Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Mathematical Physics
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 9679460, 15 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9679460
Review Article

On the Definition of Energy for a Continuum, Its Conservation Laws, and the Energy-Momentum Tensor

Laboratory “Soils, Solids, Structures, Risks”, 3SR, Grenoble Alpes University and CNRS, Domaine Universitaire, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble Cedex 9, France

Received 11 May 2016; Accepted 15 June 2016

Academic Editor: Manuel De León

Copyright © 2016 Mayeul Arminjon. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. I. Müller and W. H. Müller, Fundamentals of Thermodynamics and Applications, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2009. View at MathSciNet
  2. E. M. Lifshitz and L. D. Landau, The Classical Theory of Fields, Pergamon, Oxford, UK, 3rd edition, 1971.
  3. V. Fock, The Theory of Space, Time and Gravitation, Pergamon, Oxford, UK, 1st edition, 1959. View at MathSciNet
  4. F. J. Belinfante, “On the spin angular momentum of mesons,” Physica, vol. 6, pp. 887–898, 1939. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  5. A. Trautman, “On the conservation theorems and equations of motion in covariant field theories,” Bulletin de l'Académie Polonaise des Sciences, Cl. 3, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 675–678, 1956. View at Google Scholar
  6. R. M. Wald, General Relativity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill, USA, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. M. J. Gotay and J. E. Marsden, “Stress-energy-momentum tensors and the Belinfante-Rosenfeld formula,” in Mathematical Aspects of Classical Field Theory, vol. 132 of Contemporary Mathematics, pp. 367–392, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  8. M. Forger and H. Römer, “Currents and the energy-momentum tensor in classical field theory: a fresh look at an old problem,” Annals of Physics, vol. 309, no. 2, pp. 306–389, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  9. M. Leclerc, “Canonical and gravitational stress-energy tensors,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 959–989, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  10. M. Arminjon, “Energy and equations of motion in a tentative theory of gravity with a privileged reference frame,” Archives of Mechanics, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 25–52, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. S. Chandrasekhar, “Conservation laws in general relativity and in the post-Newtonian approximations,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 158, pp. 45–54, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  12. M. Arminjon and F. Reifler, “General reference frames and their associated space manifolds,” International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 155–165, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  13. M. Arminjon, “Some remarks on quantum mechanics in a curved spacetime, especially for a Dirac particle,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 2218–2235, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  14. P. J. Olver, “Lectures on Lie groups and differential equations,” in Symmetries of Variational Problems, chapter 5, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  15. M. Arminjon, “A simpler solution of the non-uniqueness problem of the covariant Dirac theory,” International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, vol. 10, no. 7, Article ID 1350027, 24 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. B. A. Dubrovin, A. T. Fomenko, and S. P. Novikov, Modern Geometry—Methods and Applications, Part I, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1992.
  17. H. Stephani, General Relativity-An Introduction to the Theory of the Gravitational Field, English Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1982. View at MathSciNet
  18. N. Rosen, “Flat-space metric in general relativity theory,” Annals of Physics, vol. 22, pp. 1–11, 1963. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  19. A. A. Logunov and M. A. Mestvirishvili, The Relativistic Theory of Gravitation, Mir Publishers, Moscow, Russia, 1989. View at MathSciNet
  20. W. Petry, “Gravitation in flat space-time and general relativity,” Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, vol. 2, pp. 50–54, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. M. Arminjon, “Space isotropy and weak equivalence principle in a scalar theory of gravity,” Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 177–189, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. T. Padmanabhan, “Momentum density of spacetime and the gravitational dynamics,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 48, article 4, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  23. C. Cattaneo, “General relativity: relative standard mass, momentum, energy and gravitational field in a general system of reference,” Nuovo Cimento, vol. 10, pp. 318–337, 1958. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  24. J.-P. Provost, “A brief history of the energy-momentum tensor; 1900–1912,” in Proceedings of the 13th Marcel Grossmann Meeting, R. T. Jantzen, K. Rosquist, and R. Ruffini, Eds., pp. 2054–2056, World Scientific, Stockholm, Sweden, July 2012.
  25. M. Berger and B. Gostiaux, Differential Geometry: Manifolds, Curves, and Surfaces, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1988. View at MathSciNet
  26. J. Dieudonné, Treatise on Analysis, Volume 1: Foundations of Modern Analysis, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1969.