Fractal Dimension versus Process Complexity

<div>Alternating values for <svg height="12.5794pt" id="M411" style="vertical-align:-3.29107pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -9.28833 31.5794 12.5794" width="31.5794pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M822 650H589L583 622C660 617 677 607 674 561C672 534 664 481 647 390L600 137H596L273 650H126L120 622C176 620 194 615 207 594C221 571 225 557 214 504L161 257C141 166 129 112 121 85C108 42 83 30 29 28L23 0H260L266 28C193 33 173 42 176 89C178 122 186 172 202 255L256 527H259L583 -8H612L690 390C708 481 720 535 728 558C744 603 756 619 816 622L822 650Z" id="g113-79"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="839" vert-adv-y="839"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,10.062,3.132)"><path d="M487 458L455 460C436 434 425 433 397 433C331 433 279 437 225 437C103 437 52 374 24 338L49 312C100 363 152 379 229 374C210 308 184 213 163 117C158 94 156 74 156 58C156 6 180 -12 211 -12C261 -12 313 27 348 68L332 99C307 76 285 64 267 64C252 64 236 86 250 148L301 373C320 373 344 369 364 369C399 369 435 370 450 372C458 386 470 411 487 458Z" id="g50-241"></path><glyph.data ascent="3443" descent="-2856" horiz-adv-x="499" vert-adv-y="499"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,15.118,0)"><path d="M300 -147C201 -63 143 98 143 270S200 602 300 686L282 710C136 610 70 450 70 271V270C70 89 136 -72 282 -170L300 -147Z" id="g113-41"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="346" vert-adv-y="346"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,19.616,0)"><path d="M536 404C536 423 520 448 491 448C445 448 398 404 308 283L286 338C255 416 242 448 217 448C182 448 138 402 92 341L111 321C149 368 169 378 178 378C188 378 198 363 214 320L254 212C185 117 138 65 107 65C98 65 85 69 82 75C79 82 73 86 65 86C44 86 23 60 23 39C23 7 44 -12 71 -12C119 -12 168 33 265 177L306 61C321 17 347 -12 373 -12C413 -12 465 33 507 96L491 119C459 84 432 60 413 60C395 60 378 92 358 148L321 250C341 279 369 310 389 332C417 363 439 382 456 382C466 382 475 376 481 368C486 361 492 358 496 358C513 358 536 381 536 404Z" id="g113-121"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="559" vert-adv-y="559"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,26.883,0)"><path d="M275 270C275 450 212 609 64 710L45 686C145 604 203 442 203 270S147 -63 45 -147L64 -170C213 -68 275 89 275 270Z" id="g113-42"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="346" vert-adv-y="346"></glyph.data></g></svg> with periodicity 6. The depicted values are for TM number 1 159 345. The diagram in (a) shows the data set and in (b) we included a fit from below.</div>

Advances in Mathematical Physics

Fractal Dimension versus Process Complexity

Figure 4