Research Article

In Vitro Comparison of Dynesys, PEEK, and Titanium Constructs in the Lumbar Spine

Table 1

L4-L5 kinematic results (mean ± SD).

IntactDYNPEEKTIDestabilized

ROM (°)FE12.47 ± 3.775.39 ± 2.504.83 ± 1.994.43 ± 1.7814.45 ± 3.57
LB9.68 ± 2.405.05 ± 2.344.55 ± 1.603.33 ± 1.379.86 ± 3.14
AT4.45 ± 3.164.68 ± 3.123.55 ± 2.403.24 ± 1.974.65 ± 1.68
AC0.28 ± 0.160.23 ± 0.130.28 ± 0.130.34 ± 0.250.46 ± 0.28

IPT (mm)
 LeftFE7.61 ± 1.494.78 ± 1.615.50 ± 1.895.32 ± 1.789.02 ± 2.31
LB9.51 ± 2.638.64 ± 2.328.92 ± 2.718.38 ± 2.509.22 ± 2.00
AT5.18 ± 2.995.26 ± 3.054.98 ± 2.714.64 ± 2.214.81 ± 1.49
AC1.04 ± 0.510.86 ± 0.560.92 ± 0.540.95 ± 0.701.47 ± 0.55
 RightFE8.55 ± 2.475.85 ± 2.466.22 ± 2.416.06 ± 2.349.78 ± 2.86
LB8.85 ± 1.768.36 ± 1.967.99 ± 1.897.69 ± 1.809.38 ± 1.47
AT3.68 ± 1.654.09 ± 1.873.57 ± 1.623.44 ± 1.533.87 ± 1.19
AC1.11 ± 0.390.88 ± 0.550.94 ± 0.491.00 ± 0.651.69 ± 0.77

ID (mm)
 LeftFE6.87 ± 1.902.15 ± 1.252.74 ± 1.382.44 ± 1.158.22 ± 2.59
LB5.97 ± 2.063.26 ± 1.973.69 ± 1.612.79 ± 1.325.51 ± 1.97
AT0.80 ± 0.640.42 ± 0.340.47 ± 0.450.39 ± 0.230.98 ± 0.73
AC0.79 ± 0.360.10 ± 0.090.16 ± 0.090.10 ± 0.081.28 ± 0.62
 RightFE7.47 ± 2.292.26 ± 1.972.40 ± 0.842.17 ± 0.849.04 ± 2.96
LB5.26 ± 1.322.65 ± 1.752.36 ± 0.831.52 ± 0.575.87 ± 2.06
AT0.68 ± 0.490.55 ± 0.450.68 ± 0.840.60 ± 0.671.08 ± 0.60
AC0.90 ± 0.350.13 ± 0.100.17 ± 0.110.10 ± 0.041.52 ± 0.85

ROM = range of motion; IPT = interpedicular travel; ID = interpedicular displacement; FE = flexion-extension; LB = lateral bending; AT = axial torsion; AC = axial compression; DYN = Dynesys; TI = Titanium rod.