Advances in Polymer Technology

Advances in Polymer Technology / 2020 / Article
Special Issue

Design and Engineering of Polymer Systems for Bioapplications

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 9040535 |

Shahla Ataei, Pedram Azari, Aziz Hassan, Belinda Pingguan-Murphy, Rosiyah Yahya, Farina Muhamad, "Essential Oils-Loaded Electrospun Biopolymers: A Future Perspective for Active Food Packaging", Advances in Polymer Technology, vol. 2020, Article ID 9040535, 21 pages, 2020.

Essential Oils-Loaded Electrospun Biopolymers: A Future Perspective for Active Food Packaging

Academic Editor: Samira Hosseini
Received15 Oct 2019
Accepted13 Dec 2019
Published21 Feb 2020


The growth of global food demand combined with the increased appeal to access different foods from every corner of the globe is forcing the food industry to look for alternative technologies to increase the shelf life. Essential oils (EOs) as naturally occurring functional ingredients have shown great prospects in active food packaging. EOs can inhibit the growth of superficial food pathogens, modify nutritious values without affecting the sensory qualities of food, and prolong the shelf life when used in food packaging as an active ingredient. Since 2016, various reports have demonstrated that combinations of electrospun fibers and encapsulated EOs could offer promising results when used as food packaging. Such electrospun platforms have encapsulated either pure EOs or their complexation with other antibacterial agents to prolong the shelf life of food products through sustained release of active ingredients. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the essential oil-loaded electrospun fibers that have been applied as active food packaging material.

1. Introduction

For many decades, synthetic polymers have dominated food packaging industry due to their favourable properties such as softness, lightness, and transparency. So far, petrochemical-based plastics such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyvinylchloride (PVC), polyethylene (PE) [1], polypropylene (PP) [2], polystyrene (PS) [3], and polyamide (PA) [4] have been extensively used as packaging materials as a result of their low cost of synthesis, decent mechanical performance, lack of permeability to oxygen, carbon dioxide, anhydride, and aromatic compounds as well as heat sealability, all of which contribute to food preservation and waste reduction. Despite several desirable properties, the usage of conventional plastics needs to be restricted since their long degradation cycles pose serious ecological threats to the environment. Therefore, it is increasingly important to employ novel biodegradable raw materials. Although complete replacement of conventional plastics with eco-friendly plastics is impossible to achieve, at least for specific applications such as food packaging, the use of biobased active food packaging seems to be a realistic solution. Active food packaging is a new method to prolong the shelf life of food products and to maintain of their safety, quality, and integrity. According to the European regulation (EC) No. 450/2009, active packaging consists of systems that interact with the food as they would absorb substances such as moisture, carbon dioxide, or odour from packaged food or release desired materials such as antimicrobial, antioxidant compounds or flavours into the packaged food (European Commission 2009) [5]. Despite the importance of active food packaging, there are limitations associated with the existing polymeric materials to serve as optimal active packaging and modifications are necessary. Such modifications involve addition of other additives such as antimicrobial and antioxidant agents which are required.

EOs derived from different parts of aromatic plants have been extensively researched for being a natural product and their nutritional health benefits. The main interest in EOs lies in their various therapeutic properties, namely, antioxidant, antimicrobial, antitumour, analgesic, insecticidal, antidiabetic, and anti-inflammatory [69]. As of 2019, the number of published papers regarding essential oils in food industry is almost 800 papers, indicating the use of EOs as biopreservatives in all types of foods [10].

EOs hold great potential for active food packaging applications as they can be directly added to the food products or incorporated into food packaging for gradual release during transportation and storage to improve shelf life and preservation [11]. Although EOs have been demonstrated as an alternative to chemical preservatives in active food packaging systems, they are associated with certain limitations that need to be resolved for successful incorporation in active food packaging systems. High volatility, low aqueous solubility, and intense smell are the major shortcomings that have limited the usage of EOs in food industry. Therefore, the encapsulation of oils has been considered as a key solution in food packaging. Recent advances in encapsulation technology have improved the stability of sensitive components during production, through a reduction in evaporation and degradation of volatile compounds as well as firmer control over the capsules’ dimensions, shape, and morphology during the encapsulation process [12, 13]. These methods carry out chemical encapsulation through ionic gelation, simple and complex coacervation, cocrystallization, interfacial polymerization, molecular inclusion, entrapment in liposomes, and ionic gelation plus electrostatic interactions [14].

Among the various approaches for nanoencapsulation, electrospinning is a versatile, easy to operate method for continuous fabrication of nanostructures [15]. Electrospun membranes exhibit a fibrous morphology with large surface area to volume ratio, high porosity, and fiber diameters in the range of nano to micron, all of which are favourable properties for the sustained release of active ingredients from the packaging membrane to the surface of the food [16]. While electrospinning is widely applied in the fields of tissue engineering [17], wound dressing [18], enzyme immobilization [19], and electrode materials [20], its application as food packaging is only recently explored [21]. These recent advances in applications of loaded electrospun membranes in active food packaging call for a review on this topic. Although there are several reviews on relevant topics, the subject has the potential to be reviewed on its own merits.

Fernández-López and Viuda-Martos studied application of EOs in food systems [10]. Ribeiro-Santos et al. reviewed application of EOs incorporated into films and coatings in food packaging. Films containing EOs are usually produced via casting method [22]. In another study, São Pedro et al. reviewed nanoencapsulation of EOs into lipid carriers such as solid lipid nanoparticles, liposomes, and nanoemulsions for drug delivery systems. They concluded significant improvement in antimicrobial activity of EOs [23]. In the above-mentioned reviews, the authors have emphasized the potential of EOs to be used as a part of packaging materials or their direct incorporation into the food matrix. However, this review focuses on EOs, as effective protective antimicrobials, and their incorporation in active food packaging through electrospinning. The properties of the polymeric matrices, main active components of Eos, and encapsulation through electrospinning are reviewed. The main objective of this review is to provide a broad insight into the potential applications of electrospun nanofibers encapsulating EOs as active food packaging materials. To the best knowledge of the authors, there is no review available on application of encapsulated EOs in food packaging using electrospinning technique.

2. Essentials Oils (EOs) for Active Food Packaging

EOs are produced by angiospermic plants and have found various usages in different industries [24]. Among all the plant species, only aromatic plants are sources of EOs. Aromatic plants form about 10% of plant species (over 17,000) and are well distributed around world [25]. EOs are secondary metabolites which could be derived from different plant organs including flowers (jasmine, rose, chamomile, violet, and lavender), buds (clove), leaves (thyme, eucalyptus, salvia, and rosemary), fruits (star anise), twigs (Luma chequen), bark (cinnamon), seeds (cardamom), wood (sandal), rhizome, and roots (ginger), all of which have the potential to be applied in food packaging as antimicrobial and antioxidant agents [2630].

The chemical composition and quality of EOs depend on characteristics of the source plant such as growth conditions, variety, geographical origin, age, season, and condition of the plant when harvested. Extraction method, analysis conditions, and processing chemicals can also affect their properties [3134]. Their extraction yield is usually very low (about 1%) which makes them valuable rare substances. EOs consist of concentrated lipophilic volatile aroma compounds including terpenes, terpenoids, and phenol-derived aromatic and aliphatic components. The phenolic compounds in EOs can diminish or almost eliminate the presence of microorganisms and minimize lipid oxidation [35].

The natural extracts of EOs are classified as Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and received approval for safety and effectiveness [36]. Therefore, in food related application, they are more suitable alternatives to synthetic antioxidants such as butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) or butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) which might have a carcinogenic effect [36].

These oils are substances accountable for the active function of packaging with the flexibility to be settled in a different container or be directly added to the packaging material. In either of the cases, the release of the oils during transportation and storage leads to increased shelf life.

Electrospun-loaded EOs could be the answer to market demands as they allow foods to reach the consumers with their original or enhanced organoleptic properties, increased shelf life, and improved safety [3740]. The packaging materials produced in these systems can contain active ingredients designed for sustained release during storage or transportation to delay food deterioration.

Table 1 summarizes the essential oils that have been successfully used in food packaging for improved efficiency.

Essential oil combinationsPropertiesFood productApplied film material

Rosemary [41]AntimicrobialChickenCellulose acetate
Cinnamon clove [42]AntimicrobialBakeryCassava starch
Lemon, thyme, and cinnamon [43]AntibacterialNAChitosan
Cinnamon, winter savory, and oregano [44]AntimicrobialBologna and hamAlginate
Bergamot [45]Antifungal and antibacterialNAChitosan
Garlic, rosemary, and oregano [46]AntimicrobialNAWhey protein isolate (WPI)
Oregano [47]Antimicrobial (against S. aureus, Shewanella putrefaciens, and Yersinia enterocolitica) and antioxidantNAQuince seed mucilage
Oregano [48]AntimicrobialPizzaCellulosic resin
Oregano [49]AntimicrobialRipened sheep cheese modelPolypropylene (PP) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET)
Oregano and thyme [50]Antimicrobial (against Pseudomonas spp. and coliform bacteria)Fresh ground beefSoy protein
Oregano [51]AntimicrobialFresh beefWhey protein isolate (WPI)
Mixture of oregano, pimento berry, and lemongrass (mix A) and mixture of nutmeg, lemongrass, and citral (mix B) [52]Antimicrobial (against L. monocytogenes)Fresh broccoliMethylcellulose (MC) and blend of polycaprolactone/alginate (PCL/ALG)
Ginger, turmeric, and plai [53]AntioxidantNAFish skin gelatin
Satureja hortensis [54]Antibacterial and antioxidantNAk-Carrageenan
Oregano and pimento [55]AntioxidantWhole beef muscleMilk protein
Clove [56]AntibacterialFishGelatin chitosan
Clove [57]Antibacterial and antioxidantSardine pattiesSunflower protein concentrate
Linalool or methyl chavicol [39]AntimicrobialCheddar cheeseLow-density polyethylene (LDPE)
Oregano and bergamot [58]AntimicrobialFormosa plumHydroxypropyl methylcellulose and limonene constituent EO
Cinnamon and mustard [59]AntibacterialTomatoesZein
Limonene constituent EO, lemongrass, and oregano [60]AntimicrobialStrawberriesChitosan
Peppermint, red thyme, chitosan, and lemon [61]FlavouringStrawberryChitosan

3. Electrospinning and Nanoencapsulation in Active Food Packaging

Electrospinning which was first patented by Cooley and Morton in 1902 is a straightforward method for producing continuous micro- and nanofibers [62]. Unlike the conventional methods of fiber production which are based on application of mechanical force, electrospinning uses high-voltage electrostatic repulsive force for drawing and fiber stretching. Therefore, via electrospinning, it is possible to obtain fibers with diameters in the range of nanometres [63]. A typical electrospinning device is made up of a high voltage power source, a pump with tuneable feeding rate, a capillary as spinneret, and a collector. High voltage power source oppositely charges the capillary (commonly more than 10 kV) and the collector creating the pulling force for whipping instability [63]. When the charges building up within the polymer solution accumulate to a critical amount, a jet starts initiation from the capillary tip. The jet undergoes uniaxial stretching and thinning, while moving toward the oppositely charged collector and solvent evaporation is happening in the meantime. Once the jet reaches the collector, all the solvent should be evaporated, and formation of micro- or nanofibrous morphologies should have taken place. There are two sets of parameters that affect the morphology of the electrospinning products: intrinsic parameters such as solution viscosity, solvent evaporation rate, and conductivity of the polymer solution and processing parameters which include applied voltage, feeding rate, collector shape and texture, and collection distance [64]. Figure 1 shows the various aspects involved in production of encapsulated electrospun fibers including EO extraction (Figure 1(a)), complexation and solution preparation (Figure 1(b)), and a typical electrospinning system (Figure 1(c)). Several other techniques such as phase separation, bicomponent extrusion, template synthesis, drawing, centrifugal spinning, and melt blowing have been reported to produce polymeric micro/nanofibers [6569]. However, for food applications, most of these methods suffer from various shortcomings such as difficulty of control, lack of applicability to a wide range of materials, and exposure to chemicals affecting the stability of sensitive nutrients and prohibiting their usage due to toxicity concerns [7072]. Due to their size and high specific surface area, electrospun nanofibers have an edge in encapsulation efficiencies and demonstrate major potential for applications requiring controlled release of active ingredients, while exhibiting appropriate levels of biodegradability and biocompatibility [73]. The electrospun antimicrobial membranes are fabricated by adding antimicrobial agents into the polymer solution followed by electrospinning. Although the incorporation of EOs into nanofibers was demonstrated earlier, there was no report on the application of electrospun-loaded EOs for antimicrobial packaging materials until 2016 [74]. Biopolymers such as polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) [75], chitosan (CS) [74], polycarbonate (PC) [76], and polyethylene oxide (PEO) [77] have been popular options for encapsulation of EOs through electrospinning because of their excellent properties in generating nanofibers and membranes [21].

Within the last few years, nanoencapsulation of biological compounds in carrier materials has found its way to food technology as a simple yet effective technique for modification of the quality of food and preservation [78]. Encapsulation is effective in enhancing the stability and solubility of EOs as well as masking their strong flavour. Due to the hydrophobicity, instability, and volatility of EOs, they usually cannot be directly added to electrospinning solution and a carrier substance such as cyclodextrins (CDs), liposomes (LO), and CS is usually required [79, 80].

3.1. Encapsulation of Cinnamon Essential Oil (CEO)

CEO is a plant-derived antimicrobial substance of which FDA has categorized it as GRAS. Its protective qualities do not disturb the physicochemical or nutritious properties of the food. CEO exhibits a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity against a variety of microorganisms through prevention of cell wall biosynthesis, functions of membrane, and specific enzyme activities [81]. Encapsulation of CEO protects it from harsh environmental conditions, extends the shelf life, and allows controlled release of the active compound [82].

Conn et al. reported successful use of CEO as an antimicrobial agent against common microorganisms [83, 84]. CEO was encapsulated into β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) before incorporation in electrospun PVA fibers. CDs are cyclic oligosaccharides produced through enzymatic conversion of starch and exhibit nontoxic and biodegradable characteristics. Several studies have reported the use of CDs for food-related applications [8587]. CDs are composed of α-1,4-linked glucopyranose units and form a shortened cone-like structure cavity. As a result of their unique chemical structure, they form noncovalent host-guest inclusion complexes with EOs, CEO/β-CD inclusion complex (CEO/β-CD-IC), enhancing their solubility, chemical stability, and bioavailability and protecting them from oxidation [88]. The mechanism behind the complexation is the displacement of the high-enthalpy water molecules occupying the cavity, with a guest molecule of proper polarity and dimensions [89, 90]. Therefore, they are often used to encapsulate various types of food additives and essential oils [89].

β-CD is the most commonly used member of CDs which is a hydrophobic molecule capable of entrapping EOs within its inner cavity [91]. A novel antimicrobial membrane electrospun based on PVA, CEO, indicated molecular interactions amongst PVA, CEO, and β-CD, resulting in enhancement in thermal stability of CEO and masking its special flavour. Thermogravimetric analysis of PVA/CEO/β-CD nanofibers indicated a shift of the second weight loss peak to higher temperature (110–160°C) due to possible formation of chemical or hydrogen bonds between PVA and CEO. The inhibition zone of nanofibers based on PVA/CEO/β-CD was reported to be wider than that of PVA/CEO. The entrapment of CEO into the cavities of β-CD improved the solubility of CEO and led to a more effective release into the agar medium [92]. Moreover, water contact angle results indicated that addition of CEO/β-CD reduced the hydrophobicity of the nanofibrous membrane. Perhaps that explains the excellent antimicrobial properties of the PVA/CEO/β-CD nanofibrous film against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. According to the report, it effectively extended the shelf life of strawberries and showed potential for active food packaging applications. Furthermore, the electrospun membranes are managed to incorporate greater amount of CEO compared to casted film which resulted in enhanced antimicrobial activity.

Rieger and Schiffmann investigated the antimicrobial property of electrospun CS/cinnamaldehyde/PEO nanofibers against E. coli [74]. It was demonstrated that the inherent antibacterial properties of chitosan combined with the quick release of cinnamaldehyde (CA) achieved elevated inactivation rates against Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [74].

Wen et al. for the first time reported the use of polylactic acid (PLA) and CEO as antimicrobial food packaging material. CEO/β-CD-IC was successfully produced through coprecipitation method and modified the thermal stability of CEO. PLA was the selected polymer matrix since it is an FDA approved bioplastic as food-contact material [83, 93]. The CEO/β-CD-IC was encapsulated into PLA nanofibers by electrospinning [94]. The electrospun biodegradable PLA/CEO/β-CD nanofilm demonstrated better antimicrobial activity, against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, compared to PLA/CEO nanofilm. The results indicated that PLA/CEO/β-CD fiber efficiently increased the shelf life of pork, suggesting a potential application in active food packaging [94].

Liu et al. studied the effect CEO contents (1%, 1.5%, 2%, and 2.5% v/v) on the efficiency of encapsulation, nanoparticle dimensions, and antibacterial activity of CS nanoparticles loaded in PLA. CS nanoparticles as the carriers of CEO were added to the PLA solution followed by electrospinning. The obtained electrospun fibers were capable of sustained release of CEO [95]. The study suggested that addition of CEO could enhance the antibacterial activity of the PLA/CS-CEO fibers. The optimal composition was reported to be PLA/CS-CEO-1.5, which showed the greatest antibacterial activity against E. coli and S. aureus (99.3% and 98.4%, resp.) during the incubation period. The observation was a result of high crystallinity of CEO and its strong interactions with CS which lowered the solubility of PLA and allowed the CEO to exhibit a similar antimicrobial activity even at slower release rate [96].

Lin et al. reported encapsulation of CEO/β-CD/proteoliposomes into polyethylene oxide (PEO) nanofibers to study their antimicrobial behavior against Bacillus cereus (B. cereus) [97]. B. cereus is one of the major sources of contamination and spoilage in meat products [98]. B. cereus shows high adaptability to extreme environments (acidic, alkaline, and high temperature) [99]. Nanoantibacterial liposomes, artificial lipid vesicles, are microscopic morphologies made up of a central section enclosed by concentric phospholipid bilayers embedding aqueous cores. They are capable of encapsulating both hydrophilic substances in the inner aqueous section and hydrophobic matters within lipid bilayers and amphiphilic molecules at the lipid/water interface [88]. Proteoliposomes tend to agglomerate and shed when they come into a direct contact with food surface, as a result reducing the bioactivity of encapsulated substances. In addition, the hydrophobic nature of nanoliposomes has a negative effect on their encapsulation efficiency (EE) of EOs. Therefore, for further enhancement of the EE and stability of CEO in proteoliposomes, β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) is added to the system.

The physicochemical stability of CEO proteoliposomes was significantly enhanced by introduction of β-CD. Taking advantage of bacterial protease secreted from B. cereus, the controlled release of CEO from proteoliposomes was achieved via proteolysis of protein in proteoliposomes. Additionally, the antibacterial efficiency of CEO/β-CD proteoliposomes against B. cereus was improved as a result of their stability by encapsulation in nanofibers. The nanofibrous combination showed satisfactory antibacterial efficiency as active food packaging for beef against B. cereus without any impact on sensory quality while extending the shelf life.

Figure 2(a) shows the steps involved in preparation of CEO/β-CD (Figure 2) proteoliposomes and their incorporation in PEO spinning solution, while Figure 2(b) displays B. cereus proteinase-triggered CEO release from proteoliposomes. The CEO/β-CD proteoliposomes can precisely prevent bacterial multiplication by the stimulus-response of casein to bacterial protease in presence of B. cereus.

The combination of EO and lysozyme (LYS) when used as antimicrobial packaging can decrease the dose of EO besides extending the application of LYS-derived packaging material. Feng et al. reported a novel antimicrobial electrospun nanofilm based on PVA/β-cyclodextrin/CEO/LYS, where the combination of CEO and LYS was acting as antimicrobial agent [75]. LYS is a natural antimicrobial enzyme classified as GRAS which is usually derived from chicken egg white [100, 101]. LYS exhibits antimicrobial action toward Grampositive bacteria through splitting the bonds between N-acetylmuramic acid and N-acetylglucosamine of the peptidoglycan in the cell wall [102]. In this study, CEO was selected for its antimicrobial activity against bacteria (L. monocytogenes and S. enteritidis) and molds (A. niger (ATCC1015) and Penicillium (CICC41489)). The choice of PVA as the electrospinning matrix was because of its solubility in water soluble and biocompatibility as it has been extensively used in food preservation [103]. Furthermore, PVA could be applied without usage of organic solvents, thereby preventing the denaturation of LYS [104]. The aim of their study was to reduce the dosage of CEO in the packaging material without affecting antimicrobial action. The study suggested that the concentration of antimicrobial agent consisting 2% CEO and 0.25% LYS (w/w) in PVA matrix has a decent performance as food packaging material.

Shao et al. fabricated ultrafine PVA/permutite/CEO membranes via electrospinning [105]. PVA doped with permutite powder was applied as polymer matrix and CEO was encapsulated as the antibacterial component. Permutite is a nontoxic highly stable aluminosilicate which can be engaged in reversible interactions with various types substances including gas molecules [106]. The fabricated membranes were characterized for physicochemical properties such as morphology, porosity, surface area, tensile, and chemical interaction. Furthermore, the antibacterial action of the as-prepared films was explored for fruit packaging by using fresh cut strawberries. Fresh cut fruits hold a large share of the market since they only require partial processing without any additional preparation [107]. However, being susceptible to microorganisms such as mold, yeast, and fungi remains to be the major problem for the fresh cut fruit [108]. The release behavior in electrospun membranes is diffusion controlled as it is physically adsorbed by polymeric matrix and very low activation energy is required for the release process [109]. Such property finds importance at lower temperatures (4–6°C), where the release of EOs at low temperatures will hardly achieve the minimum concentration required for preservation [110]. In the study, differential scanning calorimetry and pore distribution results suggested weak physical interactions between the CEO and the fibers as a result of mesoporous adsorption (15.77 J/g and 37.7 J/g) which can benefit the release of CEO at low temperature. The authors concluded that PVA/permutite/CEO fibrous films have the potential to delay the rapid corruption of strawberries during storage.

3.2. Encapsulation of Eugenol Essential Oil

Eugenol (4-allyl-2-methoxyphenol), most abundantly found component in clove oil, nutmeg oil, and cinnamon oil, has been successfully applied in food preservation, cosmetics manufacturing, and traditional medicine. Several researches have confirmed antibacterial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and local anesthetic properties of eugenol [111]. Presence of high contents of phenolic compounds such as eugenol in volatile oils exhibits strong antioxidant properties [112]. Eugenol is a yellow oily liquid which exhibits lipid peroxidation induced by reactive oxidase system (ROS) because of its radical scavenging activity [35, 36, 113]. Like other EOs, eugenol also suffers from high volatility and poor water solubility. Therefore, encapsulation of eugenol is necessary to increase its effectiveness and longer shelf life [114]. Kayaci et al. in a joint research demonstrated that the EE of the volatile active agents such as menthol, vanillin, eugenol, geraniol, and allyl isothiocyanate was only effective when used with CD inclusion complexes (CD-IC) [15, 115118]. One of the challenges in encapsulation is to incorporate higher amounts of the active ingredient in the polymeric matrix [115, 119]. When electrospun polymers appear as carrier matrix, the amount of the active ingredients in CD system is often limited to 5% of the fabricated membrane’s weight. This is due to difficulty of electrospinning uniform nanofibers from polymeric solution containing higher amounts of CD. This research group recently focused on nanofibrous webs encapsulating much higher amounts of active agents (loading of ∼10% (w/w) or more with respect to fibrous CD matrix). They reported that production of polymer-free electrospinning from only CD systems was spun [120123].

Celebioglu et al. prepared excessively concentrated aqueous CD solutions (160% (w/v)) [124]. They prepared inclusion complexes between eugenol (guest molecule) and cyclodextrins (host molecules) at a molar ratio of 1 : 1 CD : eugenol followed by electrospinning to obtain nanofibrous webs (eugenol/CD). Since dimensions and form of the CD cavity are a significant parameter for formation of effective inclusion complexation, three different CD derivatives were applied in this work. The three modified CDs, namely, hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin (HP-β-CD), hydroxypropyl-gamma-cyclodextrin (HP-γ-CD), and methyl-beta-cyclodextrin (M-β-CD), were used to create inclusion complexes with eugenol. The resulting electrospun eugenol/CD samples showed self-standing and flexible characteristics as a mat web and displayed rapid solubility in water. Figure 3 demonstrates the chemical structure of modified CDs, eugenol, and schematic illustration of the inclusion complexation formation between CD and eugenol. Moreover, thermal stability of eugenol was enhanced for eugenol/CD/IC (up to ∼310°C) in comparison with pure eugenol (up to ∼200°C). Furthermore, eugenol/CD exhibited effective antioxidant activities. The strongest interactions within the complex were observed between M-β-CD and eugenol compared to the other two host CD molecules (HP-β-CD and HP-γ-CD) for eugenol/CD samples. The authors suggested potentials for their membranes in food related and oral-care applications.

Liposomal encapsulation of eugenol is an alternative way to decrease the damage to eugenol at processing and storage phase. Liposome containing eugenol is a natural and effective antioxidant that can encapsulate hydrophobic and lipophilic drugs [125]. However, liposomal instability as a major drawback can affect their efficiency as an antioxidant. Furthermore, conventional liposomes often have low EE and instability of vesicle aggregation, fusion, or rupture, all of which pose serious challenges to the commercial exploitation of eugenol liposomes as an industrial antioxidant. Therefore, the stability of eugenol liposome can affect the performance of the final product as active food packaging material. The stability of liposomes is being improved through various strategies such as polymer-coated liposomes, hydrogel-liposome composites, and nanoparticle-stabilized liposomes [126128].

Cui et al. reported an undemanding method to form an antioxidant based on novel complexes of liposome encapsulated SiO2-eugenol. SiO2-eugenol forms a supramolecular assembly with a core of colloidal particles covered by a lipid shell [127]. SiO2 nanoparticles in food industry serve as an additive which can provide stiff support for the lipid bilayer thin film to enhance physical stability of liposome [129]. Besides being porous, the hydrophilic property of SiO2 nanoparticles facilitates absorption when volatilization occurs [130, 131]. There are few reports of immobilization of liposome on electrospun nanofibers for food preservation [132, 133]. While SiO2-eugenol liposomes could not be electrospun on their own, their combination with PEO could be electrospun and showed great potential as food packaging material [103, 134]. Cui et al. reported production of a novel electrospun membrane based on PEO and SiO2-eugenol liposomes [135]. Figure 4 shows schematic illustration of liposomes-encapsulated SiO2-eugenol.

The study explored application of SiO2 as an architectural template for liposomes which could bring promising prospects to application of eugenol-based antioxidant. As a proof of concept, their electrospun membranes were exposed in contact with beef over a period of 60 days and exhibited excellent antioxidant activity.

Munteanu et al. investigated the biodegradation and tensile properties of PLA membranes coated with antimicrobial and antioxidant CS-EO complexes [136]. Chitosan has exhibited significant antibacterial action against various pathogens such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [137]; therefore, it has been a popular subject of studies in antibacterial coatings [138]. It also can encapsulate other antibacterial agents such as nisin [139], which could further enhance the antimicrobial action of the packaging coatings [140]. PLA electrospun membranes were coated with bioformulations containing the essential and vegetable oils, that is, clove and argan oils loaded into CS. 99% of the argan oil is composed of acylglycerols, while the antioxidant constituents are tocopherols, squalene, sterols, and phenols [141, 142]. Eugenol as the major volatile constituent of clove oil (about 80%) is accountable for its antioxidant and antimicrobial properties [143]. The study involved coaxial electrospraying of encapsulated CS over the electrospun PLA membrane which was placed on the metallic collector. Based on the report when high molecular weight CS was used, the coaxial electrospinning produced beaded CS nanofibers with the oil encapsulated and distributed along the beaded fibers. On the other hand, use of lower molecular weight CS led to electrospraying loaded chitosan nanoparticles and providing smoother surface. The PLA films coated with CS-EO formulations exhibited higher antibacterial activity compared to the films coated only with CS. The clove oil’s antibacterial activity was higher than argan oil due to its higher phenolic content. The beaded fibers showed better antibacterial activity compared to nanoparticles perhaps due to the higher specific surface area of the rougher nanofibrous morphology of the coating layer.

Melendez-Rodriguez et al. encapsulated eugenol within the pores of mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MCM-41) by vapor adsorption [144]. Subsequently, for the first time, electrospinning technique was applied to include MCM-41 particles containing eugenol into poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV). To fabricate continuous films, the produced electrospun fibers were thermally treated at 155°C. The resultant PHBV films filled with eugenol-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles revealed increased mechanical strength, adequate thermal resistance, and good barrier properties to water vapor and limonene. According to their results, they suggested that the films can be used in the form of coatings or interlayers for active food packaging applications.

Cui et al. evaluate the antibacterial activity of clove oil-loaded chitosan nanoparticles (CO@CNPs) and gelatin electrospun nanofibers against E. coli O157:H7 biofilms on cucumbers [145]. Once CO@CNPs were used at 30% (w/v), E. coli O157:H7 population reduced to approximately 99.98% and high antibacterial activity was achieved after 8 hours. Following this, electrospinning was applied to incorporate the prepared CO@CNPs into gelatin nanofibers. After applying 9 mg/mL gelatin/CO@CNPs treatment for 24 h, the population of E. coli O157:H7 biofilm decreased to almost 99.99% in vitro. The results confirmed that treatment of the gelatin/CO@CNPs nanofibers could maintain the flavour and color of cucumber for more than 4 days. Based on their results, both CO@CNPs and gelatin/CO@CNPs nanofibers at specified amount showed significant destruction effect on E. coli O157:H7 biofilms in vitro.

3.3. Encapsulation of Thyme Essential Oil (TEO) and Thymol (THY)

TEO, a plant secondary metabolite possessing safe and nontoxic properties, is derived from thymus vulgaris. TEO exhibits excellent antibacterial action against a wide spectrum of bacteria such as Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis CICC 21482 (S. enteritidis), and Salmonella typhimurium CICC 22956 (S. typhimurium) [146]. However, TEO suffers from several shortcomings such as volatility, hydrophobicity, and special flavour which highlight the need for encapsulation which is usually achieved through a coprecipitation of TEO into ß-CD [91].

THY is also the major volatile component of essential oils derived from plants belonging to the Lamiaceae family. It is a monoterpene usually found in oregano and thyme; however, its preservation and delivery applications remain to be a challenge due to its hydrophobic and volatile nature. It is registered in European flavouring list and classified as GRAS by FDA [147]. THY exhibits antimicrobial action against a wide range of microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, and yeasts [148150] through its capacity to disturb the lipid bilayer of the cell membrane and could increase membrane permeability [151]. THY is typically used for food preservation and control of postharvest decay of fresh produce [152, 153].

Lin et al. reported production of gelatin nanofibers containing TEO/β-cyclodextrin ε-polylysine nanoparticles (TCPNs) for controlling the propagation of Campylobacter jejuni (C. jejuni) [154]. C. jejuni is the major source of contamination on poultry surface which poses huge threats to human health. Moreover, C. jejuni is a zoonotic pathogen that lives as a symbiotic microorganism in the digestive tract of the poultry [113]. During poultry slaughter, C. jejuni can leak and rupture through external channel and cause meat contamination. The C. jejuni contaminated meat is known to be the main cause of human campylobacteriosis which accounts for 8.4% of the diarrheal diseases [155].

C. jejuni meat contaminations may not be completely inactivated as it shows high resistance against some frequently used antibiotics such as cephalosporins, quinolones, and gentamicin [156] and the demand for an efficient natural antibacterial agent to replace chemical antibiotics frequently used in meat industry. Since C. jejuni primarily contaminates meat surface, an antimicrobial packaging has a great potential to inhibit its reproduction.

A simple TEO/β-CD-IC is not effective against C. jejuni as β-CD has an electroneutral nature and its absorption onto negatively charged bacterial cell wall is limited. To address this issue ionic gelation was applied to adsorb cationic biopolymers onto the surface of TEO/β-CD-IC [157]. In the study, ε-polylysine (ε-PLY), a biodegradable cationic biological metabolite with outstanding antibacterial properties, was selected to prepare TEO/β-CD ε-polylysine nanoparticles (TCPNs) [158]. The presence of –NH2 along the ε-PLY chains improves nanoparticle binding onto negatively charged bacterial cell wall leading to an acceleration in the apoptosis process [159]. Antibacterial nanofibers were obtained by adding TCPNs into the polymer matrix via electrospinning. The prepared membranes showed outstanding antimicrobial action against C. jejuni, through membranolysis. The results confirmed that damaged cell membrane and proteins leakage of C. jejuni were results of antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles. Chicken samples packed in the antimicrobial membranes possessed lower aerobic bacterial count and thiobarbituric acid (TBA). Total volatile basic nitrogen (TVBN) and pH values were lower as well without any adverse effect on color, texture, and sensory evaluation, signaling bright prospects for the membranes in poultry preservation.

Aytac et al. reported encapsulation of THY/γ-CD-IC into in electrospun zein nanofibrous web for food packaging application [160]. Two different molar ratios THY/γ-CD (1 : 1 and 2 : 1, resp.) were prepared and encapsulated into electrospun zein nanofibers. Figure 5 shows the chemical structure of THY, schematic representation of γ-CD, and THY/γ-CD-IC formation. The choice of γ-CD was due to its lack of adverse effects on nutrient absorption in food products and nutraceutical applications [161]. Successful formation of complex between THY and γ-CD at both molar ratios was reported. Cyclodextrin inclusion complexes of thymol (THY/CD-IC) have been demonstrated to be applicable in pork meat systems to prevent oxidation and enhance meat stability at high relative humidity (up to 75%) for long storage periods [162165].

However, it is worth mentioning that the release of THY was higher than that from zein-THY/γ-CD-IC nanofibrous membranes (2 : 1). Similarly, zein-THY/γ-CD-IC nanofibrous membranes (2 : 1) had stronger antibacterial activity against E. coli and S. aureus. In brief, zein-THY/γ-CD-IC nanofibrous membranes were most efficient at decreasing the bacterial count in meat stored over a 5-day period at 4°C. Thus, these membranes exhibit great potential as antibacterial food packaging material.

Zhang et al. encapsulated THY in poly(lactide-co-glycolide), PLGA fiber through core-shell coaxial electrospinning [166]. PLGA which is known for its biodegradability and controlled delivery properties [167] has the capability of encapsulating hydrophobic substances and had shown great potential in enhancing the efficiency of delivery in food systems [168, 169]. The study indicated that nanofibers with good core-shell structure were formed and volatile THY was encapsulated successfully. The results demonstrated that PLGA can efficiently suppress the volatilization of THY, so the encapsulated thymol gradually evaporates into the fruits and vegetables storage environment. In their work, the antibacterial and fruit preservation ability of the nanofiber films were tested by strawberry. The results suggested that the produced membranes efficiently inhibit bacterial, fungal, and yeast growth to extend the shelf life of fruits. This novel biocompatible antibacterial packaging material would have a huge application prospect for food preservation.

3.4. Encapsulation of Tea Tree Oil (TTO), Peppermint Oil (PO), Chamomile Oil (CO), Chrysanthemum Essential Oil (CHEO), and Moringa Oil (MO)

TTO is a natural essential oil which is composed of several organic substances such as terpene hydrocarbons, terpene alcohols, and terpene phenols. There are several reports regarding antimicrobial and anticancer properties of TTO [170, 171]. However, like other EOs, the application of TTO remains limited due to its chemical instability in exposure to air and high temperatures [172]. Therefore, forming noncovalent inclusion complex with ß-CD as an antibacterial agent paves the way toward stability [173].

Cui et al. studied the incorporation of TTO/β-CD-IC, as antibacterial agent into electrospun PEO, to fabricate antibacterial packaging material [174]. As mentioned earlier, TTO is not completely soluble in aqueous PEO solution and the volatilization of TTO would intensify during the electrospinning which might create further problems regarding quick release during storage [175]. Therefore, in the study, the ß-CD and TTO were used as a host guest to create water-soluble inclusion complex. The membranes were subjected to plasma treatment, and after the treatment the efficiency of antibacterial agent release from PEO nanofibers was improved appropriately. The plasma treated electrospun membranes exhibited the highest antibacterial activity against E. coli O157:H7 on the beef for a period of 7 days, with inhibition efficiently of 99.99% at either 4°C or 12°C. According to their results, the plasma-treated PEO nanofibers containing TTO/β-CD prolong the shelf life of beef and sustain its sensory quality which suggests a bright prospect in food preservation.

Tang et al. fabricated gelatin nanofibers incorporating two kinds of EOs, that is, peppermint essential oil (PO) and chamomile essential oil (CO), for potential edible packaging application [176]. PO has excellent antimicrobial property, which made it the subject of several studies in food preservation, pharmaceuticals, and wound dressing [177179]. CO on the other hand is mostly used in medicinal tea, cosmetics, perfumery, and food industry due to its calming, antibacterial, and antioxidant properties [180183]. Gelatin nanofibers loaded with PO and CO were successfully produced with morphological homogeneity and smoothness. All the gelatin nanofibers containing PO, CO, or their combination showed enhanced antibacterial action proportionate to EO content against Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) as well as certain antioxidant property. Incorporation of CO resulted in improved antioxidant activity, while the antibacteria activity against E. coli and S. aureus was better for the nanofibers containing EO. The mixture of PO and CO in gelatin nanofiber showed overall better bioactivities compared to the samples that contained only one of them. Addition of EOs enhanced the surface hydrophobicity of nanofibers based on water contact angle results. This is important since the high hydrophilicity and sensitivity to moisture of gelatin are one of its major drawbacks as packaging material [184]. Therefore, it is not surprising that researches have been focused on blending gelatin with other hydrophobic materials to eliminate its drawbacks for food packaging applications [185, 186]. Along with hydrophobic polymers, EOs could be an alternative to be incorporated in gelatin-based packaging for improvement of bioactivities as well as the required physical properties [187]. The high surface area to volume ratio and the nanostructure of electrospun nanofibers were shown to improve the sustained release of bioactive ingredients to food surface and intensify the bioactive actions [16, 84]. Furthermore, the addition of EO is reported to enhance mechanical flexibility of electrospun membranes and to control tensile modulus and strength. The mentioned phenomena are achieved through affecting morphology and diameter of nanofibers by inducing rearrangement of protein network and cross-links between the polymer chains and some constituents of EOs [5]. Finally, the cytotoxicity test demonstrated the noncytotoxicity of gelatin nanofibers incorporated with PO and CO, thus indicating the potential of the gelatin/EOs nanofibers as prospective food packaging.

Chrysanthemum essential oil (CHEO) is an aromatic oil extracted from chrysanthemum which has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties [188]. Chrysanthemum has cardiovascular protective functions and can prevent a variety of diseases such as hypertension, atherosclerosis, and coronary heart disease [189, 190].

Lin et al. incorporated CHEO into CS nanofibers (CS/NF) using electrospinning [191].

Since CHEO had a negative effect on phosphofructokinase activity, hexokinase, and pyruvate kinase in L. monocytogenes cells, antibacterial properties of CHEO against L. monocytogenes increased. The slow release of CHEO from CHEO/CS/NF effectively prolonged the antibacterial action. The antibacterial application of the CHEO nanofibers against L. monocytogenes was tested on beef. Beef parameters like thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), pH values, and texture at different storage temperatures (4°C, 12°C, and 25°C) were evaluated. Due to the presence of antioxidant components in CHEO released from CHEO/CS/NF, the beef parameters like thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) value in treated beef were lower (0.135 MDA/) comparing with the untreated sample. Moreover, pH value for beef sample packed with CHEO/CS/NF showed 6.43 (after 10 days of storage) that was lower than pH value of unpacked sample (7.05) at 4°C. They suggested a potential application in food packaging.

Moringa oil (MO), an essential oil derived from Moringa oleifera, is resistant to autooxidation. Moringa oleifera grows in South and Central America, Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Indian subcontinent [192]. Lin et al. fabricated MO-loaded chitosan nanoparticles (MO@CNPs) and loaded them into gelatin nanofibers for biocontrol of L. monocytogenes and S. aureus on cheese [193]. Beside the excellent physicochemical properties of nanofibers, they had outstanding antibacterial activity against S. aureus and L. monocytogenes on cheese at 4°C and 25°C and negligible impact on the surface color and sensory quality of cheese within 4 days of storage. Hence, the MO@CNPs loaded gelatin nanofiber demonstrated excellent antibacterial action as a candidate for further food application studies.

To summarize, Table 2 demonstrates successful encapsulation of the different EOs into various carriers and electrospun matrices with their food related properties. The relevant electrospinning parameters could be found in Table S1 in Supplementary Materials.

MatrixEssential oil (guest)Carrier (host)Food evaluatedActionFindings

PVA [84]CEOβ-CDStrawberriesAntibacterial against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (S. aureus and E. coli)(1) Addition of CEO/β-CD caused to increase water contact angle and more hydrophilicity of the nanofibrous film
(2) Enhanced antimicrobial action compared with that of casted films
(3) The molecular interaction among PVA, CEO, and ß-CD modified the thermal stability of CEO
(4) Electrospinning achieved incorporation of greater amounts CEO in the membrane and enhanced antimicrobial action compared to film casting

PEO [74]CinnamaldehydeCSNAAntimicrobial against E. coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa(1) The release of CA from CS/CA (0.5 and 5.0%)/PEO nanofibrous membranes directly affected cytotoxicity against P. aeruginosa (within three hours, 81 ± 4% of the P. aeruginosa was deactivated)

PLA [94]CEOβ-CD-ICPorkAntibacterial against E. coli and S. aureus(1) The CEO/ß-CD-IC was prepared by the coprecipitation
(2) Formation of CEO/β-CD-IC considerably improved the thermal stability and antimicrobial activity of CEO
(3) The electrospun PLA/CEO/β-CD nanofibers showed outstanding antimicrobial action against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria
(4) Electrospinning achieved incorporation of greater amounts CEO in the membrane and enhanced antimicrobial action compared to film casting

PLA [95]CEOCSNAAntibacterial against E. coli and S. aureusThe optimal composition found to be PLA/CS-CEO-1.5, which exhibited the highest antibacterial activity for a long time

PEO nanofibers [97]CEOβ-CD proteoliposomesBeef and meat production preservationAntibacterial against B. cereus(1) The antibacterial effect of CEO/β-CD proteoliposomes against B. cereus increased, and their stability enhanced due to encapsulation
(2) The physicochemical stability and the EE of CEO proteoliposomes were significantly enhanced through introduction of ß-CD
PVA [75]CEO/LYSβ-CDNAAntibacterial against L. monocytogenes and Salmonella enteritidis. Antifungal against Aspergillus niger and Penicillium(1) The suitable CEO and LYS concentrations were as 2% (w/w) and 0.25% (w/w), respectively
(2) The molecular interactions among PVA, ß-CD, CEO, and LYS modified the thermal stability of CEO and LYS
(3) The minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) against L. monocytogenes and S. enteritidis was approximately 0.8–1 mg/mL
(4) Minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) was approximately 6-7 mg·mL−1

PVA doped with permutite powder [105]CEOPVA/permutiteFresh cut fruits (strawberry)Antibacterial(1) The nanofibrous mat exhibited high porosity with the pore size distribution ranging from 1.7 nm to 56.7 nm
(2) DSC and pore distribution analysis indicated presence of weak physical interactions between the CEO and nanofibers due to mesoporous adsorption (15.77 J/g and 37.7 J/g) which helps release of CEO at low temperature

Eugenol/CD/IC-NW (self-standing (without matrix) [124]EugenolCD/ICNAAntioxidant(1) Volatility nature of eugenol was preserved (∼70–95%) in eugenol/CD inclusion complex nanofibrous webs (eugenol/CD/IC-NW)
(2) Thermal stability of eugenol for eugenol/CD/IC-NW increased up to ∼310°C from ∼200°C
(3) The eugenol/CD/IC-NW showed rapid aqueous dissolution, contrary to poor water solubility of eugenol
(4) The strongest complexation was between M-β-CD and eugenol compared to other two host CD molecules (HP-β-CD and HP-γ-CD)
(5) The electrospun eugenol/CD/IC-NW samples exhibited improved antioxidant action compared to eugenol in its pure form
(6) Radical scavenging property of eugenol/CD/IC-NW was enhanced compared to eugenol in its pure form

PEO [135]SiO2-eugenolLiposomeBeefAntioxidantLiposomes containing SiO2-eugenol was immobilized on electrospun nanofibers. This system exhibited outstanding antioxidant action on beef during 60-day storage
PLA [136]Clove containing 80% eugenol (essential oil) and argan oils (vegetable oils)CSNAAntibacterial and antioxidant(1) The samples prepared with Chit-H showed higher roughness of the coating layer compared to samples prepared with Chit-L
(2) Chit-H samples showed higher antibacterial action compared to Chit-L, for either of the oils, due to the higher specific surface area of the rougher morphology of the coating layer
(3) The clove oil had better antibacterial activity than argan oil, in combination with both chitosan types
(4) Chit-H samples showed higher antibacterial activity compared with Chit-L, in combination with both types of oil
(5) PLA coated with chitosan-oil formulations had higher antibacterial action than the films coated with pure CS
(6) The chitosan-clove oil combination showed higher antioxidant action compared to pure CS coating.

PHBV films [144]EugenolMesoporous silica nanoparticlesNAAntimicrobial against S. aureus and E. coli(1) The incorporation of eugenol EO on MCM-41 significantly increased plasticization on PHBV and a reduction in its crystallinity
(2) The mechanical strength of the PHBV films and barrier properties were enhanced
(3) The incorporation of MCM-41 with eugenol caused slight reduction in ductility

Gelatin nanofibers [145]Clove oilCSCucumberAntibacterial against E. coli O157:H7Approximately 99.98% reduction in E. coli O157:H7 population was obtained after 8 hours of treatment, when CO@CNPs were used at 30% (w/v)

Gelatin [154]TEOβ-CD ε-polylysineChickenAntimicrobial against C. jejuni(1) The TCPNs loaded gelatin nanofibers (TEGNs) exhibited exceptional antimicrobial action against C. jejuni on chicken
(2) The TEGNs packaged chicken samples had lower aerobic bacterial count, TBA, TVBN, and pH values without undesirable effect on color, texture, and sensory evaluation

Zein [160]THY/γ-CD-ICZeinMeatAntimicrobial against E. coli and S. aureus(1) THY/γ-CD-IC (2 : 1) exhibited higher preservation rate and stability than THY/γ-CD-IC (1 : 1)
(2) Zein-THY/γ-CD-IC-NF (2 : 1) contained more THY as indicated by TGA
(3) THY/γ-CD-IC (2 : 1) had higher stability. The released amount of THY from zein-THY/γ-CD-IC-NF (2 : 1) was more than zein-THY-NF and zein-THY/γ-CD-IC-NF (1 : 1)
(4) Antibacterial action of zein-THY/γ-CD-IC-NF (2 : 1) was greater than zein-THY-NF and zein-THY/γ-CD-IC-NF (1 : 1)
PLGA [166]THYPLGA nanofiberFruitsInhibition of the growth of bacteria, fungi, and yeastDue to core-shell morphology, THY encapsulated in the PLGA nanofiber is slowly released to inhibit the growth of bacteria on the surface of food

PEO [174]TTOβ-CD-ICBeefAntibacterial against E. coli O157:H7(1) The highest antibacterial action against E. coli O157:H7 was observed on the beef for 7 d, at 4°C or 12°C
(2) The flavour values significantly enhanced in plasma-treated TTO/β-CD-IC PEO nanofibers compared with the control groups
(3) TTO/β-CD-IC at concentrations of 30% and 40% exhibited great antibacterial action leading to a 99.94% and 99.96% decrease in population after 24 hours

Gelatin [176]POGelatinNAAntibacterial against E. coli and S. aureus(1) The combination of PO and CO in gelatin nanofiber showed overall improved bioactivities compared to PO or CO alone
(2) The surface hydrophobicity of nanofibers was enhanced with the addition of EOs
(3) The addition of EO was reported to improve mechanical flexibility of electrospun mats with the ability to tune tensile modulus and strength of nanofibers

CS [191]CHEOCSBeefAntibacterial against L. monocytogenes(1) The cell membrane permeability of L. monocytogenes increased
(2) Respiratory metabolism of L. monocytogenes was prevented
(3) The slow release of CHEO from CHEO/CS/NF achieved an antibacterial inhibition efficiency of 99.91 to 99.97% between 4°C and 25°C
(4) In presence of antioxidant agents in ECHO/CS/NF, the value of TBARS in treated beef was 0.135 MDA/kg

Gelatin [193]MOCSCheeseAntibacterial against L. monocytogenes and S. aureusNanofibers have high antibacterial effect at 4°C and 25°C with negligible effect on surface color

4. Conclusions

Growing consumer demand for safe and chemical-free natural products has improved the quality and safety of the products against pathogenic deterioration and lipid oxidation within their shelf life. Especial attention has been given to EOs as natural additives and antimicrobial and antioxidant agents classified as GRAS. In this regard, the study of EOs has great importance, since it has been proven that their antimicrobial activity can replace artificial preservatives. However, their low solubility in water, oxidation susceptibility, and volatilization have limited their use. The encapsulation technique is a beneficial way in improving the stability of EOs and thus their efficiency as antibacterial/antioxidant agents. The combination of electrospinning and nanoencapsulation EOs has allowed successful development of new antimicrobial packages for food preservation. These new nanoencapsulation techniques have attracted global interest in food packaging and research area due to the positive protection and environmental friendliness. As presented in the article, these new combinations take advantage of encapsulation and slow release properties of electrospun polymers as a potential new platform for stabilization of natural oils for food packaging.

While the initial results of loaded electrospun fibers for food packaging are promising, it should not be forgotten that the composite nanofibers hugely depend on electrospinning process. Electrospinning despite various advantages has serious problems as well. Low production rate especially for aqueous polymeric solutions remains a major problem, along with limitations to selection of highly volatile organic solvents as well. Particularly, solvents must not have any adverse effect on the antimicrobial properties of the active ingredients or bring the risk of future side effects. Technical advancements in electrospinning in terms of process control and production rate within the last three decades have provided an opportunity to use nanofibers for more applications. However, electrospinning still needs lots of further innovations in order to upscale production rate and quality for food packaging application at industrial scale.

The current review demonstrated that electrospinning technology is a potential new platform for enhanced stabilization by encapsulation of natural oils in nanofibers. Whilst the initial results suggest great prospects for loaded nanofibers as food packaging, to produce a feasible product at industrial scale, loaded electrospun fibers require extensive processing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


This research was funded by Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) FP096-2018A and Research University Grant-Faculty Program GPF013A-2018. S. Ataei would like to acknowledge the University of Malaya for her appointment as Visiting Research Fellow (Ref. UM/PS-19308).

Supplementary Materials

Table S1: the electrospinning parameters used in related references. (Supplementary Materials)


  1. P. Tice, Packaging Materials: 4. Polyethylene for Food Packaging Applications, ILSI, Washington, DC, USA, 2003.
  2. S. Allahvaisi, Polypropylene in the Industry of Food Packaging, IntechOpen, London, UK, 2012.
  3. K. Cassidy and S. Elyashiv-Barad, “US FDA’s revised consumption factor for polystyrene used in food-contact applications,” Food Additives and Contaminants, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1026–1031, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. J. Elyashiv-Barad, S. Plant, and J. W. Strawbridge, Plastics in Food Packaging, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011. View at: Publisher Site
  5. S. Yildirim, B. Röcker, M. K. Pettersen et al., “Active packaging applications for food,” Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 165–199, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. Ocaña-Fuentes, E. Arranz-Gutiérrez, F. J. Señorans, and G. Reglero, “Supercritical fluid extraction of oregano (Origanum vulgare) essentials oils: anti-inflammatory properties based on cytokine response on THP-1 macrophages,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1568–1575, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. V. S. Periasamy, J. Athinarayanan, and A. A. Alshatwi, “Anticancer activity of an ultrasonic nanoemulsion formulation of Nigella sativa L. essential oil on human breast cancer cells,” Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, vol. 31, pp. 449–455, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. H.-F. Yen, C.-T. Hsieh, T.-J. Hsieh, F.-R. Chang, and C.-K. Wang, “In vitro anti-diabetic effect and chemical component analysis of 29 essential oils products,” Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 124–129, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. F. Brahmi, A. Abdenour, M. Bruno et al., “Chemical composition and in vitro antimicrobial, insecticidal and antioxidant activities of the essential oils of Mentha pulegium L. and Mentha rotundifolia (L.) Huds growing in Algeria,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 88, pp. 96–105, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. Fernández-López and M. Viuda-Martos, “Introduction to the special issue: application of essential oils in food systems,” Foods, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 56, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C. M. Galanakis, “Recovery of high added-value components from food wastes: conventional, emerging technologies and commercialized applications,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 68–87, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. Jaworek, “Micro- and nanoparticle production by electrospraying,” Powder Technology, vol. 176, no. 1, pp. 18–35, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. Jaworek and A. T. Sobczyk, “Electrospraying route to nanotechnology: an overview,” Journal of Electrostatics, vol. 66, no. 3-4, pp. 197–219, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. Castro-Rosas, C. R. Ferreira-Grosso, C. A. Gómez-Aldapa et al., “Recent advances in microencapsulation of natural sources of antimicrobial compounds used in food—a review,” Food Research International, vol. 102, pp. 575–587, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. F. Kayaci and T. Uyar, “Encapsulation of vanillin/cyclodextrin inclusion complex in electrospun polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) nanowebs: prolonged shelf-life and high temperature stability of vanillin,” Food Chemistry, vol. 133, no. 3, pp. 641–649, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Y. P. Neo, S. Swift, S. Ray, M. Gizdavic-Nikolaidis, J. Jin, and C. O. Perera, “Evaluation of gallic acid loaded zein sub-micron electrospun fibre mats as novel active packaging materials,” Food Chemistry, vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 3192–3200, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. W.-J. Li, C. T. Laurencin, E. J. Caterson, R. S. Tuan, and F. K. Ko, “Electrospun nanofibrous structure: a novel scaffold for tissue engineering,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 613–621, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. R. A. Thakur, C. A. Florek, J. Kohn, and B. B. Michniak, “Electrospun nanofibrous polymeric scaffold with targeted drug release profiles for potential application as wound dressing,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 364, no. 1, pp. 87–93, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. R. El-Aassar, “Functionalized electrospun nanofibers from poly (AN-co-MMA) for enzyme immobilization,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic, vol. 85-86, pp. 140–148, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. Q. Dong, G. Wang, H. Hu et al., “Ultrasound-assisted preparation of electrospun carbon nanofiber/graphene composite electrode for supercapacitors,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 243, pp. 350–353, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. A. Bhushani and C. Anandharamakrishnan, “Electrospinning and electrospraying techniques: potential food based applications,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 21–33, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. R. Ribeiro-Santos, M. Andrade, N. R. d. Melo, and A. Sanches-Silva, “Use of essential oils in active food packaging: recent advances and future trends,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 61, pp. 132–140, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. São Pedro, I. E. Santo, C. V. Silva, C. Detoni, and E. Albuquerque, “The use of nanotechnology as an approach for essential oil-based formulations with antimicrobial activity,” in Microbial Pathogens and Strategies for Combating Them, A. Méndez-Vilas, Ed., vol. 2, pp. 1364–1374, Formatex Research Center Pulisher, Badajoz, Spain, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  24. R. Pavela, “Essential oils for the development of eco-friendly mosquito larvicides: a review,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 76, pp. 174–187, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. K. Svoboda and R. Greenaway, “Investigation of volatile oil glands of Satureja hortensis L.(summer savory) and phytochemical comparison of different varieties,” The International Journal of Aromatherapy, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 196–202, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. W. A. Wannes, B. Mhamdi, J. Sriti et al., “Antioxidant activities of the essential oils and methanol extracts from myrtle (Myrtus communis var. italica L.) leaf, stem and flower,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1362–1370, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. Dvaranauskaite, P. Venskutonis, C. Raynaud, T. Talou, P. Viskelis, and A. Sasnauskas, “Variations in the essential oil composition in buds of six blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum L.) cultivars at various development phases,” Food Chemistry, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 671–679, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. L. E. Hill, C. Gomes, and T. M. Taylor, “Characterization of beta-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes containing essential oils (trans-cinnamaldehyde, eugenol, cinnamon bark, and clove bud extracts) for antimicrobial delivery applications,” LWT—Food Science and Technology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 86–93, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J. Lv, H. Huang, L. Yu et al., “Phenolic composition and nutraceutical properties of organic and conventional cinnamon and peppermint,” Food Chemistry, vol. 132, no. 3, pp. 1442–1450, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. C. Vallverdú, R. Vila, F. Tomi, M. Carhuapoma, J. Casanova, and S. Cañigueral, “Composition of the essential oil from leaves and twigs of Luma chequen,” Flavour and Fragrance Journal, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 241–243, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. I. Hussain, F. Anwar, S. T. Hussain Sherazi, and R. Przybylski, “Chemical composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of basil (Ocimum basilicum) essential oils depends on seasonal variations,” Food Chemistry, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 986–995, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. Khajeh, Y. Yamini, N. Bahramifar, F. Sefidkon, and M. Reza Pirmoradei, “Comparison of essential oils compositions of Ferula assa-foetida obtained by supercritical carbon dioxide extraction and hydrodistillation methods,” Food Chemistry, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 639–644, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. P. S. Negi, “Plant extracts for the control of bacterial growth: efficacy, stability and safety issues for food application,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 156, no. 1, pp. 7–17, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. L. Riahi, H. Chograni, M. Elferchichi, Y. Zaouali, N. Zoghlami, and A. Mliki, “Variations in Tunisian wormwood essential oil profiles and phenolic contents between leaves and flowers and their effects on antioxidant activities,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 46, pp. 290–296, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. F. Bakkali, S. Averbeck, D. Averbeck, and M. Idaomar, “Biological effects of essential oils—a review,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 446–475, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. K.-K. Li, S.-W. Yin, X.-Q. Yang, C.-H. Tang, and Z.-H. Wei, “Fabrication and characterization of novel antimicrobial films derived from thymol-loaded zein-sodium caseinate (SC) nanoparticles,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 60, no. 46, pp. 11592–11600, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. D. Dainelli, N. Gontard, D. Spyropoulos, E. Zondervan-van den Beuken, and P. Tobback, “Active and intelligent food packaging: legal aspects and safety concerns,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 19, pp. S103–S112, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. Ozdemir and J. D. Floros, “Active food packaging technologies,” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 185–193, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. P. Suppakul, K. Sonneveld, S. W. Bigger, and J. Miltz, “Efficacy of polyethylene-based antimicrobial films containing principal constituents of basil,” LWT—Food Science and Technology, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 779–788, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. L. Vermeiren, F. Devlieghere, M. van Beest, N. de Kruijf, and J. Debevere, “Developments in the active packaging of foods,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 77–86, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. A. A. M. d. Melo, R. M. Geraldine, M. F. A. Silveira et al., “Microbiological quality and other characteristics of refrigerated chicken meat in contact with cellulose acetate-based film incorporated with rosemary essential oil,” Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1419–1427, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. A. C. Souza, G. E. O. Goto, J. A. Mainardi, A. C. V. Coelho, and C. C. Tadini, “Cassava starch composite films incorporated with cinnamon essential oil: antimicrobial activity, microstructure, mechanical and barrier properties,” LWT—Food Science and Technology, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 346–352, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. Y. Peng and Y. Li, “Combined effects of two kinds of essential oils on physical, mechanical and structural properties of chitosan films,” Food Hydrocolloids, vol. 36, pp. 287–293, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. Oussalah, S. Caillet, S. Salmiéri, L. Saucier, and M. Lacroix, “Antimicrobial effects of alginate-based films containing essential oils on Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella typhimurium present in bologna and ham,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 901–908, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. J. Hafsa, M. a. Smach, M. R. Ben Khedher et al., “Physical, antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of chitosan films containing Eucalyptus globulus essential oil,” LWT—Food Science and Technology, vol. 68, pp. 356–364, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. A. C. Seydim and G. Sarikus, “Antimicrobial activity of whey protein based edible films incorporated with oregano, rosemary and garlic essential oils,” Food Research International, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 639–644, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. M. Jouki, F. T. Yazdi, S. A. Mortazavi, and A. Koocheki, “Quince seed mucilage films incorporated with oregano essential oil: physical, thermal, barrier, antioxidant and antibacterial properties,” Food Hydrocolloids, vol. 36, pp. 9–19, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. D. A. Botre, N. d. F. F. Soares, P. J. P. Espitia, S. de Sousa, and I. R. T. Renhe, “Avaliação de filme incorporado com óleo essencial de orégano para conservação de pizza pronta,” Revista Ceres, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 283–291, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. V. Otero, R. Becerril, J. A. Santos, J. M. Rodríguez-Calleja, C. Nerín, and M.-L. García-López, “Evaluation of two antimicrobial packaging films against Escherichia coli O157:H7 strains in vitro and during storage of a Spanish ripened sheep cheese (Zamorano),” Food Control, vol. 42, pp. 296–302, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. Z. K. Emiroğlu, G. P. Yemiş, B. K. Coşkun, and K. Candoğan, “Antimicrobial activity of soy edible films incorporated with thyme and oregano essential oils on fresh ground beef patties,” Meat Science, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 283–288, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. K. G. Zinoviadou, K. P. Koutsoumanis, and C. G. Biliaderis, “Physico-chemical properties of whey protein isolate films containing oregano oil and their antimicrobial action against spoilage flora of fresh beef,” Meat Science, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 338–345, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. P. N. Takala, K. D. Vu, S. Salmieri, R. A. Khan, and M. Lacroix, “Antibacterial effect of biodegradable active packaging on the growth of Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium and Listeria monocytogenes in fresh broccoli stored at 4°C,” LWT—Food Science and Technology, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 499–506, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. P. Tongnuanchan, S. Benjakul, and T. Prodpran, “Physico-chemical properties, morphology and antioxidant activity of film from fish skin gelatin incorporated with root essential oils,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 350–360, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. S. Shojaee-Aliabadi, H. Hosseini, M. A. Mohammadifar et al., “Characterization of antioxidant-antimicrobial κ-carrageenan films containing Satureja hortensis essential oil,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 52, pp. 116–124, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. M. Oussalah, S. Caillet, S. Salmiéri, L. Saucier, and M. Lacroix, “Antimicrobial and antioxidant effects of milk protein-based film containing essential oils for the preservation of whole beef muscle,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 52, no. 18, pp. 5598–5605, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. J. Gómez-Estaca, A. López de Lacey, M. E. López-Caballero, M. C. Gómez-Guillén, and P. Montero, “Biodegradable gelatin-chitosan films incorporated with essential oils as antimicrobial agents for fish preservation,” Food Microbiology, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 889–896, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. P. R. Salgado, M. E. López-Caballero, M. C. Gómez-Guillén, A. N. Mauri, and M. P. Montero, “Sunflower protein films incorporated with clove essential oil have potential application for the preservation of fish patties,” Food Hydrocolloids, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 74–84, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. W. S. Choi, S. Singh, and Y. S. Lee, “Characterization of edible film containing essential oils in hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and its effect on quality attributes of “Formosa” plum (Prunus salicina L.),” LWT, vol. 70, pp. 213–222, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. J. Yun, X. Fan, X. Li, T. Z. Jin, X. Jia, and J. P. Mattheis, “Natural surface coating to inactivate Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and maintain quality of cherry tomatoes,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 193, pp. 59–67, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. K. D. Vu, R. G. Hollingsworth, E. Leroux, S. Salmieri, and M. Lacroix, “Development of edible bioactive coating based on modified chitosan for increasing the shelf life of strawberries,” Food Research International, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 198–203, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. Á. Perdones, I. Escriche, A. Chiralt, and M. Vargas, “Effect of chitosan-lemon essential oil coatings on volatile profile of strawberries during storage,” Food Chemistry, vol. 197, pp. 979–986, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. S. Ramakrishna, K. Fujihara, W.-E. Teo, T. Yong, Z. Ma, and R. Ramaseshan, “Electrospun nanofibers: solving global issues,” Materials Today, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 40–50, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. Z.-M. Huang, Y.-Z. Zhang, M. Kotaki, and S. Ramakrishna, “A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 63, no. 15, pp. 2223–2253, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. L. Wannatong, A. Sirivat, and P. Supaphol, “Effects of solvents on electrospun polymeric fibers: preliminary study on polystyrene,” Polymer International, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 1851–1859, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. V. Lassalle and M. L. Ferreira, “PLA nano- and microparticles for drug delivery: an overview of the methods of preparation,” Macromolecular Bioscience, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 767–783, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. L. G. Gómez-Mascaraque, G. Sanchez, and A. López-Rubio, “Impact of molecular weight on the formation of electrosprayed chitosan microcapsules as delivery vehicles for bioactive compounds,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 150, pp. 121–130, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. S. Torres-Giner, A. Martinez-Abad, M. J. Ocio, and J. M. Lagaron, “Stabilization of a nutraceutical omega-3 fatty acid by encapsulation in ultrathin electrosprayed zein prolamine,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. N69–N79, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. S. M. Jafari, Nanoencapsulation Technologies for the Food and Nutraceutical Industries, Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017.
  69. A. A. Almetwally, M. El-Sakhawy, M. Elshakankery, and M. Kasem, “Technology of nano-fibers: production techniques and properties-critical review,” Journal of the Textile Association, vol. 78, pp. 5–14, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  70. S. Chakraborty, I.-C. Liao, A. Adler, and K. W. Leong, “Electrohydrodynamics: a facile technique to fabricate drug delivery systems,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 1043–1054, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. A. López-Rubio, E. Sanchez, S. Wilkanowicz, Y. Sanz, and J. M. Lagaron, “Electrospinning as a useful technique for the encapsulation of living bifidobacteria in food hydrocolloids,” Food Hydrocolloids, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 159–167, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. R. Pérez-Masiá, J. M. Lagaron, and A. Lopez-Rubio, “Morphology and stability of edible lycopene-containing micro- and nanocapsules produced through electrospraying and spray drying,” Food and Bioprocess Technology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 459–470, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. M. Eltayeb, P. K. Bakhshi, E. Stride, and M. Edirisinghe, “Preparation of solid lipid nanoparticles containing active compound by electrohydrodynamic spraying,” Food Research International, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 88–95, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. K. A. Rieger and J. D. Schiffman, “Electrospinning an essential oil: cinnamaldehyde enhances the antimicrobial efficacy of chitosan/poly(ethylene oxide) nanofibers,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 113, pp. 561–568, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. K. Feng, P. Wen, H. Yang et al., “Enhancement of the antimicrobial activity of cinnamon essential oil-loaded electrospun nanofilm by the incorporation of lysozyme,” RSC Advances, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1572–1580, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. J. Wróblewska-Krepsztul, T. Rydzkowski, I. Michalska-Pożoga, and V. K. Thakur, “Biopolymers for biomedical and pharmaceutical applications: recent advances and overview of alginate electrospinning,” Nanomaterials, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 404, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. K. A. Rieger, N. P. Birch, and J. D. Schiffman, “Electrospinning chitosan/poly(ethylene oxide) solutions with essential oils: correlating solution rheology to nanofiber formation,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 139, pp. 131–138, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. I. Katouzian and S. M. Jafari, “Nano-encapsulation as a promising approach for targeted delivery and controlled release of vitamins,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 53, pp. 34–48, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. M. Shrestha, T. M. Ho, and B. R. Bhandari, “Encapsulation of tea tree oil by amorphous beta-cyclodextrin powder,” Food Chemistry, vol. 221, pp. 1474–1483, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. J.-h. Cheng, Y.-n. Hu, Z.-g. Luo, W. Chen, H.-m. Chen, and X.-c. Peng, “Preparation and properties of octenyl succinate β-cyclodextrin and its application as an emulsion stabilizer,” Food Chemistry, vol. 218, pp. 116–121, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. E. N. Faikoh, Y.-H. Hong, and S.-Y. Hu, “Liposome-encapsulated cinnamaldehyde enhances zebrafish (Danio rerio) immunity and survival when challenged with Vibrio vulnificus and Streptococcus agalactiae,” Fish & Shellfish Immunology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 15–24, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. Z. Fang and B. Bhandari, “Encapsulation of polyphenols—a review,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 510–523, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. R. E. Conn, J. J. Kolstad, J. F. Borzelleca et al., “Safety assessment of polylactide (PLA) for use as a food-contact polymer,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 273–283, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. P. Wen, D.-H. Zhu, H. Wu, M.-H. Zong, Y.-R. Jing, and S.-Y. Han, “Encapsulation of cinnamon essential oil in electrospun nanofibrous film for active food packaging,” Food Control, vol. 59, pp. 366–376, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. G. Chen and B. Liu, “Cellulose sulfate based film with slow-release antimicrobial properties prepared by incorporation of mustard essential oil and β-cyclodextrin,” Food Hydrocolloids, vol. 55, pp. 100–107, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. C. López-de-Dicastillo, M. Jordá, R. Catalá, R. Gavara, and P. Hernández-Muñoz, “Development of active polyvinyl alcohol/β-cyclodextrin composites to scavenge undesirable food components,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 59, no. 20, pp. 11026–11033, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. M. Jawaid and S. K. Swain, Bionanocomposites for Packaging Applications, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2018.
  88. C. Sebaaly, C. Charcosset, S. Stainmesse, H. Fessi, and H. Greige-Gerges, “Clove essential oil-in-cyclodextrin-in-liposomes in the aqueous and lyophilized states: from laboratory to large scale using a membrane contactor,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 138, pp. 75–85, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. E. M. M. Del Valle, “Cyclodextrins and their uses: a review,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1033–1046, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. J. Szejtli, “Introduction and general overview of cyclodextrin chemistry,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 1743–1754, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. C. Samperio, R. Boyer, W. N. Eigel et al., “Enhancement of plant essential oils’ aqueous solubility and stability using alpha and beta cyclodextrin,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 58, no. 24, pp. 12950–12956, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. H. M. C. de Azeredo, “Antimicrobial nanostructures in food packaging,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 56–69, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. H. Samsudin, H. Soto-Valdez, and R. Auras, “Poly(lactic acid) film incorporated with marigold flower extract (Tagetes erecta) intended for fatty-food application,” Food Control, vol. 46, pp. 55–66, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. P. Wen, D.-H. Zhu, K. Feng et al., “Fabrication of electrospun polylactic acid nanofilm incorporating cinnamon essential oil/β -cyclodextrin inclusion complex for antimicrobial packaging,” Food Chemistry, vol. 196, pp. 996–1004, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. Y. Liu, S. Wang, R. Zhang, W. Lan, and W. Qin, “Development of poly(lactic acid)/chitosan fibers loaded with essential oil for antimicrobial applications,” Nanomaterials, vol. 7, no. 7, p. 194, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. M. Kashiri, Y. Maghsoudlo, and M. Khomeiri, “Incorporating Zataria multiflora Boiss. essential oil and sodium bentonite nano-clay open a new perspective to use zein films as bioactive packaging materials,” Food Science and Technology International, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 582–596, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. L. Lin, Y. Dai, and H. Cui, “Antibacterial poly(ethylene oxide) electrospun nanofibers containing cinnamon essential oil/beta-cyclodextrin proteoliposomes,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 178, pp. 131–140, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. M. C. Ribeiro, M. da Silva Fernandes, A. Yoshiteru Kuaye, R. Jimenez-Flores, and M. Gigante, “Preconditioning of the stainless steel surface affects the adhesion of Bacillus cereus spores,” International Dairy Journal, vol. 66, pp. 108–114, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. S. Kumari and P. K. Sarkar, “Bacillus cereus hazard and control in industrial dairy processing environment,” Food Control, vol. 69, pp. 20–29, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. İ. Ünalan, F. Korel, and A. Yemenicioğlu, “Active packaging of ground beef patties by edible zein films incorporated with partially purified lysozyme and Na2EDTA,” International Journal of Food Science & Technology, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1289–1295, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. K. S. Doosh and S. M. Abdul-Rahm, “Effect of lysozyme isolated from hen egg white in elongation the shelf life of Iraqi soft cheese made from buffalo milk,” Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 635–641, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. C. B. Amara, N. Eghbal, P. Degraeve, and A. Gharsallaoui, “Using complex coacervation for lysozyme encapsulation by spray-drying,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 183, pp. 50–57, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. L. Ge, Y.-s. Zhao, T. Mo, J.-r. Li, and P. Li, “Immobilization of glucose oxidase in electrospun nanofibrous membranes for food preservation,” Food Control, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 188–193, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. D.-z. Yang, Y.-h. Long, and J. Nie, “Release of lysozyme from electrospun PVA/lysozyme-gelatin scaffolds,” Frontiers of Materials Science in China, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 261–265, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. P. Shao, Z. Yan, H. Chen, and J. Xiao, “Electrospun poly(vinyl alcohol)/permutite fibrous film loaded with cinnamaldehyde for active food packaging,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 135, no. 16, p. 46117, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. J. Wu, C. Yu, and Q. Li, “Regenerable antimicrobial activity in polyamide thin film nanocomposite membranes,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 476, pp. 119–127, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. A. Baselice, F. Colantuoni, D. A. Lass, G. Nardone, and A. Stasi, “Trends in EU consumers’ attitude towards fresh-cut fruit and vegetables,” Food Quality and Preference, vol. 59, pp. 87–96, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. M. Oliveira, M. Abadias, J. Usall, R. Torres, N. Teixidó, and I. Viñas, “Application of modified atmosphere packaging as a safety approach to fresh-cut fruits and vegetables—a review,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 13–26, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. J. Xiao, C. Shi, H. Zheng et al., “Kafirin protein based electrospun fibers with tunable mechanical property, wettability, and release profile,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 64, no. 16, pp. 3226–3233, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. H. H. Kara, F. Xiao, M. Sarker et al., “Antibacterial poly(lactic acid) (PLA) films grafted with electrospun PLA/allyl isothiocyanate fibers for food packaging,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 133, no. 2, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. S. Phunpee, S. Saesoo, I. Sramala et al., “A comparison of eugenol and menthol on encapsulation characteristics with water-soluble quaternized β-cyclodextrin grafted chitosan,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 84, pp. 472–480, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. K. P. Anthony, S. A. Deolu-Sobogun, and M. A. Saleh, “Comprehensive assessment of antioxidant activity of essential oils,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 77, no. 8, pp. C839–C843, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. H. Cetin Babaoglu, A. Bayrak, N. Ozdemir, and N. Ozgun, “Encapsulation of clove essential oil in hydroxypropyl β‐cyclodextrin for characterization, controlled release, and antioxidant activity,” Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, vol. 41, no. 5, Article ID e13202, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  114. H. M. C. Marques, “A review on cyclodextrin encapsulation of essential oils and volatiles,” Flavour and Fragrance Journal, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 313–326, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. T. Uyar, J. Hacaloglu, and F. Besenbacher, “Electrospun polyethylene oxide (PEO) nanofibers containing cyclodextrin inclusion complex,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 3949–3958, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  116. F. Kayaci, Y. Ertas, and T. Uyar, “Enhanced thermal stability of eugenol by cyclodextrin inclusion complex encapsulated in electrospun polymeric nanofibers,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 61, no. 34, pp. 8156–8165, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  117. F. Kayaci, H. S. Sen, E. Durgun, and T. Uyar, “Functional electrospun polymeric nanofibers incorporating geraniol-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes: high thermal stability and enhanced durability of geraniol,” Food Research International, vol. 62, pp. 424–431, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  118. Z. Aytac, S. Y. Dogan, T. Tekinay, and T. Uyar, “Release and antibacterial activity of allyl isothiocyanate/β-cyclodextrin complex encapsulated in electrospun nanofibers,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, vol. 120, pp. 125–131, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  119. Z. Aytac, S. I. Kusku, E. Durgun, and T. Uyar, “Quercetin/β-cyclodextrin inclusion complex embedded nanofibres: slow release and high solubility,” Food Chemistry, vol. 197, pp. 864–871, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  120. Z. Aytac, Z. I. Yildiz, F. Kayaci-Senirmak, N. O. San Keskin, T. Tekinay, and T. Uyar, “Electrospinning of polymer-free cyclodextrin/geraniol-inclusion complex nanofibers: enhanced shelf-life of geraniol with antibacterial and antioxidant properties,” RSC Advances, vol. 6, no. 52, pp. 46089–46099, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  121. Z. Aytac, Z. I. Yildiz, F. Kayaci-Senirmak et al., “Fast-dissolving, prolonged release, and antibacterial cyclodextrin/limonene-inclusion complex nanofibrous webs via polymer-free electrospinning,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 64, no. 39, pp. 7325–7334, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  122. Z. Aytac, Z. I. Yildiz, F. Kayaci-Senirmak, T. Tekinay, and T. Uyar, “Electrospinning of cyclodextrin/linalool-inclusion complex nanofibers: fast-dissolving nanofibrous web with prolonged release and antibacterial activity,” Food Chemistry, vol. 231, pp. 192–201, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  123. A. Celebioglu, F. Kayaci-Senirmak, S. İpek, E. Durgun, and T. Uyar, “Polymer-free nanofibers from vanillin/cyclodextrin inclusion complexes: high thermal stability, enhanced solubility and antioxidant property,” Food & Function, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 3141–3153, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  124. A. Celebioglu, Z. I. Yildiz, and T. Uyar, “Fabrication of electrospun eugenol/cyclodextrin inclusion complex nanofibrous webs for enhanced antioxidant property, water solubility, and high temperature stability,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 457–466, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  125. D. Pornpattananangkul, L. Zhang, S. Olson et al., “Bacterial toxin-triggered drug release from gold nanoparticle-stabilized liposomes for the treatment of bacterial infection,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 133, no. 11, pp. 4132–4139, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  126. G. A. T. Kaminski, M. R. Sierakowski, R. Pontarolo, L. A. d. Santos, and R. A. d. Freitas, “Layer-by-layer polysaccharide-coated liposomes for sustained delivery of epidermal growth factor,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 140, pp. 129–135, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  127. W. Liu, W. Liu, A. Ye et al., “Environmental stress stability of microencapsules based on liposomes decorated with chitosan and sodium alginate,” Food Chemistry, vol. 196, pp. 396–404, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  128. L. M. P. Montenegro, J. B. Griep, F. C. Tavares, D. H. de Oliveira, D. Bianchini, and R. G. Jacob, “Synthesis and characterization of imine-modified silicas obtained by the reaction of essential oil of Eucalyptus citriodora, 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane and tetraethylorthosilicate,” Vibrational Spectroscopy, vol. 68, pp. 272–278, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  129. J. H. Cui, Y. Liang, D. Yang, and Y. Liu, “Facile fabrication of rice husk based silicon dioxide nanospheres loaded with silver nanoparticles as a rice antibacterial agent,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 21423, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  130. K. Okada, T. Tomita, Y. Kameshima, A. Yasumori, and K. J. D. MacKenzie, “Porous properties of coprecipitated Al2O3-SiO2 xerogels prepared from aluminium nitrate nonahydrate and tetraethylorthosilicate,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1307–1312, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  131. H. Ziyang, Z. Lan, and L. Guangchao, “Study on fabrication and properties of porous HA/SiO2 composite coating on titanium substrate,” Acta Chimica Sinica, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 235–240, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  132. Z. Li, H. Kang, N. Che et al., “Controlled release of liposome-encapsulated Naproxen from core-sheath electrospun nanofibers,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 111, pp. 18–24, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  133. N. C. Wickremasinghe, V. A. Kumar, and J. D. Hartgerink, “Two-step self-assembly of liposome-multidomain peptide nanofiber hydrogel for time-controlled release,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 3587–3595, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  134. I. Peinado, M. Mason, A. Romano, F. Biasioli, and M. Scampicchio, “Stability of β-carotene in polyethylene oxide electrospun nanofibers,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 370, pp. 111–116, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  135. H. Cui, L. Yuan, W. Li, and L. Lin, “Antioxidant property of SiO2-eugenol liposome loaded nanofibrous membranes on beef,” Food Packaging and Shelf Life, vol. 11, pp. 49–57, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  136. B. Munteanu, L. Sacarescu, A.