A Comparative Study on Performance Measurement of Decision-Making Units: A Case Study in Iranian Tejarat Banks

Table 7

Comparative result of efficiency value through three types of CCR model.

Branch no.	Similar value criteria (a)			Group fuzzy weights (b)			Confined fuzzy weights (c)
	Efficiency value	AP efficiency value	Full ranking	Efficiency value	AP efficiency value	Full ranking	Efficiency value	AP efficiency value	Full ranking
1	0.728	*	18	0.850	*	16	0.613	*	11
2	0.958	*	13	1	1.032	12	0.445	*	20
3	0.458	*	25	0.782	*	18	0.492	*	18
4	1	1.319	9	1	1.79	5	0.529	*	16
5	1	5.376	1	1	5.17	1	1	2.356	1
6	0.608	*	23	0.749	*	19	0.552	*	15
7	0.961	*	12	0.893	*	15	0.628	*	9
8	1	2.047	3	1	2.44	3	1	1.829	2
9	1	1.929	5	1	1.408	9	0.303	*	25
10	0.502	*	24	0.550	*	25	0.407	*	22
11	0.710	*	19	0.714	*	20	0.672	*	7
12	0.794	*	16	0.909	*	14	0.578	*	13
13	0.735	*	17	0.646	*	22	0.399	*	23
14	1	2.024	4	1	1.889	4	1	1.033	4
15	1	1.137	11	1	1.157	10	0.386	*	24
16	1	1.393	7	1	1.476	7	0.627	*	10
17	0.939	*	14	0.923	*	13	0.695	*	6
18	0.633	*	22	0.627	*	23	0.504	*	17
19	1	1.622	6	1	1.64	6	0.852	*	5
20	1	1.354	8	1	1.424	8	0.669	*	8
21	0.915	*	15	0.680	*	21	0.439	*	21
22	1	3.587	2	1	3.24	2	1	1.063	3
23	1	1.278	10	1	1.09	11	0.589	*	12
24	0.674	*	21	0.826	*	17	0.552	*	14
25	0.678	*	20	0.596	*	24	0.454	*	19
Mean of efficiency value	0.864	—	—	0.870	—	—	0.615	—	—