Advances in OptoElectronics

Advances in OptoElectronics / 2011 / Article
Special Issue

Intelligent Materials for Solar Cells

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 102932 |

Ravindra Kumar Gupta, Hee-Woo Rhee, "Highly Conductive Redox-Couple Solid Polymer Electrolyte System: Blend-KI-I2 for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells", Advances in OptoElectronics, vol. 2011, Article ID 102932, 5 pages, 2011.

Highly Conductive Redox-Couple Solid Polymer Electrolyte System: Blend-KI-I2 for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

Academic Editor: Surya Prakash Singh
Received30 Apr 2011
Accepted12 Jul 2011
Published12 Sep 2011


Ionic conductivity of a redox-couple solid polymer electrolyte system, ( ) blend: [0.9KI : 0.1I2] with in weight fraction, is reported. A blend of poly(ethylene oxide) (abbreviated as PEO) and succinonitrile in equal weight fraction was used as a polymeric matrix instead of the PEO and succinonitrile because of its low-cost, electrical conductivity superior to the PEO, and thermal stability better than the succinonitrile. The electrolyte with showed ionic conductivity of S cm−1 and iodine ion diffusivity of nearly  cm2 s−1 at 25°C. The conductivity and diffusivity values were nearly two orders of magnitude higher than those of the PEO-KI-I2 due to the improved PEO crystallinity. It also exhibited dye-sensitized solar cell efficiency of 2.2% at 100 mW cm−2, which is twice of the cell prepared using the PEO-KI-I2 only.

1. Introduction

Following the invention of low-cost dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs), redox-couple solid polymer electrolytes have attracted considerable attention in recent years [1, 2]. These electrolytes eliminate the shortcomings of the liquid/gel electrolytes, such as leakage/evaporation of organic solvent especially at elevated temperatures, electrode corrosion, a need of hermetic sealing, and scale up of the manufacturing process. The PEO-MI-I2 (M = Li, Na, or K) electrolyte-based DSSCs exhibited energy conversion efficiency ( ) of 0.01–2% under the irradiation of 100 mW cm−2 [26]. It was attributed to low ionic conductivity ( ~ 10−6–10−5 S cm−1) of electrolytes and poor interfacial contacts between the electrolyte, TiO2, and dye at nanopores. The blending of PEO with a low molecular weight ether-based polymer improved the ionic conductivity, interfacial contacts, and, thus, the cell performance [3, 6, 7]. Dispersion of inorganic nanofiller into the electrolyte enhanced conductivity via providing the highly conductive space-charge regions and improved cell efficiency via penetration into the TiO2 nanopores [6, 8].

Recently, DSSCs with succinonitrile-ionic liquid-based electrolytes have showed relatively high efficiency, 5–6.7% at 25°C due to high ionic conductivity (10−4–10−3 S cm−1), and iodine ion diffusivity (~10−6 cm2 s−1) of electrolytes along with better interfacial contacts [9, 10]. The succinonitrile (abbreviated as SN) acts as a solvent because of its low melting temperature ( , ~54°C) and high dielectric constant (~55). It also provides vacancies for ion transport in its plastic crystal phase between −35°C and 54°C. However, low -value (~40°C) and high-temperature instability of the electrolytes limited the use of the DSSCs for the indoor application only.

In a recent investigation, we showed that a blend of PEO and succinonitrile in equal weight fraction can also be utilized as a polymeric matrix [11]. The blend exhibited two orders of magnitude higher than that of the PEO and thermal stability better than the succinonitrile. The PEO offers dissociation/complexation of salt and segmental motion of polymeric chains. The succinonitrile is relatively cheap and provides vacancies for ion conduction. It also acts as organic filler that provides highly conductive free volume for ion transport [1113]. In the present paper, PEO-SN blend is used as a matrix to synthesize a new low-cost and thermally stable fast ion conducting solid polymer electrolyte system, ( )[PEO-SN] :  [0.9KI : 0.1I2], where in weight fraction. KI is used as an ionic salt because K+ ions assist in separating the polymeric chains for fast ion conduction [4]. The electrolytes are characterized by studying thermal, electrical, and photovoltaic properties.

2. Experimental

Highly pure Aldrich chemicals (≥99%) were used for preparing the solid polymer electrolyte system. Molecular weight of the PEO was 106 g mol−1. The precursors were dissolved in anhydrous acetonitrile (99.8%, Aldrich) and stirred at 60°C for 24 h resulting in homogeneous solution. The solution was poured on a Teflon Petri dish followed by drying in nitrogen gas atmosphere at room temperature for a week and further drying under vacuum at 28°C for a day. The PEO-SN blend with thickness ~100 μm was translucent and mechanically good. The self-standing thick films of electrolytes were achievable up to only, though salt was dissolvable up to .

For the thermal properties, a differential scanning calorimeter (MDSC 2910, TA Instruments) and a thermogravimetric analyzer (Hi Res TGA 2950, TA Instruments) were used with a heating rate of 10°C min−1 in N2 gas atmosphere. Ionic conductivity of the films was measured using the impedance spectroscopy by a Solartron frequency response analyzer (1252A) coupled with SI 1287 electrochemical interface in a frequency range of 1 Hz–300 kHz. The electrolyte was sandwiched between two stainless steel plates with the help of a 300-μm thick Teflon spacer in a specially designed sample holder. A CHI600C voltammeter (CH instruments) together with an electrochemical cell (Figure 1) under a scan rate of 50 mV s−1 was employed for the iodine ion diffusivity measurement. DSSCs were prepared using conventional procedure with Solaronix-based Ti-Nanoxide D37 paste (TiO2 particle size 37 nm), and 0.5 mM N719 dye solution [3]. An IVIVMSTAT electrochemical interface coupled with Newport solar simulator was used for the photovoltaic study.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 shows differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves for the ( )[PEO-SN] : [0.9KI : 0.1I2], where in weight fraction. It portrayed endothermic peaks due to the melting temperature ( ), crystal to plastic crystal phase transition ( ), and glass transition temperature ( ) of the electrolytes, which are listed in Table 1 [913]. The blend ( ) exhibited intense peaks at −35°C ( ) and ~30°C ( ) [11, 12]. The electrolyte with showed a less intense -peak at 29°C without the -peak. Further increase in reduced the -value with largely weak peak intensity. This is an indicative of a large decrease of the PEO crystallinity. The relative crystallinity ( ) can be quantified by the ratio of change in enthalpy ( ) of sample to that of the fully crystalline PEO (193 Jg−1 [12]). As shown in Table 1, the values of and of the polymer electrolytes decreased with increasing and reached to nearly zero for . This portrayed arrest of the amorphous phase for the [PEO-SN]-KI-I2 electrolytes with . The PEO-KI-I2 possessed of 36.8% [11]. It is due to the fact that interaction between the PEO chains, ionic salt, and plastic crystal extended the amorphous regions across the PEO with randomly oriented flexible polymeric chains [12, 13]. This observation is corroborative with the X-ray diffractometry (XRD) and polarized optical microscopy (POM) studies, data not shown. The XRD patterns and POM images of the electrolytes with exhibited absence of the reflection peaks of the PEO and succinonitrile, and PEO spherulites, respectively. It is also worth mentioning that the TGA curves of the blend ( ) and electrolyte ( ) exhibited their thermal stability up to 100°C. Further increase in temperature started to sublimate the succinonitrile with a complete loss near to its boiling temperature (~250°C) [11].

Composition 𝑇 𝑚 [°C] 𝑇 p c [°C] 𝑇 𝑔 [°C] Δ 𝐻 𝑚 [J g−1] 𝜒 [%] 𝜎 2 5 C [S cm−1] 𝐴 [S cm−1 K0.5] 𝐸 𝑎 [eV]
𝑥 [wt. fraction][O]/[K+] [mole ratio]

030.1−34.7−6048.725.2 1 × 1 0 8
0.0539.829.1−46.416.38.4 3 . 6 × 1 0 5 1410.14
0.118.814.6−46~0.1~0 6 . 5 × 1 0 4 8.50.081
0.1511.911.5−46.1~0.4~0 7 × 1 0 4 14.10.086

Table 1 also shows ionic conductivity ( ) of the polymer electrolyte system, ( )[PEO-SN] :  [0.9KI : 0.1I2], where . The -value increased with increasing due to an increase in ion concentration. The electrolyte with ([O]/[K+] 12) exhibited the conductivity of ~  S cm−1, which is four orders of magnitude higher than that of the blend. In addition, it is two orders of magnitude higher than the conductivity (  S cm−1) of the 0.85PEO: 0.15[0.9KI: 0.1I2] ([O]/[K+] 24), prepared identically using PEO. It is also more than an order of magnitude higher than the conductivity (  S cm−1) of the 0.75PEO :  0.25[0.9KI : 0.1I2] electrolyte having [O]/[K+] 12 [5]. It suggests that the superior ion transport for the 0.85[PEO-SN] : 0.15[0.9KI : 0.1I2] was provided most probably by the vacancies of the succinonitrile and extended free volumes.

This phenomenon is also depicted by the variations (Figure 3(a)) of the polymer electrolyte system, ( )[PEO-SN] : [0.9KI : 0.1I2], where . It showed an increase in -value with increasing temperature forming a concave-type shape. This suggests that the ion transport is in the amorphous domains and coupled with the polymer segmental motion. This can be expressed by the Vogel-Tamman-Fulcher empirical relation [13], . The notation corresponds to the preexponentials factor, is a temperature at which the free volume vanishes, and is pseudo activation energy. As obvious in Figure 3(b), the electrolytes with , 0.1, and 0.15 exhibited a linear variation between and with the coefficient of regression values greater than 0.995. The slope of the linear curve resulted in value, which is shown in Table 1. The value of decreased with increasing with least value of ~0.08 eV for indicating easy ion migration. This helps in improving the anionic diffusion required for the DSSC application, which has been discussed below.

Figure 4 shows steady-state voltammograms of the 0.85[PEO-SN] : 0.15[0.9KI : 0.1I2] and 0.85PEO:0.15[0.9KI : 0.1I2] at ~25°C. The former electrolyte showed limiting cathodic current, of and limiting anodic current, of . These current values are relatively higher to those of the 0.85PEO : 0.15[0.9KI : 0.1I2], , and , suggesting improved and ions diffusion. The apparent diffusion coefficient ( ) of anions was estimated using an expression, [9, 10]. The notation is a number of electrons per molecule, is the bulk concentration, is the radius of the microelectrode, and is the Faraday’s constant. The of the 0.85[PEO-SN] : 0.15[0.9KI : 0.1I2] was calculated as  cm2 s−1 for and  cm2 s−1 for . The 0.85PEO : 0.15[0.9KI : 0.1I2] portrayed of  cm2 s−1 and of  cm2 s−1. Thus, the PEO-SN blend-based electrolyte possessed better anonic diffusivity due to the fact that the succinonitrile provides highly conductive free volumes for easy ion migration.

Figure 5 shows photocurrent density-voltage curve of the DSSCs fabricated using the 0.85[PEO-SN]: 0.15[0.9KI : 0.1I2]. The measurement was carried out under solar irradiation of 100 mW cm−2 (AM 1.5) at ~25°C. The cell exhibited short-circuit current density ( ) of 6.5 mA cm−2, open-circuit voltage ( ) of 0.7 V, fill-factor (FF) of 49%, and cell efficiency ( ) of 2.2%. For the 0.75PEO:0.25KI/0.025I2, having a similar value of [O]/[K+], , , FF, and were achieved as 2.47 mA cm−2, 0.82 V, 50.8%, and 1.04%, respectively [5]. Thus, the [PEO-SN]-[KI-I2]-based DSSCs exhibited better efficiency, which is due to the improved ionic conductivity and anionic diffusivity with the better interfacial contacts [610].

4. Conclusion

A new fast ion conducting redox-couple solid polymer electrolyte system, ( )[PEO-SN]: [0.9KI : 0.1I2], where , was synthesized using a low-cost and thermally stable 0.5PEO : 0.5SN blend as a polymeric matrix. The 0.85[PEO-SN] : 0.15[0.9KI : 0.1I2] exhibited ionic conductivity, anionic diffusivity, and cell efficiency better than those of the 0.85PEO : 0.15[0.9KI : 0.1I2]. This was attributed to the extension of amorphous regions across the PEO and availability of vacancies for ion transport by the succinonitrile as well as the improved interfacial contacts between the electrolyte, TiO2, and dye at nanopores.


This work was financially supported by the Fundamental R&D Program for Core Technology of Materials, the Ministry of Knowledge Economy, Korea, and the Brain Korea 21 Program of the Ministry of Education, Korea.


  1. B. O'Regan and M. Grätzel, “A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films,” Nature, vol. 353, no. 6346, pp. 737–740, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  2. A. Hagfeldt, G. Boschloo, L. Sun, L. Kloo, and H. Pettersson, “Dye-sensitized solar cells,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 110, no. 11, pp. 6595–6663, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M.-S. Kang, J. H. Kim, Y. J. Kim, J. Won, N.-G. Park, and Y. S. Kang, “Dye-sensitized solar cells based on composite solid polymer electrolytes,” Chemical Communications, no. 7, pp. 889–891, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. G. P. Kalaignan, M. S. Kang, and Y. S. kang, “Effects of compositions on properties of PEO-KI-I2 salts polymer electrolytes for DSSC,” Solid State Ionics, vol. 177, no. 11-12, pp. 1091–1097, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. P. K. Singh, K. W. Kim, K. I. Kim, N. G. Park, and H. W. Rhee, “Nanocrystalline porous TiO2 electrode with ionic liquid impregnated solid polymer electrolyte for dye sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 5271–5274, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. Y. Zhou, W. Xiang, S. Chen et al., “Influences of poly(ether urethane) introduction on poly(ethylene oxide) based polymer electrolyte for solvent-free dye-sensitized solar cells,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 54, no. 26, pp. 6645–6650, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. S. Kang, J. H. Kim, J. Won, and Y. S. Kang, “Oligomer approaches for solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells employing polymer electrolytes,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 111, no. 13, pp. 5222–5228, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. T. Stergiopoulos, I. M. Arabatzis, G. Katsaros, and P. Falaras, “Binary polyethylene oxide/titania solid-state redox electrolyte for highly efficient nanocrystalline TiO2 photoelectrochemical cells,” Nano Letters, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 1259–1261, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. P. Wang, Q. Dai, S. M. Zakeeruddin, M. Forsyth, D. R. MacFarlane, and M. Grätzel, “Ambient temperature plastic crystal electrolyte for efficient, all-solid-state dye-sensitized solar cell,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 126, no. 42, pp. 13590–13591, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Z. Chen, H. Yang, X. Li, F. Li, T. Yi, and C. Huang, “Thermostable succinonitrile-based gel electrolyte for efficient, long-life dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 17, no. 16, pp. 1602–1607, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. R. K. Gupta, H.-M. Kim, and H.-W. Rhee, “Poly(ethylene oxide): succinonitrile-a polymeric matrix for fast-ion conducting redox-couple solid electrolytes,” Journal of Physics D, vol. 44, no. 20, Article ID 205106, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. L. Z. Fan, Y. S. Hu, A. J. Bhattacharyya, and J. Maier, “Succinonitrile as a versatile additive for polymer electrolytes,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 17, no. 15, pp. 2800–2807, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. R. Yue, Y. Niu, Z. Wang, J. F. Douglas, X. Zhu, and E. Chen, “Suppression of crystallization in a plastic crystal electrolyte (SN/LiClO4) by a polymeric additive (polyethylene oxide) for battery applications,” Polymer, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1288–1296, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 Ravindra Kumar Gupta and Hee-Woo Rhee. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.