Research Article
Improving the Consistency of Injection Molding Products by Intelligent Temperature Compensation Control
Table 5
Statistical analysis of results under different control methods.
| Method | Sample | Average weight (g) | Mean absolute deviation | Repeatability |
| Proposed | Product 1 | 32.4882 | 0.0739 | 0.2883% | Product 2 | 32.4856 | 0.0636 | 0.2572% | Sum | 32.4869 | 0.0687 | 0.2718% |
| PID | Product 1 | 32.3956 | 0.3109 | 1.0855% | Product 2 | 32.3532 | 0.2577 | 0.9396% | Sum | 32.3744 | 0.2864 | 1.0123% |
| GPC | Product 1 | 32.5868 | 0.2071 | 0.7253% | Product 2 | 32.5814 | 0.1857 | 0.6744% | Sum | 32.5841 | 0.1965 | 0.6968% |
|
|