-L. Vasiliu et al., “Antioxidant/antibacterial electrospun nanocoatings applied onto PLA films,” Materials, vol. 11, no. 10, p. 1973, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  137. K. Divya, S. Vijayan, T. K. George, and M. S. Jisha, “Antimicrobial properties of chitosan nanoparticles: mode of action and factors affecting activity,” Fibers and Polymers, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 221–230, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  138. M. Gällstedt, A. Brottman, and M. S. Hedenqvist, “Packaging-related properties of protein- and chitosan-coated paper,” Packaging Technology and Science, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 161–170, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  139. S.-I. Hong, J.-W. Lee, and S.-M. Son, “Properties of polysaccharide-coated polypropylene films as affected by biopolymer and plasticizer types,” Packaging Technology and Science, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  140. C. H. Lee, D. S. An, H. J. Park, and D. S. Lee, “Wide-spectrum antimicrobial packaging materials incorporating nisin and chitosan in the coating,” Packaging Technology and Science, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 99–106, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  141. H. Berrougui, M. Cloutier, M. Isabelle, and A. Khalil, “Phenolic-extract from argan oil (Argania spinosa L.) inhibits human low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation and enhances cholesterol efflux from human THP-1 macrophages,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 184, no. 2, pp. 389–396, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  142. M. Kouidri, A. K. Saadi, A. Noui, and F. Medjahed, “The chemical composition of argan oil,” International Journal of Advanced Studies in Computers, Science and Engineering, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 24, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  143. K. Chaieb, H. Hajlaoui, T. Zmantar et al., “The chemical composition and biological activity of clove essential oil, Eugenia caryophyllata (Syzigium aromaticum L. Myrtaceae): a short review,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 501–506, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  144. B. Melendez-Rodriguez, K. J. Figueroa-Lopez, A. Bernardos et al., “Electrospun antimicrobial films of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) containing eugenol essential oil encapsulated in mesoporous silica nanoparticles,” Nanomaterials, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 227, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  145. H. Cui, M. Bai, M. M. A. Rashed, and L. Lin, “The antibacterial activity of clove oil/chitosan nanoparticles embedded gelatin nanofibers against Escherichia coli O157:H7 biofilms on cucumber,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 266, pp. 69–78, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  146. H. Cui, C. Ma, C. Li, and L. Lin, “Enhancing the antibacterial activity of thyme oil against Salmonella on eggshell by plasma-assisted process,” Food Control, vol. 70, pp. 183–190, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  147. A. Marchese, I. E. Orhan, M. Daglia et al., “Antibacterial and antifungal activities of thymol: a brief review of the literature,” Food Chemistry, vol. 210, pp. 402–414, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  148. L. Rivas, M. J. McDonnell, C. M. Burgess et al., “Inhibition of verocytotoxigenic Escherichia coli in model broth and rumen systems by carvacrol and thymol,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 139, no. 1-2, pp. 70–78, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  149. M. A. Numpaque, L. A. Oviedo, J. H. Gil, C. M. García, and D. L. Durango, “Thymol and carvacrol: biotransformation and antifungal activity against the plant pathogenic fungi Colletotrichum acutatum and Botryodiplodia theobromae,” Tropical Plant Pathology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 3–13, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  150. P. S. Chavan and S. G. Tupe, “Antifungal activity and mechanism of action of carvacrol and thymol against vineyard and wine spoilage yeasts,” Food Control, vol. 46, pp. 115–120, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  151. L.-H. Wang, Z.-H. Zhang, X.-A. Zeng, D.-M. Gong, and M.-S. Wang, “Combination of microbiological, spectroscopic and molecular docking techniques to study the antibacterial mechanism of thymol against Staphylococcus aureus: membrane damage and genomic DNA binding,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 409, no. 6, pp. 1615–1625, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  152. D. Valero, J. M. Valverde, D. Martínez-Romero, F. Guillén, S. Castillo, and M. Serrano, “The combination of modified atmosphere packaging with eugenol or thymol to maintain quality, safety and functional properties of table grapes,” Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 317–327, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  153. C. O. Pérez-Alfonso, D. Martínez-Romero, P. J. Zapata, M. Serrano, D. Valero, and S. Castillo, “The effects of essential oils carvacrol and thymol on growth of Penicillium digitatum and P. italicum involved in lemon decay,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 158, no. 2, pp. 101–106, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  154. L. Lin, Y. Zhu, and H. Cui, “Electrospun thyme essential oil/gelatin nanofibers for active packaging against Campylobacter jejuni in chicken,” LWT, vol. 97, pp. 711–718, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  155. P. Umaraw, A. Prajapati, A. K. Verma, V. Pathak, and V. P. Singh, “Control of Campylobacter in poultry industry from farm to poultry processing unit: a review,” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 659–665, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  156. W. C. Silva, B. N. Targino, R. S. Mendonça, A. S. Sant’Ana, and H. M. Hungaro, “Campylobacter: an overview of cases, occurrence in food, contamination sources, and antimicrobial resistance in Brazil,” Food Reviews International, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 364–389, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  157. A. Pant and J. S. Negi, “Novel controlled ionic gelation strategy for chitosan nanoparticles preparation using TPP-β-CD inclusion complex,” European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 112, pp. 180–185, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  158. H. Lu, L. Zou, Y. Xu, and Y. V. Li, “Controlled dispersion of multiwalled carbon nanotubes modified by hyperbranched polylysine,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 135, no. 19, p. 46249, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  159. M. Rizwan, R. Yahya, A. Hassan et al., “Synthesis of a novel organosoluble, biocompatible, and antibacterial chitosan derivative for biomedical applications,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 135, no. 9, p. 45905, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  160. Z. Aytac, S. Ipek, E. Durgun, T. Tekinay, and T. Uyar, “Antibacterial electrospun zein nanofibrous web encapsulating thymol/cyclodextrin-inclusion complex for food packaging,” Food Chemistry, vol. 233, pp. 117–124, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  161. Z. Li, M. Wang, F. Wang et al., “γ-cyclodextrin: a review on enzymatic production and applications,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 245–255, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  162. P. A. P. Cevallos, M. P. Buera, and B. E. Elizalde, “Encapsulation of cinnamon and thyme essential oils components (cinnamaldehyde and thymol) in β-cyclodextrin: effect of interactions with water on complex stability,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 70–75, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  163. Z. Aytac and T. Uyar, “Antioxidant activity and photostability of α-tocopherol/β-cyclodextrin inclusion complex encapsulated electrospun polycaprolactone nanofibers,” European Polymer Journal, vol. 79, pp. 140–149, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  164. F. Tao, L. E. Hill, Y. Peng, and C. L. Gomes, “Synthesis and characterization of β-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes of thymol and thyme oil for antimicrobial delivery applications,” LWT—Food Science and Technology, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 247–255, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  165. I. Mourtzinos, N. Kalogeropoulos, S. E. Papadakis, K. Konstantinou, and V. T. Karathanos, “Encapsulation of nutraceutical monoterpenes in β-cyclodextrin and modified starch,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. S89–S94, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  166. Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Z. Zhu, X. Jiao, Y. Shang, and Y. Wen, “Encapsulation of thymol in biodegradable nanofiber via coaxial eletrospinning and applications in fruit preservation,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1736–1741, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  167. H. K. Makadia and S. J. Siegel, “Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) as biodegradable controlled drug delivery carrier,” Polymers, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1377–1397, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  168. C. Gomes, R. G. Moreira, and E. Castell-Perez, “Poly (DL-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanoparticles with entrapped trans-cinnamaldehyde and eugenol for antimicrobial delivery applications,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. N16–N24, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  169. L. M. Silva, L. E. Hill, E. Figueiredo, and C. L. Gomes, “Delivery of phytochemicals of tropical fruit by-products using poly (DL-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, and antimicrobial activity,” Food Chemistry, vol. 165, pp. 362–370, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  170. R. F. Lins, W. R. Lustri, S. Minharro, A. Alonso, and D. de Sousa Neto, “On the formation, physicochemical properties and antibacterial activity of colloidal systems containing tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) oil,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 497, pp. 271–279, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  171. D. J. Ireland, S. J. Greay, C. M. Hooper et al., “Topically applied Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil causes direct anti-cancer cytotoxicity in subcutaneous tumour bearing mice,” Journal of Dermatological Science, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 120–129, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  172. O. Catanzano, M. C. Straccia, A. Miro et al., “Spray-by-spray in situ cross-linking alginate hydrogels delivering a tea tree oil microemulsion,” European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 66, pp. 20–28, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  173. F. d. S. Oliveira, T. S. d. Freitas, R. P. d. Cruz et al., “Evaluation of the antibacterial and modulatory potential of α-bisabolol, β-cyclodextrin and α-bisabolol/β-cyclodextrin complex,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 92, pp. 1111–1118, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  174. H. Cui, M. Bai, and L. Lin, “Plasma-treated poly(ethylene oxide) nanofibers containing tea tree oil/beta-cyclodextrin inclusion complex for antibacterial packaging,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 179, pp. 360–369, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  175. F. A. P. Scacchetti, E. Pinto, and G. M. B. Soares, “Functionalization and characterization of cotton with phase change materials and thyme oil encapsulated in beta-cyclodextrins,” Progress in Organic Coatings, vol. 107, pp. 64–74, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  176. Y. Tang, Y. Zhou, X. Lan et al., “Electrospun gelatin nanofibers encapsulated with peppermint and chamomile essential oils as potential edible packaging,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 2227–2234, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  177. R. Liang, S. Xu, C. F. Shoemaker, Y. Li, F. Zhong, and Q. Huang, “Physical and antimicrobial properties of peppermint oil nanoemulsions,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 60, no. 30, pp. 7548–7555, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  178. I. Liakos, L. Rizzello, H. Hajiali et al., “Fibrous wound dressings encapsulating essential oils as natural antimicrobial agents,” Journal of Materials Chemistry B, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 1583–1589, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  179. B. P. Chumpitazi, G. L. Kearns, and R. J. Shulman, “Review article: the physiological effects and safety of peppermint oil and its efficacy in irritable bowel syndrome and other functional disorders,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 738–752, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  180. M. H. H. Roby, M. A. Sarhan, K. A.-H. Selim, and K. I. Khalel, “Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of essential oil and extracts of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare L.) and chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.),” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 44, pp. 437–445, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  181. S. Agatonovic-Kustrin, D. Babazadeh Ortakand, D. W. Morton, and A. P. Yusof, “Rapid evaluation and comparison of natural products and antioxidant activity in calendula, feverfew, and German chamomile extracts,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1385, pp. 103–110, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  182. F. Duman, I. Ocsoy, and F. O. Kup, “Chamomile flower extract-directed CuO nanoparticle formation for its antioxidant and DNA cleavage properties,” Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol. 60, pp. 333–338, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  183. A. Cvetanović, J. Švarc-Gajić, P. Mašković, S. Savić, and L. Nikolić, “Antioxidant and biological activity of chamomile extracts obtained by different techniques: perspective of using superheated water for isolation of biologically active compounds,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 65, pp. 582–591, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  184. Z. A. N. Hanani, Y. H. Roos, and J. P. Kerry, “Use and application of gelatin as potential biodegradable packaging materials for food products,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 71, pp. 94–102, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  185. F. M. Fakhouri, D. Costa, F. Yamashita et al., “Comparative study of processing methods for starch/gelatin films,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 681–689, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  186. S. F. Hosseini, M. Rezaei, M. Zandi, and F. Farahmandghavi, “Bio-based composite edible films containing Origanum vulgare L. essential oil,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 67, pp. 403–413, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  187. M. Ahmad, S. Benjakul, T. Prodpran, and T. W. Agustini, “Physico-mechanical and antimicrobial properties of gelatin film from the skin of unicorn leatherjacket incorporated with essential oils,” Food Hydrocolloids, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 189–199, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  188. P.-D. Duh, “Antioxidant activity of water extract of four Harng Jyur (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat) varieties in soybean oil emulsion,” Food Chemistry, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 471–476, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  189. C.-K. Lii, Y.-P. Lei, H.-T. Yao et al., “Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. reduces the oxidized LDL-induced expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and E-selectin in human umbilical vein endothelial cells,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 213–220, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  190. F. Khallouki, M. Hmamouchi, C. Younos, R. Soulimani, J. M. Bessiere, and E. M. Essassi, “Antibacterial and molluscicidal activities of the essential oil of Chrysanthemum viscidehirtum,” Fitoterapia, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 544–546, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  191. L. Lin, X. Mao, Y. Sun, G. Rajivgandhi, and H. Cui, “Antibacterial properties of nanofibers containing chrysanthemum essential oil and their application as beef packaging,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 292, pp. 21–30, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  192. M. Nadeem and M. Imran, “Promising features of Moringa oleifera oil: recent updates and perspectives,” Lipids in Health and Disease, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 212, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  193. L. Lin, Y. Gu, and H. Cui, “Moringa oil/chitosan nanoparticles embedded gelatin nanofibers for food packaging against Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus on cheese,” Food Packaging and Shelf Life, vol. 19, pp. 86–93, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Shahla Ataei et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles