Advances in Mathematical Physics

Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 3654530, 12 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3654530

## On Functions of Several Split-Quaternionic Variables

^{1}Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA^{2}Department of Mathematics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA

Received 5 October 2015; Accepted 7 February 2016

Academic Editor: Ricardo Weder

Copyright © 2016 Gueo Grantcharov and Camilo Montoya. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

Alesker studied a relation between the determinant of a quaternionic Hessian of a function and a specific complex volume form. In this note we show that similar relation holds for functions of several split-quaternionic variables and point to some relations with geometry.

#### 1. Introduction

Quaternions are known to have deep relation to the self-dual Yang-Mills equations in mathematical physics. It is also known that the self-duality equations have an “indefinite” version, the basic conformal metric used in their definition has signature . Such equations are not elliptic, but it is known for more than 30 years that many of the integrable systems arise as a reduction of the indefinite self-duality equations [1]. It is also known that the geometry of a superstring with supersymmetry was shown in [2, 3] to be described by a space-time with a pseudo-Kähler metric of signature , whose curvature satisfies the (anti) self-duality equations.

The split quaternions are indefinite analog of quaternions and play similar role in the indefinite self-duality equations as the quaternions play in the positive definite case. It is well known that spaces with quaternionic-like structures (e.g., quaternionic-kähler and hyperkähler) form an active area of research. One topic in it is developing the notion of quaternionic plurisubharmonic functions [4]. Similar to the quaternionic case, there are geometric structures on manifolds of dimension greater than four, related to the split quaternions. Mathematically, these structures are described by quadruples , where is a signature metric and are parallel endomorphisms of the tangent bundle with respect to the Levi-Civita connection of , such that In the literature such structures are called hypersymplectic [5], neutral hyperkähler [6], parahyperkähler [7, 8], pseudohyperkähler [9], and so forth. A more general condition is when are parallel with respect to a connection with skew-symmetric torsion; such structures are considered in [10]. One of the features is the existence of a nondegenerate -form given by . Locally the metric arises from a single function, called potential, similar to the Kähler metrics. The function satisfies . In the quaternionic case, such potentials in multidimensional quaternionic space correspond to a quaternionic plurisubharmonic functions and were considered from analytical view point first by Alesker [4].

The aim of this paper is to provide an analog of the results in [4] for functions of split-quaternionic variables. Although it is unlikely to find an appropriate definition of plurisubharmonic function because of the indefiniteness, a meaning of determinant of a split-quaternionic-Hermitian matrix can be given. As a main result in the paper we show that , where is the Moore determinant of the quaternionic Hessian of . The proof is similar to the proof in [4] and relies on a linear change of variables formula and the density of the delta functions of split-quaternionic hyperplanes in , which is proven by Graev [11]. We notice also that split-Lagrangian calibrations of [12] can be defined naturally for metrics arising from such functions for which .

#### 2. The Split Quaternions and Functions on

##### 2.1. The Algebra of the Split Quaternions

The split quaternions are spanned over by the basis with algebraic relations , , . The inner product is defined by and (hence the signature). The conjugate of is , and then .

Another realization of in given by the following embedding : whose usefulness becomes obvious when we notice that it preserves the norm; that is,

The embedding above is extended to vectors in by the map where

so the embedding looks like

Similarly for an split-quaternionic matrix, we define its adjoint matrix as the image of the extension of to given by where and .

A related homomorphism is that of the Study map, which we denote by , which can be generalized for a matrix , where :

The Study map also has an associated determinant, where is the standard determinant of complex matrices, given by

For , we have and we can check that

So it is natural to expect that this representation extends linearly to matrix groups, that is, the following.

Proposition 1. *For any split-quaternionic matrices and , we have the following:*(1)* for and , where the superscripts are the respective dimensions.*(2)*For , , where .*(3)*For , , where . Furthermore, if is unitary, then ; that is, is symplectic, and .*

*Proof. *Let . Then and by the property above we have HenceFor the second claim, if the adjoint of is unitary as matrix, then we show that is symplectic; that is, but by (12) we have that and combined with (14): we get thatand by multiplying the above equation by on the right we obtain as needed.

*Following Wan and Wang [13] we define on the corresponding first-order differential operators that act as partial derivatives with respect to the variable in the th entry, , and or , in (6),and use them to define the analogs of and in complex analysis for the purposes of our study of functions on . We will denote by the partial derivatives and for notational simplicity.*

*Definition 2 (the Baston operator). *Let be a domain. The operators , , and are defined as

*Due to the particular embedding we chose, we can simplify notations and calculations, summarized in the following lemma.*

*Lemma 3. Properties of , , , , and are as follows: (1) where (2) for the same pair of indices and .(3)Let such that (clearly) for all . Let ; then without loss of generality we can suppose . Then if we consider the ordered pairs and , we have *

*Proof. *We compute as Since both indices and run from to , the “symmetric terms” and both appear, and by the skew-symmetry of the wedge product (), and since any , the only remaining terms are the terms with , so we can cancel the and write (19) as where is the coefficient of term in .

