Psychosocial Predictors for Cancer Prevention Behaviors in Workplace Using Protection Motivation Theory

Table 4

Descriptive statistics and intercorrelations between the main measures ().

	Age	Gender	Vulnerability	Severity	Fear	Self-efficacy	Cost	Reward	Response efficacy	Protection motivation	Behavior
Age	—	.029	−.127	−.066	−.090	−.040	−.125	−.054	−.074	.084	.099
Gender		—	−.002	.077	−.100	.112	−.127	−.140	.065	.093	.193
Vulnerability			—	.524	.547	−.226	.147	−.146	−.068	.084	.023
Severity				—	.604	−.356	.213	−.051	−.200	.007	−.007
Fear					—	−.347	.090	.038	−.181	−.011	−.091
Self-efficacy						—	−.229	−.232	.570	.425	.372
Cost							—	.062	−.197	−.244	−.289
Reward								—	−.282	−.270	−.228
Response efficacy									—	.447	.294
Protection Motivation										—	.517
Behavior											—
Mean	32.21	98	12.96	16.06	21.89	26.41	17.44	4.01	18.48	15.35	25.23
SD	4.22	60.9	1.94	2.88	4.77	5.23	3.77	1.37	3.18	2.67	4.72

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Correlation is significant at the 0.001 level (2-tailed).
Number; (%) of males.