Nutritional and Nonnutritional Content of Underexploited Edible Seaweeds

Alghazeer, Rabia; El Fatah, Hesham; Azwai, Salah; Elghmasi, Sana; Sidati, Maammar; El Fituri, Ali; Althaluti, Ezdehar; Gammoudi, Ftaim; Yudiati, Ervia; Talouz, Nadia; Shamlan, Ghalia; AL-Farga, Ammar; Alansari, Wafa S.; Eskandrani, Areej A.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8422414

Aquaculture Nutrition

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 8422414 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8422414

Nutritional and Nonnutritional Content of Underexploited Edible Seaweeds

Rabia Alghazeer,¹Hesham El Fatah,²Salah Azwai,³Sana Elghmasi,⁴Maammar Sidati,⁵Ali El Fituri,⁵Ezdehar Althaluti,⁶Ftaim Gammoudi,³Ervia Yudiati,⁷Nadia Talouz,⁸Ghalia Shamlan,⁹and Ammar AL-Farga¹⁰ et al.

Academic Editor: Liqiao Chen

Received20 Jul 2022

Revised03 Sept 2022

Accepted20 Sept 2022

Published15 Oct 2022

Abstract

Macroalgae are a valuable source of highly bioactive primary and secondary metabolites that may have useful bioapplications. To investigate the nutritional and nonnutritional contents of underexploited edible seaweeds, proximate composition, including protein, fat, ash, vitamins A, C, and E, and niacin, as well as important phytochemicals, including polyphenols, tannins, flavonoids, alkaloids, sterols, saponins, and coumarins, were screened from algal species using spectrophotometric methods. Ash content ranged from 3.15–25.23% for green seaweeds, 5–29.78% for brown algae, and 7–31.15% for red algae. Crude protein content ranged between 5 and 9.8% in Chlorophyta, 5 and 7.4% in Rhodophyta, and between 4.6 and 6.2% in Phaeophyceae. Crude carbohydrate contents ranged from 20 to 42% for the collected seaweeds, where green algae had the highest content (22.5–42%), followed by brown algae (21–29.5%) and red algae (20–29%). Lipid content was found to be low in all the studied taxa at approximately 1–6%, except for Caulerpa prolifera (Chlorophyta), which had a noticeable higher lipid content at 12.41%. These results indicated that Phaeophyceae were enriched with a high phytochemical content, followed by that of Chlorophyta and Rhodophyta. The studied algal species contained a high amount of carbohydrate and protein, indicating that they could be considered as a healthy food source.

1. Introduction

Marine algae are a valuable source of highly bioactive primary and secondary metabolites that may have potential bioapplications in the development of new industrial, pharmaceutical, and food applications. Several active compounds from natural sources have shown reduced side effects and are of great interest because of their very low cytotoxicity [1].

The nutritional value of algae is very important as it has been used as a part of the diet in many countries, particularly those in Asia [2, 3]. The variety of chemical components in algae and their quantity depends on many factors such as species, maturity, and environmental conditions [4]. Algae are nutritionally important with a high level of vital nutrients, including polysaccharides, polyunsaturated fatty acids, proteins, and amino acids, as well as dietary fiber, vitamins, and minerals [5–7]. In addition, algae contain a wide variety of nutritional minerals, including iodine, potassium, calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, iron, and zinc [8]. One of the most valuable nutritional properties of algae is related to their high content of polysaccharide.

In addition to their nutritional value, seaweeds contain various nonnutritional compounds that recently have been the subject of considerable scientific and therapeutic interest [9]. The major bioactive compounds of marine algae include phenolics, phlorotannins, terpenes, terpenoids, alkaloids, tannins, and flavonoids [10, 11]. Algae also contain antioxidants, including polyphenols, carotenoids, and flavonoids [12, 13], while compounds, such as rutin, quercetin, and kaempferol, as well as flavonoids, have been identified in many algal species [14]. In addition, several marine algae have been assessed in in vitro and in vivo investigations for their anticancer activity [15, 16].

A Libyan study has reported the phytochemical analysis and antioxidant and antimicrobial effect of several seaweeds [17]; however, the availability of pharmaceutical data from seaweeds is still rare in comparison with that from plants. In this study, we undertook a qualitative and quantitative analysis of many of the nonnutritive and nutritive compounds in 20 different algal species collected from different areas of Libya.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collections

Twenty-four species were studied from three groups of algae. These included Chlorophyta (green algae): Caulerpa prolifera (collected in 2021 from Farwa Island, Zuwara, 90 km west of Tripoli) and Codium tomentosum, Ulva compressa (formerly Enteromorpha compressa), Ulva intestinalis (formerly Enteromorpha intestinalis), Ulva linza (Enteromorpha linza), Flabellia petiolata, Halimeda tuna, and Ulva lactuca; Phaeophyceae (brown algae): Cladostephus spongiosus, Cystoseira compressa, Ericaria amentacea (formerly Cystoseira stricta), Dictyota dichotoma, Halopteris scoparia, Padina pavonica, Petalonia fascia, and Sargassum hornschuchii; and Rhodophyta (red algae): Asparagopsis taxiformis, Ceramium virgatum (formerly Ceramium rubrum), Corallina officinalis, Pterocladiella capillacea (formerly Gelidium capillaceum), Gracilariopsis longissima (formerly Gracilaria verrucosa), Hypnea musciformis, Jania rubens, and Osmundea pinnatifida (formerly Laurencia pinnatifida) were collected on 2021 from the western coast of Libya (SA 01, N 32°53’45.47 E 13°21’3.16; SA 02, N 32°53’51.95 E 13°21’4.25; SA 03, N 32°53’54.19 E 13°20’54.10; SA 04, N 32°53’46.23 E 13°20’50.90) (Figure 1). The algal samples were taxonomically identified at the Marine Biology Research Center, Tajura, East of Tripoli, Libya.

The collected algae were cleaned with sea water to remove all the extraneous matter (epiphytes and necrotic parts) and brought to the laboratory in plastic bags. Thereafter, the algae were thoroughly washed with tap water, followed with distilled water before being dried at room temperature in the shade for 7–14 days. The dried samples were grounded thoroughly into fine powder using a kitchen blender. The powdered samples were then stored at 4°C.

2.2. Phytochemical Screening

The tested extracts were screened for sterols, alkaloids, phenolic compounds, tannins, saponins, flavonoids, glycosides, coumarins, and quinones. Phytochemical screening of the extracts was performed according to the standard method described by Harborne [18].

2.3. Proximate Analysis

Carbohydrate, protein, fat, ash, and moisture content were estimated according to the procedure of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists [19].

2.4. Determination of Vitamin Contents

Vitamin A, C, and E and niacin levels in the extracts were determined according to the methods described by Okwu and Ndu [20].

2.5. Quantitative Determination of Phytochemicals

Total phenolic content was estimated according to the Folin–Ciocalteu colorimetric method by Singleton et al. [21] using gallic acid as the standard. Total flavonoid content was estimated as described by Zhishen et al. [22] using rutin as the standard. Total tannin content was determined as detailed by Julkunen-Tiitto [23] using tannic acid as the standard. Total alkaloid content was determined as described by Shamsa et al. [24] and Sharief et al. [25] using atropine as the standard. Total coumarin content was estimated following the standard methods by Buragohain [26] and de Osório and Martins [27] using coumarin as the standard. Total steroid content was estimated according to Devanaboyina et al. [28] using cortisone as the standard.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Phytochemical Analysis

Important phytochemicals, such as polyphenols, tannins, flavonoids, alkaloids, sterols, saponins, and coumarins, were screened from algal species collected from the western coast of Libya. The phytochemical contents obtained from the extraction of the collected algae are shown in Table 1. This analysis showed that Phaeophyceae were highly enriched in phytochemicals, followed by Chlorophyta and Rhodophyta (Table 1).

3.2. Proximate Primary Composition

The proximate composition of the dried seaweeds collected from Tripoli coastline is shown in Figures 2 and 3, with the moisture and ash shown in Figure 2. In Chlorophyta, the moisture content of the collected macroalgae was between 40.50 and 92.61%. Ulva spp. had the lowest levels of moisture content of approximately 40–47% after drying, while C. tomentosum had the highest value at 92.6%. The brown seaweed C. spongiosus had the lowest moisture level (39.77%) after drying, while D. dichotoma had the highest (90.55%) in Phaeophyceae. In the Rhodophyta, J. rubens had the lowest moisture content (36.56%), while A. taxiformis and O. pinnatifida had the highest content (93.57 and 93.82%, respectively). The ash content ranged from 3.15 to 25.23% for green seaweeds, with C. tomentosum and C. prolifera having the lowest and the highest values, respectively. For brown algae, H. scoparia had the lowest ash content (approximately 5%), and C. spongiosus had the highest (29.78%). For red algae, P. capillacea had the highest ash content (31.15%), while C. officinalis and G. longissima had the lowest (7%). We found that moisture contents were relatively high for most of the collected seaweeds. Wan et al. [29] observed similar results and determined that the moisture content from green, red, and brown species ranged from 64.9 to 94%. Lower residual moisture contents have been reported by other researchers using other methods such as oven-drying at 60°C or freeze-drying [30, 31]. The higher moisture content recorded in this study could be attributed to the drying method used for the algae (air-drying). Higher drying temperatures may reduce drying time and cost, but several compounds (e.g., vitamins, proteins, unsaturated fatty acids, phenols, and carotenoids) would be vulnerable to degradation during the drying process [32, 33]. The optimal method for drying the seaweeds should be used to obtain a high proximate composition, as the removal of water from seaweeds is a necessary step in maintaining their quality as a food or in their proximate composition [34]. The high ash content obtained in the collected seaweeds may be due to the collection of the algal samples during low-temperature seasons [35]. Furthermore, a high level of ash content is associated with the amount of mineral elements [34, 35].

The crude carbohydrate contents ranged from 20 to 42% of the collected seaweeds where green algae had the highest content with 22.5–42%, followed by brown algae and red algae with approximately 21–29.5% and 20–29%, respectively (Figure 3). C. prolifera and U. linza showed the lowest and the highest values in Chlorophyta, respectively. There was little variation in the carbohydrate contents between the Phaeophyta and Rhodophyta, with C. compressa and P. capillacea having the lowest value of around 20% and P. pavonica and J. rubens having the highest contents at 29% in brown and red algae, respectively. High carbohydrate content was observed from macroalgal species in several studies [36, 37]. These relatively high carbohydrate contents in green algae suggest that they could be an important source of phycocolloids in food and industrial uses. These results were similarly observed in other studies [31, 38].

The crude protein content differed widely across groups of algae with low concentrations between 5 and 9.8% in Chlorophyta, 5–7.4% in Rhodophyta, and 4.6%–6.2% in Phaeophyceae (Figure 3). Wells et al. [39] recorded that among the marine macroalgae, the red and green algae often contain high levels of protein (as % dry weight) in contrast to lower levels in most brown algae. The protein content was moderately low compared with those in other macroalgae and agrees with the results from other studies [31, 34, 38]. In contrast, Wan et al. [29] recorded the highest protein content in seaweeds from the Rhodophyta division, including C. crispus, Gracilariopsis, and Pyropia species. Small variations in the crude protein content of studied macroalgae could be because of similar environmental conditions and geographical collection sites [40, 41]. In addition, during seasons of nutrient limitation (for instance, the summer season in coastal waters) the protein content of macroalgal decreases, and the relative proportions of amino acids change [39, 42].

Macroalgal species have a relatively low lipid content with values of <5% w/dry weight [43]. Lipids in marine macrophytes are usually phospholipids and glycolipids [44]. Low lipid contents were observed in all the studied taxa at approximately 1%–6%, except for C. prolifera, which had the highest lipid content at 12.405% (Figure 3). In agreement with the observed results, Pirian et al. [35] stated that the higher lipid contents were associated with the green algae Caulerpa sertularioides, C. racemosa, and Bryopsis corticulans found in the Persian Gulf. For the brown algae, D. dichotoma had the highest lipid content at 6.50% (Figure 3). These results were similar to those recorded by McDermid and Stuercke [45] who found that Dictyota acutiloba and Dictyota sandvicensis had a total lipid content ( and % dry weight). However, Miyashita et al. [46] stated that brown algal species found in temperate seas produced more lipids than those growing in tropical seas. Biancarosa et al. [47] also observed that brown species have a higher lipid content compared with those of green species.

3.3. Secondary Metabolite Composition

Algal seaweeds are rich in vitamins [39, 48]. Algae are a source of water-soluble vitamin B2 (riboflavin), B12 (cobalamin), and C (ascorbic acid) and lipid-soluble vitamin E (α-, β-, γ-, and δ-tocopherol, and α-, β-, γ-, and δ-tocotrienol) [29].

The results of this study showed that chlorophyte and Phaeophyceae are rich in vitamin A and C. The green algae F. petiolata had the highest vitamin A content in all studied taxa, whereas the red algae C. rubrum and H. musciformis had the lowest content (Figure 4). Higher values of vitamin A in green algae may be due to their rich β-carotene content (provitamin A) as compared with that in other algal groups [49].

Vitamin E from seaweeds can be especially important in aquaculture feeds as this can serve as an internal antioxidant [29]. We found that brown and green algae had a higher content of vitamin E as compared with that in red algae (Figure 4). F. petiolata and D. dichotoma had the highest content of vitamin E from chlorophyte and Phaeophyta, respectively, while the red seaweed Corallina officinalis had the lowest content of vitamin E. These results agreed with earlier reports that stated that brown algae contained higher levels of vitamin E content followed by green and red algae [50].

3.4. Phenolics

Polyphenols have been widely described in plants and algae, and phenolic compounds have gained a significant attention because of their biological effects: antioxidant, antiproliferative, antimicrobial, antiallergic, antidiabetic, and neuroprotective actions [51–53], while others are known for either or both their toxicological effects and antinutritional properties [29]. The phenolic compounds found in macroalgae vary from simple molecules, such as phenolic acids or flavonoids, to the more complex phlorotannin polymeric structures.

Algae phenolic concentration is dependent on several factors, such as species, seasonal variations, and environmental conditions [54]. Phenolic compounds are considered as one of the most effective antioxidants in marine algae [55, 56]. We found that phenols were relatively low in chlorophytes and rhodophytes, where U. lactuca and J. rubens had the lowest values ( and mg GAE/gdw) (Table 2), whereas C. prolifera and O. pinnatifida had the highest values ( and mg GAE/gdw) from green and red algae, respectively. Brown algae had a relatively higher content of phenols compared with those in green algae, ranging between mg GAE/gdw in Ericaria amentacea and mg GAE/gdw in D. dichotoma. The higher total phenolic content resulted in higher antioxidant capacity. These results agreed with Chia et al. [57] who recorded those brown seaweeds to have a higher content of phenolic compounds compared with that in green seaweeds and that this may be due to the presence of phlorotannins, bipolar polyphenols that are commonly found in brown seaweeds.

Flavonoids are one of the most diverse and widespread groups of natural products and are probably the most important natural phenolics. The flavonoid content in red seaweeds was low and ranged from 0.49 to 14.84 mg RE/gdw. In green seaweeds, the flavonoid content varies from 4.78 mg RE/gdw in U. lactuca to 29.11 mg RE/gdw in F. petiolata. The highest flavonoid content was found in brown algae, which ranged between 6.86 and 32.38 mg RE/gdw, where D. dichotoma had the highest value at 32.38 mg RE/gdw (Table 2). Although the samples were collected during the same season, there was significant difference in their flavonoid content. This change in flavonoid content may be due to the variation in physicochemical parameters, such as salinity among the collected stations or environmental conditions [58].

In regard to the alkaloid content of the collected algae, we found that a moderate to high content, ranging from to mg AE/gdw in green algae, to mg AE/gdw in brown algae, and to mg AE/gdw in red algae (Table 2).

Algae vary in their total sterol content and in the variety of sterols present [44]. We found that green algae contained the highest sterol content, followed by that in brown algae and then in red algae (Table 2). C. prolifera had the highest value from chlorophytes of 95.35 mg EE/gdw, while D. dichotoma and S. hornschuchii had approximately 90.10 mg EE/gdw. A. taxiformis had 76.45 mg EE/gdw from red seaweeds.

4. Conclusion

Seaweeds from the western coast of Libya have similar nutritional values to those found in vegetables and other seaweeds around the world. Hence, we suggest that the studied algal species could be used as alternative nutrient sources for carbohydrate, protein, and lipids for human and animal consumption as these species had a high carbohydrate and low lipid content with an important fraction of protein indicating that marine algae could be considered as healthy food.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Authors’ Contributions

R.A. conceived, designed, and organized the study. S.A., S.E., M.S., A.E.F., E.A., and F.G. contributed to the conduct of the study. R.A., S.A., M.A., E.Y., N.T., G.S., A.A., W.S.A., and A.A.E performed the experiments. R.A., E.A., A.A.E., G.S., A.A., and W.S.A analyzed the data. R.A., S.A., M.A., S.E., M.S., A.E.F., E.A., E.Y., and N.T drafted the manuscript and critiqued the output for intellectual content. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

References

R. R. Remya, A. V. Samrot, S. S. Kumar et al., “Bioactive Potential of Brown Algae,” Adsorption Science & Technology, vol. 2022, article 9104835, 13 pages, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Ali, M. Jahangir, M. Saleem, M. K. Pervez, S. Hameed, and V. U. Ahmad, “Metabolites of marine algae collected from Karachi-coasts of Arabian Sea,” Natural Product Sciences, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 61–65, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
S. M. Jibri, B. H. Jakada, H. Y. Umar, and T. A. Q. Ahmad, “Importance of some algal species as a source of food and supplement,” International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 186–193, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. B. Stengel, S. Connan, and Z. A. Popper, “Algal chemodiversity and bioactivity: sources of natural variability and implications for commercial application,” Biotechnology Advances, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 483–501, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. P. Pati, S. D. Sharma, L. Nayak, and C. R. Panda, “Uses of seaweed and its application to human welfare: a review,” International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 12–20, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Tanna and A. Mishra, “Nutraceutical potential of seaweed polysaccharides: structure, bioactivity, safety, and toxicity,” Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 817–831, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Choudhary, O. P. Chauhan, and A. Mishra, “Edible seaweeds: a potential novel source of bioactive metabolites and nutraceuticals with human health benefits,” Frontiers in Marine Science, vol. 8, pp. 1–17, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Jyoti, M. Nehra, and M. Khan, “Algae as a Nutritional and Functional Food Source,” Madridge J Food Technol, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 189–199, 2022.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Ahmad and J. Ahamad, “Bioactive phytochemicals: drug discovery to product development,” Bentham Science Publishers, vol. 38, pp. 176–213, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. X. Li, I. Wijesekara, Y. Li, and S. K. Kim, “Phlorotannins as bioactive agents from brown algae,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 2219–2224, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Pradhan, P. P. Bhuyan, S. Patra et al., “Beneficial effects of seaweeds and seaweed-derived bioactive compounds: current evidence and future prospective,” Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, vol. 39, article 102242, 2022.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Andarwulan, N. Cahyarani Puspita, and D. Średnicka-Tober, “Antioxidants such as flavonoids and carotenoids in the diet of Bogor, Indonesia residents,” Antioxidants, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 587, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Widowati, S. Handayani, and I. L. R. Suprihatin, “Phytochemicals and antioxidant of methanol extract of Gracilaria salicornia, Halimeda gracilis, Halimeda macroloba, and Hypnea ssperi from Tidung Island coastal region,” European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Ben-Dor, A. Nahum, M. Danilenko et al., “Effects of acyclo-retinoic acid and lycopene on activation of the retinoic acid receptor and proliferation of mammary cancer cells,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 391, no. 2, pp. 295–302, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
K. W. Samarakoon, J. Y. Ko, J. H. Lee, O. N. Kwon, S. W. Kim, and Y. J. Jeon, “Apoptotic anticancer activity of a novel fatty alcohol ester isolated from cultured marine diatom, _Phaeodactylum tricornutum_,” Journal of Functional Foods, vol. 6, pp. 231–240, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Zorofchian Moghadamtousi, H. Karimian, R. Khanabdali et al., “Anticancer and Antitumor Potential of Fucoidan and Fucoxanthin, Two Main Metabolites Isolated from Brown Algae,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 768323, 10 pages, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. E. Shafay, M. El-Sheekh, E. Bases, and R. El-Shenody, “Antioxidant, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory and anticancer potential of some seaweed extracts,” Food Science and Technology, vol. 42, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. Harborne, Phytochemical methods a guide to modern techniques of plant analysis, springer science & business media, 1998.
AOAC, Official Methods of Analysis, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington D.C. 15th, Ed., 1990.
D. E. Okwu and C. U. Ndu, “Evaluation of the phytonutrients, mineral and vitamin contents of some varieties of yam (Dioscorea sp.),” International Journal of Molecular Medicine and Advance Science, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 199–203, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
V. L. Singleton, R. Orthofer, and R. M. Lamuela-Raventós, “Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent,” In Methods in enzymology, vol. 299, pp. 152–178, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhishen, T. Mengcheng, and W. Jianming, “The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals,” Food Chemistry, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 555–559, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Julkunen-Tiitto, “Phenolic constituents in the leaves of northern willows: methods for the analysis of certain phenolics,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 213–217, 1985.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Shamsa, H. Monsef, R. Ghamooshi, and M. Verdian-rizi, “Spectrophotometric determination of total alkaloids in some Iranian medicinal plants,” Thai Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 32, pp. 17–20, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Sharief, A. Srinivasulu, and V. U. M. Rao, “Estimation of alkaloids and total phenol in roots of derris trifoliate and evaluation for antibacterial and antioxidant activity,” Indian Journal of Applied Research, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1–3, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Buragohain, “Carcass traits and sensory characteristics of meat of broiler fed varying levels of Tithonia diversifolia flower meal (TDFM) as substitute of conventional feeds in Mizoram,” Science, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 108–112, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. D. C. Osório and J. L. S. Martins, “Determinação de cumarina em extrato fluido e tintura de guaco por espectrofotometria derivada de primeira ordem,” Revista Brasileira de Ciências Farmacêuticas, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 481–486, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Devanaboyina, N. Ramalakshmi, B. S. Sudeepthi, K. Hemachakradhar, and N. P. Raju, “Preliminary phytochemical screening, quantitative estimation and evaluation of antimicrobial activity of Alstonia macrophylla stem bark,” International Journal of Science Inventions Today, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 31–39, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
A. H. Wan, S. J. Davies, A. Soler-Vila, R. Fitzgerald, and M. P. Johnson, “Macroalgae as a sustainable aquafeed ingredient,” Reviews in Aquaculture, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 458–492, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Rodrigues, A. C. Freitas, L. Pereira et al., “Chemical composition of red, brown and green macroalgae from Buarcos bay in Central West Coast of Portugal,” Food Chemistry, vol. 183, pp. 197–207, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. A. Bhuiyan, S. Qureshi, A. H. Mustafa Kamal, S. Aftab Uddin, and A. Siddique, “Proximate chemical composition of sea grapes Caulerpa racemosa (J. Agardh, 1873) collected from a sub-tropical coast,” Virology & Mycology, vol. 5, no. 158, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Niamnuy, S. Devahastin, S. Soponronnarit, and G. V. Raghavan, “Kinetics of astaxanthin degradation and color changes of dried shrimp during storage,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 591–600, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Gupta, S. Cox, and N. Abu-Ghannam, “Effect of different drying temperatures on the moisture and phytochemical constituents of edible Irish brown seaweed,” LWT-Food Science and Technology, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1266–1272, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
H. D’Armas, C. Jaramillo, M. D’Armas, A. Echavarría, and P. Valverde, “Proximate composition of several green, brown and red seaweeds from the coast of Ecuador,” Revista de Biología Tropical, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 61–68, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Pirian, Z. Z. Jeliani, M. Arman, J. Sohrabipour, and M. Yousefzadi, “Proximate analysis of selected macroalgal species from the Persian Gulf as a nutritional resource,” Tropical Life Sciences Research, vol. 31, no. 1, p. 1, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Lafarga, F. G. Acién-Fernández, and M. Garcia-Vaquero, “Bioactive peptides and carbohydrates from seaweed for food applications: natural occurrence, isolation, purification, and identification,” Algal Research, vol. 48, article 101909, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Leandro, D. Pacheco, J. Cotas, J. C. Marques, L. Pereira, and A. M. Gonçalves, “Seaweed’s bioactive candidate compounds to food industry and global food security,” Life, vol. 10, no. 8, p. 140, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Sivaramakrishnan, L. Biswas, B. Shalini et al., “Analysis of proximate composition and in-vitro antibacterial activity of selected green seaweeds from South Andaman Coast of India,” International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1739–1749, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. L. Wells, P. Potin, J. S. Craigie et al., “Algae as nutritional and functional food sources: revisiting our understanding,” Journal of Applied Phycology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 949–982, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Munir, A. M. Khan, R. Qureshi, S. Murtaza, and M. Munazir, “Preliminary phytochemical screening, proximate analysis, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of an algal species of Hydrodictyon reticulatum,” Journal of Bioresource Management, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 1, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
W. A. Stirk, D. L. Reinecke, and J. van Staden, “Seasonal variation in antifungal, antibacterial and acetylcholinesterase activity in seven South African seaweeds,” Journal of Applied Phycology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 271–276, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Schiener, K. D. Black, M. S. Stanley, and D. H. Green, “The seasonal variation in the chemical composition of the kelp species Laminaria digitata, Laminaria hyperborea, Saccharina latissima and Alaria esculenta,” Journal of Applied Phycology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 363–373, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. S. Biris-Dorhoi, D. Michiu, C. R. Pop et al., “Macroalgae—a sustainable source of chemical compounds with biological activities,” Nutrients, vol. 12, no. 10, p. 3085, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
S. L. Holdt and S. Kraan, “Bioactive compounds in seaweed: functional food applications and legislation,” Journal of Applied Phycology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 543–597, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. J. McDermid and B. Stuercke, “Nutritional composition of edible Hawaiian seaweeds,” Journal of Applied Phycology, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 513–524, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Miyashita, N. Mikami, and M. Hosokawa, “Chemical and nutritional characteristics of brown seaweed lipids: a review,” Journal of Functional Foods, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1507–1517, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Biancarosa, I. Belghit, C. G. Bruckner et al., “Chemical characterization of 21 species of marine macroalgae common in Norwegian waters: benefits of and limitations to their potential use in food and feed,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 2035–2042, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. R. Ganesan, U. Tiwari, and G. Rajauria, “Seaweed nutraceuticals and their therapeutic role in disease prevention,” Food Science and Human Wellness, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 252–263, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ortiz, E. Uquiche, P. Robert, N. Romero, V. Quitral, and C. Llantén, “Functional and nutritional value of the Chilean seaweeds Codium fragile, Gracilaria chilensis and Macrocystis pyrifera,” European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 320–327, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Plaza, A. Cifuentes, and E. Ibáñez, “In the search of new functional food ingredients from algae,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 31–39, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Murray, A. L. Dordevic, L. Ryan, and M. P. Bonham, “An emerging trend in functional foods for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and diabetes: marine algal polyphenols,” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 1342–1358, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Gupta, S. Cox, G. Rajauria, A. K. Jaiswal, and N. Abu-Ghannam, “Growth inhibition of common food spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms in the presence of brown seaweed extracts,” Food and Bioprocess Technology, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1907–1916, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Cotas, A. Leandro, P. Monteiro et al., “Seaweed phenolics: from extraction to applications,” Marine Drugs, vol. 18, no. 8, p. 384, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
S. A. Santos, R. Félix, A. Pais, S. M. Rocha, and A. J. Silvestre, “The quest for phenolic compounds from macroalgae: a review of extraction and identification methodologies,” Biomolecules, vol. 9, no. 12, p. 847, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Y. Luo, B. Wang, C. G. Yu, and C. L. Su, “Evaluation of antioxidant activities of five selected brown seaweeds from China,” Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, vol. 4, no. 23, pp. 2557–2565, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
N. A. Zakaria, D. Ibrahim, S. F. Sulaiman, and A. Supardy, “Assessment of antioxidant activity, total phenolic content and in-vitro toxicity of Malaysian red seaweed, Acanthophora spicifera,” Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 182–191, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Y. Chia, M. S. Kanthimathi, K. S. Khoo, J. Rajarajeswaran, H. M. Cheng, and W. S. Yap, “Antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of three species of tropical seaweeds,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Farasat, R. A. Khavari-Nejad, S. M. B. Nabavi, and F. Namjooyan, “Antioxidant activity, total phenolics and flavonoid contents of some edible green seaweeds from northern coasts of the Persian Gulf,” Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research: IJPR, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 163, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Rabia Alghazeer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

931

Downloads

541

Citations