Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Orthopedics
Volume 2011, Article ID 176497, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/176497
Clinical Study

Anterior Lumbar Interbody Implants: Importance of the Interdevice Distance

1The Virginia Spine Institute, Reston, VA 20190, USA
2The Spinal Research Foundation, 1831 Wiehle Avenue, Suite 200, Reston, VA 20190, USA

Received 7 October 2010; Accepted 28 December 2010

Academic Editor: John P. Kostuik

Copyright © 2011 Brian R. Subach et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. N. G. Baldwin, L. A. Ferrara, M. A. Morone et al., “Biomechanics of lumbar interbody cage,” in Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques. Cages, Dowels, and Grafts, R. W. Haid, M. R. McLaughlin, and R. G. Fessler, Eds., Quality Medical Publishing, St. Louis, Mo, USA, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  2. N. Kumar, M. R. Judith, A. Kumar, V. Mishra, and M. C. Robert, “Analysis of stress distribution in lumbar interbody fusion,” Spine, vol. 30, no. 15, pp. 1731–1735, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. R. F. Closkey, J. R. Parsons, C. K. Lee, M. F. Blacksin, and M. C. Zimmerman, “Mechanics of interbody spinal fusion: analysis of critical bone graft area,” Spine, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1011–1015, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  4. J. P. Grant, T. R. Oxland, and M. F. Dvorak, “Mapping the structural properties of the lumbosacral vertebral endplates,” Spine, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 889–896, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. T. G. Lowe, S. Hashim, L. A. Wilson et al., “A biomechanical study of regional endplate strength and cage morphology as it relates to structural interbody support,” Spine, vol. 29, no. 21, pp. 2389–2394, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. M. J. Sohn, M. M. Kayanja, C. Kilinçer, L. A. Ferrara, and E. C. Benzel, “Biomechanical evaluation of the ventral and lateral surface shear strain distributions in central compared with dorsolateral placement of cages for lumbar interbody fusion,” Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 219–224, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  7. R. D. Labrom, J. S. Tan, C. W. Reilly, S. J. Tredwell, C. G. Fisher, and T. R. Oxland, “The effect of interbody cage positioning on lumbosacral vertebral endplate failure in compression,” Spine., vol. 30, no. 19, pp. E556–E561, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  8. A. Polikeit, S. J. Ferguson, L. P. Nolte, and T. E. Orr, “The importance of the endplate for interbody cages in the lumbar spine,” European Spine Journal, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 556–561, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  9. W. J. Beutler and W. C. Peppelman, “Anterior lumbar fusion with paired BAK standard and paired BAK proximity cages: subsidence incidence, subsidence factors, and clinical outcome,” Spine Journal, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 289–293, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. L. Chen, H. Yang, and T. Tang, “Cage migration in spondylolisthesis treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion using BAK cages,” Spine, vol. 30, no. 19, pp. 2171–2175, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. J. Y. Choi and K. H. Sung, “Subsidence after anterior lumbar interbody fusion using paired stand-alone rectangular cages,” European Spine Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 16–22, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  12. P. C. McAfee, B. W. Cunningham, G. A. Lee et al., “Revision strategies for salvaging or improving failed cylindrical cages,” Spine, vol. 24, no. 20, pp. 2147–2153, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. B. A. Taylor, A. R. Vaccaro, A. S. Hilibrand, D. A. Zlotolow, and T. J. Albert, “The risk of foraminal violation and nerve root impingement after anterior placement of lumbar interbody fusion cages,” Spine, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 100–104, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. R. Vaidya, R. Weir, A. Sethi, S. Meisterling, W. Hakeos, and C. D. Wybo, “Interbody fusion with allograft and rhBMP-2 leads to consistent fusion but early subsidence,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery B, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 342–345, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  15. E. Gercek, V. Arlet, J. Delisle, and D. Marchesi, “Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning,” European Spine Journal, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 513–516, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  16. M. Schiffman, S. A. Brau, R. Henderson, and G. Gimmestad, “Bilateral implantation of low-profile interbody fusion cages: subsidence, lordosis, and fusion analysis,” Spine Journal, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 377–387, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. A. Kumar, J. A. Kozak, B. J. Doherty, and J. H. Dickson, “Interspace distraction and graft subsidence after anterior lumbar fusion with femoral strut allograft,” Spine, vol. 18, no. 16, pp. 2393–2400, 1993. View at Google Scholar