Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Orthopedics
Volume 2014, Article ID 791539, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/791539
Research Article

A Longitudinal Low Dose μCT Analysis of Bone Healing in Mice: A Pilot Study

1Research Center of CHUS (CRCHUS), 3001, 12th Avenue North, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada J1H 5N4
2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, 3001, 12th Avenue North, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada J1H 5N4
3Sherbrooke Molecular Imaging Centre (CIMS), CRCHUS, 3001, 12th Avenue North, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada J1H 5N4
4Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, 3001, 12th Avenue North, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada J1H 5N4
5Laboratoire d’Organogénèse Expérimentale (LOEX), Research Center of CHUQ, Enfant-Jésus Hospital, 1401, 18th Street, Quebec City, QC, Canada G1J 1Z4
6Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, 2325 Université Street, Quebec City, QC, Canada G1V 0A6
7Department of Chemical and Biotechnological Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Sherbrooke, 2500 Université Boulevard, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada J1K 2R1

Received 11 June 2014; Accepted 13 October 2014; Published 6 November 2014

Academic Editor: Panagiotis Korovessis

Copyright © 2014 Lu-Zhao Di et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. M. Parfitt, M. K. Drezner, F. H. Glorieux et al., “Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 595–610, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. E. Oetgen, G. A. Merrell, N. W. Troiano, M. C. Horowitz, and M. A. Kacena, “Development of a femoral non-union model in the mouse,” Injury, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1119–1126, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. F. Griffith and H. K. Genant, “Bone mass and architecture determination: state of the art,” Best Practice & Research: Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 737–764, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. L. A. Feldkamp, S. A. Goldstein, A. M. Parfitt, G. Jesion, and M. Kleerekoper, “The direct examination of three-dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 3–11, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. H. Kinney, N. E. Lane, and D. L. Haupt, “In vivo, three-dimensional microscopy of trabecular bone,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 264–270, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. L. Bouxsein, S. K. Boyd, B. A. Christiansen, R. E. Guldberg, K. J. Jepsen, and R. Müller, “Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1468–1486, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. C. Jones, C. H. Arns, A. P. Sheppard, D. W. Hutmacher, B. K. Milthorpe, and M. A. Knackstedt, “Assessment of bone ingrowth into porous biomaterials using MICRO-CT,” Biomaterials, vol. 28, no. 15, pp. 2491–2504, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. M. Cowan, Y.-Y. Shi, O. O. Aalami et al., “Adipose-derived adult stromal cells heal critical-size mouse calvarial defects,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 560–567, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. M. Cowan, T. Aghaloo, Y.-F. Chou et al., “MicroCT evaluation of three-dimensional mineralization in response to BMP-2 doses in vitro and in critical sized rat calvarial defects,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 501–512, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. T. Aghaloo, C. M. Cowan, Y.-F. Chou et al., “Nell-1-induced bone regeneration in calvarial defects,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 169, no. 3, pp. 903–915, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S.-Y. Park, K.-H. Kim, K.-T. Koo et al., “The evaluation of the correlation between histomorphometric analysis and micro-computed tomography analysis in AdBMP-2 induced bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects,” Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 218–226, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. C. Johnson, R. W. Johnson, S. A. Munoz, G. R. Mundy, T. E. Peterson, and J. A. Sterling, “Longitudinal live animal micro-CT allows for quantitative analysis of tumor-induced bone destruction,” Bone, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 141–151, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. H. Waarsing, J. S. Day, and H. Weinans, “An improved segmentation method for in vivo μCT imaging,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 1640–1650, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. H. Waarsing, J. S. Day, J. C. van Der Linden et al., “Detecting and tracking local changes in the tibiae of individual rats: a novel method to analyse longitudinal in vivo micro-CT data,” Bone, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 163–169, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. V. David, N. Laroche, B. Boudignon et al., “Noninvasive in vivo monitoring of bone architecture alterations in hindlimb-unloaded female rats using novel three-dimensional microcomputed tomography,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1622–1631, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. J. E. Henderson, C. Gao, and E. J. Harvey, “Skeletal phenotyping in rodents: tissue isolation and manipulation,” in Osteoporosis Research, G. Duque and K. Watanabe, Eds., Springer, London, UK, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  17. C. Gao, J. Seuntjens, G. N. Kaufman et al., “Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation to promote bone healing,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1183–1189, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Y.-X. He, G. Zhang, X.-H. Pan et al., “Impaired bone healing pattern in mice with ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis: a drill-hole defect model,” Bone, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1388–1400, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Nagashima, A. Sakai, S. Uchida, S. Tanaka, M. Tanaka, and T. Nakamura, “Bisphosphonate (YM529) delays the repair of cortical bone defect after drill-hole injury by reducing terminal differentiation of osteoblasts in the mouse femur,” Bone, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 502–511, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. D. Abramoff, P. J. Magelhaes, and S. J. Ram, “Image processing with imageJ,” Biophotonics International, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 36–42, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  21. P. A. Yushkevich, J. Piven, H. C. Hazlett et al., “User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability,” NeuroImage, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 1116–1128, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. N. Greve and B. Fischl, “Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration,” NeuroImage, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 63–72, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Jenkinson, P. Bannister, M. Brady, and S. Smith, “Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images,” NeuroImage, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 825–841, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. G. N. Hounsfield, “Computed medical imaging,” Science, vol. 210, no. 4465, pp. 22–28, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Katsumata, A. Hirukawa, S. Okumura et al., “Effects of image artifacts on gray-value density in limited-volume cone-beam computerized tomography,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, vol. 104, no. 6, pp. 829–836, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. P. Mah, T. E. Reeves, and W. D. McDavid, “Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography,” Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 323–335, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. Donneys, N. S. Nelson, S. S. Deshpande et al., “Quantifying mineralization using bone mineral density distribution in the mandible,” Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1502–1506, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman, “Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 85–93, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman, “Cronbach's alpha,” The British Medical Journal, vol. 314, no. 7080, article 572, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. L. Tremoleda, M. Khalil, L. L. Gompels, M. Wylezinska-Arridge, T. Vincent, and W. Gsell, “Imaging technologies for preclinical models of bone and joint disorders,” EJNMMI Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. B. De Man, J. Nuyts, P. Dupont, G. Marchal, and P. Suetens, “Metal streak artifacts in X-ray computed tomography: a simulation study,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 464–472, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. D. Cook, L. P. Patron, S. L. Salkeld, K. E. Smith, B. Whiting, and R. L. Barrack, “Correlation of computed tomography with histology in the assessment of periprosthetic defect healing,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 467, no. 12, pp. 3213–3220, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. H. Uusitalo, J. Rantakokko, M. Ahonen et al., “A metaphyseal defect model of the femur for studies of murine bone healing,” Bone, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 423–429, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. T. M. Campbell, W. T. Wong, and E. J. Mackie, “Establishment of a model of cortical bone repair in mice,” Calcified Tissue International, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 49–55, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. L. Monfoulet, B. Rabier, O. Chassande, and J.-C. Fricain, “Drilled hole defects in mouse femur as models of intramembranous cortical and cancellous bone regeneration,” Calcified Tissue International, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 72–81, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. L. N. M. Hayward, C. M. J. De Bakker, L. C. Gerstenfeld, M. W. Grinstaff, and E. F. Morgan, “Assessment of contrast-enhanced computed tomography for imaging of cartilage during fracture healing,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 567–573, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. L. Yu, X. Liu, S. Leng et al., “Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective,” Imaging in Medicine, vol. 1, pp. 65–84, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  38. R. Duran-Struuck and R. C. Dysko, “Principles of bone marrow transplantation (BMT): providing optimal veterinary and husbandry care to irradiated mice in BMT studies,” Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 11–22, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. K. Laperre, M. Depypere, N. van Gastel et al., “Development of micro-CT protocols for in vivo follow-up of mouse bone architecture without major radiation side effects,” Bone, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 613–622, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. R. J. Klinck, G. M. Campbell, and S. K. Boyd, “Radiation effects on bone architecture in mice and rats resulting from in vivo micro-computed tomography scanning,” Medical Engineering and Physics, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 888–895, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. K. S. Crump, P. Duport, H. Jiang, N. S. Shilnikova, D. Krewski, and J. M. Zielinski, “A meta-analysis of evidence for hormesis in animal radiation carcinogenesis, including a discussion of potential pitfalls in statistical analyses to detect hormesis,” Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part B: Critical Reviews, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 210–231, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. C. Bosch, B. Melsen, and K. Vargervik, “Importance of the critical-size bone defect in testing bone-regenerating materials,” The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 310–316, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. K. Hietaniemi, J. Peltonen, and P. Paavolainen, “An experimental model for non-union in rats,” Injury, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 681–686, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. C. Lu, T. Miclau, D. Hu, and R. S. Marcucio, “Ischemia leads to delayed union during fracture healing: a mouse model,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 51–61, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. F. W. Rhinelander, “Thevascular response of bone to internal fixation,” in The Science and Practice of Intramedullary Nailing, C. C. Edwards, Ed., pp. 25–29, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  46. C. Colnot, “Skeletal cell fate decisions within periosteum and bone marrow during bone regeneration,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 274–282, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus