Research Article
Design and Optimization of Fuel Cells: A Case Study on Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell Power Systems for Portable Applications
Table 1
Design and operation parameters.
| Parameter | Value | Unit | Description |
| | 0.5 | — | Anode current transfer coefficient | | 0.6 | — | Cathode current transfer coefficient | | 1.5 | | Anode exchange current density | | 0.005 | | Cathode exchange current density | | 348.4 | | Active cell area | | 0.05 | | Anode thickness | | 0.1 | | Cathode thickness | | 0.51 | | Electrolyte thickness | | 2.49 | | Anode conductivity | | 2.90 | | Cathode conductivity | | 8.3 | | Electrolyte conductivity | | 0.03 | | Total contact resistance | | 0.045 | | Anode empirical constant | | 0.045 | | Cathode empirical constant | | 15 | | Anode maximum current density | | 2.5 | | Cathode maximum current density | | 1.18 | | Reversible Nernst voltage at standard conditions | | 8.314 | | Universal gas constant | | Varies | | Operation temperature | | 2 | — | Number of electrons transferred per mole | | 0.95 | — | Fuel utilization factor | | 0.95 | — | Efficiency of power conditioning devices | | 0.0499 | | BoP efficiency empirical constant | | 0.05 | — | BoP efficiency empirical constant | | 285,250 | | Enthalpy of formation for PEM reaction | | 96485 | | Faraday’s constant | | 1 | — | Air stoichiometry |
|
|