To demonstrate , we use commutation of :Proving the final claim is done in two nearly identical calculations, depending on the parity of and . We will prove one case, where without loss of generality we assume is even and we still have . This means that , , but , , and similarly , , but , (in the other case if was odd we would have the completely symmetric situation, with ’s becoming ’s, etc.). So we calculate

*Definition 4 (mixed Baston product). *For we define the mixed Baston product of as where and is defined to be the sign of the permutation from to if and otherwise.

In particular, for , the mixed Baston product coincides with the -times wedged Baston of ; that is,

*The results and definitions above will allow us to translate the -times wedged Baston of in terms of the “split-quaternionic Hessian” of , defined in terms of the Moore determinant, which are precisely the next sections.*

*2.2. Split-Quaternionic Determinants*

*2.2. Split-Quaternionic Determinants*

*Due to the noncommutativity of the multiplication in (just as in ) trying to construct an effective definition of determinants is complicated. There are several ways to define them. The main results in this direction follow the work of E. Study, J. Dieudonné, and E. H. Moore, as outlined by Aslaksen in [14]. However, the problem becomes much simpler if we are restricted to hyperhermitian matrices; that is, such that ; then we can define a simple and useful determinant following the work of E. H. Moore, called the Moore determinant. This is done by specifying a certain ordering of the factors in terms in the sum over permutations of the symmetric group .*

*Definition 5 (the Moore determinant, see [14] or [15]). *For a permutation , write as a product of disjoint cycles such that the smallest number is at the front of each factor and then sort the disjoint cycles in decreasing order according to the first number of each factor. In other words, write where, for , we have for all , and . Then we define the Moore determinant of a hyperhermitian matrix [denoted by ] as Another equivalent definition of the Moore determinant is the inductive one (see [15]), defined as, for a hyperhermitian matrix , the inductive definition is given as follows: for , we have and for for , if and if , and the hyperhermitian matrix obtained by interchanging the th and th columns and then deleting both the th row and column of the corresponding matrix. For any matrix , it can be easily checked that is also hyperhermitian, which leads to the equalities The Moore determinant is related to the Study determinant from (8) aswhich is given by the middle equality which can be seen easily by noticing that and are similar matrices (having the same exact entries in different arrays, except that the former consists of 4 -blocks and the latter consists of -blocks) and differ by only elementary operations (shuffling some rows, columns, and signs) so that their complex determinants are equal.

Again focusing on hyperhermitian matrices, we can manipulate them to get what are also known as* self-adjoint* matrices, for which the Pfaffians () can be defined (again see [15]). They are defined on skew-symmetric matrices, so for a hyperhermitian matrix and matrix (and endomorphism) defined in Proposition 1, we define the map by From this follows the well-known equalities proved by Dyson [15]: This allows us to prove is a homomorphism and, in particular, the following corollary.

*Corollary 6. For any hyperhermitian matrix and any split-quaternionic matrix , the matrix is also hyperhermitian and *

*Proof. *Using the identities (32), (33), and (35) above, Proposition 1, and the multiplicative properties of complex determinants and , a direct calculation showsand the corollary is proved.

*Definition 7 (mixed discriminant of hyperhermitian matrices). *Let be hyperhermitian matrices. The* mixed discriminant* [denoted by ] of is defined to be the coefficient of the monomial divided by in the polynomial given by , where det is again the Moore determinant. Note also that .

*2.3. The “Split-Quaternionic Hessian” of a Function*

*2.3. The “Split-Quaternionic Hessian” of a Function*

*Let be a function of split-quaternionic variables, where . We define the partial derivative with respect to as and for , its conjugate is , we similarly define the partial derivative with respect to a conjugate variable as This immediately implies that the mixed partials calculation is since which extends from the fact that for and , . This also shows that the matrix is hyperhermitian; that is, *

*Definition 8 (the “split-quaternionic Hessian” of a function ). *The “split-quaternionic Hessian” (denoted ) of a function defined on a domain in is defined analogously to the complex Hessian of a function, only with respect to split-quaternionic variables. For and , the split-quaternionic Hessian of , is defined as We now turn to the Monge-Amperè operator. As Alesker in [4] defined the* mixed Monge-Amperè operator* in quaternionic space of a function is defined as Generalized further, for functions , the* mixed discriminant* ds is defined as the Moore determinant of the respective quaternionic Hessian matrices; we follow this construction to define a similar Monge-A-Amperè operator to split-quaternionic functions, denoted by Note also that, for , the mixed Monge-Amperè operator is equal to the regular Monge-Amperè operator:

