Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Preventive Medicine
Volume 2016, Article ID 4815285, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4815285
Research Article

Evaluation of Quality and Readability of Health Information Websites Identified through India’s Major Search Engines

1Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India
2Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh 160012, India

Received 22 September 2015; Revised 9 February 2016; Accepted 2 March 2016

Academic Editor: Gerardo E. Guillén Nieto

Copyright © 2016 S. Raj et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. World Health Organization, The World Health Report 2008: Primary Health Care Now More Than Ever, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2008, http://www.who.int/whr/2008/en/.
  2. D. Lacher, E. Nelson, W. Bylsma, and R. Spena, “Computer use and needs of internists: a survey of members of the American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine,” in Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium, pp. 453–456, 2000.
  3. S. Fox and L. Rainie, The Online Health Care Revolution: How the Web Helps Americans Take Better Care of Themselves, Pew Charitable Trusts, Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
  4. N. L. Bennett, L. L. Casebeer, R. E. Kristofco, and S. M. Strasser, “Physicians' Internet information-seeking behaviors,” Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 31–38, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. W. Hesse, D. E. Nelson, G. L. Kreps et al., “Trust and sources of health information. The impact of the internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first health information national trends survey,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 165, no. 22, pp. 2618–2624, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. D. Abbas, A. M. Abubakar, B. Omeiza, and K. Minoza, “Information-seeking behavior and computer literacy among resident doctors in Maiduguri, Nigeria,” Annals of African Medicine, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 115–119, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. India to have 243 million internet users by June 2014: IAMAI, November 2014, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/tech-news/India-to-have-243-million-internet-users-by-June-2014-IAMAI/articleshow/29563698.cms.
  8. S. Bhandari and A. Kapoor, “Catching the e-healthcare bug, Webchutney digital healthcare report, 2011,” 2014, http://www.slideshare.net/sidharthrao/webchutney-digital-healthcare-report-2011.
  9. M. S. Eastin, “Credibility assessments of online health information: the effects of source expertise and knowledge of content,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 6, no. 4, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P. Doupi and J. Van der Lei, “Rx medication information for the public and the WWW: quality issues,” Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 171–179, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. G. K. Berland, M. N. Elliott, L. S. Morales et al., “Health information on the internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 285, no. 20, pp. 2612–2621, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. Eysenbach, J. Powell, O. Kuss, and E.-R. Sa, “Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web: a systematic review,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 287, no. 20, pp. 2691–2700, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Roshan, S. Agarwal, and R. J. A. England, “Role of information available over the internet: what are the parents of children undergoing tonsillectomy likely to find?” Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, vol. 90, no. 7, pp. 601–605, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. Petch, Content Analysis of Selected Health Information Websites: Final Report, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada, 2004, http://www.sfu.ca/act4hlth/pub/working/Content%20Analysis.pdf.
  15. R. Soobrah and S. K. Clark, “Your patient information website: how good is it?” Colorectal Disease, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. e90–e94, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. P. Impicciatore, C. Pandolfini, N. Casella, and M. Bonati, “Reliability of health information for the public on the World Wide Web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home,” British Medical Journal, vol. 314, no. 7098, pp. 1875–1879, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. H. Bower, “Internet sees growth of unverified health claims,” British Medical Journal, vol. 313, no. 7054, p. 381, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Health On the Net, “HONcode principles,” 2014, http://www.hon.ch/HONcode/Webmasters/Conduct.html.
  19. J. C. Wyatt, “Commentary: measuring quality and impact of the world wide web,” The British Medical Journal, vol. 314, no. 7098, pp. 1879–1881, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Badarudeen and S. Sabharwal, “Assessing readability of patient education materials: current role in orthopaedics,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 468, no. 10, pp. 2572–2580, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. World Top 50 best poular serach engines list: 2014, http://topbestlisted.blogspot.com/2011/08/worlds-top-10-best-popular-search.html.
  22. G. McFarlane, “Google Vs. Bing Vs. Yahoo: The Search Engine Wars (MSFT, GOOG),” 2015, http://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/070915/google-vs-bing-vs-yahoo-search-engine-wars.asp.
  23. Pew Research Centre, Healt Fact Sheet, January 2014, http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheets/health-fact-sheet.
  24. G. Eysenbach and C. Köhler, “How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews,” British Medical Journal, vol. 324, no. 7337, pp. 573–577, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. The LIDA Instrument (full version 1.2), http://www.minervation.com/lida-tool/minervation-lida-instrument-v1-2/.
  26. R. F. Flesch, “A new readability yardstick,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 221–233, 1948. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. P. Kincaid, R. P. Fishburne, R. L. Rogers, and B. S. Chissom, “Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count, and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel,” Research Branch Report 8–75, Chief of Naval Technical Training: Naval Air Station Memphis, 1975, http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a006655.pdf. View at Google Scholar
  28. G. H. McLaughlin, “SMOG grading: a new readability formula,” Journal of Reading, vol. 12, pp. 639–646, 1969. View at Google Scholar
  29. Readability Formulas, http://www.readabilityformulas.com/.
  30. G. S. Antonarakis and S. Kiliaridis, “Internet-derived information on cleft lip and palate for families with affected children,” The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 75–80, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. C. C. Doak, L. Doak, and J. H. Root, Teaching Patients with Low Literacy Skills, J. B. Lippincott, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2nd edition, 1996.
  32. A. Coulter, “Evidence based patient information is important, so there needs to be a national strategy to ensure it,” The British Medical Journal, vol. 317, no. 7153, pp. 225–226, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  33. Harris Interactive, “The growing influence and use of health care information obtained online,” 2011, http://www.harrisinteractive.com/vault/HI-Harris-Poll-Cyberchondriacs-2011-09-15.pdf.
  34. D. L. Greene, A. J. Appel, S. E. Reinert, and M. A. Palumbo, “Lumbar disc herniation: evaluation of information on the internet,” Spine, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 826–829, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. C. Livas, K. Delli, and Y. Ren, “Quality evaluation of the available internet information regarding pain during orthodontic treatment,” Angle Orthodontist, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 500–506, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. Gagliardi and A. R. Jadad, “Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: Chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination,” British Medical Journal, vol. 324, no. 7337, pp. 569–573, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. A. Malpani, “Using information therapy to put patients first,” 2012, http://www.healthlibrary.com/book110_chapter1206.htm.
  38. N. Lawrentschuk, R. Abouassaly, N. Hackett, R. Groll, and N. E. Fleshner, “Health information quality on the internet in urological oncology: a multilingual longitudinal evaluation,” Urology, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 1058–1063, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. A. M. Fast, C. M. Deibert, G. W. Hruby, and K. I. Glassberg, “Evaluating the quality of Internet health resources in pediatric urology,” Journal of Pediatric Urology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 151–156, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. P. Grewal and S. Alagaratnam, “The quality and readability of colorectal cancer information on the internet,” International Journal of Surgery, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 410–413, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus