Advances in Mathematical Physics

Advances in Mathematical Physics / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 5376013 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5376013

Zhi-Yuan Chen, Bin Ge, Wen-Shuo Yuan, Xiao-Feng Cao, "Existence of Solution for Double-Phase Problem with Singular Weights", Advances in Mathematical Physics, vol. 2020, Article ID 5376013, 7 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5376013

Existence of Solution for Double-Phase Problem with Singular Weights

Academic Editor: Carlo Bianca
Received12 May 2020
Revised15 Jun 2020
Accepted25 Jun 2020
Published15 Jul 2020

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to establish the existence of solutions for singular double-phase problems depending on one parameter. This work improves and complements the existing ones in the literature. There seems to be no results on the existence of solutions for singular double-phase problems.

1. Introduction and Main Results

The study of various mathematical problems involving the double-phase operator has become very attractive in recent decades. The existence and multiplicity of solutions of double-phase Dirichlet problems has been studied by several authors (see, e.g., [18]); in particular, for the eigenvalues of the double-phase operator, see [7]. For other double-phase problems with variable exponents, there are the works of Zhang and Radulescu [9], Shi et al. [10], and Cencelj et al. [11].

But up to now, to the best of our knowledge, no paper discussing the existence of solutions for singular double-phase problems via critical point theory can be found in the existing literature. In order to fill in this gap, we study double-phase problems from a more extensive viewpoint. More precisely, we are going to prove that problem has at least one solution. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first works which combines a singular term and indefinite term in one problem.

This paper is concerned with the existence of solutions to the following singular double-phase problem: where is a smooth bounded domain in , , , , is Lipschitz continuous, and is a given measurable function. The precise conditions on the data will be presented later.

Problems of the above type arise for instance in nonlinear elasticity. The main reasons are to describe the behavior of Lavrentiev’s phenomenon; we refer to [1214]. In fact, Zhikov intended to provide models for strongly anisotropic materials in the context of homogenization. In particular, he considered the following functional: where the modulating coefficient dictates the geometry of the composite made of two differential materials, with hardening exponents and , respectively. Recently, there is a wide literature on the regularity theory for minimizers of variational problems and solutions of differential equations with the double-phase operator; far from being complete, we refer the readers to [1521], respectively, and references therein.

In the entire paper, we suppose the following assumptions:

: is Lipschitz continuous and are chosen such that .

: such that in .

: is a continuous function such that for a.a. , , and (i)there exists positive measurable subsets and such that on , and where ;(ii)there exists such that on , and where ;(iii)there exists such that where .

Example 1. The following function satisfies hypotheses : with .

We are now in the position to state our main results. Firstly, problem has a solution when .

Theorem 1. Assume that , , and hold. Then for all , problem has at least one nontrivial weak solution with negative energy.

Moreover, we also show that problem has a solution when . In order to do this task, the following conditions are needed:

: is a Carathéodory function such that for a.a. , , and (i)there exists and such that where ;(ii)there exists a positive measurable subset such that

Example 2. The following functions satisfy hypotheses :

Theorem 2. Assume that , , and hold. Then for all , problem has at least one nontrivial weak solution with negative energy.

The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present some necessary preliminary knowledge on space . In Section 3, the proof of the main results is given.

2. Preliminaries

In order to discuss problem , we need some facts on space which are called Musielak-Orlicz-Sobolev spaces. For this reason, we will recall some properties involving the Musielak-Orlicz spaces, which can be found in [7, 2224] and references therein.

Denote by the set of all generalized -function. For and , we define It is clear that is a locally integrable function and which is called condition .

The Musielak-Orlicz space is defined by endowed with the Luxemburg norm The Musielak-Orlicz-Sobolev space is defined by and it is equipped with the norm We denote by the completion of in . With these norms, the spaces , , and are separable reflexive Banach spaces (see [7] for the details).

Proposition 3. ([1], Proposition 2.1).
Set For , we have (i)For (ii)(iii)If , then (iv)If , then

Proposition 4. ([7], Proposition 2.15, Proposition 2.18). (1)If , then the embedding from to is continuous. In particular, if , then the embedding is compact(2)Assume that holds. Then, Poincare’s inequality holds; that is, there exists a positive constant such that

By the above Proposition, there exists such that , where denotes the usual norm in for all . It follows from (2) of Proposition 4 that is an equivalent norm in . We will use the equivalent norm in the following discussion and write for simplicity.

In order to discuss the problem , we need to define a functional in :

We know that (see [25], P63, example) and the double-phase operator is the derivative operator of in the weak sense. Moreover, similar to the proof of Theorem 3.1 in [25], we know that the energy functional is sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous.

3. Variational Setting and Proof of the Main Results

For any and each , we define where . By using , we get and . Also, by Proposition 4 (1) we deduce that embeddings and are compact and continuous. Furthermore, there exists a constant such that

Now, we are ready to prove Theorem 1.

Proof of Theorem 1. To complete the proof of the main result, we need to consider the following three steps.

Step 1. We first show that for every , the functional is coercive on .
Let be fixed. Put . Clearly, from the continuity of , there exists such that Thus, we deduce that for any and , By virtue of assumption (iii), (15), (17), and Proposition 3, one has for any with Since and , so this implies as . The proof of Step 1 is now completed.

Step 2. We show that there exists with , for small enough.
Let such that , in a subset , and in . Thus, by condition (i), it follows that there exists such that Hence, for any , from and (i), we deduce that Since , we have for with The proof of Step 2 is now complete.

Step 3. We show that there exists such that for any .
Let be a minimizing sequence of . Then, using Step 1, we get that is a bounded sequence. So, there exists such that, up to a subsequence, Recall that is sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous, and so we deduce that Now, using Hölder’s inequality, we get that, as , Analogously, Hence, by (24) and (25), one yields Moreover, using assumptions (i) and (ii), for all , there exists such that The above information and Hölder’s inequality imply Again, by Proposition 4 (1), we deduce that Thus, using the fact that is bounded in and the dominated convergence theorem, we can infer that Hence, for every , by (26) and (30), one yields which implies that is weakly lower semicontinuous, and consequently, which implies that So, we complete Step 3.

Therefore, combining the above Steps 2 and 3, we deduce that is the required nontrivial solution of problem . Therefore, we complete the Proof of Theorem 1.

Now, we are ready to prove Theorem 2.

Proof of Theorem 2. To complete the proof of the main result, we need to consider the following three steps.

Step 1. We first show that for every , the functional is coercive on .
Firstly, due to condition (i), one has Again, using the condition (i), Hölder’s inequality, Proposition 3, and relation (34), we deduce that for any with , the following inequality holds true: Since , we infer that as . The proof of Step 1 is now complete.

Step 2. We show that there exists with , for small enough.
Let such that , in a subset , and in . Thus, by condition (ii), it follows that Hence, for any , from and (ii), we deduce that Since , we have for with The proof of Step 2 is now complete.

Step 3. We show that there exists such that for any .
Let be a minimizing sequence of . Then, using Step 1, we get that is a bounded sequence. So, there exists such that, up to a subsequence, Thus, as the proof of Step 3 in Theorem 1, we also obtain that and is weakly lower semicontinuous, and consequently, which implies that The proof of Step 3 is complete.

Therefore, combining the above Steps 2 and 3, we deduce that is the required nontrivial solution of problem . Thus, we complete the Proof of Theorem 2.

Data Availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

The authors declare that the study was realized in collaboration with equal responsibility. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2018YFC0310500), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 3072020CF2401), the Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia (No. 2017MS0116), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11201095), the Postdoctoral Research Startup Foundation of Heilongjiang (No. LBH-Q14044), and the Science Research Funds for Overseas Returned Chinese Scholars of Heilongjiang Province (No. LC201502).

References

  1. W. Liu and G. Dai, “Existence and multiplicity results for double phase problem,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 265, no. 9, pp. 4311–4334, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. W. Liu and G. Dai, “Three ground state solutions for double phase problem,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 59, no. 12, p. 121503, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. B. Ge and Z.-Y. Chen, “Existence of infinitely many solutions for double phase problem with sign-changing potential,” Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales. Serie A. Matemáticas, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 3185–3196, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. B. Ge, D. J. Lv, and J. F. Lu, “Multiple solutions for a class of double phase problem without the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz conditions,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 188, pp. 294–315, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. B. Ge, L. Y. Wang, and J. F. Lu, “On a class of double-phase problem without Ambrosetti–Rabinowitz-type conditions,” Applicable Analysis, vol. 2019, pp. 1–16, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. G. Hou, B. Ge, B. Zhang, and L. Wang, “Ground state sign-changing solutions for a class of double phase problem in bounded domains,” Boundary Value Problems, vol. 2020, no. 1, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. F. Colasuonno and M. Squassina, “Eigenvalues for double phase variational integrals,” Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata, vol. 195, no. 6, pp. 1917–1959, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. K. Perera and M. Squassina, “Existence results for double-phase problems via Morse theory,” Communications in Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 20, no. 2, article 1750023, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Q. Zhang and V. D. Radulescu, “Double phase anisotropic variational problems and combined effects of reaction and absorption terms,” Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, vol. 118, pp. 159–203, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. X. Shi, V. D. Rădulescu, D. D. Repovš, and Q. Zhang, “Multiple solutions of double phase variational problems with variable exponent,” Advances in Calculus of Variations, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. Cencelj, V. D. Rădulescu, and D. D. Repovš, “Double phase problems with variable growth,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 177, pp. 270–287, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. V. V. Zhikov, “Averaging of functionals of the calculus of variations and elasticity theory,” Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR. Seriya Matematicheskaya, vol. 50, pp. 675–710, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  13. V. V. Zhikov, “On Lavrentiev's phenomenon,” Russian Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 3, pp. 249–269, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  14. V. V. Zhikov, “On some variational problems,” Russian Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 5, pp. 105–116, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  15. M. Colombo and G. Mingione, “Regularity for double phase variational problems,” Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, vol. 215, no. 2, pp. 443–496, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. Colombo and G. Mingione, “Bounded minimisers of double phase variational integrals,” Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, vol. 218, no. 1, pp. 219–273, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. P. Baroni, M. Colombo, and G. Mingione, “Regularity for general functionals with double phase,” Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 1–48, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. C. De Filippis and G. Mingione, “Manifold constrained non-uniformly elliptic problems,” Journal of Geometric Analysis, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 1661–1723, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. C. De Filippis and G. Mingione, “A borderline case of Calderon-Zygmund estimates for non-uniformly elliptic problems,” Algebra i Analiz, vol. 31, pp. 82–115, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  20. P. Baroni, M. Colombo, and G. Mingione, “Harnack inequalities for double phase functionals,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 121, pp. 206–222, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. S. Byun and J. Oh, “Global gradient estimates for the borderline case of double phase problems with BMO coefficients in nonsmooth domains,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 263, no. 2, pp. 1643–1693, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. Musielak, Orlicz Spaces and Modular Spaces, Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1034, Springer, Berlin, 1983.
  23. A. Benkirane and M. Sidi El Vally, “Variational inequalities in Musielak-Orlicz-Sobolev spaces,” Bulletin of the Belgian Mathematical Society, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 787–811, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. X. Fan and C. X. Guan, “Uniform convexity of Musielak-Orlicz-Sobolev spaces and applications,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 163–175, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. K. C. Chang, Critical Point Theory and Applications, Shanghai Scientific and thchnology Press, Shanghai, 1996.

Copyright © 2020 Zhi-Yuan Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views184
Downloads349
Citations

Related articles