*Lemma 9. For any hyperhermitian matrix and any real diagonal real matrix of the form we have thatwhere is the matrix obtained by deleting rows and columns with indexes from a nonempty subset (see [4], pg. 10).*

*This lemma is proved as proposition in Alesker [4]; we will just be using a simple corollary.*

*Corollary 10. If in Lemma 9 above, then where and is still a hyperhermitian matrix, *

*2.4. Linear Change of Variables*

*2.4. Linear Change of Variables*

*In this section we prove a split-quaternionic change of variables formula for linear transformations. Since the split quaternions can be represented by real matrices, this endeavour is done easier via a real representation of the matrix algebra. In this light we define to be the following embedding (also a homomorphism like , see Proposition 1) for a split-quaternionic vector and matrix , where : *

*Using this real embedding the corresponding matrices , and are and satisfy the split-quaternionic relations (1). Moreover, if we define for , , , then one can calculate that commutes with ; that is *

*For a function , , and the real representation denoted by , the partial derivative of with respect to can be written as the differential operatorand the derivative in the direction as For a linear transformation ; ; and a function we define the pullback via of as and their corresponding real representation denoted as and Let and , so that , and , that is, *

*Proposition 11. With the same setup as above, we have that is, *

*Proof. *Denote by the th column of the functional operator , for , and then by the definitions of and it follows directly that with the understanding that for the th column. Hence we have where is the th column of the functional operator . Since , then by definition we have so that by the chain rule for functions of several variables directly in the first column, that is, . Since and is a linear operator, we use the commutation relations (53) to calculate And hence and (57) follows.

*Corollary 12 (change of variables under split-quaternionic linear transformations). If is a real-valued function, then *

*Proof. *If is real-valued, then Then by (58) and taking the conjugate of both sides gives us Then applying (58) to the LHS of the line above where , and hence (64) follows and the corollary is proved.

*3. Statement of the Theorem*

*3. Statement of the Theorem*

*3.1. The Main Result of This Paper*

*3.1. The Main Result of This Paper*

*Theorem 13. Let be a domain and . Then where is a multi-index and is the holomorphic volume form in .*

*3.2. Proof of Theorem 13 for the Case *

*3.2. Proof of Theorem 13 for the Case*

*First we prove Theorem 13 for the case (base case) and then proceed by induction.*

*Proof. *Let and consider the embedding from Section 2.1: The correspoding operators are and we use Lemma 3 to complete the proof:from which it follows that wedging to itself yields where again and is the holomorphic volume form in .

On the other hand (40) tells us how to compute entries in the split-quaternionic Hessian, which works out beautifully: and when combined with Lemma 3, that givesThe third row of the above then also implies that so that is actually since [see (41)]. This concludes the proof of Theorem 13 for the case .

*3.3. Proof of Induction*

*3.3. Proof of Induction*

*We now assume that Theorem 13 is true for some ; we want to prove by induction that it holds for . We consider a function of variables that has continuous 2nd-order mixed partial derivatives. First we prove a result in functional analysis regarding the density of delta functions (on hyperplanes) in the space of (tempered) distributions, implying that the span of said delta functions contains the set of smooth functions, which are dense in the functions.*

*Lemma 14. Linear combinations of delta functions is dense in the space of generalized functions , where is the Schwartz space of rapidly decreasing functions on .*

*Proof. *Consider the Fréchet space with the Fréchet topology and its dual space . We wish to show that the Schwartz space is dense in , the dual of the distribution space. It is well known that the evaluation map is an injection from a topological vector space into its double dual ; hence for we have a copy of .

But since is a nuclear Fréchet space which is also barreled (see [16], pg. 107, 147) then is (semi)reflexive; that is, as vector spaces and hence the Schwartz space is trivially dense in the dual of . Consider the subspace and its closure inside , and suppose . By the Hahn-Banach theorem, there is a linear functional such that and . Thus there exists a nonzero Schwartz function such that the functional But then for any (all) , since the Radon transform (defined on hyperplanes) (for nonzero ) is injective (proved in [11, 17]), which is a contradiction since was assumed to be nonzero.

Hence ; that is, the span of delta functions is dense in .

*Proof of Theorem 13 for . *By Lemma 14 and the properties of the mixed Baston product and mixed discriminant, it suffices to provefor in the case , where is a split-quaternionic hyperplane, which implies Theorem 13. We proceed by finding a unitary linear transformation such that . We can use the pullback functions , and by Corollary 12 we have that where and . Then since is unitary; that is, . Hence it follows by the definition of the mixed discriminant and using the simpler notation where again . From these considerations, it then suffices to prove (80) in the case where and . We can compute the split-quaternionic Hessian of , where the derivatives are now weak derivatives of distributions. For any test function