Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Operations Research
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 154516, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/154516
Research Article

Computer Language Effciency via Data Envelopment Analysis

Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, Cannaregio 873, 30121 Venezia, Italy

Received 8 April 2011; Revised 9 September 2011; Accepted 9 September 2011

Academic Editor: Ching-Jong Liao

Copyright © 2011 Andrea Ellero and Paola Pellegrini. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. Aldrawiesh, A. Al-Ajlan, Y. Al-Saawy, and A. Bajahzar, “A comparative study between computer programming languages for developing distributed systems in web environment,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interaction Sciences: Information Technology, Culture and Human (ICIS '09), pp. 457–461, ACM, New York, NY, USA, November 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. A. R. Feuer and N. H. Gehani, “Comparison of the programming languages C and pascal,” Computing Surveys, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 73–92, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  3. L. Prechelt, “Are scripting languages any good? A validation of Perl, Python, Rexx, and Tcl against C, C++, and java,” Advances in Computers, vol. 57, no. C, pp. 205–270, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. C. Ruknet, Guide to Programming Languages: Overview and Comparison, Artech House, Norwood, Mass, USA, 1995.
  5. M. Shaw, G. T. Almes, J. M. Newcomer, B. K. Reid, and W. A. Wulf, “Comparison of programming languages for software engineering,” Software—Practice and Experience, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–52, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  6. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 429–444, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  7. K. Tone, “A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 498–509, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  8. W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford, and K. Tone, Data Envelopment Analysis, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2007.
  9. C. J. O'Donnell, D. S. P. Rao, and G. E. Battese, “Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios,” Empirical Economics, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 231–255, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. G. E. Battese, D. S. Prasada Rao, and C. J. O'Donnell, “A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 91–103, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. A. Lopez Ortega, “Programming languages benchmark,” Alvaro's Site, 2007, http://www.alobbs.com/1307/Programming Languages Benchmark.html.
  12. G. Marceau, “The speed, size and dependability of programming languages,” Square root of x divided by zero, 2009, http://gmarceau.qc.ca/blog/2009/05/speed-size-and-dependability-of.html.
  13. S. Horsley, “The sieve of Eratosthenes. Being an account of his method of finding all the prime numbers,” Philosophical Transactions, vol. 62, pp. 327–347, 1972. View at Google Scholar
  14. S. Rabinowitz and S. Wagon, “A spigot algorithm for the digits of Pi,” The American Mathematical Monthly, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 195–203, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  15. W. Ackermann, “Zum Hilbertschen Aufbau der reellen Zahlen,” Mathematische Annalen, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 118–133, 1928. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. V. E. Hoggatt, and M. Bicknell, “Roots of Fibonacci polynomials,” The Fibonacci Quarterly, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 271–274, 1973. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  17. I. Vardi, Computational Recreations in Mathematica, chapter 9, Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, Calif, USA, 1991.
  18. C. Beust, “Dynamic and static languages are fighting again,” Otaku, Cedric's weblog, 2007, http://beust.com/weblog/archives/000454.html.
  19. C. Beust, T. Neward, O. Beni, and G. Young, “Debate and more insights on dynamic vs. static languages,” Sadek Drobis Blog, 2008, http://sadekdrobi.com/2008/05/23/debate-and-more-insights-on-dynamic-vs-static-languages.
  20. S. Drobi, “Debate and more insights on dynamic vs. static languages,” Info Queue, 2008, http://www.infoq.com/news/2008/05/more-insights-static-vs-dynamic.
  21. S. Jain, “Remain static or go dynamic?” Pathfinder development, 2009, http://www.pathf.com/blogs/2009/04/remain-static-or-go-dynamic.
  22. M. Podwysocki, “Static versus dynamic languages—attack of the clones,” Matthew Podwysocki's Blog, 2008, http://weblogs.asp.net/podwysocki/archive/2008/05/28/static-versus-dynamic-languages-attack-of-the-clones.aspx.
  23. A. Turoff, “Static vs. dynamic languages,” Notes on Haskell, 2008, http://notes-on-haskell.blogspot.com/2008/05/static-vs-dynamic-languages.html.
  24. B. Venners, “Static versus dynamic attitude,” Artima Developer, 2005, http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=92979.
  25. L. Prechelt, “Empirical comparison of seven programming languages,” Computer, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 23–29, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. T. L. Saaty, “A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures,” vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 234–281, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  27. T. Saaty, Fundamentals of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, 200.