Research Article

An Examination of Ranking Quality for Simulated Pairwise Judgments in relation to Performance of the Selected Consistency Measure

Table 3

Performance of the K(A) index. Statistical characteristics of the MAEs distribution in relation to various for i=1,…,15 of K(A) values. The results were generated for n=4 on the basis of as the simulation algorithm and are based on 10,000 perturbed random reciprocal PCMs. The scenario assumed LLSM as the PP and Saaty’s preference scale.

for Mean in –quantiles of MAEs among and Average MAEs among and

10.1231750.0038320.0052440.0130850.0319330.0440360.017332
20.2985480.0041780.0055860.0145310.0393710.0570140.020352
30.3676210.0071130.0092160.0200610.0554380.0773660.027509
40.4187430.0088360.0114920.0244250.0687020.0894140.033247
50.4688030.0109290.0140930.0313280.0800870.0970350.040523
60.5053680.0066430.0090280.0254460.0761310.0996590.035366
70.5704150.0146580.0191580.0447940.0860160.1044790.049809
80.6215020.0187610.0239140.0472240.0824490.0996150.051410
90.6600450.0121660.0166480.0429150.0894870.1097220.048732
100.7213320.0208380.0252630.0463270.0858890.1013780.051714
110.7658480.0173530.0228950.0490890.0934220.1106780.054968
120.8220920.0205210.0262870.0541300.0930590.1097860.058010
130.8710550.0204690.0264520.0538830.0953740.1143560.058507
140.9210110.0196560.0260320.0561660.1113840.1329450.063610
150.9693290.0205480.0277420.0702110.1429470.1689170.078853