Research Article | Open Access

Jung-Chao Ban, Chih-Hung Chang, Ting-Ju Chen, Mei-Shao Lin, "Dimension Spectrum for Sofic Systems", *Advances in Mathematical Physics*, vol. 2014, Article ID 624523, 11 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/624523

# Dimension Spectrum for Sofic Systems

**Academic Editor:**Christian Maes

#### Abstract

We study the dimension spectrum of sofic system with the potential functions being matrix valued. For finite-coordinate dependent positive matrix potential, we set up the entropy spectrum by constructing the quasi-Bernoulli measure and the cut-off method is applied to deal with the infinite-coordinate dependent case. We extend this method to nonnegative matrix and give a series of examples of the sofic-affine set on which we can compute the spectrum concretely.

#### 1. Introduction

Let be a subshift of finite type (SFT) with being the incidence matrix and being its shift map. Motivated by the study of the iterated function systems (IFS) and generalized SierpiÅ„ski carpets (GSC, cf. [1â€“5]), one considers a special type of potential functions which take values on the set of matrices. For , define the* topological pressure *as follows:
whenever the limit exists and denotes the collection of -cylinders in . (Here is the matrix norm; that is, , where is the column vector with entries being 1â€™s). In [4], if is* positive*, that is, , and* HÃ¶lder* potential with is topologically mixing, the authors prove that the Gibbs measure for exists uniquely and the system admits the multifractal analysis. More precisely, let
be the level set for the upper Lyapunov exponent. Then the Hausdorff dimension of the level set is obtained as follows.

Theorem 1 (see [4, Theorem 1.3]). *Let be a SFT and let be HÃ¶lder continuous. Then is differentiable and for any , ,
**
where denotes the Hausdorff dimension.*

The study of the thermodynamic properties with these potentials relates deeply to the fractal properties of the given IFS or GSC. We emphasize that the formula (3) set up the* fine structure* in the Hausdorff dimension point of view for . The authors extend this result to the case that is nonnegative with some additional irreducible conditionsâ€™ the reader may refer to [3] for the detail. When the underlying space is a sofic shift and , that is, the potential function is finitary real valued, there raises a natural equilibrium measure called* semigroup measure* proposed by Kitchens and Tuncel [6]. When , the thermodynamic properties relate to fractal dynamics of given sofic affine-invariant sets (cf. [7]).

Theorem 1 investigates the dimension spectrum of SFTs; it is natural to ask whether the formula is preserved by passing to their factors (sofic shifts). To be advanced, does the formula hold for those shifts beyond sofic shifts such as the case for the specification property? Recent research revealed that some properties of SFTs are preserved for the cases beyond the specification (cf. [8â€“10]). This study intends to show that the formula of dimension spectrum of SFTs is passing to their factors, that is, sofic shifts, and their Hausdorff dimension can be expressed explicitly for some class of sofic shifts.

Let be a sofic shift which is a subshift of the shift space and let be the shift map on it. The well-known Curtis-Lyndon-Hedlund Theorem ([11, Theorem ]) demonstrates that if is a function, then is a homomorphism if and only if is a* sliding block code*. The sliding block code is induced from* block map*, that is, a map for some . For all and if , define by , where is the* restriction map* of a cylinder to lattice. Then is thus defined as the limit of ; that is, and . (We refer reader to [11, 12] for more detail). We call â€‰* right resolving* if for all and any and such that and we have
where if and only if . If , then we define . Throughout this paper we assume is right resolving.

In this paper, we study that the dimension spectrum with is a matrix-valued potential on taking values on the set of matrices. To be precise, let be the collection of nonnegative (positive) matrices which are â˜… continuous on ; notation â˜… stands for the of HÃ¶lder continuous and for continuous, the same for . For , let be defined similarly as in (1) and the* level set for the upper Lyapunov exponent* for is also defined similarly as (2):

The main results of the present paper are the following. We want to mention here that our results were independently investigated by Feng and Huang [13, Theorem 1.4] via different approach. Our method, except for providing another point of view for the mathematical demonstration, can be applied for evaluating the topological pressure rigorously.

**Thearom A.**â€‰â€‰* be a sofic shift induced by ** and let ** be a matrix-valued potential on ** which depends on ** coordinates. Then *(1)*for all ** is differentiable;*(2)*if **, **where ** is the maximal eigenvalue of *.

Theoremâ€‰â€‰A deals with the finite-coordinate dependent matrix potentials. This method also allows us to set up the dimension spectrum for infinite-coordinate dependent one for . We emphasize here that our method makes the discussion of the limiting measure on infinite-coordinate systems possible. Let Since , we have for some ([4, Lemma 2.2]). The following result deals with the dimension spectrum for infinite-coordinate .

**Thearom B.*** be a matrix-valued potential on ** which depends on infinite many coordinates*. * Then*(1)*for all ** is differentiable;*(2)*if **, ** where ** is the maximal eigenvalue of *.

The block map plays an important role in this method and one of the advantages of this method is that we can prove that (3) holds for by using the matrix theory argument (Perron-Frobenius Theorem [6]). We will show there are some interesting examples of sofic affine set that we can compute their rigorous formulae for -spectrum and the pressure functions; then the dimension spectrum is thus derived by simple computation.

The content of the paper is following. In Section 2, we present the proof of Theoremâ€‰â€‰A and the proof of Theoremâ€‰â€‰B is given in Section 3. Section 4 extends Theoremsâ€‰â€‰A and B to nonnegative matrix-valued potential functions and investigates some examples.

#### 2. Proof of Theorem A

This section gives a proof for Theoremâ€‰â€‰A. We recall some definitions first. Denote by the set of probability measures on and the subset of -invariant measures of , and are defined similarly.

*Definition 2. *â€‰ â€‰We say that is* quasi-Bernoulli* if there exists a constant such that

For , the -spectrum of is defined by
where denotes the maximal eigenvalue of .

Our method is motivated by the idea which is proposed in [5] and the intrinsic property of the sliding block codes and ; we formulate it briefly.(1)Since depends on coordinates, we construct from as mentioned above. Then the* pullback potential* on from is also defined. We extend the idea of the proof of Lemma 4.3 of [5] to construct an invariant, ergodic probability measure on and extend this measure to some limiting measure which supports the whole .(2)For all we define a measure on by measuring one of its preimages with the measure in which is constructed in Step . Although the measure in satisfies the Markov property and probability properties, the measure on cannot share the same properties. However, the space is still compact and the standard argument allows us to find an invariant and ergodic measure on .(3)Combining steps with we are able to show that the limiting measure is* Gibbs-like* and satisfies the* quasi-Bernoulli property* (we emphasize here that this measure is not necessary a Gibbs measure) and the -spectrum preserved under the factor which is induced from the limit of ; that is, . Therefore, the differentiability and the dimension spectrum can be preserved from .

*Proof of Theorem . *We divide the proof in the following steps.*Stepâ€‰â€‰1*. Let be a sliding block code from to . For , define from to by :
where denotes the projection map to coordinate on for all . Define a matrix potential on by, if ,
Then is well defined for all from the fact that depends on -coordinate. Write . Define for and ; we setup a matrix which is indexed by the elements of as follows:
where denotes the matrix with entries which are all zeros. For all with , we denote by the indicator matrix of ,
It is obvious that if is mixing, then is primitive. Therefore, if we assume , there exists a uniform constant such that for all and there exists a path with , , , , and
Combining the fact of ,
Thus
and also . Let be an ordered set by the lexigraphic ordering and we rearrange according to this ordering. Since is primitive, Perron-Frobenius Theorem is applied to show that there exist eigenvalues and with corresponding eigenvectors and , respectively, for . We may also assume
That is,
For all and , let and
We define a measure as follows:
It follows from (19) that if ,
That is,
It follows from the same computation we also have that
This implies that ,
It can be easily checked that and then we define
The Kolmogorov consistence theorem is applied to show that there exists a measure on such that
*Stepâ€‰â€‰2*. In this step, we will define a measure on . Since
is onto, for all , we define an ordered set as
and set a measure on **:**
We note here that is not invariant. Let
for all and assume ,
Hence
Set
where denotes the -coordinate of vector of for or . Since is right resolving, for all there is at least one and at most preimages of such that . Therefore, if and , it follows from (33) that
By the positivity of , , and is finite, we can conclude that there exist two constants and such that and ; then
This means that for all there exists a constant such that
And thus
for some .*Stepâ€‰â€‰3*. Since is not invariant, we follow the proof of [4] to construct an invariant and ergodic measure satisfying the property of (21) in this step. For all , define a sequence . It follows from (37) that if ,
Hence there exists a constant such that
Thus there exists a such that
Since is compact, then let be the limiting measure of
Combining the fact that with the above computations it yields and . Up to a small modification of the proof in Theorem 1.1 of [4] we also have that is ergodic. The Radon-Nikodym theorem applies to show that there is a constant such that for -a.e. and . It follows from that and are both invariant probability measures. We obtain and for all *Stepâ€‰â€‰4*. From the above computation we obtain that if with and , then . Moreover, there exists such that
With the positivity of implements there exists a constant such that for any we have
This demonstrates is quasi-Bernoulli and so are and . Hence is a quasi-Bernoulli measure. According to the fact that right-resolving factor cannot increase the topological entropy, we can assert that
where . Theorem 1.3 of [4] is applied to show that for all is differentiable and if ,
where denotes the maximal eigenvalue of . Finally, the differentiability for with comes from the fact since is right resolving and is the pullback potential of . This completes the proof.

*Remark 3. *We remark that in the proof of Theoremâ€‰â€‰A, is not a Gibbs measure, and in the following, we will show that this method allow us to approximate the potential depending on infinite coordinate for .

#### 3. Proof of Theorem B

In this section, we extend our result to the matrix-valued potentials that are infinite-coordinate dependent.

*Proof of Theorem . *The first statement is an immediate consequence of Theoremâ€‰â€‰A since depends on -coordinate. It is still remaining to prove the second statement.

For with , let and let be its maximal eigenvalue as in Theoremâ€‰â€‰A. Since is primitive and is positive, is also primitive for all . We claim that for . Indeed, let and be indexed by and , respectively. For all ,
where and . Therefore, for ,
for some . Hence, . Taking we have
Using the same argument, we also have
On the other hand, for with being fixed,
for some . Similarly we have
and there exists such that
The fact that asserts and there exists such that for we have
This demonstrates as for some . Define . implies
It can also be checked that satisfies the quasi-Bernoulli property and for all ,
Using the same proof of Theoremâ€‰â€‰A, we have
Combining Theorems 1 with , we conclude that is thus differentiable and the desired equality (8) follows. This completes the proof.

#### 4. Examples

This section illustrates several examples that help for the understanding of our results.

##### 4.1. Computation of Dimension Spectrum

Suppose is an irreducible subshift of finite type and is a factor. Chazottes and Ugalde [14] indicate that if a matrix-valued push-forward potential function is* row allowable* and is positive on periodic points, then there exists a unique Gibbs measure on . Here is called row allowable if there is no zero row in . Before extending our results to nonnegative matrix-valued potential functions, we give the definition of a* column allowable* matrix first.

*Definition 4. *We call column allowable if for all , we have . We also denote by the collection of column allowable matrices of size .

It can be easily verified that forms a semigroup under matrix product.

Lemma 5. *If and , then .*

*Proof. *Indeed, for all ,
This completes the proof.

For nonnegative matrix-valued potential , we have the following result.

Theorem 6. *Let depend on -coordinate and there exists a finite set such that for all and there exists such that and for all , and then (6) holds.*

*Proof. *We give the proof for the case that all elements in are equal length and the case for different length is in the same fashion. It follows from the proof in Theorem that can be constructed which is indexed by the . Since for any (we assume that is equal length and the definition allows us to define all elements which have equal length of ) we also assume that consist of only one element; say . Without loss of generality, assume . It suffices to show that is primitive. Indeed, for any and , since , Lemma 5 is thus applied to show that
This means that . The other case can be done similarly. Therefore, the same proof as in Theorem leads to (6) and the proof is completed.

In the proof of Theorem , the -spectrum plays an important role for the computing of dimension spectrum. We emphasize that for a measure , it is not easy to compute the rigorous formula for . If the measure is given as in Theorem , the following theorem provides a class of matrix-valued potentials for which we can compute its -spectrum explicitly. Let depend on -coordinate and as defined in Theorem ; we define a matrix from (recall that ) as follows: denotes the maximal eigenvalue of .

Proposition 7. *Under the same assumptions of Theorem 6, assume that
**
satisfies that
**
Assume that and are as defined in Theorem . Then
**
where is the maximal root of the characteristic polynomial of .*

*Proof. *Let
be constructed as in Step 1 of the proof of Theorem . Since elements of are mutually commuted, then the set of matrices can be diagonalized simultaneously. That is, there exists a unique such that is a diagonal matrix for all . Since is primitive, there exist and such that (19) holds. We first compute the -spectrum , where is defined in the proof of Theoremâ€‰â€‰A with the property that there exists a constant such that for each ,
This induces
We note here that the second equality comes from the positivity of , and is invertible. Since , the proof is completed.

Here we give a concrete example for the dimension spectrum of sofic system.

*Example 8. *Let be the golden mean shift with
and the right-resolving sliding block code with :
Define a matrix potential on , as in Proposition 7 by
Then and . A little modification of the proof of Theorem indicates that is differentiable. Suppose with ; Theorem 6 is applied to show that
On the other hand, one can easily compute that
and Proposition 7 applies to show that

##### 4.2. Computation of Pressure

Let be a subshift of finite type and be its pressure for . If is differentiable, Theorem 1.3 of [4] demonstrates that the dimension spectrum can be computed via the formula of . However, the computation of the explicit formula for is not easy. If a sofic system, we provide a wide class of matrix potential on for which we can compute its rigorously which leads to the dimension spectrum of . We first give a theorem which is analogous to Theorem 1.3 of [4].

Theorem 9. *Let . We have for any with *

*Proof. *Up to a minor modification, the proof is identical to the proof of Theorem 1.3 of [4] and we omit it here.

We prove the following class for which we can compute its and .

Theorem 10. *If depends on -coordinate, then it satisfies the following properties. *(1)*Let be the matrix constructed in Theorem which is primitive.*(2)*Let be induced from as in the proof of Theorem . If there exists a sequence of real numbers and is a row vector such that for any we have
**Then
**
where denotes the maximal eigenvalue of defined in (77) and thus it is differentiable. Furthermore, (74) can be computed explicitly.*

*Proof. *Define by
where is a column vector with . Since is primitive, then the left and right eigenvectors are positive; that is, . Combining (75) with Perron-Frobenius Theorem we have
The second equality exists because is finite-coordinate dependent and 4th equality comes from the right-resolving property of . This completes the proof.

*Remark 11. * In Theorem , we always assume that if one is regarded as where and edges,
Then there is only* one level* from to ; that is, the number of levels of for any and is equal to one, and thus can be constructed with the entry which is a single smaller matrix. However, if there is more than one level from to , we only need to modify by
where denotes the number of levels from to . Since is right resolving, Theorem still follows.

In the assumption (75) of Theorem 10, one can easily check that the result remains if there exists a column vector such that for any

One can also easily check that for those classes of Theorem 10, if is the measure in Theorem , Then the -spectrum is