Research Article

Ensemble Just-In-Time Learning-Based Soft Sensor for Mooney Viscosity Prediction in an Industrial Rubber Mixing Process

Table 2

Comparison of Mooney viscosity prediction results using different soft sensors ( = 10 for JIT learning).

No.MethodRMSERRMSE (%)R2

1PLS7.329811.70260.8002
2GPR4.26285.93540.9324
3GMMGPR3.46064.80770.9555
4JITGPR (ED similarity)3.15614.27000.9630
5JITGPR (cosine similarity)3.20534.34940.9618
6JITGPR (CWD similarity)3.65525.23700.9503
7JITGPR (CC similarity)3.20294.33130.9618
8SP-EJITGPR (SAR)3.21274.41050.9616
9SP-EJITGPR (PLS stacking)3.99165.40670.9407
10SP-EJITGPR (GPR stacking)3.77925.05080.9469
11SP-EJITGPR (FMM)3.06704.20730.9650
12MP-EJITGPR (SAR)4.37696.03320.9288
13MP-EJITGPR (PLS stacking)4.19665.39430.9345
14MP-EJITGPR (GPR stacking)3.78194.97350.9468
15MP-EJITGPR (FMM)2.92023.90850.9683

ED : Euclidean distance; CWD: covariance weighted distance; CC: correlation coefficient; SAR: simple averaging rule; FMM: finite mixture mechanism; SP: similarity perturbation; and MP: multimodal perturbation.