#### Abstract

The previously obtained integral field representation in the form of double weighted Fourier transform (DWFT) describes effects of inhomogeneities with different scales. The first DWFT approximation describing the first-order effects does not account for incident wave distortions. However, in inhomogeneous media the multiscale second-order effects can also take place when large-scale inhomogeneities distort the field structure of the wave incident on small-scale inhomogeneities. The paper presents the results of the use of DWFT to derive formulas for wave statistical moments with respect to the first- and second-order effects. It is shown that, for narrow-band signals, the second-order effects do not have a significant influence on the frequency correlation. We can neglect the contribution of the second-order effects to the spatial intensity correlation when thickness of the inhomogeneous layer is small, but these effects become noticeable as the layer thickness increases. Accounting for the second-order effects enabled us to get a spatial intensity correlation function, which at large distances goes to the results obtained earlier by the path integral method. This proves that the incident wave distortion effects act on the intensity fluctuations of a wave propagating in a multiscale randomly inhomogeneous medium.

#### 1. Introduction

The presence of random inhomogeneities in a radio signal path can have a profound effect on functioning of radiotechnical systems. Fluctuations (scintillations) in a signal in the randomly inhomogeneous ionosphere, in particular, reduce resolving power of the global Earth satellite monitoring and the rate of data transfer in communication systems. On the other hand, observations of scintillation of radio signals from such extraterrestrial sources as stars and artificial Earth satellites contribute significantly to our knowledge of the inhomogeneous structure of the ionosphere and troposphere.

The methods for describing scintillation developed in the 60–80s of the last century used the geometrical optics (GO) and Born and Rytov approximations [1–9], as well as the phase-screen method [2, 3, 7, 10–12]. The GO approximation model can only be adopted to describe the effects of inhomogeneities with transverse scales exceeding the Fresnel radius. The effects of inhomogeneities with scales smaller than the Fresnel radius (Fresnel diffraction effects) cannot be correctly described within the GO model.

It is possible to take account of the Fresnel diffraction effects using the perturbations theory. The Born approximation (single scattering theory) uses the perturbation theory to describe the field itself, and in the Rytov approximation, the perturbation theory is employed to derive the complex phase associated with the field logarithm. However, the Rytov and Born approximations take the diffraction Fresnel effects into account only for weak fluctuations; these approximations are not applicable in multipath emergence and in strong focusing on random caustics. Most of the approaches to simulation of the latter effects are based on integral field representations. When the inhomogeneities are in a restricted area away from the source and the observer and the intensity of inhomogeneities is rather weak, it is possible to use GO [10, 11] or Rytov [12] approximations near the inhomogeneous area. To get the field integral representation in this situation, accounting for the diffraction effects and caustics arising away from inhomogeneities, often the Kirchhoff method [2, 5–7, 13] is applied, which goes to the phase-screen method when the inhomogeneous layer thickness is reduced [2, 3, 7].

This approach is extended by the path integral method [14, 15] and the multiple phase-screen method [11, 16, 17]. However, the path integral method represents a solution in the form of a two-dimensional integral continuum. And the second method involves numerical integration, finite but still large enough (up to 20 for optical radiation in turbulent atmosphere [18]) number of phase screens, which makes it difficult to use these methods for diagnostic purposes.

In the Markov approximation, equations for statistical moments [2] are obtained from the wave equation in the small-angle approximation. Unfortunately, using analytics, we can find solutions only to equations for the mean field and for the spatial correlation function [2]. Equations for other moments can be solved with either numerical [19] or asymptotic methods [20].

Another approach involves the Maslov and interference integral methods [21, 22] and relies on the expanding of the solution of the wave equation in plane waves. This approach requires knowledge of a ray field structure. In a number of problems such as wave propagation in random media and when diagnosing inhomogeneous media, this structure is not always known.

Combinations of the Maslov and interference integral methods were used in solving equations for the two-point random function (averaging of which gives the coherence function) [23] and Markov equations for statistical moments [24]. The same approach enabled solving the equation for the product of the desired field and the known solution (termed as “joker wave” in [25]) in extended 3D space for 2D problem [26] and in the extended 5D space for 3D problem [26–29]. The resulting integral representation in the form of a double weighted Fourier transform (DWFT) describes the wave field, considering for simultaneous effects of inhomogeneities of different scales [26–29].

We will use here the DWFT method [26–30], which in the small-angle approximation describes both strong fluctuations associated with the random caustics that form in a large-scale inhomogeneous medium, and the Fresnel type diffraction effects typical for wave propagation in a medium with small-scale inhomogeneities. Unlike the Maslov and interference integral methods, where the Fourier transform is performed in the receiver or transmitter coordinates, respectively, the DWFT method uses the Fourier transform with respect to both receiver and transmitter coordinates. As a result, in the DWFT integral representation, the wave field is expanded in partial waves that do not have amplitude fluctuations in the first approximation. This not only makes it easier to find the statistical moments of the field, but also shows a greater validity range of the DWFT method in statistical problems compared to the Maslov and interference integral methods.

Let us remark that, in the DWFT method, as in other GO generalizations to generate a wave solution, we use “spanning a wave-field cloth on a ray framework” [21]. In the first DWFT approximation [26–30], the contribution of low-amplitude inhomogeneities to the partial wave phase takes the integral from permittivity perturbation along the unperturbed (direct) ray. For such an effect that inhomogeneities of different scales impose on the wave field we shall call the first-order effect. In addition, in a multiscale medium, large-scale inhomogeneities distort the field structure of a wave incident on a small-scale inhomogeneity. At the same time, keeping in mind the several order difference of scales and amplitudes of various inhomogeneities, the distortion of an incident wave on the scales of small-scale inhomogeneities can be significant. The effects which require trajectory variations to be taken into account when it passes through an inhomogeneity will be called the second-order effects.

Here we use the DWFT method when analyzing statistical characteristics of a wave propagating in a multiscale randomly inhomogeneous medium, with and without regard to the second-order effects. The next, second, section describes the DWFT method. The third section employs the perturbation theory in DWFT and shows transition of the second DWFT approximation to the second GO approximation. The fourth section focuses on the use of the first DWFT approximation to derive expressions for the mean field and the two-frequency mutual coherence function. In the fifth section, the second DWFT approximation considers the second-order effects. Also, the expression is derived for the intensity correlation function, and we compare it asymptotically over long distances, with regard to the second-order effects, with the known results of the path integral method. The conclusion summarizes the main results.

#### 2. Method of Double Weighted Fourier Transform (DWFT)

Let us consider the field of a harmonic (with time dependence of the form ) point source located at the point . In a scalar approximation, this field in an inhomogeneous medium is a solution of equationwhere permittivity includes the background (deterministic) and random components, respectively; is the amplitude of the incident spherical wave; is the wave number; and are the light speed and the wavelength in free space, respectively. Let ; that is, we will consider the effects of random inhomogeneities in the absence of a background inhomogeneity. Quite often, the size of inhomogeneities exceeds the wavelength such that . In this case, a wave is scattered along its propagation path, for example, along the axis , and usually [2–4] by substitutingand from elliptical equation (1) we pass on to the parabolic equation for the “complex amplitude” :with the initial conditionIn the absence of inhomogeneity with and , the solution of problem (3)-(4) takes the form ofLet us introduce a five-variable function as the product of the unknown function and the known function .For function , sometimes called a “joker wave” [25], we will take , which satisfies the equationTaking into account (3)-(4) and (7), we can write an equation for :In (8), we introduce new variables:Let us turn from the function to its Fourier image with respect to variables and :From (8), we get the equation for :It is easy to find a solution to (12) in the absence of inhomogeneities, that is, if ,In the GO method and its generalizations, solution of the wave equation with large is presented as a Debye series in inverse powers of . Here, we will also find the solution of problem (12) in the form ofSubstituting (14) into (12) and equating coefficients of equal power in , we derive a system of recurrent equations for and . If we limit (14) to the first term, we getwhere the phase path (eikonal) and the amplitude satisfy equationsInitial conditions for eikonal (16) and transfer (17) equations can be obtained from (13):Solving equations in partial first-order derivatives (16)-(17) can be reduced to solving equations of characteristics [1], and thus from (2), (6), (10), we obtain the following expression:whereIn (20), integration is performed along the characteristics (rays) that satisfy ray equationswith initial conditionsOur solution (19) contains “excess” variables and . They can be expressed through coordinates and . This corresponds to the transition to a certain surface in the five-dimensional space . In particular, just like in [26], we can choose this connection from the condition that there are no transverse coordinates in the arguments of the function :In this case, having set and taking (5) into account, (19)–(21) can be written as follows:whereis a field in the absence of inhomogeneities.

#### 3. The Perturbation Theory in DWFT Solution

To use solution (24), ray equations (27) with the initial conditions (22) should be solved. Since the exact solution of ray equations for an arbitrary random field is unknown, we have to use approximate methods.

Supposing the permittivity fluctuations typical of dispersion are small, that is, consideringlet us use the perturbation theory here.

Assumewhere are solutions of ray equations (27) and (22) in the absence of inhomogeneities (), and the solutions have the formFor the trajectory variation , there are equationswith zero initial conditionsUse iterations to find approximate solutions (33)-(34):Inserting (30), (32), and (35) in (24)–(27) and considering that , we obtainwhereIf trajectory variations are less than the minimum size of inhomogeneitiesin (38), we can expand the function in powers and getTaking (41) into account, expression (36) gives the second DWFT approximation, in the integrand of which the terms are discarded in phase and in the amplitude, respectively.

Compare this approximation to the second GO approximation. To do this, we calculate (36), using the stationary phase method, assuming for simplicity that :whereExactly the same expression was obtained in the GO approximation in [31]. The first and second terms on the right-hand side of (43) describe the phase path variations caused by a phase velocity change and by a trajectory variation, respectively. Typically, in statistical problems the first approximation is used, and the next approximation is calculated mostly to determine the validity range of the first approximation [4]. However, in some problems, estimation of the second approximation is of great importance. For example, in global satellite navigation systems, the first approximation describes a first-order error that is eliminated in dual-frequency measurements, and the error in these measurements is determined by the next approximation [31].

From derivation of second GO approximation (42), we can see that, for its applicability, the condition of stationary phase method applicability should be met. This condition goes to the condition of the excess of sizes of inhomogeneities over the Fresnel radiusIn addition, condition (40) that sizes of inhomogeneities exceed the trajectory variations should be fulfilled (see also [1]).

#### 4. Statistical Characteristics of the Wave Field in the First DWFT Approximation

In the first approximation, when condition (40) is met, the DWFT solution iswhereLet us consider a real normal quasi-homogeneous random field with a zero mean and correlation functionwhere .

With respect to the field quasi-homogeneity, the first two variables of the function change much faster than the others.

##### 4.1. Mean Field

After averaging (46), we getwhereHere we take into account the fact that the size of an inhomogeneous area exceeds the correlation radius greatly and use the delta-correlation (see [2], for example), which is related to the fact that in the small-angle approximation when integrating (51) we can neglect the dependence on .

Considering the absence of the dependence on , from (49), we obtainThis result for the mean field was derived earlier in the DWFT approximation for the 2D-inhomogeneous medium in [26]. It can also be obtained in the Markov and first phase (i.e., when amplitude fluctuations are neglected) GO approximations [2].

##### 4.2. Two-Frequency Mutual Coherence Function

The two-frequency mutual coherence function for the two spherical waves is derived as follows:By substituting (46) in (53) and averaging, we getwhereAfter averaging (56), we obtainSubstituting integration variables in (57) and taking integrals over and , we getHereand the notations are introduced (see [19], for example):A spatial coherence function can be obtained from two-frequency mutual coherence function (53), (59)-(60) by setting the frequency separation to zero:Expression (62), like formula (52) for the mean field, coincides with the results of the Markov approximation [2], and it can also be obtained from the phase GO approximation.

For small but finite , when analyzing the narrow-band signals propagation, expression (60) can be calculated asymptotically, and from (53) we obtainwhereThe condition of applicability of asymptotic expression (63) is whereFor narrow-band signals, when , condition (66) is much weaker than the condition of GO approximation (45).

#### 5. Second-Order Effects in an Inhomogeneous Medium

Here we account for the fact that, in inhomogeneous media, with distance from the source, the trajectory fluctuations grow; at a distance great enough, these fluctuations become larger than sizes of some inhomogeneities, and condition (40) that was used above is no more applicable, at least for small-scale inhomogeneities. So here, in (38) we leave the trajectory variations in the argument. On the other hand, using (36), we neglect phase addition . Thus, we use an expression similar to (47)but with another phase fluctuation:where and are described by expressions (32) and (35), respectively.

As we can see from (68), averaging of expression (67), required to calculate statistical characteristics, is complicated by the nonlinear dependence of (68) on . To solve this problem, we use a hybrid approach [5, 9]. We assume that the random permittivity field can be represented as the sum of two independent random fields:where and correspond to large-scale and small-scale inhomogeneities, respectively. With that, we account for the trajectory variations only when estimating the contribution of small-scale inhomogeneities. In this case,Furthermore, we consider the fact that, due to a rapid drop in the inhomogeneities spectrum, the contribution of small-scale inhomogeneities to trajectory variations in (35) can be neglected:After substituting (70)–(73) in (67), we get

##### 5.1. Mean Field

Since is a linear part of exponent argument in (74), being independent of , averaging (71) only over realizations of yieldswhere, with the delta-correlation of , just as in derivation of (50), we haveAfter averaging (75) over realizations , we getwhereFrom the comparison between (77) and (52), it is apparent that the consideration of the incident wave distortions does not affect the mean field.

##### 5.2. Two-Frequency Mutual Coherence Function

Substituting (74) in (55) givesBy averaging the resulting expressions over realizations , we getwhereWe take into account the fact that for small-scale inhomogeneitiesand rewrite (80):whereIn (84), is a function (56) used above to investigate the two-frequency mutual coherence function, without regard to second-order effects for .

When calculating (85), we have to take into account the relationship of the spectrum and the correlation functionBesides, considering the smoothness of large-scale inhomogeneities, we assumeAs a result, by substituting (86)-(87) in (85), we obtainWe average (88) over large-scale fluctuations and turn to variables and evaluate integrals over and . After summing up with , we getwhereIf we assumethat is, neglect the dependence of (90) on , from (89), we get previously obtained expression (57). This means that when condition (91) is met, the second-order effects, which are related to the front curvature of a wave incident on an inhomogeneity, are not significant in the two-frequency mutual coherence function.

Note that, with the bandwidth decreasing, grows, and for , that is, for a monochrome signal, conditions (91) are always met. It follows that the second-order effects do not affect the behavior of the spatial correlation function.

##### 5.3. Intensity Spatial Correlation

As the previous paragraph shows, the second-order effects are not significant in the behavior of the field spatial correlation function. Now let us consider the spatial correlation function for intensity.

As the intensity equals , the correlation function for intensity equalsFrom (62), it follows that . To determine the functionwe will use DWFT solution (74) with respect to the second-order effectswhereBy averaging (95) in small-scale inhomogeneities and taking their small value into account, we getwhere