the electromagnetic field equations as well as the gauge condition of electromagnetic potential and so forth. The electromagnetic field equations described with the -quaternion can be equivalently translated into Maxwell’s equations of the classical electromagnetic theory in the three-dimensional vector space. Moreover the definition of electromagnetic strength and the gauge condition of electromagnetic potential both can be equivalently translated, respectively, into that in the classical electromagnetic theory.

It should be noted that the paper discussed only the electromagnetic field equations and the gravitational field equations and so forth, described with the complex quaternion, and the equivalent transformation of those field equations into that in the three-dimensional vector space. However it clearly states that the introducing of the complex quaternion space is able to availably describe the physics features of electromagnetic and gravitational fields. This will afford the theoretical basis for the further relevant theoretical analysis and is helpful to apply the complex quaternion analysis to study the angular momentum, electric/magnetic dipole moment, torque, energy, force, and so forth in the electromagnetic and gravitational fields.

#### Conflict of Interests

The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

#### Acknowledgments

The author is indebted to the anonymous referees for their valuable and constructive comments on the previous paper. This project was supported partially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant no. 60677039.

#### References

- V. Majernik, “Quaternionic formulation of the classical fields,”
*Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras*, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 119–130, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - W. M. Honig, “Quaternionic electromagnetic wave equation and a dual charge-filled space,”
*Lettere Al Nuovo Cimento*, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 137–140, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - A. Singh, “Quaternionic form of the electromagnetic-current equations with magnetic monopoles,”
*Lettere al Nuovo Cimento*, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 145–148, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus - S. Demir, M. Tanışlı,, and N. Candemir, “Hyperbolic quaternion formulation of electromagnetism,”
*Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras*, vol. 20, no. 3-4, pp. 547–563, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus - K. Morita, “Quaternions, Lorentz group and the Dirac theory,”
*Progress of Theoretical Physics*, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 501–532, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus - S. M. Grudsky, K. V. Khmelnytskaya, and V. V. Kravchenko, “On a quaternionic Maxwell equation for the time-dependent electromagnetic field in a chiral medium,”
*Journal of Physics A*, vol. 37, no. 16, pp. 4641–4647, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus - H. T. Anastassiu, P. E. Atlamazoglou, and D. I. Kaklamani, “Application of bicomplex (quaternion) algebra to fundamental electromagnetics: a lower order alternative to the Helmholtz equation,”
*IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation*, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 2130–2136, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus - J. G. Winans, “Quaternion physical quantities,”
*Foundations of Physics*, vol. 7, no. 5-6, pp. 341–349, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus - J. Edmonds, “Quaternion wave equations in curved space-time,”
*International Journal of Theoretical Physics*, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 115–122, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus - F. A. Doria, “A Weyl-like equation for the gravitational field,”
*Lettere al Nuovo Cimento*, vol. 14, no. 13, pp. 480–482, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus - A. S. Rawat and O. P. S. Negi, “Quaternion gravi-electromagnetism,”
*International Journal of Theoretical Physics*, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 738–745, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus - M. Gogberashvili, “Octonionic electrodynamics,”
*Journal of Physics A*, vol. 39, no. 22, pp. 7099–7104, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus - V. L. Mironov and S. V. Mironov, “Octonic representation of electromagnetic field equations,”
*Journal of Mathematical Physics*, vol. 50, no. 1, Article ID 012901, 10 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus - M. Tanisli, M. E. Kansu, and S. Demir, “Reformulation of electromagnetic and gravito-electromagnetic equations for Lorentz system with octonion algebra,”
*General Relativity and Gravitation*, vol. 46, article 1739, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet