Utilization of Integrated Community Case Management and Its Factors in Southern Ethiopia: Facility Based-Cross-Sectional Study

Table 3

Factors associated with ICCM service utilization in Hadiya Zone, Ethiopia, June 2018.

Variable	Variable category	Frequency	Crude OR 95% CI	Adjusted OR 95% CI
Sex of the respondent	Male	82	1.82 (0.95, 3.47)
	Female	492	1
Marital status	In union	551	1
	Not in union	23	0.53 (0.22, 1.27)
Respondents’ age	18–25	129	0.97 (0.58, 1.63)
	26–30	208	1.04 (0.66, 1.63)
	31–40	220	1
	>40	17	1.37 (0.38, 4.97)
Respondents’ education	No formal education	317	1	1
	Primary education	207	0.57 (0.38, 0.86)	0.61 (0.39, 0.96)
	Secondary education	32	1.03 (0.41, 2.62)	1.08 (0.39, 3.04)
	Tertiary education	18	4.05 (0.53, 31.01)	3.35 (0.41, 27.49)
Signs of malnutrition	Yes	17	0.38 (0.15, 0.97)	0.37 (0.12,1.14)
	No	540	1	1
Families sought medical help	Yes	81	0.48 (0.29, 0.79)	0.66 (0.37,1.17)
	No	476	1	1
Visited by HEWs	Yes	319	1	1
	No	238	2.24 (1.47, 3.43)	1.18 (0.72,1.93)
Informed about ICCM before	Yes	504	1	1
	No	53	13.12 (5.26, 32.77)	6.53 (2.50,17.05)
WDA membership	Yes	410	1	1
	No	147	4.63 (2.82, 7.59)	2.23 (1.26,3.92)
Had got services by HEWs before	Yes	324	1	1
	No	233	7.01 (3.37, 14.90)	2.20 (0.93,5.18)
Accept HEWs services	Yes	405	1	1
	No	152	5.80 (1.78, 18.87)	3.08 (0.83,11.45)
Family income	<22.03	138	1.53 (0.91, 2.59)	1.01 (0.55, 1.83)
	22.04–36.69	117	2.4 (1.31, 4.41)	2.00 (1.02, 3.81)
	36.70–89.02	176	1	1
	≥89.03	143	1.42 (0.85, 2.36)	1.32 (0.75, 2.31)
Family size	≤4.5	138	1.18 (0.74, 1.90)
	>4.5	436	1

Variables that were not transferred to multivariable analysis ().