Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Operations Research
Volume 2016, Article ID 7171467, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7171467
Research Article

Finding the Most Preferred Decision-Making Unit in Data Envelopment Analysis

1Department of Mathematics, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Mathematics, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Received 20 June 2016; Revised 25 October 2016; Accepted 20 November 2016

Academic Editor: Konstantina Skouri

Copyright © 2016 Shirin Mohammadi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. E. Thanassoulis and R. G. Dyson, “Estimating preferred target input-output levels using data envelopment analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 80–97, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. Zhu, “Data envelopment analysis with preference structure,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 136–150, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  3. G. R. Jahanshahloo, A. Shirzadi, and S. M. Mirdehghan, “Finding the reference set of a decision making unit,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 563–573, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  4. M. Mehdiloozad, S. M. Mirdehghan, B. K. Sahoo, and I. Roshdi, “On the identification of the global reference set in data envelopment analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 245, no. 3, pp. 779–788, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  5. V. Belton and S. P. Vickers, “Demystifying DEA—a visual interactive approach based on multiple criteria analysis,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 883–896, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. J. Stewart, “Relationships between data envelopment analysis and multicriteria decision analysis,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 654–665, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  7. V. Belton and T. J. Stewart, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach, Kluwer Academic, 2002.
  8. B. Golany, “An interactive MOLP procedure for the extension of DEA to effectiveness analysis,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 725–734, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. G. Thompson, L. N. Langemeier, C.-T. Lee, E. Lee, and R. M. Thrall, “The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 46, no. 1-2, pp. 93–108, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Y.-H. B. Wong and J. E. Beasley, “Restricting weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 829–835, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. T. Post and J. Spronk, “Performance benchmarking using interactive data envelopment analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 472–487, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  12. T. Joro, P. Korhonen, and J. Wallenius, “Structural comparison of data envelopment analysis and multiple objective linear programming,” Management Science, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 962–970, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. B. Y. H. Wong, M. Luque, and J.-B. Yang, “Using interactive multiobjective methods to solve DEA problems with value judgements,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 623–636, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  14. A. Ebrahimnejad and F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, “Equivalence relationship between the general combined-oriented CCR model and the weighted minimax MOLP formulation,” Journal of King Saud University—Science, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 47–54, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J.-B. Yang and D.-L. Xu, “Interactive minimax optimisation for integrated performance analysis and resource planning,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 46, pp. 78–90, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. A. P. Wierzbicki, “The use of reference objectives in multi objectives optimization,” in Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Theory and Application, G. Fandel and T. Gal, Eds., Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  17. J.-B. Yang and P. Sen, “Preference modelling by estimating local utility functions for multiobjective optimization,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 115–138, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J.-B. Yang, “Gradient projection and local region search for multiobjective optimization,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 432–459, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J.-B. Yang and D. Li, “Normal vector identification and interactive tradeoff analysis using minimax formulation in multiobjective optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A:Systems and Humans., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 305–319, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J.-B. Yang, “Minimax reference point approach and its application for multiobjective optimisation,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 541–556, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. J.-B. Yang, B. Y. H. Wong, D.-L. Xu, and T. J. Stewart, “Integrating DEA-oriented performance assessment and target setting using interactive MOLP methods,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 195, no. 1, pp. 205–222, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  22. W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford, and K. Tone, Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses: With DEA-Solver Software and References, Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.
  23. G. R. Jahanshahloo, A. Shirzadi, and S. M. Mirdehghan, “Finding strong defining hyperplanes of PPS using multiplier form,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 194, no. 3, pp. 933–938, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus