Research Article  Open Access
N. A. Shah, F. A. Khanday, "A Generic Current Mode Design for Multifunction Grounded Capacitor Filters Employing LogDomain Technique", Active and Passive Electronic Components, vol. 2011, Article ID 313580, 10 pages, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/313580
A Generic Current Mode Design for Multifunction Grounded Capacitor Filters Employing LogDomain Technique
Abstract
A generic design (GD) for realizing an nth order logdomain multifunction filter (MFF), which can yield four possible stable filter configurations, each offering simultaneously lowpass (LP), highpass (HP), and bandpass (BP) frequency responses, is presented. The features of these filters are very simple, consisting of merely a few exponential transconductor cells and capacitors; all grounded elements, capable of absorbing the shunt parasitic capacitances, responses are electronically tuneable, and suitable for monolithic integration. Furthermore, being designed using logdomain technique, it offers all its advantages. As an example, 5thorder MFFs are designed in each case and their performances are evaluated through simulation. Lastly, a comparative study of the MFFs is also carried, which helps in selecting better highorder MFF for a given application.
1. Introduction
The popularity attributed to the use of continuoustime filters in ever growing wireless industry is their effective handling of highfrequency realworld signals and lowpower systems. But the integration of continuoustime filters and digital circuits on the same IC needs reduction in supply voltage which entails increase in the power consumption of conventional analog signal processors for conservation of same dynamic range (DR) and chip area for a given bandwidth [1]. To circumvent this limitation, the use of compandingbased signal processors was proposed [2, 3], which comprises compression block, for converting linear input current into compressed voltage; a core processor, for the production of corresponding compressed output voltage and an expansion block, for the conversion of nonlinear output voltage to a linear output current.
The use of logarithmic and exponential functions in the development of logdomain filters permits them to operate on very low supply voltage without sacrificing the dynamic range [4]. These filters also contain low impedance nodes along the signal path, facilitating the achievement of greater bandwidths. Thus, due to these advantages, logdomain filters are receiving interest in literature, and substantial progress has been made in simplifying the processes of analysis and synthesis for such circuits [5–13].
The implementation of filters with multifunction feature finds applications in phaselocked loops, FM stereo demodulator, touchtone telephone tone decoder, and crossover network used in threeway highfidelity loudspeakers [14]. Therefore, it is imperative to have such type of filters in logdomain as well. Owing to strenuous efforts, some loworder logdomain MFFs have been reported [15–18], and research in the design of highorder logdomain MFFs continues to be an area of endeavour [19], though conventional integrated highorder filter design with multifunction feature have been reported in [20–22]. The method presented in [20] is based on the cascading of loworder filters with the exchange of input and ground terminals. The cascading result in the use of excessive number of components [21] and the exchange of input and ground terminals is tedious. For highorder design, each time loworder filters are cascaded, the number of components required also increases by the same measure. As a sequel, the design leads to increase in circuit complexity, volume, noise, parasitic effects, and power dissipation, for both IC and discrete designs. In [21], simultaneous outputs are available for different filter functions but for BP filter function only even order can be implemented. Besides, in the general block diagram of the multifunction filter, the order of the feedbacks to be taken for a particular order is not clearly stated. In [22], a general method for simultaneous realization of various filter functions is discussed but involves complex mathematics. Besides, voltage buffers are required at the output to avoid loading effects.
Based on the above facts, a simple generic nth order MFF topology is introduced in this manuscript. From this topology, four different stable nth order MFF circuits can be constructed which can be implemented using lossless integrators, algebraic summation blocks, and appropriate feedback paths. Each configuration obtained from the generic topology simultaneously offers LP, HP, and BP frequency responses. The proposed generic topology enjoys the following advantages: (i) no restriction on the order of the filter (i.e., n can be even or odd), (ii) modularity of filter structure is ensured being exclusively lossless integrator based, (iii) permit electronic adjustment of frequency characteristics, (iv) suitable for monolithic integration, (v) circuit complexity and noise are reduced [19].
It is worth to point out here that the highorder logdomain MFF of [19] turn out to be one of the configurations of the proposed generic MFF design which, based on the type of integrators, their order of sequence and type of feedback, can yield as many as four different stable filter configurations. Besides, it has been demonstrated that each design has different performances depending on choice of parameters. The comparative study presented in this paper will facilitate the selection of a particular MFF design in accordance with the requirements of a given application.
2. Proposed Generic MFF Topology
The general transfer function of nth order HP filter function is as follows: where determine the pole locations.
Algebraic manipulations yieldwhere time constant of jth integrator is (j = ).
The generic functional block diagram (GFBD) of the nth order HP filter topology obtained from (2) is given in Figure 1. An examination of Figure 1 reveals that it consists of lossless integrators, arranged one after the other with feedbacks from their outputs to the summation block. Depending on the type of integrator, their order of sequence and type of feedback, as many as four stable nth order MFF filter configurations, can be obtained from GFBD which are discussed hereunder:
nth order filter topology MFF1: Noninverting lossless integrator followed by inverting lossless integrator with positive and negative feedbacks from their respective outputs.
nth order filter topology MFF2 [19]: Noninverting lossless integrators are arranged one after the other with negative feedbacks from their outputs.
nth order filter topology MFF3: Inverting lossless integrator and Noninverting lossless integrator arranged one after the other with positive feedbacks from their outputs.
nth order filter topology MFF4: Inverting lossless integrators are arranged one after the other with positive and negative feedbacks taken alternately from their outputs.
The filter functions HP, BP, and LP being in conformity with (2) are respectively available at nodes A, B, and C of Figure 1. The former response is obtainable at the output of the summation block while latter responses can be, respectively, obtained by integrating (1) n/2 or (n ± 1)/2times and ntimes. The derived general transfer function of LP response is as follows: For BP filter function, symmetrical and asymmetrical responses are, respectively, available at the output of n/2th integrator and th or th integrator corresponding to n either being even or odd. The derived transfer functions of symmetrical and asymmetrical responses for each of the configurations are as follows: The order of the filter and its configuration determines the noninverting or inverting mode of the transfer function as summarised in Table 1. In addition, the four MFF configurations presented above are the only achievable stable designs from the generic design as is demonstrated for the 2nd order in Table 2.

 
*I_{1}: First integrator after summation, I_{1}: Second integrator after summation, NI: Noninverting, I: Inverting. ^{#}F_{1}: Feedback from first integrator, F_{2}: Feedback from second integrator. ^{~}U: Unstable, S: Stable. 
To transpose GFBD to its logdomain counterpart, an appropriate set of complementary LOG and EXP operators are required, which are, respectively, given by [12] where and , respectively, represent the baseemitter voltage and thermal voltage of BJT, I_{O} is the bias current, and circumflex denotes the signals in the logdomain.
The sequence of steps to be followed in transforming a linear GFBD into logdomain one are given hereunder(i)Place EXP and LOG blocks in front and behind of each integrator, respectively. (ii)Place LOG and EXP blocks at the input and output of the filter, respectively.(iii)dc stabilize the circuit by applying the rules contained in [9] according to which at least one pair of E+ and E− cells must have their outputs connected to each capacitor node and the sum of dc bias currents of E+ cells with their outputs connected at a node should be equal to the corresponding sum of dc bias currents of E− cells with their outputs connected at the same node.
Following the above steps, we obtain the transposed GFBD of the logdomain MFF filter topology depicted in Figure 2. To realize logdomain GFBD of Figure 2, logdomain lossless integrator and summation blocks are required.
3. LogDomain Building Blocks
The building blocks for implementing logdomain integrator are exponential cells (E cells) which have been reported in [7] for both types of polarity. The reason for using these cells in the circuits is their realization using only NPN transistors, thereby rendering the circuits suitable for IC form. The output current in both the cells is given in terms of terminal voltages as follows: The possible realizations of LOG and EXP operators from the E cells, used in this paper, are taken from [7].
The logdomain lossless noninverting and inverting integrator configuration is depicted in Figures 3 and 4 respectively, where the inputoutput relationship is as follows: where is the timeconstant of logdomain integrator. Thus, an equivalent resistor is realized by the logdomain integrator, which is electronically controllable through I_{O}.
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
The multipleinput algebraic summation blocks required for obtaining HP filter in each configuration are demonstrated in Figures 5(a) and 5(d). The expression for output voltage is obtained as follows:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
4. Simulation Results
To verify the validity of the proposed design, 5thorder logdomain MFF of each configuration depicted, respectively, in Figures 6(a) and 6(d) were constructed for V_{CC} = V_{EE} = 1.5 V, I_{O} = 25 μA, and C = 15.9 pF which yield cutoff/centre frequency (f_{C}) = 10 MHz. The NPN transistors in cell implementations are simulated using the parameters of the AT&T CBICR NR100N NPN transistor [5]. The frequency behaviour of the filter was evaluated by performing largesignal transient analysis using the PSPICE simulator, with modulation index factor . The small deviations, caused by bipolar transistor imperfections, have been compensated by following the procedure suggested in [11, 22]. The values of the compensation factors were . Also, the DC bias currents for the final stage of the filter are multiplied by a factor 1.0086. The compensated magnitude responses of 5thorder logdomain MFF topologies are given in Figures 7(a) and 7(d). The electronic tunability of cutoff frequency and gain of MFFs has been verified for different values of the bias current as shown in Figure 8.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(a)
(b)
A comparative study of the proposed circuits was carried out on the basis of usually used parameters of nonlinear behaviour, number of components, sensitivity, and power consumption.
The nonlinear behaviour of each MFF biquad configuration for LP response was carried out employing IMD3 test. For this purpose, two closely spaced tones 3 MHz and 3.2 MHz, which fall in the passband of the LP response, were applied at the input of each of the filters. The simulated values of distortion at m = 100 for the biquads are given in Table 3.

Also, the simulated IMD3 responses as a function of the modulation index factor, are given in Figure 9. Further, Table 3 also contains computed data about simulated rms values of the output noise currents integrated over 20 MHz range, dynamic ranges (DR) at 0.3% distortion level, number of devices required, and static power consumption. For obtaining sensitivity graph, Monte Carlo analysis with 100 runs assuming 1% deviation (with Gaussian distribution) was carried out with respect to the variations of the integrating capacitors and bias currents. From this graph, the values of standard deviation (STD) and mean variance (MV) of the maximum gain and cutoff frequency were calculated as given in Table 4. In addition, Monte Carlo analysis with 100 runs assuming 1% deviation (with Gaussian distribution) was carried out with respect to the variations of bias currents. From this graph, the values of standard deviation (STD) and mean variance (MV) of the IMD3 values were calculated as given in Table 4.

The results of Tables 3 and 4 reveal that each design has different performance for different set of parameters, thereby, facilitating application specific selection of MFF design. Further, one can see from the comparative study that MFF1 is better design as most of its performance factors are superior visavis other designs.
5. Conclusion
A novel generic nth MFF topology based on logdomain technique, capable of yielding four canonical stable designs, has been presented. The derived MFFs besides realizing simultaneously HP, LP, and BP responses are modular as these can be constructed using only lossless integrators. The circuits use grounded capacitors and permit electronic adjustment of filter parameters. Both these features are suitable for monolithic integration. Further, no restriction is required to be imposed on the order of the filter. The comparative study of MFFs facilitates their application specific design. The PSPICE results confirm the theoretical predictions.
References
 E. Vittoz, “Low power lowvoltage limitations and prospects in analog design,” in Analog Circuit Design: LowPower LowVoltage, Integrated Filters and Smart Power, R. J. Plassche, W. M. C. Sansen, and J. H. Huijsing, Eds., Kluwer, Boston, Mass, USA, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. P. Tsividis, V. Gopinathan, and L. Toth, “Companding in signal processing,” Electronics Letters, vol. 26, no. 17, pp. 1331–1332, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Tsividis, “Externally linear, timeinvariant systems and their application to companding signal processors,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 65–85, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 E. I. ElMasry and J. Wu, “Fully differential classAB logdomain integrator,” Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 35–46, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. R. Frey, “Logdomain filtering: an approach to currentmode filtering,” IEE Journal on Electronic Circuits and Systems, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 406–416, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
 D. Perry and G. W. Roberts, “The design of logdomain filters based on the operational simulation of LC ladders,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 763–775, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
 D. R. Frey, “Log domain filtering for RF applications,” IEEE Journal of SolidState Circuits, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 1468–1475, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
 C. Psychalinos, “Realization of logdomain highorder transfer functions using firstorder building blocks and complementary operators,” International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 17–32, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Psychalinos, “On the transposition of G_{m}C filters to DC stabilized logdomain filters,” International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 217–236, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Psychalinos, “Logdomain linear transformation filters revised: improved building blocks and comparison results,” International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 119–133, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. W. Leung and G. W. Roberts, “Effects of transistor nonidealities on highorder logdomain ladder filter frequency responses,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 373–387, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Arslanalp and E. Yuce, “A BJT technologybased currentmode tunable allpass filter,” Microelectronics Journal, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 921–927, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. T. Tola, R. Arslanalp, and S. Surav Yilmaz, “Current mode highfrequency KHN filter employing differential class AB log domain integrator,” International Journal of Electronics and Communications, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 600–608, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. D. Paarmann, Design and analysis of analog filters. A signal processing perspective, Kluwer, 2001.
 A. Kircay and U. Cam, “A novel logdomain firstorder multifunction filter,” ETRI Journal, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 401–404, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 E. I. ElMasry and W. U. Jie, “CMOS micropower universal logdomain biquad,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 389–392, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
 N. A. Shah and F. A. Khanday, “Synthesis of SIFO electronically tunable logdomain universal biquad,” Frequenz, vol. 68, pp. 30–36, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
 N. A. Shah and F. A. Khanday, “A MISO electronically tunable logdomain universal biquad with digital programmability,” Frequenz, vol. 59, pp. 36–41, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
 N. A. Shah and F. A. Khanday, “A DC stabilized logdomain nthorder multifunction filter based on the decomposition of nthorder HP filter function to FLF topology,” International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1075–1091, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Ozoguz and C. Acar, “On the currentmode current conveyorbased highorder filter realizations,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems (ICECS ’98), vol. 3, pp. 127–130, September 1998. View at: Google Scholar
 E. Yuce and S. Minaei, “On the realization of highorder currentmode filter employing current controlled conveyors,” Computers and Electrical Engineering, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 165–172, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. M. Chang and B. M. AlHashimi, “New highorder filter structures using only singleendedinput OTAs and grounded capacitors,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 458–463, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 N. A. Shah and F. A. Khanday. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.