Advances in Public Health

Advances in Public Health / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 1932940 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1932940

Togbemabou Primous Martial Godjedo, Alidehou Jerrold Agbankpe, Moussiliou Noël Paraiso, Tamegnon Victorien Dougnon, Marie Hidjo, Lamine Baba-Moussa, Honore Bankole, "Epidemiological Characteristics of Meningococcal Meningitis (2016 to 2018) Four Years after the Introduction of Serogroup A Meningococcal Conjugate Vaccine in Benin", Advances in Public Health, vol. 2020, Article ID 1932940, 7 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1932940

Epidemiological Characteristics of Meningococcal Meningitis (2016 to 2018) Four Years after the Introduction of Serogroup A Meningococcal Conjugate Vaccine in Benin

Academic Editor: Carol J. Burns
Received13 Feb 2020
Revised03 Aug 2020
Accepted11 Aug 2020
Published19 Aug 2020

Abstract

Objectives. This study aims to study the epidemiological and geographic characteristics of the meningococcal serogroups four years after the introduction of serogroup A meningococcal conjugate vaccine. Methods. This is a prospective, descriptive, analytical study, and it took place from 2016 to 2018. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were taken after the identification of meningitis cases. The samples, thus, taken were sent to the laboratory for culture and identification of Neisseria meningitidis in accordance with WHO standards. Results. Eight hundred and ninety-nine bacterial strains were identified, of which 219 were strains of Neisseria meningitidis. The majority of N. meningitidis-positive samples were from male patients (59.8%) with a median age of 4 (IQR: 1–13). Four of N. meningitidis serogroups were identified, namely, serogroups C (6.8%), W (19.6%), X (1.8%), and A (0.5%). Geographically, 92.7% of the identified N. meningitidis serogroups came from patients who lived in the northern region of the country. The departments most concerned were Alibori (N. meningitidis C (66.7%) and N. meningitidis W (20.9%)); Atacora (N. meningitidis W (41.9%), N. meningitidis X (75.0%), and N. meningitidis C (13.3%)); and Borgou (N. meningitidis W (23.3%)). Conclusion. The results of this study showed that there is an emergence of cases of meningococcal of serogroup C four years after the introduction of MenAfricVac in Benin. These results demonstrated the effectiveness of case-by-case surveillance in detecting small changes in the distribution of serogroups that could have important implications for public health strategies in the coming seasons.

1. Introduction

A Gram-negative diplococcus, Neisseria meningitidis, is one of the main etiologies of meningitis and sepsis [1], with a mortality history of about 80% among cases registered at the beginning of the first epidemic [2]. Even with the availability of effective antibiotics, meningococcal meningitis is frequently associated with a mortality rate of around 15% [3, 4]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 500,000 cases and 50,000 deaths are attributed to N. meningitidis each year worldwide [5]. N. meningitidis has 12 capsular serogroups, and the majority of serogroups A, B, C, W, Y, and X are responsible for life-threatening invasive meningococcal disease [3, 6].

The burden of meningococcal meningitis is disproportionately higher in the African meningitis belt, with a higher incidence in children under 5 years of age [7]. The most predominant form in Africa is the meningococcus of serogroup A, with 85% of cases, especially in the first thirty years [1]. The disease is serious and can be fatal without adequate antibiotic therapy. Bacterial meningitis can quickly become fatal and cause severe disability in those who survive. Survivors may have complications such as cognitive impairment, behavioral problems, hearing loss, motor weakness, paralysis, incoordination, or seizure disorder; although little data are available in low-resource settings [8], one study found that, up to a quarter of bacterial meningitis survivors had neuropsychological sequelae 3 to 60 months after discharge from hospital [8, 9]. Therefore, prompt treatment is recommended, especially in children [10].

In Benin, the incidence of meningitis was 71 to 619 per 100,000 inhabitants in 2004 with a fatality rate of 3.1% [11]. The epidemic control measures consisted of reactive vaccination campaigns in the epidemic departments, using the polysaccharide vaccines A/C/W or A/C/W/Y combined with the adapted treatment protocol [12]. To detect epidemics, routine surveillance of suspected cases of acute bacterial meningitis is carried out in Benin and in all the other countries of the African meningitis belt according to WHO recommendations [13], although the recommendation to divide large districts of more than 100,000 inhabitants into subdistricts of approximately 30,000–100,000 inhabitants is not always followed. Districts reporting weekly incidences of 3 cases per 100,000 inhabitants for a week are considered to be on alert, and those with incidences of 10 cases per 100,000 inhabitants are considered to be epidemic [14]. In 2003, the World Health Organization and the meningitis vaccination project initiated a project to support Benin and other countries in the establishment of a reinforced meningitis surveillance network [15]. After the introduction of the meningococcal A conjugate vaccine (PsA-TT, MenAfriVac), implemented in Benin in 2012 through mass campaigns targeting people aged 1 to 29, the incidence of meningitis in this serogroup has greatly decreased [12]. Four years after the introduction of MenAfricVac, what about the incidence of meningococcal of Neisseria meningitidis A and what is the share of other serogroups in cases of meningococcal meningitis in Benin? It is to answer these questions that this study was initiated. The aim is to study the epidemiological and geographic characteristics of meningococcal meningitis in Benin and to assess the impact of MenAfricVac on the other meningococcal serogroup.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Framework

This study was carried out in the Republic of Benin, a coastal country in West Africa, with an area of 114,763 km2, with an average annual temperature ranging from 26°C to 28°C. The population was estimated at 11,496,140 inhabitants in 2018 with 51.2% women. With its pyramidal structure, the health system of Benin is modeled on the administrative division of the country. It is made up of a peripheral level, which is represented by the health zone whose manager is the Coordinating Doctor of the Health Zone of an intermediate level represented by the department with as responsible, the Departmental Director of Health at the central level, and it is represented by the Ministry of Health [16].

2.2. Methods

This study was carried out on the basis of data collected from suspected meningitis cases notified by epidemiological surveillance centers throughout Benin. The study period was from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018.

2.2.1. Data Collection

Data collection was carried out according to the method described by Godjedo et al. [16]. Patients with high onset fever, stiff neck and/or altered consciousness, and/or other meningeal signs were included in the study. After the identification of the suspected case, the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sample was taken and conveyed to the hospital laboratory for analysis. Each sample taken is accompanied by the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) notification form. On this sheet, the social, clinical, and epidemiological information of the patient was recorded.

In the event that the zone hospital did not have a bacteriology section within its laboratory, the samples were placed on transport medium (Trans-Isolate) and sent to the departmental laboratories having a bacteriology session within 48 hours. All samples are, then, sent to the National Public Health Laboratory (NPHL) for confirmation and identification of the bacterial species.

2.2.2. Bacteriological Analysis of CSF Samples

The bacteriological analyzes were carried out according to the methodology described by WHO [7] and repeated by Godjedo et al. [16]. After macroscopic examination of the 2,928 samples, the Gram stain followed. The samples were, then, streaked on Columbia blood agar and chocolate agar plates and incubated at 37°C anaerobically for 48 hours to isolate the pure colonies of N. meningitidis.

All cocci Gram-negative, catalase, and cytochrome oxidase strains were selected, and serogrouping of N. meningitidis species was performed by the latex agglutination test. Latex agglutination was carried out using a Pastorex meningitis kit (Bio-Rad) making it possible to detect the N. meningitidis antigens of serogroups A, B, C, Y, and W, and a kit of Directigen meningitis (Becton Dickinson) was used to detect N. meningitidis antigens from serogroups X and Z. The kits were used in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

2.2.3. Statistical Analysis

The epidemiological data of the patients were recorded in an Excel spreadsheet and were analyzed with the R software. The graphs were produced with the Graphpad Prism 7 software.

3. Results

3.1. General Characteristics of Patients

Bacteriological analysis of CSF samples showed that out of the 2928 samples, 899 bacterial strains were identified, of which 24.4% (219) were strains of N. meningitidis. The majority of these N. meningitidis-positive CSF samples had a cloudy appearance (83.1%). It should be noted that the patients whose CSF samples were positive for N. meningitidis were predominantly male (59.8%) and lived in the northern region (92.7%). The median age of these patients was 4 years with an interquartile range (IQR) from 1 to 13 years. The category of patients (Table 1) aged 0 to 4 years was the most represented (45.4%).


CharacteristicsNumber of CSF samples (%)Number of pathogens identified (%)Number of N. meningitidis strain identified (%)Number of ungrouped N. meningitidis strainNumber of N. meningitidis serogroups (%)
CAWX

Total2928 (100)899 (30.7)219 (24.4)156 (71.2)15 (6.8)1 (0.5)43 (19.6)4 (1.8)

Appearance of CSF samples
Clear1594 (54.4)129 (14.3)24 (11.0)14 (9.0)3 (20.0)0 (0.0)6 (14.0)1 (25.0)
Turbid875 (29.9)674 (75.0)182 (83.1)131 (84.0)11 (73.3)1 (100.0)36 (83.7)3 (75.0)
Hemorragic199 (6.8)38 (4.2)1 (0.4)1 (0.6)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Xanthochromic112 (3.8)52 (5.8)10 (4.6)8 (5.1)1 (6.7)0 (0.0)1 (2.3)0 (0.0)
Unknown148 (5.1)6 (0.7)2 (0.9)2 (1.3)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)

Sex
Male1639 (56.0)531 (59.1)131 (59.8)92 (59.0)11 (73.3)1 (100.0)24 (55.8)3 (75.0)
Female1285 (43.9)366 (40.7)87 (39.7)63 (40.4)4 (26.7)19 (44.2)1 (25.0)
Unknown4 (0.1)2 (0.2)1 (0.5)1 (0.6)

Region
Northern2907 (99.3)889 (98.9)203 (92.7)145 (92.9)12 (80.0)1 (100.0)42 (97.7)3 (75.0)
Center6 (0.2)3 (0.3)9 (4.1)6 (3.8)2 (13.3)1 (25.0)
Southern15 (0.5)7 (0.8)7 (3.2)5 (3.2)1 (6.7)1 (2.3)
Age (years)n = 1965n = 591n = 150n = 87n = 15n = 1n = 43n = 4
Median (IQR)4 (1–90)4 (1–90)4 (1–13)6 (4–43)15 (2–25)9 (2–36)6 (4.5–7.75)

Age category (Years)
0–4892 (45.4)143 (24.2)34 (22.7)14 (16.1)05 (33.3)14 (32.6)1 (25.0)
5–9355 (18.1)112 (19.0)28 (18.7)14 (16.1)03 (20.0)09 (20.9)02 (50.0)
10–14184 (9.4)77 (13.0)26 (17.3)17 (19.5)04 (26.7)01 (100.0)03 (7.0)01 (25.0)
15–19106 (5.4)58 (9.8)16 (10.7)14 (16.1)02 (4.7)
20–2456 (2.8)23 (3.9)03 (2.0)03 (7.0)
25–2965 (3.3)35 (6.0)09 (6.0)5 (5.7)04 (9.3)
30–3457 (2.9)28 (4.7)05 (3.3)05 (11.6)
35–3964 (3.3)34 (5.8)05 (3.3)02 (2.3)03 (7.0)
40–4430 (1.5)13 (2.2)03 (2.0)03 (3.4)
45–4947 (2.4)19 (3.2)05 (3.3)05 (5.7)
50–5420 (1.0)10 (1.7)05 (3.3)02 (2.3)03 (20.0)
55–5939 (2.0)21 (3.6)06 (4.0)06 (6.9)
60–6413 (0.6)02 (0.3)01 (0.7)01 (1.2)
65–6923 (1.2)07 (1.2)03 (2.0)03 (3.4)
≥7014 (0.7)09 (1.5)01 (0.7)01 (1.2)

3.2. Proportion of N. meningitidis Serogroups

Four serogroups of N. meningitidis have been identified. These are serogroups A, C, W, and X. Serogroup W (Table 1) was the most represented (19.6%), followed by serogroup C (6.8%), serogroup X (1.8), and serogroup A (0.5%). For the study period, the results showed that there were more patients positive for N. meningitidis serogroup W in 2017 (44.4%) than in 2018 (33.3%) and 2016 (22, 2%). Serogroups C and W were much more identified throughout the study period. The highest incidence of meningococcal meningitis is that of N. meningitidis W (0.14) in 2017. It increased slightly from 2016 to 2017 and decreased slightly from 2017 to 2018. It was in 2017 that the first cases of group C meningococcal meningitis were detected with an incidence of 0.09. This incidence decreased in 2018 (0.04). Also, in 2017, we noted cases of group X meningococcal meningitis with a constant incidence from 2017 to 2018 (0.02). On the other hand, there is a total disappearance of N. meningitidis A meningitis from 2017 to 2018 (Figure 1). The age category of patients 6 to 18 years of age is that in which a high proportion (Table 1) of N. meningitidis C (46.7%), W (65.1%) and X (75%) with respective median ages of 15 (IQR: 2–25), 9 (IQR: 2–36), and 6 (IQR: 4.5–7.75).

3.3. Geographic Distribution of N. meningitidis Serogroups

The results showed that the majority of N. meningitidis serogroups (A, C, W, and X) (92.1%) were identified in patients living in the northern region of the country (Table 1). It should be noted that the region of northern Benin is subdivided into four departments (Alibori, Atacora, Borgou, and Donga). The results from Figure 2 have shown that, in Alibori, there is a predominance of serogroups C (n = 10) and W (n = 9), in Atacora, the predominance is observed at the level of serogroups W (n = 18), X (n = 3), and X (n = 15), and in the Borgou, serogroup W (n = 10) is still the most represented (Figure 2).

3.4. Impact of Vaccination on the Disease

Of the 219 patients confirmed positive for N. meningitidis, 33 revealed that they did not know their vaccination status vis-à-vis MenAfricVac in 2012 (Men A conjugate vaccine), 21 said they were not vaccinated, and 9 claimed to have been vaccinated. The patients confirmed positive for N. meningitidis serogroups W (53.5%) and C (46.7%) were those whose vaccination status was unknown (Figure 3). Deaths were reported only in the latter with case fatality rates ranging from 9.3 (4/43 for N. meningitidis W) to 40% (6/15 for N. meningitidis C).

4. Discussion

The introduction in 2012 of MenAfriVac had a beneficial effect on the incidence of confirmed meningitis cases with N. meningitidis A. An almost total disappearance was observed in confirmed cases of N. meningitidis A, with four cases occurring in 2015 [12]. The results of our surveillance showed a prevalence of 2.15% of meningococcal meningitis from 2016 to 2018. This percentage is lower than that found at the same period in Niger (84.8%) and in Chad (33.2%) [17, 18], both belonging to the African meningitis belt unlike Benin where the northern and central regions are the part found there.

The majority of N. meningitidis-positive cases (22.7%) in this study was aged 0 to 4 years and lived in the northern region of the country. Thus, this high percentage of meningococcal meningitis cases is explained by the immature immune system of children and, hence, the health vulnerability of the latter in the face of N. meningitidis. This vulnerability of children to meningococcal meningitis has also been noted in several countries (Burkina-Faso, Chad, Mali, Niger, and Togo) of the African meningitis belt [19]. The northern of Benin is characterized by a rainy season (May to October) and a dry season with harmattan (November to April). During the dry season, heat, dry, and dusty wind during the day increases the risk of communicable respiratory diseases [20, 21]. This region is the part of Benin that is found in the African meningitis belt. This is what justifies the fact that the majority of patients living in this region were confirmed positive for N. meningitidis. Sidikou et al. showed that, from 2010 to 2018, meningococcal meningitis had a very high incidence in the regions (Niamey, Tillabery, Dosses, Tahoua, and Maradi) which also belong to the African meningitis belt [17].

Serogrouping of isolated N. meningitidis strains had shown a high proportion of N. meningitidis W (19.6%), the majority of which had been identified during the 2017 epidemiological surveillance (44.4%). These results are in the same direction as those obtained by Sidikou et al. [17] and Mounkoro et al. [22]. From 2016 to 2018, the work of Sidikou et al. [17] revealed a high proportion of N. meningitidis W (71%) in Burkina-Faso. Similarly, the work of Mounkoro et al. [22] showed a high proportion of N. meningitidis W (32.2%) responsible for the epidemic in Togo in 2016. Apart from the predominance of N. meningitidis W, in 2017, it there has been an occurrence of type C meningococcal meningitis. These results are consistent with those obtained by Sidikou et al. [17]. From 2016 to 2018, the work of Sidikou et al. [17] revealed a high proportion of the species of N. meningitidis C with a predominance in 2017. Our results show that six years after the introduction of the MenAfricVac conjugate vaccine (2011-2012), the epidemiology of meningococcal meningitis in Benin was marked by the disappearance of cases of N. meningitidis A meningitis, an emergence of cases of N. meningitidis C and N. meningitidis X, and a consistency of the cases of N. meningitidis W. As part of this epidemiological surveillance, no case of N. meningitidis A was reported in 2018, justifying the continued effectiveness of MenAfricVac. These results support other analyses that show the remarkable and continuous impact of MenAfricVac on carriage and meningococcal meningitis type A throughout the meningitis belt [23]. Combined with the high acceptance by the community [24], the low cost of the vaccine, and the long duration of protective immunity [25] (shorter in children aged <5 years [26]), these results provide convincing evidence of the continuous deployment of MenAfricVac in Benin and in high-risk countries within or at the periphery of the meningitis belt, via mass immunization and the introduction into the systematic vaccination system of children aged 9 to 18 months [27, 28]. This remarkable disappearance of N. meningitidis A disease has been observed in other countries which have introduced MenAfricVac [29]. The circulation of N. meningitidis serogroups (C, W, and X) has also been observed in other countries in the meningitis belt which also introduced MenAfricVac: Niger [17], Burkina- Faso, Chad, Mali [19, 23], and Côte d’Ivoire [30].

Geographically, the northern region is made up of the departments of Alibori, Atacora, Borgou, and Donga, and the department of Collines are the departments most involved in the surveillance of meningitis in Benin. This study showed that there is a distribution of serogroups of N. meningitidis which is not proportional within these five departments belonging to the African meningitis belt. This disproportionality could be explained by the lack of health structure and health surveillance in certain departments and, especially, the diversity of sociocultural and economic habits from one department to another. N. meningitidis C was in high proportion in the patients of the departments of Alibori (66.7%), while N. meningitidis W was found in high proportion (Figure 2) in patients living in the departments of Atacora (41.9%), Borgou (23.3%), Alibori (20.9%), and Collines (14.0%) (Figure 2). As for N. meningitidis X, it had been found in 75% patients living in the Department of Collines. These results further confirm the emergence of meningococcal meningococcus from serogroups C and X.

When analyzing the data, small proportions of specific meningococcal serogroups were detected in the departments not belonging to the African meningitis (N. meningitidis C (6.7%) and N. meningitidis W (1.2%) in the department of Plateau). In Benin, from 2016 to 2018, Godjedo et al. have already shown that, with the case-by-case surveillance system, there had been cases of meningitis and death in the department of the Plateau (12.5% fatality) [16]. This demonstrates that strong surveillance systems are capable of detecting small changes in the distribution of serogroups that could have important implications for public health strategies in the coming seasons.

It should be noted that more than half (52.4%) of the patients identified positive with one of the four serogroups of N. meningitidis identified do not know their vaccination status and 33.3% (21/63) of them had declared not be vaccinated. A high proportion of N. meningitidis W-positive patients (53.5%) with an unknown vaccination status and 30.2% (13/43) were noted. However, the lethality was lower in these patients (9.3%) than in those positive for N. meningitidis C (40.0%). This shows the importance of vaccination campaigns in the fight against meningococcal meningitis in Benin.

During this study, a very high percentage (71.2%) of cases of N. meningitidis were not grouped (Table 1). This high percentage is due to the numerous polyagglutinable and incompletely identified strains. This could be due to the conditions and processing of CSF samples from sampling, through transport and storage of these before diagnosis. Suboptimal sample storage, transport, processing, and handling practices (for example, multiple freeze-thaw cycles) can negatively affect the quality of samples and lead to nonconclusive results when tested by culture, latex, and/or rt-PCR [18]. We must also add that the cold chain breaks sometimes during the storage of latex tests (Pastorex) due to the lack of availability of electrical energy. This can lead to the ineffectiveness of these tests during diagnosis and, hence, the multitude of cases of ungrouped N. meningitidis. As a result, the total number of serogroup cases (A, C, W, and X) obtained in this study does not really reflect the incidence of meningococcal meningitis. As a limitation of the epidemiological surveillance system for meningitis in Benin, our study showed the absence on-site of an rt-PCR machine for the diagnosis of the disease. However, several authors showed that rt-PCR is the most appropriate and reliable diagnostic or confirmation method [31, 32].

5. Conclusions

The results of this study showed that six years after the introduction of MenAfricVac, there has been a remarkable decrease or even disappearance of cases of meningitis with N. meningitidis A and an emergence of cases of meningitis with N. meningitidis C with several deaths in 2017. At the same time, there was an insignificant decrease in N. meningitidis W meningitis from 2017 to 2018. This investigation confirmed the strong presence of meningococcal meningitis cases in the northern region of Benin. However, cases of meningococcal C, W, and X meningitis have been noted in the southern region (with deaths). This underlines the importance of setting up an efficient surveillance system at the national level and strengthening the capacities of laboratories to make in-depth diagnoses (PCR and sequencing), to support the development and introduction of the next generation of meningococcal meningitis vaccines in Benin and sub-Saharan Africa.

Data Availability

Data can be obtained from the corresponding author on request.

Ethical Approval

In Benin, ethical approval was not required for routine surveillance of meningitis, as it had been approved as part of the systematic diagnosis algorithm in the Ministry of Health.

Informed consent was sought from parents or guardians of surveillance participants.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

TPG, MNP, AJA, and HB wrote the protocol. TPG, AJA, and MH were involved in field work, protocol implementation, data analysis, and interpretation and wrote the draft of the manuscript. AJA and TVD made substantial contributions to conception and study design, data analysis, and interpretation. MNP, LB-M, and HB participated in the critical revision of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the staff of the epidemiological surveillance service of the Ministry of Health of Benin and all the health personnel who participated in this surveillance. The authors also thank Dr. Lawaly Manzo for his contribution to the writing of this manuscript.

References

  1. A. M. Munguambe, A. E. C. C de Almeida, A. A. Nhantumbo et al., “Characterization of strains of Neisseria meningitidis causing meningococcal meningitis in Mozambique, 2014: implications for vaccination against meningococcal meningitis,” PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 8, Article ID e0197390, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. B. Greenwood, “Meningococcal meningitis in Africa,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 341–353, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  3. M. E. Peterson, Y. Li1, A. Bita et al., “Meningococcal serogroups and surveillance: a systematic review and survey,” Journal of Global Health, vol. 9, no. 1, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. I. Pelton, “The global evolution of meningococcal epidemiology following the introduction of meningococcal vaccines,” Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. S3–S11, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. World Health Organization-AFRO, Standard Operating Procedures for Case-Based Surveillance of Meningitis, Preparedness and Response to Meningitis epidemics, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, 2017.
  6. L. H. Harrison, S. I. Pelton, A. Wilder-Smith et al., “The Global Meningococcal Initiative: recommendations for reducing the global burden of meningococcal disease,” Vaccine, vol. 29, no. 18, pp. 3363–3371, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. World Health Organization, Laboratory Methods for the Diagnosis of Meningitis Caused by Neisseria Meningitidis, Streptococcus Pneumoniae, and Haemophilus Influenzae, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2nd edition, 2011.
  8. M. Kohli-Lynch, N. J. Russell, A. C. Seale et al., “Neurodevelopmental impairment in children after Group B streptococcal disease worldwide: systematic review and meta-analyses,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. S190–S199, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Ramakrishnan, A. J. Ulland, L. C. Steinhardt, J. C. Moïsi, F. Were, and O. S. Levine, “Sequelae due to bacterial meningitis among African children: a systematic literature review,” BMC Medicine, vol. 7, no. 47, pp. 1–17, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J.-M. Collard, B. Issaka, M. Zaneidou et al., “Epidemiology changes in meningococcal meningitis in Niger from 2008 to 2011 and the impact of vaccination,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 576, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. G. Djohy, A. H. Edja, and M. S. Djohy, “Représentations populaires de la méningite épidémique dans un contexte de changement climatique au Nord-Bénin,” Sciences sociales et santé, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 47–74, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. C. L. Trotter, C. Lingani, K. Fernandez et al., “Impact of MenAfriVac in nine countries of the African meningitis belt, 2010-15: an analysis of surveillance data,” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 867–872, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. P. Boisier, P. Nicolas, S. Djibo et al., “Meningococcal meningitis: unprecedented incidence of serogroup X--related cases in 2006 in Niger,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 657–663, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. World Health Organization, “Detecting meningococcal meningitis epidemics in highly-endemic African countries,” Weekly Epidemiological Record, vol. 75, no. 38, pp. 305–312, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  15. F. M. LaForce and J.-M. Okwo-Bele, “Eliminating epidemic group A meningococcal meningitis in Africa through a new vaccine,” Health Affairs, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1049–1057, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. T. P. Godjedo, M. N. Paraiso, A. J. Agbankpe et al., “Case-by-case surveillance for bacterial meningitis in Benin: data analysis, 2016 to 2018,” Open Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 10, no. 01, pp. 1–14, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. F. Sidikou, C. C. Potts, M. Zaneidou et al., “Epidemiology of bacterial meningitis in the nine years since meningococcal serogroup A conjugate vaccine introduction, Niger, 2010–2018,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 220, no. Supplement_4, pp. S206–S215, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. F. Paye, K. Gamougame, S. K. Payamps et al., “Implementation of case-based surveillance and real-time polymerase chain reaction to monitor bacterial meningitis pathogens in Chad,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 220, no. Supplement_4, pp. S182–S189, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. H. M. Soeters, A. O. Diallo, B. W. Bicaba et al., “Bacterial meningitis epidemiology in five countries in the meningitis belt of sub-Saharan Africa, 2015-2017,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 220, no. Supplement_4, pp. S165–S174, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. Codjoe and V. Nabie, “Climate change and cerebrospinal meningitis in the Ghanaian meningitis belt,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 6923–6939, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. H. Palmgren, “Meningococcal disease and climate,” Global Health Action, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 2061, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. D. Mounkoro, C. S. Nikiema, I. Maman et al., “Neisseria meningitidis serogroup W meningitis epidemic in Togo, 2016,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 220, no. Supplement_4, pp. S216–S224, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. O. Diallo, H. M. Soeters, I. Yameogo et al., “Bacterial meningitis epidemiology and return of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup A cases in Burkina Faso in the five years following MenAfriVac mass vaccination campaign,” PLoS One, vol. 12, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. O. T. Idoko, A. Diallo, S. O. Sow et al., “Community perspectives associated with the African PsA-TT (MenAfriVac) vaccine trials,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 61, no. suppl_5, pp. S416–S421, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. White, O. Idoko, S. Sow et al., “Antibody kinetics following vaccination with MenAfriVac: an analysis of serological data from randomised trials,” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 327–336, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. Yaro, B.-M. Njanpop Lafourcade, S. Ouangraoua et al., “Antibody persistence at the population level 5 years after mass vaccination with meningococcal serogroup A conjugate vaccine (PsA-TT) in Burkina Faso: need for a booster campaign?” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 435–443, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. Bwaka, A. Bita, C. Lingani et al., “Status of the rollout of the meningococcal serogroup A conjugate vaccine in African meningitis belt countries in 2018,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 220, no. Supplement_4, pp. S140–S147, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. L. Sambo, M. Chan, S. Davis et al., “A vaccine meets its promise: success in controlling epidemic meningitis in sub-Saharan Africa,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 61, no. suppl_5, pp. S387–S388, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. C. Lingani, C. Bergeron-Caron, J. M. Stuart et al., “Meningococcal meningitis surveillance in the African meningitis belt, 2004–2013,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. S410–S415, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M.-K. Soumahoro, C. Kouamé-Elogne, J.-C. Anné, S. Noufé et al., “Emergence of Neisseria meningitidis W135 in Cote d’Ivoire: laboratory based-surveillance,” Epidemiology Health, vol. 40, Article ID e2018058, p. 5, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. Vuong, J. M. Collard, M. J. Whaley et al., “Development of real-time PCR methods for the detection of bacterial meningitis pathogens without DNA extraction,” PLoS One, vol. 11, Article ID e0147765, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. H. M. Wu, S. M. Cordeiro, B. H. Harcourt et al., “Accuracy of real-time PCR, Gram stain and culture for Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis and Haemophilus influenzae meningitis diagnosis,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 26, no. 13, 2013. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Togbemabou Primous Martial Godjedo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views2415
Downloads351
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.