Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Orthopedics
Volume 2016, Article ID 7369409, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7369409
Clinical Study

Flexible Stabilisation of the Degenerative Lumbar Spine Using PEEK Rods

1Service de Neurochirurgie, Clinique du Millenaire, 34000 Montpellier, France
2Service de Rééducation Fonctionnelle, Centre Hospitalier Paul Coste Floret, 34240 Lamalou les Bains, France
3Invibio Ltd., Technology Centre, Hillhouse International, Thornton Cleveleys, Lancashire FY5 4QD, UK

Received 4 November 2015; Accepted 19 January 2016

Academic Editor: Boris Zelle

Copyright © 2016 Jacques Benezech et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. M. Bono and C. K. Lee, “Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the past 20 years: influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcome,” Spine, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 455–463, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. W. Polly Jr., E. R. G. Santos, and A. A. Mehbod, “Surgical treatment for the painful motion segment: matching technology with the indications: posterior lumbar fusion,” Spine, vol. 30, no. 16, pp. S44–S51, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Kanayama, B. W. Cunningham, T. J. C. Setter et al., “Does spinal instrumentation influence the healing process of posterolateral spinal fusion? An in vivo animal model,” Spine, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1058–1065, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Y. Kotani, B. W. Cunningham, A. Cappuccino, K. Kaneda, and P. C. McAfee, “The role of spinal instrumentation in augmenting lumbar posterolateral fusion,” Spine, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 278–287, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. Narayan, R. W. Haid, B. R. Subach, C. H. Comey, and G. E. Rodts, “Effect of spinal disease on successful arthrodesis in lumbar pedicle screw fixation,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 97, no. 3, supplement, pp. 277–280, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. P. Fritzell, O. Hägg, P. Wessberg, and A. Nordwall, “2001 Volvo award winner in clinical studies: lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group,” Spine, vol. 26, no. 23, pp. 2521–2532, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. L. Brox, R. Soresen, A. Friis et al., “Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration,” Spine, vol. 28, no. 17, pp. 1913–1921, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  8. B. I. Martin, S. K. Mirza, B. A. Comstock, D. T. Gray, W. Kreuter, and R. A. Deyo, “Are lumbar spine reoperation rates falling with greater use of fusion surgery and new surgical technology?” Spine, vol. 32, no. 19, pp. 2119–2126, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. Cavagna, C. Tournier, and S. Aunoble, “Lumbar decompression and fusion in elderly osteoporotic patients: a prospective study using less rigid titanium rod fixation,” Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 86–91, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. M. D. Rahm and B. B. Hall, “Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with instrumentation: a retrospective study,” Journal of Spinal Disorders, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 392–400, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. T. R. Lehmann, K. F. Spratt, J. E. Tozzi et al., “Long-term follow-up of lower lumbar fusion patients,” Spine, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 97–104, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. E. Chosa, K. Goto, K. Totoribe, and N. Tajima, “Analysis of the effect of lumbar spine fusion on the superior adjacent intervertebral disk in the presence of disk degeneration, using the three-dimensional finite element method,” Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 134–139, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. Ghiselli, J. C. Wang, N. N. Bhatia, W. K. Hsu, and E. G. Dawson, “Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery—American Volume, vol. 86, no. 7, pp. 1497–1503, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. Akamaru, N. Kawahara, S. T. Yoon et al., “Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis,” Spine, vol. 28, no. 14, pp. 1560–1566, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. L. Bastian, U. Lange, C. Knop, G. Tusch, and M. Blauth, “Evaluation of the mobility of adjacent segments after posterior thoracolumbar fixation: a biomechanical study,” European Spine Journal, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 295–300, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. C. Eck, S. C. Humphreys, and S. D. Hodges, “Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion: a review of clinical, biomechanical, and radiologic studies,” The American Journal of Orthopedics, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 336–340, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  17. D. Chou, D. Lau, A. Skelly, and E. Ecker, “Dynamic stabilization versus fusion for treatment of degenerative spine conditions,” Evidence-Based Spine-Care Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 33–42, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. C. Morrison, R. Macnair, C. MacDonald, A. Wykman, I. Goldie, and M. H. Grant, “In vitro biocompatibility testing of polymers for orthopaedic implants using cultured fibroblasts and osteoblasts,” Biomaterials, vol. 16, no. 13, pp. 987–992, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. J. Ferguso, J. M. Visser, and A. Polikeit, “The long term mechanical integrity of non reinforced Peek-Optima polymer for demanding spinal applications: experimental and finite elements analysis,” European Spine Journal, vol. 15, pp. 149–156, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  20. S. Vadapalli, K. Sairyo, V. K. Goel et al., “Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion—a finite element study,” Spine, vol. 31, no. 26, pp. E992–E998, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. L. Williams, M. F. Gornet, and J. K. Burkus, “CT evaluation of lumbar interbody fusion: current concepts,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 2057–2066, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. K. B. Sagomonyants, M. L. Jarman-Smith, J. N. Devine, M. S. Aronow, and G. A. Gronowicz, “The in vitro response of human osteoblasts to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) substrates compared to commercially pure titanium,” Biomaterials, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1563–1572, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. M. Kurtz and J. N. Devine, “PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants,” Biomaterials, vol. 28, no. 32, pp. 4845–4869, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. Vogler, R. Paillex, M. Norberg, P. De Goumoëns, and J. Cabri, “Validation transculturelle de l'Oswestry disability index en français,” Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 379–385, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. D. Vogler, R. Paillex, M. Norberg, P. De Goumoëns, and J. Cabri, “Validation transculturelle de l’Oswestry disability index en français,” Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 379–385, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. J. C. T. Fairbank and P. B. Pynsent, “The oswestry disability index,” Spine, vol. 25, no. 22, pp. 2940–2953, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. F. Mavrogenis, C. Vottis, G. Triantafyllopoulos, P. J. Papagelopoulos, and S. G. Pneumaticos, “PEEK rod systems for the spine,” European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, vol. 24, supplement 1, pp. 111–116, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. M. Athanasakopoulos, A. F. Mavrogenis, G. Triantafyllopoulos, S. Koufos, and S. G. Pneumaticos, “Posterior spinal fusion using pedicle screws,” Orthopedics, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. e951–e957, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. R. K. Ponnapan, H. Serhan, B. Zarda, R. Patel, T. Albert, and A. R. Vaccaro, “Biomechanical evaluation and comparison of polyetheretherketone rod system to traditional titanium rod fixation,” The Spine Journal, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 263–267, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. M. F. Gornet, F. W. Chan, J. C. Coleman et al., “Biomechanical assessment of a PEEK rod system for semi-rigid fixation of lumbar fusion constructs,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 133, no. 8, Article ID 081009, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. W.-K. Chou, A. Chien, and J.-L. Wang, “Biomechanical analysis between PEEK and titanium screw-rods spinal construct subjected to fatigue loading,” Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. E121–E125, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. Y.-H. Ahn, W.-M. Chen, K.-Y. Lee, K.-W. Park, and S.-J. Lee, “Comparison of the load-sharing characteristics between pedicle-based dynamic and rigid rod devices,” Biomedical Materials, vol. 3, no. 4, Article ID 044101, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. D. K. Sengupta, “Dynamic stabilization devices in the treatment of low back pain,” Orthopedic Clinics of North America, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 43–56, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. F. J. Schwab, D. G. Nazarian, F. Mahmud, and C. B. Michelsen, “Effects of spinal instrumentation on fusion of the lumbosacral spine,” Spine, vol. 20, no. 18, pp. 2023–2028, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. A. Asher, W. L. Carson, J. W. Hardacker, R. G. Lark, and S. M. Lai, “The effect of arthrodesis, implant stiffness, and time on the canine lumbar spine,” Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 549–559, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. R. J. Kowalski, L. A. Ferrara, and E. C. Benzel, “Biomechanics of bone fusion,” Neurosurgical Focus, vol. 10, no. 4, article E2, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. L. Turner, D. J. Paller, and C. B. Murrell, “The mechanical effect of commercially pure titanium and polyetheretherketone rods on spinal implants at the operative and adjacent levels,” Spine, vol. 35, no. 21, pp. E1076–E1082, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. R. A. Deyo, D. T. Gray, W. Kreuter, S. Mirza, and B. I. Martin, “United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions,” Spine, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 1441–1445, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. D. T. Gray, R. A. Deyo, W. Kreuter et al., “Population-based trends in volumes and rates of ambulatory lumbar spine surgery,” Spine, vol. 31, no. 17, pp. 1957–1963, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. H. Graf, “Lumbar instability. Surgical treatment without fusion,” Rachis, vol. 412, pp. 123–137, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  41. T.-M. Markwalder and M. Wenger, “Dynamic stabilization of lumbar motion segments by use of Graf's ligaments: results with an average follow-up of 7.4 years in 39 highly selected, consecutive patients,” Acta Neurochirurgica, vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 209–214, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. P. Korovessis, Z. Papazisis, G. Koureas, and E. Lambiris, “Rigid, semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short term results,” Spine, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 735–742, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. D. Grob, A. Benini, A. Junge, and A. F. Mannion, “Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine: surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years,” Spine, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 324–331, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. R. P. Nockels, “Dynamic stabilization in the surgical management of painful lumbar spinal disorders,” Spine, vol. 30, no. 16, pp. S68–S72, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. K. J. Schnake, S. Schaeren, and B. Jeanneret, “Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis,” Spine, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 442–449, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. H.-J. Wilke, K. Wenger, and L. Claes, “Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants,” European Spine Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 148–154, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. J. Sénégas, “Mechanical supplementation by non-rigid fixation in degenerative intervertebral lumbar segments: the Wallis system,” European Spine Journal, vol. 11, supplement 2, pp. S164–S169, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. M. Pasciak, J. Grzywocz, A. Nobis, A. Pala, and T. Wadek, “PEEK plastic rods versus titanium ‘stiff’ rods in transpedicular lumbar stabilization. Clinical comparison of short term results,” European Spine Journal, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. S471–S535, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  49. R. M. Galler, “The use of Peek rods in the stabilization of the lumbar spine,” in Proceedings of the 79th AANS Annual Scientific Meeting, Eposter, Denver, Colo, USA, April 2011, http://w3.cns.org/dp/2011CNS/1144.pdf.
  50. D. R. Ormond, L. Albert Jr., and K. Das, “Polyetheretherketone (Peek) rods in lumbar spine degenerative disease: a case series,” Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. F. De Iure, G. Bosco, M. Cappuccio, S. Paderni, and L. Amendola, “Posterior lumbar fusion by peek rods in degenerative spine: preliminary report on 30 cases,” European Spine Journal, vol. 21, supplement 1, pp. S50–S54, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. L. Qi, M. Li, S. Zhang, J. Xue, and H. Si, “Comparative effectiveness of PEEK rods versus titanium alloy rods in lumbar fusion: a preliminary report,” Acta Neurochirurgica, vol. 155, no. 7, pp. 1187–1193, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. J. M. Highsmith, L. M. Tumialán, and G. E. Rodts Jr., “Flexible rods and the case for dynamic stabilization,” Neurosurgical Focus, vol. 22, article E11, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus