Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Mathematical Physics
Volume 2018, Article ID 6237592, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6237592
Research Article

Evaluation of Heat Irreversibility in a Thin Film Flow of Couple Stress Fluid on a Moving Belt

1Department of Mathematical Sciences, Redeemer’s University, Ede, Nigeria
2Department of Education, Vaal University of Technology, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa

Correspondence should be addressed to Samuel O. Adesanya; gn.ude.nur@saynaseda

Received 1 August 2018; Revised 28 September 2018; Accepted 3 October 2018; Published 1 November 2018

Academic Editor: Antonio Scarfone

Copyright © 2018 Samuel O. Adesanya et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This article addresses the inherent heat irreversibility in the flow of a couple stress thin film along a moving vertical belt subjected to free and adiabatic surface. Mathematical analysis for the fluid-governing-equations is performed in detail. For maximum thermal performance and efficiency, the present analysis follows the second law of thermodynamics approach for the evaluation of entropy generation rate in the moving film. With this thermodynamic process, the interconnectivity between variables responsible for energy wastage is accounted for in the thermo-fluid equipment. Results of the analysis revealed the fluid properties that contribute more to energy loss and how the exergy of the system can be restored.

1. Introduction

The past few years have witnessed a growing interest in studies related to thin film flow along a moving belt. This has been so due to its wide range of applications in the field of environmental sciences, chemical engineering, and physical sciences. For example, in the design of film evaporator, paper, coating production, etc., by a way of a short literature review on a thin film on moving belt, Siddiqui et al. [1] focused on the film flow of Sisko fluid and Oldroyd 6-constant fluids on the vertically moving belt. Alam et al. [2, 3] described the non-Newtonian Johnson–Segalman film in the case of hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics flow conditions, respectively. In a study by Farooq et al. [4], the exact solution for the Jeffery film flow on a moving belt was obtained. Hameed and Ellahi [5] obtained a numerical approximation for the hydromagnetic flow of Oldroyd 6-constant film by using Chebyshev collocation method. By using the Optimal Homotopy analysis and Lie symmetry group classification both Ene et al. [6] and Hayat et al. [7] derived explicit solution for the Oldroyd 6-constant fluid film. The literature is inexhaustive when it comes to results on a thin film on a moving belt; these interesting results are not limited to [6, 813] and the references therein.

All the studies in [113] neglect the thermal effect; therefore, the energy transfer associated with heat flow in many mechanical and chemical engineering applications cannot be described. Motivated by Gul et al. [1416], in which thermal effect on the moving belt is confined to the first law of thermodynamics. Also, Mahmud and Fraser [17] have done second law analysis to conserve exergy of a thermo-fluid setup. They argued that the useful energy destroyed accounts for underperformance and decreased the thermodynamic efficiency of a system. Therefore, the present study addresses both the energy conservation and management from a thermodynamics viewpoint; in other words, both first and second law of thermodynamics that governs energy conservation and transmission are incorporated in the vertically moving thin film for the very first time. Our focus here is to implement the energy evaluation technique as a valuable tool for identifying variables connected with the destruction of available energy for work and a measure of the efficiency of thermal equipment so as to reduce waste especially during fluid coupling in a conveyor belt. It is interesting to note that, a thorough literature search revealed that little or nothing has been done on couple stress fluid thin film on a moving belt despite the fact that the class of fluid is mostly used as lubricants since it accommodates tiny microstructures of mechanical importance even in the lubrication of pulley bearing-system used for conveyor belts. The presence of these polymer additives in synthetic lubricants cannot be explained by the classical Newtonian model and this challenged was addresses by Stokes [18]. In the next section, the mathematical analysis is presented based on the steady, viscous, and incompressible unidirectional flow conditions. For the sake of brevity, the derivation of the couple stress model used here is described explicitly in ([1921]) and not included. In Section 3 of the work, the solutions of the dimensionless boundary-value problems are obtained and used to generate the Bejan and entropy generation profiles.

2. Mathematical Analysis

The analysis is focused on a wide belt moving steadily through a container that is filled with couple stress fluid in an upward direction. A thin fluid layer is picked up as the belt passes through the container and the effect of gravitational force on the thin is considered. The lamina film is assumed to be of uniform thickness . As shown in Figure 1, the Cartesian coordinate is chosen along the substrate such that the x-axis lies in the transverse direction of the film flow while the y-axis is chosen in an upward direction.

Figure 1: Flow geometry.

Taking the thermal effect into consideration, the balanced equations for the thin film with constant physical properties are as follows.

Momentum equation:The appropriate boundary conditions for the moving belt problem are as follows.If the flow is accompanied with thermal effect, then the balanced energy equation for the fluid temperature is given bywith thermal conditionsAs a result of the inherent irreversibility in many heat transfer processes, the momentum and energy exchange on the couple stress thin film on the moving belt will ultimately lead to a nonequilibrium situation; therefore there will be a continuous generation of entropy, , due to heat transfer and fluid friction within the moving film. The rate at which exergy is depleted which results in underperformance is given bywithUsing (6), (1)-(2) give the Boundary-Value Problem (BVP)and the dimensionless form (3)-(4) gives the following.Using the same analysis in (6), we have the dimensionless entropy generation rate () as follows. The first term on the right side of (9) is due to Heat Transfer Irreversibility (HTI) while the remaining terms are due to Fluid Friction Irreversibility (FFI) resulting from viscous dissipation. As a result, the Bejan number can be defined by the ratio of HTI with the total entropy generation, , on the thin film. In other wordsThe coefficients represent the dynamic viscosity, dimensional velocity, couple stress, and density, respectively, and viscous heating parameter, dimensionless entropy generation rate, thermal conductivity of the fluid, and referenced temperature. The exact solution of the BVP (7) givesand also (8) admitsThe exact solutions are used to determine the entropy generation rate (9) and heat irreversibility ratio in (10). The skin friction and the rate of heat transfer along the belt are defined as and the dimensionless form becomes

3. Results and Discussion

In the section, the responses of the exact solution to a variation of parameters for the velocity, temperature, and entropy generation are presented graphically as a function of the spatial variable. The two limiting cases of the couple stress parameter are shown in Figure 2; evidently, as the couple stress parameter approaches zero, the Newtonian class is fully recovered, while as it becomes infinite, the fluid behaves like plastic. Therefore in this work, the couple stress parameter is carefully chosen in between the limiting cases. In Figures 3(a)3(d), the drainage problem is presented. In Figure 3(a), the flow is observed to increase with increasing values of the couple stress parameter, since the increase in the couple stress parameter implies a decrease in the dynamic viscosity of the fluid and thus an increase in the molecular distance between the fluid particles. Figure 3(b) displayed an asymmetrical heat flow from the isothermal wall to the adiabatic surface; this shows that the temperature profile is well behaved. Moreover, the rate of heat transfer at the free end increases significantly due to the migration of heat from cold region to the cold ambient air. Figure 3(c) revealed the contribution of the couple stress parameter to the entropy generation profile in the moving thin film flow. The result here shows that entropy at the cold isothermal vertical wall is decreasing with increasing values of the couple stress parameter while the reverse trend is observed at the free surface. Figure 3(d) represents the nonequilibrium in the irreversible process; at small values of the couple stress parameter, FFI is seen to contribute more to the heat irreversibility; this dominance declines across the vertical length as seen in the plot. Interestingly as the couple stress parameter increases, the dynamic viscosity of the fluid declines and the impact of the HTI is seen. Result in Figure 4(a) depicts the lifting effect when the fluid moves against gravitational force. Naturally, the gravitational pull decreases the flow velocity as the dynamic viscosity of the fluid decreases. Figure 4(b) confirmed that, as the viscous heating increases, the fluid temperature is expected to increase as shown in the plot. This contributes to the total heat energy, and entropy is expected to increase the kinetic energy of the fluid particles as presented in Figure 4(c) and the HTI dominates over FFI in the moving film as shown in Figure 4(d). Result in Figure 5(a) represents a constant variation of couple stress parameter with skin friction while the rate of heat transfer along the moving belt increases with increasing value of the couple stress parameter as shown in Figure 5(b).

Figure 2: Drainage velocity against the limiting cases of the couple stress parameter.
Figure 3: (a) drainage velocity against couple stress parameter, (b) temperature against couple stress parameter, (c) entropy generation against couple stress parameter, (d) Bejan number against couple stress parameter.
Figure 4: (a) lifting flow velocity against couple stress parameter, (b) temperature against viscous heating parameter, (c) entropy generation against viscous heating parameter, (d) Bejan number against viscous heating parameter.
Figure 5: (a) Skin friction for lifting flow against couple stress parameter, (b) heat transfer rate for lifting flow against couple stress parameter.

4. Concluding Remarks

The inclusion of couple stresses into the vertically moving thin film is the major contribution of this study. The exact solutions of the velocity and temperature fields are obtained and used to derive the entropy generation rate and heat irreversibility ratio. The result of the computation shows the following:(i)Drainage and lifting problems are opposing phenomena.(ii)Couple stress parameter contributes to entropy generation only at the adiabatic surface(iii)Entropy generation decreases with couple stress parameter at the isothermal cold surface(iv)Viscous heating of the fluid enhances the entropy generation rate

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. A. M. Siddiqui, M. Ahmed, and Q. K. Ghori, “Thin film flow of non-Newtonian fluids on a moving belt,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 1006–1016, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  2. M. K. Alam, M. T. Rahim, T. Haroon, S. Islam, and A. M. Siddiqui, “Solution of steady thin film flow of Johnson-Segalman fluid on a vertical moving belt for lifting and drainage problems using Adomian decomposition method,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 218, no. 21, pp. 10413–10428, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  3. M. K. Alam, A. M. Siddiqui, M. T. Rahim, and S. Islam, “Thin-film flow of magnetohydrodynamic ({MHD}) Johnson-Segalman fluid on vertical surfaces using the Adomian decomposition method,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 219, no. 8, pp. 3956–3974, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  4. A. Farooq, B. Batiha, and A. M. Siddiqui, “Lifting of a Jeffrey fluid on a vertical belt under the simultaneous effects of magnetic field and wall slip conditions,” International Journal of Advanced Mathematical Sciences, vol. 1, no. 2, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. M. Hameed and R. Ellahi, “Thin film flow of non-Newtonian {MHD} fluid on a vertically moving belt,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 1409–1419, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  6. R.-D. Ene, V. Marinca, and V. B. Marinca, “Thin film flow of an Oldroyd 6-constant fluid over a moving belt: An analytic approximate solution,” Open Physics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 44–64, 2016. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. Hayat, R. Ellahi, and F. M. Mahomed, “Exact solution of a thin film flow of an Oldroyd 6-constant fluid over a moving belt,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 133–139, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  8. A. M. Siddiqui, A. A. Farooq, M. A. Rana, and B. S. Babcock, “Variational iteration and Adomian decomposition methods for the nonlinear thin film flow of a Jeffrey-six constant fluid on a vertically moving belt,” International Journal of Applied Nonlinear Science, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 275–288, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  9. M. Moosavi, M. Momeni, T. Tavangar, R. Mohammadyari, and M. Rahimi-Esbo, “Variational iteration method for flow of non-Newtonian fluid on a moving belt and in a collector,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 1775–1783, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Sajid, T. Hayat, and S. Asghar, “Comparison between the {HAM} and {HPM} solutions of thin film flows of non-Newtonian fluids on a moving belt,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 50, no. 1-2, pp. 27–35, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. Majeed Ahmed AL-Jawary, Ghassan Hasan Radhi, and Jure Ravnik, “Daftardar-Jafari method for solving nonlinear thin film flow problem,” Arab Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 20–27, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. A. M. Siddiqui, A. A. Farooq, T. Haroon, and M. A. Rana, “A study of thin film flow of an Oldroyd 8-constant fluid on a moving belt using variational iteration approach,” Canadian Journal of Physics, vol. 92, no. 10, pp. 1196–1202, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Abelman and S. N. N. Nguetchue, “Application of the homotopy analysis method (HAM) to thin film flow of a second-grade fluid on a vertically moving belt,” Chemical Engineering Communications, vol. 199, no. 10, pp. 1298–1319, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Taza Gul, Rehan Ali Shah, Saeed Islam, and Muhammad Arif, “MHD Thin Film Flows of a Third Grade Fluid on a Vertical Belt with Slip Boundary Conditions,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2013, Article ID 707286, 14 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  15. T. Gul, F. Ghani, S. Islam et al., “Unsteady thin film flow of a fourth grade fluid over a vertical moving and oscillating belt,” Propulsion and Power Research, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 223–235, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. Gul, S. Islam, R. A. Shah et al., “Heat Transfer Analysis of MHD Thin Film Flow of an Unsteady Second Grade Fluid Past a Vertical Oscillating Belt,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 11, p. e103843, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. S. Mahmud and R. Andrew Fraser, “Flow, thermal, and entropy generation characteristics inside a porous channel with viscous dissipation,” International Journal of Thermal Sciences, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 21–32, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. V. K. Stokes, “Couple stresses in fluids,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1709–1715, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. N. A. Khan, H. Khan, and S. Anwar Ali, “Exact solutions for {MHD} flow of couple stress fluid with heat transfer,” Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 125–129, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  20. G. Janardhana Reddy, M. Kumar, B. Kethireddy, and A. J. Chamkha, “Colloidal study of unsteady magnetohydrodynamic couple stress fluid flow over an isothermal vertical flat plate with entropy heat generation,” Journal of Molecular Liquids, vol. 252, pp. 169–179, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. N. T. M. Eldabe, A. A. Hassan, and M. A. A. Mohamed, “Effect of couple stresses on the MHD of a Non-Newtonian unsteady flow between two parallel porous plates,” Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung - Section A Journal of Physical Sciences, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 204–210, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus