Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Mathematical Physics
Volume 2017, Article ID 8730859, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8730859
Research Article

Optimal Stochastic Control Problem for General Linear Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience

1Big Data Research Center, Hunan University of Commerce, Changsha 410205, China
2Key Laboratory of High Performance Computing and Stochastic Information Processing (HPCSIP) (Ministry of Education of China), College of Mathematics and Computer Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
3School of Business Administration, Hunan University, Changsha 410081, China
4School of Finance, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510006, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Chao Deng; moc.361@nanuhoahcgned

Received 14 May 2017; Revised 25 October 2017; Accepted 22 November 2017; Published 17 December 2017

Academic Editor: Xavier Leoncini

Copyright © 2017 Yan Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Iolov, S. Ditlevsen, and A. Longtin, “Stochastic optimal control of single neuron spike trains,” Journal of Neural Engineering, vol. 11, no. 4, Article ID 046004, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. A. Roberts, K. J. Friston, and M. Breakspear, “Clinical applications of stochastic dynamic models of the brain, part II: a review,” Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 225–234, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Feng, X. Chen, H. C. Tuckwell, and E. Vasilaki, “Some optimal stochastic control problems in neuroscience—a review,” Modern Physics Letters B, vol. 18, no. 21-22, pp. 1067–1085, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C.-W. Li, C.-C. Lo, and B.-S. Chen, “Robust sensorimotor control of human arm model under state-dependent noises, control-dependent noises and additive noises,” Neurocomputing, vol. 167, pp. 61–75, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. K. Singh, S. Berman, and I. Nisky, “Stochastic optimal control for modeling reaching movements in the presence of obstacles: theory and simulation,” https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.01547.
  6. F. M. M. O. Campos and J. M. F. Calado, “Approaches to human arm movement control—a review,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 69–77, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. B. Berret, E. Chiovetto, F. Nori, and T. Pozzo, “Evidence for composite cost functions in arm movement planning: An inverse optimal control approach,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 7, no. 10, Article ID e1002183, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Mainprice, R. Hayne, and D. Berenson, “Goal set inverse optimal control and iterative replanning for predicting human reaching motions in shared workspaces,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 897–908, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. X. Zhang and J. Feng, “Computational modeling of neuronal networks,” in Encyclopedia of Biophysics, pp. 344–353, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  10. J. Liu, “Portfolio selection in stochastic environments,” Review of Financial Studies, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–39, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. M. Fitts, “The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 381–391, 1954. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus