Archaea / 2016 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 5938289 |

Emma J. Gagen, Marcos Y. Yoshinaga, Franka Garcia Prado, Kai-Uwe Hinrichs, Michael Thomm, "The Proteome and Lipidome of Thermococcus kodakarensis across the Stationary Phase", Archaea, vol. 2016, Article ID 5938289, 15 pages, 2016.

The Proteome and Lipidome of Thermococcus kodakarensis across the Stationary Phase

Academic Editor: Haruyuki Atomi
Received18 Feb 2016
Accepted07 Apr 2016
Published04 May 2016


The majority of cells in nature probably exist in a stationary-phase-like state, due to nutrient limitation in most environments. Studies on bacteria and yeast reveal morphological and physiological changes throughout the stationary phase, which lead to an increased ability to survive prolonged nutrient limitation. However, there is little information on archaeal stationary phase responses. We investigated protein- and lipid-level changes in Thermococcus kodakarensis with extended time in the stationary phase. Adaptations to time in stationary phase included increased proportion of membrane lipids with a tetraether backbone, synthesis of proteins that ensure translational fidelity, specific regulation of ABC transporters (upregulation of some, downregulation of others), and upregulation of proteins involved in coenzyme production. Given that the biological mechanism of tetraether synthesis is unknown, we also considered whether any of the protein-level changes in T. kodakarensis might shed light on the production of tetraether lipids across the same period. A putative carbon-nitrogen hydrolase, a TldE (a protease in Escherichia coli) homologue, and a membrane bound hydrogenase complex subunit were candidates for possible involvement in tetraether-related reactions, while upregulation of adenosylcobalamin synthesis proteins might lend support to a possible radical mechanism as a trigger for tetraether synthesis.

1. Introduction

Microorganisms in culture rapidly divide until either an essential nutrient is completely consumed or an inhibitory waste product accumulates, or both, and the population enters a period of no net growth defined as the stationary phase. During the stationary phase, microbial cells undergo various morphological and physiological changes that lead to increased resistance to stress and an ability to survive prolonged nutrient limitation [1]. In nature, the majority of microbial cells probably exist in a stationary phase state due to nutrient deprivation in most environments [2]. Cellular processes occurring beyond the onset of stationary phase have been investigated in bacteria (for reviews, see [2, 3]) and in yeast (e.g., see [4]), but there is a dearth of information for Archaea. A literature search revealed only that Dinger et al. [5] investigated archaeal histones during late stationary phase of Thermococcus zilligii and Adams et al. [6] noted 28 genes (despite not revealing their identity) that were upregulated in Pyrococcus furiosus in the late stationary phase compared to the start of stationary phase.

During our studies on the membrane lipids of Archaea, we incidentally noticed that lipid profiles changed as cultures progressed beyond the onset of stationary phase. Intriguingly, the proportion of membrane lipids comprised of a tetraether backbone frequently seemed to increase with extended time in stationary phase and we speculated that this may be an archaeal adaptation in response to stationary phase or to nutrient limiting conditions. Tetraether lipids are membrane spanning and their presence in archaeal membranes is thought to minimise metabolic stress and futile ion cycling [7].

In the present study, we investigated archaeal stationary phase responses using a proteomics and lipidomics approach in a model archaeon, Thermococcus kodakarensis. The aim of the study was to (1) understand the mechanisms that Archaea employ to cope with survival during stationary phase and (2) examine whether any of these processes may relate to the observed increased tetraether production throughout the stationary phase. Production of diether lipids in Archaea is relatively well understood; however, the mechanism of formation of tetraether lipids is poorly constrained and may involve novel biochemistry (e.g., for a review, see [8]).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Growth of T. kodakarensis

T. kodakarensis was grown as previously described [52] with yeast extract, tryptone, and pyruvate as carbon and energy sources, in a 15 L fermentor at 85°C except without flushing of the reactor headspace. One litre of culture was harvested at the beginning of stationary phase and twelve hours later. Cells from 500 mL culture at both time points were analysed for lipids as outlined below and cells from the remaining 500 mL of culture at both time points were sent for comparative proteomic analysis at TOPLAB (Martinsried, Germany) by isotope-coded label protein. Cells were stored at −80°C until the respective analyses.

2.2. Lipid Analysis

Lipids were extracted according to Sturt et al. [53] with slight modifications. In brief, samples were lyophilized and weighed. Dry cell mass (0.09–0.14 g) was combined with precombusted sea sand (2 g) and extracted four times. Samples were extracted by ultrasonication into a solvent mixture (v : v) of methanol (MeOH), dichloromethane (DCM), and aqueous buffer (2 : 1 : 0.8). A phosphate buffer (8.7 g L−1 KH2PO4, pH 7.4) was used for the first two steps, and a trichloroacetic acid buffer (50 g L−1, pH 2) was used for the final two steps. Supernatants were pooled in a separation funnel and DCM and water were added in order to allow optimal phase separation. After transferring the organic phase, the aqueous phase was extracted three more times with DCM. Pooled organic layers were then washed three times with deionized MilliQ water. The final extract was gently evaporated under N2 flow and stored at −20°C.

Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Waters Acquity UPLC Amide column and a Waters Acquity BEH C18 column, in normal and reverse phase for, respectively, polar and core lipids [54]. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, Dionex Ultimate 3000RS UHPLC) was coupled to a Bruker maXis quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Q ToF-MS, Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) equipped with an electrospray ion source (ESI). Detection of lipids was performed in positive ionization mode while scanning a mass-to-charge () range from 150 to 2000. For each mass spectrum (MS) full scan, MS/MS experiments were obtained in data-dependent mode, targeting the most abundant ions. Active exclusion was used to limit the fragmentation of a given ion (3 times every 0.5 min) and thus allowed us to also obtain MS/MS data of less abundant ions. Lipid identification was achieved by monitoring exact masses of possible parent ions (present as either H+ or adducts) in combination with characteristic fragmentation patterns as outlined by Yoshinaga et al. [55] and supported by compound identities revealed in previous studies [52, 56]. Lipid quantification was obtained by comparison of both core and polar lipids of T. kodakarensis relative to the peak area of the internal standard 1,2-dihenarachidoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (C21-PC, Avanti Lipids). As no authentic standards are available for all compounds, concentrations are reported based on response factors of commercially available or purified standards relative to known amounts of the internal standard C21-PC. To account for the response factors, we performed calibration curves relative to C21-PC using four concentrations of the commercial and purified standards (0.5, 1, 5, and 10 ng), before and after measuring the samples from T. kodakarensis. We used phosphatidylethanolamine archaeol (PE-AR, Avanti Polar Lipids Inc., USA) for quantification of diether phospholipids and phosphatidylglycerol-monoglycosyl-glycerol-di-biphytanyl-glycerol-tetraether, PG-GDGT-G (from Matreya LLC, Pleasant Gap, PA, USA), for the tetraether phospholipids. Core lipids of T. kodakarensis were quantified using core AR and core GDGT isolated from Archaeoglobus fulgidus, as described by Zhu et al. [57]. Ionization of standards PE-AR, PG-GDGT-G, and core AR and core GDGT was lower than C21-PC and the following response factors were applied: 1.8, 9.8, 1.8, and 4.2, respectively.

2.3. Isotope-Coded Label Protein (ICPL) Sample Preparation

Isotope-coded protein label (ICPL) is a top-down proteomics approach, which is based on differential isotopic labelling of proteins derived from different cell states with either light or heavy tags directed to all lysine residues and protein N-termini [58]. After labelling, the samples are combined, cleaved into peptides, and analysed using LC-MS/MS. Since isotopes have identical physicochemical properties, the light labelled peptides coelute with their heavy counterparts and are simultaneously analysed in the mass spectrometer. Quantitative analysis is then performed by comparing the relative signal intensities of the light and heavy labelled peptide in the MS-spectra. Finally, the peptides are identified by MS/MS analysis followed by protein database searching. For each protein, the quantified peptide pairs are summarised and the mean of their ratio is reported [59, 60].

Cell pellets for protein analysis were lysed on ice in 200 μL ICPL lysis buffer (Serva Electrophoresis GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) and homogenized by grinding using a grinding kit (GE Healthcare, catalogue number 80-6483-37) before centrifugation at 12,000 ×g for 10 min at 4°C to remove cell debris. The supernatants were transferred to new tubes and after protein concentration determination by Bradford assay [61] (Bio-Rad Protein Assay Dye Reagent Concentrate #500-0006), total protein was adjusted to 5 mg mL−1 for ICPL labelling using the lysis buffer. For both samples, 100 μg of protein was labelled using the ICPL Quadruplex Plus kit (Serva Electrophoresis GmbH). Briefly, the N-terminus and the amino groups of lysine were labelled as per the manufacturer’s instructions with the nicotinoyloxysuccinimide reagents ICPL_0 and ICPL_6 (13C6) (Serva Electrophoresis GmbH) for the sample collected at the beginning of stationary phase and with ICPL_4 (2H4) and ICPL_10 (2H413C6) (Serva Electrophoresis GmbH) for the sample collected twelve hours later. A pool of both samples served as material for the reference run. The pooled samples were aliquoted and labelled separately with all four ICPL labels. Subsequent analysis steps were performed analogously to those of the analytical run. Multiplets of the reference run showed equal intensity due to the labelling of the same material and contained all detectable proteins due to the combining of both samples. Knowledge of their retention time and masses enabled the recognition of highly or on-off regulated proteins in the analytical MS run of the samples [62]. Enzymatic cleavage was performed using sequencing grade trypsin (porcine, Serva Electrophoresis GmbH) and MS_grade Glu-C (Protea Biosciences Inc.). Peptides were acidified using 1% trifluoroacetic acid.

2.4. Mass Spectrometric Analysis of T. kodakarensis Proteins

For nanoscale liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (nLC-ESI-MS/MS), 0.685 μg of protein digest was injected. Peptides were separated using an analytical column (reversed phase C18, 50 cm, 60°C) with a 140 min linear gradient (A: 0.1% formic acid, B: 80% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid) at a flow rate of 250 nL min−1 with the gradient from 5 to 50% of solution B. Mass spectrometry was performed on a linear ion trap mass spectrometer (LTQ Orbitrap Elite, Thermo Scientific) operating in positive ion mode online coupled to the nano-LC. MS consisted of a cycle combining one full MS scan (mass range: 300–1500 ) with ten data-dependent MS/MS events (CID: 35% collision energy).

2.5. Proteomic Analysis and Database Queries

Raw data were converted to mzXML format using the Trans-Proteomic Pipeline [63]. Peak detection, deconvolution, deisotoping, and quantification were done using ICPL-ESIQuant [62]. Quadruplet detection was initially performed for the sample run and reference run separately and quadruplets detected in the reference run were used to search for incomplete quadruplets in the sample run. Mascot identification data were imported with a threshold ion score of 19 where individual ion scores > 19 indicated identity or extensive homology (). The database used was constructed from the published genome of T. kodakarensis available from GenBank (accession number AP006878) [64]. Moreover, all sequences were randomized and added to the target sequences giving a concatenated database of 4612 sequences. The decoy sequences were used to calculate the false discovery rate (FDR). Four separate database queries were performed, always using one of the four ICPL labels as a fixed modification. Proteins with fewer than two quadruplets and/or a coefficient of variation above 40% were excluded from further analysis. The FDR of the identified peptides was calculated by the formula FDR = , where FP is the number of false positives and TP is the number of true positives [65]. 2027 true positive hits and 61 false positive hits resulted in an FDR of 6.0%.

2.6. T. kodakarensis Proteins Upregulated after Twelve Hours in Stationary Phase

To determine which proteins had been upregulated between the start of stationary phase (ICPL labels 0 and 6) and twelve hours later (ICPL labels 4 and 10), protein expression ratios were compared for the four ICPL labels (4 : 0, 4 : 6, 10 : 0, and 10 : 6). Proteins that were at least twofold upregulated or twofold downregulated as indicated by at least two of the ratios were considered to be of interest.

2.7. Bioinformatic Analysis Upregulated Proteins

Proteins that were up- or downregulated twelve hours after the onset of stationary phase were assessed bioinformatically using the information from the protein annotation at the NCBI, the detected conserved domains in the proteins [66], BLAST homology to other proteins [67, 68], information at BRENDA [69], and literature searches.

2.8. Assessment of Upregulated Proteins for Possible Involvement in Tetraether-Related Reactions

To consider whether any of the proteins upregulated in T. kodakarensis across the stationary phase might have characteristics that could make them candidates for direct involvement in tetraether formation from diether precursors, the upregulated proteins were assessed against various criteria.

(1) The presence of possible transmembrane helices in proteins was investigated using three different methods: searches for hidden Markov models with TMHMM [70], statistical comparison of naturally occurring transmembrane proteins using TMbase [71], and assignment based on preference functions using the SPLIT server [72].

(2) Protein identity to squalene epoxidases was determined by BLAST analysis against protein P32476 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and protein Q75W20 from Panax ginseng. Homology to a squalene epoxidase was considered because terbinafine, a squalene epoxidase inhibitor, also inhibits tetraether lipid formation [73]; therefore, potentially, the enzyme(s) catalysing tetraether formation share some similarities with squalene epoxidases. Homology was considered significant at an alignment -value of less than .

(3) The presence of genes encoding similar proteins in other Archaea was investigated by BLAST searches restricted (using the organism name function) to each of the following phylogenetically, physiologically, and ecologically diverse Archaea that have all been reported to produce tetraethers: Aeropyrum pernix, Acidilobus saccharovorans, Archaeoglobus fulgidus, Caldisphaera lagunensis, Fervidicoccus fontis, Ignicoccus hospitalis, Methanocaldococcus jannaschii, Methanopyrus kandleri, Methanospirillum hungatei, Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus, Nitrosopumilus maritimus, Pyrolobus fumarii, Sulfolobus solfataricus, and Thermoplasma acidophilum. Specific BLAST searches were also made against the genomes of Halobacterium halobium and Methanosarcina acetivorans, which have not been reported to produce tetraethers, as well as the genome of Nanoarchaeum equitans. A protein involved in tetraether formation might be conserved amongst the majority of Archaea, as other lipid synthesis enzymes are; however, it was expected to be absent from the genome of N. equitans. N. equitans has one of the smallest archaeal genomes known to date; it does not encode any genes for proteins involved in lipid synthesis [74] but instead derives its membrane lipids from its host I. hospitalis [75] and we therefore expected N. equitans to be unlikely to have retained genes for proteins involved directly in tetraether lipid synthesis.

(4) Proteins with a predicted oxidoreductase function were considered of interest as tetraether synthesis by a mechanism related to condensation of two diether lipids would occur by oxidoreduction.

(5) Proteins with an annotation associated with lipids, prenyl groups, or isoprenoids or with genomic context neighbouring an enzyme annotated as such were also considered of interest.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. T. kodakarensis Lipids throughout the Stationary Phase

In this study, tetraethers represented the majority of total intact polar lipids in T. kodakarensis, in agreement with previous investigations in Thermococcales [56, 76], however contrasting with the higher proportions of diether than tetraether polar lipids reported by Meador et al. [52]. Potentially, this discrepancy may stem from analytical biases (i.e., extraction protocols and HPLC-MS methods, e.g., Cario et al. [77]) and/or slightly different growth conditions of T. kodakarensis between the two studies, with flushing of bioreactor headspace [52] not undertaken in the present study, making it more like a batch culture system. This factor may also explain the somewhat lower cellular lipid concentrations observed in this study compared to our previous study by Meador et al. [52]. Nevertheless, the headgroup composition of polar lipids was similar to that reported by Meador et al. [52], with both diethers and tetraethers being mainly phospholipids, with phosphatidylinositol and phosphatidylglycerol as major headgroups (Figure 1). Across the twelve hours in stationary phase, there was a 3.6-fold and 1.2-fold increase in the concentrations of tetraether and diether polar lipids, respectively (Table 1). Except for phosphatidylglycerol diether, increased concentrations of tetraether and diether polar lipids were reflected in all headgroups (Figure 1). When considering total core lipids (i.e., the polar headgroup-free glycerolipid backbone), a 2.2-fold increase in tetraethers and a 1.4-fold decrease in diethers were observed (Table 1). T. kodakarensis is known to regulate its membrane lipid composition in response to growth stage and environmental factors [52, 56] and our findings extend that observation to reveal that changes in lipid composition in T. kodakarensis continue beyond the active growth stages and throughout culture stationary phase. Our results showing an increase in tetraether lipids across this period are in line with the idea suggested by Valentine et al. [7] that tetraether lipids serve to minimise loss of ions across the membrane and thus reduce metabolic stress, which in this case would aid survival throughout prolonged stationary phase conditions.

Start of stationary phaseTwelve hours after start of stationary phaseFold change

IPL diethers0.050.06+1.2
IPL tetraethers0.080.29+3.6
Total IPLs0.130.35+2.7
Core lipid diethers0.190.13−1.4
Core lipid tetraethers0.020.04+2.2
Total core lipids0.200.13−1.2

Lipids are expressed as fg of lipid per cell.
3.2. Upregulated Proteins in T. kodakarensis Cells Twelve Hours after the Onset of Stationary Phase

Of the 2,306 predicted proteins encoded by the genome of T. kodakarensis, 657 were identified in our samples and of these 336 contained at least one ICPL labelled peptide and were thus able to be quantified between the start of stationary phase and 12 hours later. Comparing the relevant ICPL label ratios (Table 2), 32 proteins were found to be at least twofold upregulated by at least two ICPL ratios (31 when considering only the average of the relevant ICPL ratios) and 12 proteins were on average at least 2-fold downregulated twelve hours after the onset of stationary phase. At a peptide identity significance threshold of , the false discovery rate (FDR) using this approach was estimated to be 6.0%.

Genome accessionAnnotated nameAverage fold change Broad level protein function predictionNotes

YP_182835tRNA (guanine-N2)-dimethyltransferase4.20 ± 0.63Posttranscriptional modification Catalyses the SAM-dependent formation of N(1)-methyladenine or N(1)-methylguanine at position 9 in tRNA, which may contribute to thermostability of archaeal tRNAs [9]
YP_183167tRNA(Met) cytidine acetyltransferase4.84 ± 2.20Posttranscriptional modificationCatalyses acetyl-CoA-dependent N4-acetylation of tRNA important for recognition of the AUG codon and translational fidelity [10]
YP_184653Lysyl-tRNA synthetase4.31 ± 0.30tRNA formation Catalyses formation of lysyl-tRNA
YP_183321Glutamyl-tRNA(Gln) amidotransferase subunit D 3.57 ± 0.30tRNA editingPart of a complex that catalyses transamidation to form Gln-tRNA from misacylated Glu-tRNA [11]
YP_183397Alanyl-tRNA editing protein AlaX1.81 ± 0.39tRNA editing Catalyses hydrolysis of misacylated tRNA [12]
YP_18391730S ribosomal protein S113.41 ± 0.63TranslationPart of the 30S subunit of the ribosome, the molecular machinery for protein biosynthesis [13]
YP_18393850S ribosomal protein L64.88 ± 2.30TranslationPart of the 50S subunit of the ribosome, the molecular machinery for protein biosynthesis [13]
YP_18395450S ribosomal protein L4P2.03 ± 0.51TranslationPart of the 50S subunit of the ribosome, the molecular machinery for protein biosynthesis [13]
YP_182519Diphthine synthase4.75 ± 0.27TranslationCatalyses the SAM-dependent trimethylation of an intermediate in diphthamide formation from histidine [14]; diphthamide is required for archaeal translation elongation factor 2 [15]
YP_184539Protein kinase 5.12 ± 0.38Posttranslational modification Component of the KEOPS complex responsible for formation of N6-threonylcarbamoyladenosine, important for translational fidelity [16, 17]
YP_182619Hypothetical protein TK02063.69 ± 0.48RNA/DNA replication and repair A predicted RAD55 domain comprises half the protein; RAD55 has been implicated in DNA repair and signal transduction [18]
YP_182979RNA helicase4.59 ± 0.34RNA/DNA replication and repairBelongs to DEAD-like helicase superfamily, involved in ATP-dependent RNA or DNA unwinding [19]
YP_183694Endonuclease3.69 ± 0.31RNA/DNA replication and repair5′-flap endonuclease and 5′-3′-exonuclease activity, characterised in Pyrococcus horikoshii [20]
Hypothetical protein TK14282.54 ± 0.39RNA/DNA replication and repairCleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor subunit-like protein; these are predicted in Archaea to be RNases [21]
YP_184316DNA polymerase II large subunit4.84 ± 2.20DNA replication and repairCatalytic subunit of DNA polymerase, genome replication [22]
YP_184182Transcriptional regulator3.63 ± 0.32Transcription regulationTrmB is a transcriptional regulator first characterized as a repressor of transcription of genes encoding sugar ABC transporters [23] and later shown in Halobacterium salinarum to act on up to 113 archaeal promoters in response to nutritional stress [24]
YP_183072Ribose ABC transporter permease4.59 ± 0.34Amino acid cycling and energy generationABC transport domain suggests involvement in amino acid/sugar uptake, although ABC transporters may be channels or exporters or serve a regulatory function [25]
YP_184170Peptide ABC transporter ATPase4.31 ± 0.30Amino acid cycling and energy generationABC transport domain suggests involvement in amino acid/sugar uptake, although ABC transporters may be channels or exporters or serve a regulatory function [25]
YP_183697Peptidase 4.21 ± 0.34Amino acid cycling and energy generationIntracellular protease with a type 1 glutamine amidotransferase domain, homologous to proteins thought to hydrolyze small peptides for nutrition [26] and upregulated under peptide-limiting conditions [27] in other Thermococcales
YP_184506NADH-quinone oxidoreductase4.01 ± 0.64Energy generationSubunit of the membrane bound hydrogenase (mbh) complex, involved in disposal of excess reducing equivalents, essential in fermentative growth of T. kodakarensis [28, 29]
YP_183806Glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase4.90 ± 0.42Energy generationInvolved in glycerol catabolism in heterotrophic Archaea [30]; it belongs to protein superfamily L-2-hydroxyglutarate oxidase; gene encoding homologous enzyme in Escherichia coli (ygaF) is induced by carbon starvation and stationary phase [31]
YP_183284Ornithine carbamoyltransferase3.36 ± 0.38Amino acid biosynthesis (?)Predicted to play a role in arginine biosynthesis via ornithine; however, T. kodakarensis is an arginine auxotroph [32]; therefore, the role of this enzyme is unclear, potentially functioning in reverse to convert citrulline to ornithine [33]; it may be a stress response factor [34]
YP_184227L-Tyrosine decarboxylase4.19 ± 1.85Coenzyme productionCatalyses formation of beta-alanine for coenzyme A production [35]
YP_183265Hypothetical protein TK08532.59 ± 0.46Coenzyme productionShows strong homology to nicotinate-nucleotide-dimethylbenzimidazole (NaMN:DMB) phosphoribosyl transferase, involved in formation of alpha-ribazole-5′-phosphate, a precursor of adenosylcobalamin (vitamin B12) [36, 37]
YP_1833273-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase4.59 ± 0.34Lipid synthesisCatalyses the rate-limiting step in isoprenoid biosynthesis (formation of mevalonate from 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA) [38]
YP_182969Methylthioribose-1-phosphate isomerase2.91 ± 0.57Function unknownPredicted to play a role in the methionine salvage pathway [39, 40]; however, T. kodakarensis lacks a function methionine salvage pathway [41]; therefore, the role of this enzyme is unknown
YP_184329Apolipoprotein N-acyltransferase4.31 ± 0.30Function unknownShows strong identity to protein Ph0642 (accession 1J31) within class 13 of the nitrilase superfamily, therefore potentially a carbon-nitrogen hydrolase [42, 43]
YP_182427Oxetanocin8.93 ± 4.22Function unknownBelongs to superfamily of metal-dependent phosphohydrolases whose function is unknown [44]; it may be a stress response protein [34]
YP_182912Zinc-dependent protease3.64 ± 0.58Function unknownIdentity to a TldE homologue (Sso0661) that does not display protease activity [45]; TldE homologues may play a role in modulation of DNA gyrase [46] or antibiotic secretion [47]
YP_183662Hypothetical protein TK12492.13 ± 0.53Function unknown Shows identity to proteins classified as hypothetical proteins within either aconitase or DUF521 superfamilies
YP_183924Hypothetical protein TK15113.25 ± 0.52Function unknownBelongs to uncharacterized protein family UPF0150
YP_184398Hypothetical membrane protein 5.66 ± 0.49Function unknownThermococcales-specific hypothetical protein with no conserved domains, potentially membrane associated
YP_1846302-Amino-3-ketobutyrate coenzyme A ligase−2.11 ± 0.32Amino acid cyclingInvolved in conversion of threonine to glycine [48]
YP_184213Oligopeptide ABC transporter ATP-binding protein−2.50 ± 0.21Amino acid cyclingABC transport domain suggests involvement in amino acid/sugar uptake, although ABC transporters may be channels or exporters or serve a regulatory function [25]
YP_183708Predicted thiol protease−48.88 ± 1.13Protein turnoverBelongs to C1 peptidase family of endo- and exopeptidases
YP_183338Phenylalanyl-tRNA ligase subunit beta−2.32 ± 0.08TranslationCatalyses attachment of phenylalanine to its cognate tRNA [49]
YP_183718Probable translation initiation factor IF-2 −8.65 ± 1.04TranslationArchaeal/eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5B, homologous to prokaryotic initiation factor 2 which promotes binding of the initiator tRNA to the ribosome during translation; the predicted protein sequence contains an intein that is posttranslationally excised
YP_183212DNA topoisomerase VI subunit B −2.31 ± 0.08DNA replication and repairPart of a type IIB DNA topoisomerase, involved in manipulating the topological state of DNA [50]
YP_182643ABC-type multidrug transport system, ATPase component−2.29 ± 0.08Transport or DNA replication and repairMay be the ATPase component of a system involved in transport of molecules across the membrane or may be an ABC ATPase, involved in DNA repair, translation, or gene regulation [51]
YP_184173CGP-CTERM sorting domain-containing protein−4.31 ± 0.36Transport (?)Contains the Cys-Gly-Pro motif and C-terminus transmembrane domain found in various Thermococcales proteins, but of unknown function (potentially related to lipid modification); it shows similarity to ABC transporter substrate-binding proteins and thus may be involved in transport of compounds across the membrane
YP_182982CGP-CTERM sorting domain-containing protein −2.46 ± 0.24Function unknownHypothetical protein with a putative ABC transport domain and a Cys-Gly-Pro motif followed by a transmembrane domain at the C-terminus; such CGP-CTERM domains have so far only been found in members of the Thermococcales and their function is speculative though they may be related to lipid modification
YP_183717Hypothetical protein TK1304 −3.92 ± 0.34Function unknownHypothetical protein with no conserved domains detected; it appears to be Thermococcales specific
YP_184217Peptide ABC transporter substrate-binding protein−4.88 ± 0.37Function unknownABC transport domain suggests involvement in amino acid/sugar uptake, although ABC transporters may be channels or exporters or serve a regulatory function [25]
YP_183593Hypothetical protein TK1180 −14.25 ± 0.63Function unknownThermococcalesspecific protein of unknown function

Protein expression ratios were compared for the relevant ICPL labels (ICPL4 : ICPL0, ICPL4 : ICPL6, ICPL10 : ICPL0, and ICPL10 : IPL6) and proteins that were at least twofold upregulated or twofold downregulated as indicated by at least two of the ratios were considered to be of interest. The average of the four ratios and standard error of the mean are presented in the table.
3.3. Functional Categorisation of Upregulated Proteins
3.3.1. Transcription and Translation

Approximately half of the upregulated proteins in T. kodakarensis across stationary phase were implicated in transcription, translation, and RNA/DNA synthesis and repair (Table 2). Upregulation of posttranscriptional and posttranslational modifiers and proteins involved in correcting misacylated tRNAs indicates that T. kodakarensis directs energy into ensuring translational fidelity as the stationary phase progresses. This is in contrast with observations in bacterial models where genes encoding transcription and translation are downregulated in response to growth arresting conditions [78] and reduced translational fidelity has been observed when bacterial cells enter stasis or start to experience carbon starvation [3, 79]. However, proteins involved in transcription, translation, and DNA repair have been listed in the general stress response proteome for all three domains of life [80].

A broad range transcriptional regulator, TrmB (transcriptional regulator of mal operon), was also upregulated during the stationary phase, confirming that gene expression in T. kodakarensis is regulated across this period, likely in response to nutrient limited conditions. TrmB was first characterized as a maltose and trehalose responsive repressor of transcription of the genes encoding sugar ABC transporters [23] and has since been shown to act on up to 113 archaeal promoters to either activate or repress transcription of diverse genes in response to nutritional starvation [24].

3.3.2. Central Metabolism and Energy Generation

As expected, proteins involved in uptake of amino acids and sugars were upregulated throughout the stationary phase, probably in response to nutritional stress (e.g., [26]) as amino acids are a carbon source for T. kodakarensis [81]. However, regulation of these proteins seems to be very specific as four other proteins with ABC domains, predicted to play a role in transport of peptides and other molecules, were significantly downregulated across the stationary phase (Table 2) and one of these (YP_184217) was an ABC transporter that Jia et al. [34] previously found to be upregulated under oxidative stress conditions. Thus, expression of various transport systems in T. kodakarensis seems to be tightly controlled, probably in response to specific carbon requirements, rather than as a general cellular stress response. Many of the ABC transport systems in T. kodakarensis are uncharacterised (for both substrate and directionality) and would benefit from further research. Upregulation of a peptidase (YP_183697) may also have been a nutritional response in T. kodakarensis, although in E. coli peptidases are upregulated under starvation conditions for the purpose of continued de novo protein synthesis [3, 82] which could also be the case for T. kodakarensis.

It seems likely that fermentative growth would have been slowing as the T. kodakarensis culture continued through stationary phase; therefore, upregulation of a protein annotated as NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit (YP_184506) of the membrane bound hydrogenase complex (mbh) was surprising (Table 2). A second oxidoreductase, YP_183806, thought to play a role in glycerol catabolism in heterotrophic Archaea (and not involved with glycerophosphate backbone of archaeal lipids which have different glycerol stereochemistry) [30] was also upregulated across the stationary phase, despite the absence of added glycerol to the culture. The gene encoding the homologous enzyme in Escherichia coli (ygaF) is reportedly induced by carbon starvation and at stationary phase [31] and the enzyme belongs to a broad group of oxidoreductases and thus may act on substrates other than glycerol.

Upregulation of ornithine carbamoyltransferase with time in stationary phase was also a surprising observation in T. kodakarensis as ornithine carbamoyltransferases typically catalyse the formation of citrulline from carbamoyl phosphate and ornithine, during arginine biosynthesis. However, T. kodakarensis is an arginine auxotroph [32]; therefore, this protein is clearly not functioning for the purpose of arginine biosynthesis and must play another role in this organism. Legrain et al. [33] suggested that it functions in reverse to convert citrulline into ornithine and carbamoyl-P as a source of energy. While its specific function remains ambiguous, potentially ornithine carbamoyltransferase is important in stress responses in T. kodakarensis as Jia et al. [34] found the same protein to be upregulated in in response to heat and oxidative stress.

3.3.3. Coenzyme Production

Enzymes central to the production of coenzyme A and vitamin B12 (adenosylcobalamin) were upregulated in T. kodakarensis throughout the stationary phase (YP_184227, YP_183265, Table 2). Upregulation of other proteins (e.g., YP_183167, Table 2) indicated that processes requiring coenzyme A were occurring during the stationary phase in T. kodakarensis. Kültz [80] has also noted that upregulation of gene products involved in coenzyme A metabolism is a stress response conserved amongst the three domains of life. Adenosylcobalamin is the most complex coenzyme known and it assists enzymes by the provision of radicals, enabling catalysis of unusual isomerization or methylation reactions if radicals are also provided from S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) [36, 83, 84]. Upregulation of another protein involved in the adenosylcobalamin production pathway has been observed for T. kodakarensis under salt stress (YP_183265, Jia et al. [34]) so, potentially, this vitamin also plays a role in various stress responses in T. kodakarensis.

Upregulation of a predicted methylthioribose-1-phosphate isomerase (YP_182969) during the stationary phase would suggest the functioning of the methionine salvage pathway and thus regeneration of SAM in T. kodakarensis across the stationary phase. SAM is a key molecule in a wide range of biochemical processes [39, 40, 85] including diphthine synthesis and posttranscriptional modifications such as formation of N(1)-methyladenine or N(1)-methylguanine at position 9 of tRNA, for example, and [9], which were processes that seem to have been upregulated during the stationary phase of T. kodakarensis (Table 2). However, Sato et al. [41] have previously shown that T. kodakarensis does not possess a functional methionine salvage pathway in vivo; thus, upregulation of the predicted methylthioribose-1-phosphate isomerase across the stationary phase is not for the purpose of SAM regeneration. The enzyme belongs to a family of proteins that are homologous to eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2B (eIF2B), involved in GTP recycling in eukaryotes [86]. Sato et al. [41] found that a homologue of an eIF2B subunit in T. kodakarensis actually demonstrates ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate synthase activity (while YP_182969 did not show this activity). Thus, YP_182969 is likely to also have an as-yet-unknown biological function in vivo and would benefit from detailed biochemical characterisation.

3.3.4. Lipid Synthesis

Upregulation of HMG-CoA reductase (YP_183327) indicated that active synthesis of isoprenoids was occurring in T. kodakarensis with extended time in stationary phase. The cellular need for new isoprenoids may have been for the purpose of protein prenylation, in response to stress conditions (e.g., [87]). Upregulation of HMG-CoA reductase has been reported for a halotolerant archaeon Haloferax volcanii [88] as well as halotolerant fungi [87] in response to nonoptimal growth (salt) conditions previously. Alternatively, the need for isoprenoids may have been for the synthesis of new lipids in T. kodakarensis which would be consistent with our observation that total IPLs increased with time in stationary phase (Table 1).

3.3.5. Hypothetical Proteins and Unknown Functions

Six proteins of unknown function or general prediction only were also upregulated in T. kodakarensis with time in stationary phase and it is difficult to speculate on their possible function aside from broad predictions based on other members of their superfamily. Amongst them was a putative carbon-nitrogen hydrolase, a metal-dependent phosphohydrolase that has also been observed to be upregulated in T. kodakarensis in response to salt stress [34] and a TldE (a protease in Escherichia coli) homologue (Table 2).

3.4. Proteins Potentially Involved in Production of Tetraether Lipids throughout the Stationary Phase

Given that both the proteome and the lipidome of T. kodakarensis changed across the twelve hours in stationary phase, we took the opportunity to investigate whether any of the upregulated proteins across this period might shed light on the production of tetraether lipids, across this same period. To date, research that has been done to determine the mechanism of tetraether synthesis in the Archaea has been in vivo using labelled precursor and substrates and/or terbinafine as an inhibitor of tetraether formation. The results of these studies are at times conflicting [73, 8993] and both the structure of the precursors and the mechanism of condensation remain unresolved. A recent hypothesis [94], which is unsupported by direct experimental observations, is that condensation of the two phytanyl chains occurs in a 1′ to 4′ fashion before the chains are attached to glycerol moieties. Villanueva et al. [94] proposed phytoene synthase as a possible enzyme to catalyse this condensation; however, the absence of phytoene synthase in most archaeal genomes means that this hypothesis fails to explain tetraether synthesis in the majority of Archaea, including T. kodakarensis.

Screening criteria to consider whether proteins upregulated in the present study (i.e., concomitant with an increase in tetraether production) could be candidates for involvement in tetraether formation included distribution of the protein in the Archaea, protein similarity to squalene epoxidases, annotation associated with lipids, and the presence of transmembrane domains (see Materials and Methods for explanatory notes on the criteria used, Table 3 for results). Of the proteins classified as being associated with lipids, YP_184329 (annotated as a class 9 apolipoprotein N-acyltransferase) may interact with lipids in the manner that other class 9 acyltransferases interact in, transferring the 1-carbonyl of a phospholipid to the amino group of a lipoprotein precursor (for mechanism, see [95, 96]). However, despite its annotation, YP_184329 was more similar to class 13 nitrilases than to class 9 nitrilases and the substrates of this class are unknown [42]. YP_184329 was predicted to have transmembrane helices by all three methods tested (Table 3) and has homologues in all but two of the archaeal genomes screened (and a homologue is lacking in the genome of N. equitans as expected as well) and therefore may be a candidate for involvement in tetraether-related reactions potentially by a mechanism reminiscent of a nitrilase.

Genome accessionAnnotated nameNumber of screened archaeal genomes with a homologue presentHomologue present or absent in genome of N. equitansDemonstrating identity to a squalene epoxidaseNumber of predicted transmembrane helices by 3 different methods

YP_182427Oxetanocin9AbsentNo0, 0, 0
YP_182519Diphthine synthase15PresentNo0, 1, 0
YP_182619Hypothetical protein TK02060AbsentNo0, 1, 0
YP_182835tRNA (guanine-N2)-dimethyltransferase7PresentNo0, 0, 0
YP_182912Zinc-dependent protease14Absent to P324760, 1, 1
YP_182969Methylthioribose-1-phosphate isomerase16AbsentNo0, 2, 1
YP_182979RNA helicase16AbsentNo0, 1, 0
YP_183072Ribose ABC transporter permease4AbsentNo10, 9, 6
YP_183167tRNA(Met) cytidine acetyltransferase10PresentNo0, 1, 1
YP_183265Hypothetical protein TK085315AbsentNo0, 2, 1
YP_183284Ornithine carbamoyltransferase16AbsentNo0, 0, 0
YP_183321Glutamyl-tRNA(Gln) amidotransferase subunit D 16PresentNo0, 1, 0
YP_1833273-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase13AbsentNo0, 2, 1
YP_183397Alanyl-tRNA editing protein AlaX15PresentNo0, 0, 0
YP_183662Hypothetical protein TK124913AbsentNo0, 0, 0
YP_183694Endonuclease16PresentNo0, 0, 0
YP_183697Peptidase 10AbsentNo0, 0, 0
YP_183806Glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase5Absent to Q75W200, 2, 1
YP_183841Hypothetical protein TK1428 16PresentNo0, 1, 0
YP_18391730S ribosomal protein S1116PresentNo0, 0, 0
YP_183924Hypothetical protein TK15113AbsentNo0, 0, 0
YP_18393850S ribosomal protein L616PresentNo0, 0, 0
YP_18395450S ribosomal protein L4P16PresentNo0, 0, 0
YP_184170Peptide ABC transporter ATPase16AbsentNo0, 0, 0
YP_184182Transcriptional regulator8AbsentNo0, 1, 0
YP_184227L-Tyrosine decarboxylase9AbsentNo0, 3, 1
YP_184316DNA polymerase II large subunit9PresentNo0, 2, 0
YP_184329Apolipoprotein N-acyltransferase11AbsentNo1, 2, 1
YP_184398Hypothetical membrane protein 0AbsentNo0, 2, 1
YP_184506NADH-quinone oxidoreductase16AbsentNo0, 0, 0
YP_184539Protein kinase 16PresentNo0, 0, 0
YP_184653Lysyl-tRNA synthetase10PresentNo0, 0, 0

Sixteen different archaeal genomes were screened (refer to Materials and Methods) and a homologue was considered to be present for proteins with an -value < and coverage across > 30% of the protein.
More stringent criteria (-value < and coverage across > 60% of the protein) were used for determining the presence of homologues in N. equitans in order not to discard any potentially relevant proteins unnecessarily.
The potential level of similarity between a tetraether related enzyme and a squalene epoxidase is completely unknown; therefore, an -value of < was considered to be of interest, across any level of coverage in the protein.
Number of transmembrane helices predicted by TMHMM, TMbase, and SPLIT (given in that order in the table). See Materials and Methods for details on transmembrane prediction tools.

A TldE homologue (YP_182912) currently annotated as a zinc-dependent protease was one of only two of the upregulated proteins in this study that demonstrated any significant alignment similarity to a squalene epoxidase (Table 3). Also, interestingly, TldD and TldE (two proteins that form a proteolytic complex possibly involved in modulation of gyrase function in Escherichia coli [47]) are widely distributed in the Archaea though they are missing in the two archaeal orders not reported to produce tetraethers (Nanoarchaeota and Haloarchaeota) [45]. Furthermore, YP_182912 was predicted to contain a transmembrane helix (Table 3), suggesting that it could interact with membrane lipids. Both YP_184329 and YP_182912 would benefit from further research to determine their function in vivo and the possibility of involvement in tetraether-related reactions.

The two upregulated proteins with predicted oxidoreductase activity were of interest, because the mechanism by which two diethers might condense to form a tetraether would conceivably be by an oxidation-reduction reaction. NADH-quinone oxidoreductase (YP_184506) in the mbh complex shows homology to subunits of complex I which catalyse the transfer of electrons from, for example, NADH to quinone molecules in a reaction associated with proton translocation across the membrane [97]. As quinones have not been detected in Thermococcales species [98] and T. kodakarensis employs electron bifurcation to generate an electrochemical potential for ATP synthesis, YP_184506 probably transfers electrons from ferredoxin to H+ [99] rather than to quinones. However, this protein is an interesting candidate for some sort of involvement in the condensation of two diether isoprenoids, given its extensive homology to complex I proteins [100] that interact with isoprenoid molecules in the membrane, transfer electrons, and effect oxidoreductase activity. Furthermore, a homologue of this protein is distributed in all archaeal genomes except N. equitans. The second oxidoreductase (YP_183806) upregulated concomitantly with tetraether formation also had some of the characteristics that make it of interest as a potential player in tetraether formation, including predicted transmembrane domains and alignment similarity to a squalene epoxidase (Table 3). However, its limited distribution (Table 3) means that if it plays a role in tetraether formation, it is not by a mechanism conserved amongst all Archaea.

An additional observation was the upregulation of an adenosylcobalamin synthesis protein, as well as enzymes catalysing reactions requiring SAM, indicating that radical-assisted reactions were occurring in T. kodakarensis during the stationary phase. There are a variety of cellular processes and unusual reactions that rely on the methyl group or radicals donated from SAM or from adenosylcobalamin or both [83, 84]. With respect to tetraether formation, a radical reaction involving cobalamin has already been proposed [92, 101] as a mechanism that could explain tetraether synthesis in a manner similar to the one proposed for formation of diabolic acid in bacteria by head-to-head condensation of two fatty acids [102]. That hypothesis is worth revisiting in light of our observation of upregulation of proteins involved in adenosylcobalamin synthesis concomitant with increased tetraether formation.

4. Conclusions

Across the stationary phase, we observed protein-level and lipid-level changes in Thermococcus kodakarensis that shed light on archaeal adaptations in response to extended time in the stationary phase and/or to nutrient stress. These adaptations included increased proportion of lipids with a tetraether backbone in the membrane, an investment in synthesis of proteins that ensure translational fidelity, very specific regulation of ABC transporters (upregulation of some and downregulation of others), and upregulation of proteins involved in coenzyme production as well as upregulation of various proteins whose cellular role remains ambiguous or completely unknown. Two of these proteins, whose function remains ambiguous, were also found to be upregulated under other nonoptimal conditions in a previous study on T. kodakarensis [34] and thus could be part of a general stress response in T. kodakarensis.

As the mechanism of tetraether lipid synthesis remains unresolved and the enzyme most recently proposed as responsible for it (phytoene synthase [94]) is notably absent in T. kodakarensis and most other archaeal genomes, we investigated whether any of the proteins upregulated in the present study (concomitant with an increase in tetraether production) could be candidates for involvement in tetraether production. A putative carbon-nitrogen hydrolase (YP_184329), a TldE homologue (YP_182912), and a subunit of the mbh complex (YP184506) were the most likely candidates from the list of proteins upregulated with time in stationary phase and each would benefit from further investigation. Upregulation of adenosylcobalamin synthesis proteins concomitant with tetraether synthesis would lend support to the possibility that a radical mechanism is the trigger for tetraether synthesis [101] and may also be worth considering in the future.


The present address of Emma J. Gagen is the University of Queensland, School of Earth Sciences, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper and regarding the funding that they have received.

Authors’ Contributions

Emma J. Gagen and Marcos Y. Yoshinaga contributed equally to this work.


Marcos Y. Yoshinaga and Emma J. Gagen were supported by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme: “Ideas” Specific Programme, ERC Grant Agreement no. 247153 (to Kai-Uwe Hinrichs). Marcos Y. Yoshinaga was also supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. The authors are grateful to Nadine Broda and Lars Wörmer for assistance with lipid analysis. They also thank Reinhard Wirth and Harald Huber for valuable discussion and critical reading of the paper.


  1. M. Vulić and R. Kolter, “Alcohol-induced delay of viability loss in stationary-phase cultures of Escherichia coli,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 184, no. 11, pp. 2898–2905, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. E. Finkel, “Long-term survival during stationary phase: evolution and the GASP phenotype,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 113–120, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. T. Nyström, “Stationary-phase physiology,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 58, pp. 161–181, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. E. K. Fuge, E. L. Braun, and M. Werner-Washburne, “Protein synthesis in long-term stationary-phase cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 176, no. 18, pp. 5802–5813, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  5. M. E. Dinger, G. J. Baillie, and D. R. Musgrave, “Growth phase-dependent expression and degradation of histones in the thermophilic archaeon Thermococcus zilligii,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 876–885, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. W. W. Adams, F. E. Jenney, C.-J. Chou et al., “Transcriptomics, proteomics, and structural genomics of Pyrococcus furiosus,” in Archaea: Evolution, Physiology, and Molecular Biology, R. A. Garrett and H.-P. Klenk, Eds., Blackwell, Malden, Mass, USA, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  7. D. L. Valentine, “Adaptations to energy stress dictate the ecology and evolution of the Archaea,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 316–323, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. Y. Koga and H. Morii, “Biosynthesis of ether-type polar lipids in archaea and evolutionary considerations,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 97–120, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Kempenaers, M. Roovers, Y. Oudjama, K. L. Tkaczuk, J. M. Bujnicki, and L. Droogmans, “New archaeal methyltransferases forming 1-methyladenosine or 1-methyladenosine and 1-methylguanosine at position 9 of tRNA,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 38, no. 19, pp. 6533–6543, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Y. Ikeuchi, K. Kitahara, and T. Suzuki, “The RNA acetyltransferase driven by ATP hydrolysis synthesizes N4acetylcytidine of tRNA anticodon,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 27, no. 16, pp. 2194–2203, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. D. L. Tumbula, H. D. Becker, W.-Z. Chang, and D. Söll, “Domain-specific recruitment of amide amino acids for protein synthesis,” Nature, vol. 407, no. 6800, pp. 106–110, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. I. Ahel, D. Korencic, M. Ibba, and D. Söll, “Trans-editing of mischarged tRNAs,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 26, pp. 15422–15427, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. R. Green and H. F. Noller, “Ribosomes and translation,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 66, pp. 679–716, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. Kishishita, K. Shimizu, K. Murayama et al., “Structures of two archaeal diphthine synthases: insights into the post-translational modification of elongation factor 2,” Acta Crystallographica, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 397–406, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. M. Pappenheimer Jr., P. C. Dunlop, K. W. Adolph, and J. W. Bodley, “Occurrence of diphthamide in archaebacteria,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 153, no. 3, pp. 1342–1347, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  16. C. Deutsch, B. El Yacoubi, V. De Crécy-Lagard, and D. Iwata-Reuyl, “Biosynthesis of threonylcarbamoyl adenosine (t6A), a universal tRNA nucleoside,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 17, pp. 13666–13673, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. L. Perrochia, D. Guetta, A. Hecker, P. Forterre, and T. Basta, “Functional assignment of KEOPS/EKC complex subunits in the biosynthesis of the universal t6A tRNA modification,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 41, no. 20, pp. 9484–9499, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. T. Lovett, “Sequence of the RAD55 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: similarity of RAD55 to prokaryotic RecA and other RecA-like proteins,” Gene, vol. 142, no. 1, pp. 103–106, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. R. Schmid and P. Linder, “D-E-A-D protein family of putative RNA helicases,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 283–292, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. E. Matsui, K. V. Musti, J. Abe, K. Yamasaki, I. Matsui, and K. Harata, “Molecular structure and novel DNA binding sites located in loops of flap endonuclease-1 from Pyrococcus horikoshii,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 40, pp. 37840–37847, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. I. Callebaut, D. Moshous, J.-P. Mornon, and J.-P. de Villartay, “Metallo-β-lactamase fold within nucleic acids processing enzymes: the β-CASP family,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 30, no. 16, pp. 3592–3601, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. I. K. O. Cann, K. Komori, H. Toh, S. Kanai, and Y. Ishino, “A heterodimeric DNA polymerase: evidence that members of Euryarchaeota possess a distinct DNA polymerase,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 24, pp. 14250–14255, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S.-J. Lee, A. Engelmann, R. Horlacher et al., “TrmB, a sugar-specific transcriptional regulator of the trehalose/maltose ABC transporter from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus litoralis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 2, pp. 983–990, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. K. Schmid, D. J. Reiss, M. Pan, T. Koide, and N. S. Baliga, “A single transcription factor regulates evolutionarily diverse but functionally linked metabolic pathways in response to nutrient availability,” Molecular Systems Biology, vol. 5, article 282, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. C. F. Higgins, “ABC transporters: physiology, structure and mechanism—an overview,” Research in Microbiology, vol. 152, no. 3-4, pp. 205–210, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. X. Du, I.-G. Choi, R. Kim et al., “Crystal structure of an intracellular protease from Pyrococcus horikoshii at 2-Å resolution,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 26, pp. 14079–14084, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. L. J. Snowden, I. I. Blumentals, and R. M. Kelly, “Regulation of proteolytic activity in the hyperthermophile Pyrococcus furiosus,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 1134–1141, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  28. T. Kanai, R. Matsuoka, H. Beppu et al., “Distinct Physiological roles of the three [nife]-hydrogenase orthologs in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus kodakarensis,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 193, no. 12, pp. 3109–3116, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. T. J. Santangelo, L. Čuboňová, and J. N. Reeve, “Deletion of alternative pathways for reductant recycling in Thermococcus kodakarensis increases hydrogen production,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 897–911, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. Y. Koga, “The biosynthesis and evolution of archaeal membranes and ether phospholipids,” in Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology, K. N. Timmis, Ed., pp. 451–458, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  31. M. Metzner, J. Germer, and R. Hengge, “Multiple stress signal integration in the regulation of the complex σS-dependent csiD-ygaF-gabDTP operon in Escherichia coli,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 51, pp. 799–811, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  32. T. J. Santangelo and J. N. Reeve, “Genetic tools and manipulations of the hyperthermophilic heterotrophic archaeon Thermococcus kodakarensis,” in Extremophiles Handbook, K. Horikoshi, Ed., pp. 567–582, Springer, Tokyo, Japan, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  33. C. Legrain, V. Villeret, M. Roovers et al., “Biochemical characterisation of ornithine carbamoyltransferase from Pyrococcus furiosus,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 247, no. 3, pp. 1046–1055, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. B. Jia, J. Liu, L. Van Duyet, Y. Sun, Y. H. Xuan, and G.-W. Cheong, “Proteome profiling of heat, oxidative, and salt stress responses in Thermococcus kodakarensis KOD1,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 6, article 605, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. H. Tomita, Y. Yokooji, T. Ishibashi, T. Imanaka, and H. Atomia, “An archaeal glutamate decarboxylase homolog functions as an aspartate decarboxylase and is involved in β-Alanine and coenzyme A biosynthesis,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 196, no. 6, pp. 1222–1230, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J. C. Escalante-Semerena, “Conversion of cobinamide into adenosylcobamide in bacteria and archaea,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 189, no. 13, pp. 4555–4560, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. M. J. Warren, E. Raux, H. L. Schubert, and J. C. Escalante-Semerena, “The biosynthesis of adenosylcobalamin (vitamin B12),” Natural Product Reports, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 390–412, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. Hedl, L. Tabernero, C. V. Stauffacher, and V. W. Rodwell, “Class II 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductases,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 186, no. 7, pp. 1927–1932, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. A. Sekowska, V. Dénervaud, H. Ashida et al., “Bacterial variations on the methionine salvage pathway,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 4, article 9, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  40. E. Albers, “Metabolic characteristics and importance of the universal methionine salvage pathway recycing methionine from 5′-methylthioadenosine,” IUBMB Life, vol. 61, pp. 1132–1142, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  41. T. Sato, H. Atomi, and T. Imanaka, “Archaeal type III RuBisCOs function in a pathway for AMP metabolism,” Science, vol. 315, no. 5814, pp. 1003–1006, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. N. Sakai, Y. Tajika, M. Yao, N. Watanabe, and I. Tanaka, “Crystal structure of hypothetical protein PH0642 from Pyrococcus horikoshii at 1.6Å resolution,” Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 869–873, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. H. C. Pace and C. Brenner, “The nitrilase superfamily: classification, structure and function,” Genome Biology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 0001.1–0001.9, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  44. M. Y. Galperin, D. A. Natale, L. Aravind, and E. V. Koonin, “A specialized version of the HD hydrolase domain implicated in signal transduction,” Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 303–305, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  45. Y. Hu, N. Peng, W. Han et al., “An archaeal protein evolutionarily conserved in prokaryotes is a zinc-dependent metalloprotease,” Bioscience Reports, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 609–618, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. C. Rife, R. Schwarzenbacher, D. Mcmullan et al., “Crystal structure of a putative modulator of DNA gyrase (pmbA) from Thermotoga maritima at 1.85 Å resolution reveals a new fold,” Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, vol. 61, pp. 444–448, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  47. N. Allali, H. Afif, M. Couturier, and L. Van Melderen, “The highly conserved TldD and TldE proteins of Escherichia coli are involved in microcin B17 processing and in CcdA degradation,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 184, no. 12, pp. 3224–3231, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. A. Bowyer, H. Mikolajek, J. W. Stuart et al., “Structure and function of the l-threonine dehydrogenase (TkTDH) from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus kodakaraensis,” Journal of Structural Biology, vol. 168, no. 2, pp. 294–304, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. Y. Goldgur, L. Mosyak, L. Reshetnikova et al., “The crystal structure of phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase from Thermus thermophilus complexed with cognate tRNAPhe,” Structure, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 59–68, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. K. D. Corbett and J. M. Berger, “Structure of the topoisomerase VI-B subunit: implications for type II topoisomerase mechanism and evolution,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 151–163, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. J. Lubelski, W. N. Konings, and A. J. M. Driessen, “Distribution and physiology of ABC-type transporters contributing to multidrug resistance in bacteria,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 463–476, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. T. B. Meador, E. J. Gagen, M. E. Loscar et al., “Thermococcus kodakarensis modulates its polar membrane lipids and elemental composition according to growth stage and phosphate availability,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 5, article 10, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. H. F. Sturt, R. E. Summons, K. Smith, M. Elvert, and K.-U. Hinrichs, “Intact polar membrane lipids in prokaryotes and sediments deciphered by high-performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization multistage mass spectrometry—new biomarkers for biogeochemistry and microbial ecology,” Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 617–628, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. L. Wörmer, J. S. Lipp, J. M. Schröder, and K.-U. Hinrichs, “Application of two new LC-ESI-MS methods for improved detection of intact polar lipids (IPLs) in environmental samples,” Organic Geochemistry, vol. 59, pp. 10–21, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. M. Y. Yoshinaga, M. Y. Kellermann, P. E. Rossel, F. Schubotz, J. S. Lipp, and K.-U. Hinrichs, “Systematic fragmentation patterns of archaeal intact polar lipids by high-performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization ion-trap mass spectrometry,” Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, vol. 25, no. 23, pp. 3563–3574, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. Y. Matsuno, A. Sugai, H. Higashibata et al., “Effect of growth temperature and growth phase on the lipid composition of the archaeal membrane from Thermococcus kodakaraensis,” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 104–108, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. C. Zhu, J. S. Lipp, L. Wörmer, K. W. Becker, J. Schröder, and K.-U. Hinrichs, “Comprehensive glycerol ether lipid fingerprints through a novel reversed phase liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry protocol,” Organic Geochemistry, vol. 65, pp. 53–62, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. A. Schmidt, J. Kellermann, and F. Lottspeich, “A novel strategy for quantitative proteomics using isotope-coded protein labels,” Proteomics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 4–15, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. M. P. Washburn, D. Wolters, and J. R. Yates, “Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 242–247, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. J. R. Yates III, J. K. Eng, A. L. McCormack, and D. Schieltz, “Method to correlate tandem mass spectra of modified peptides to amino acid sequences in the protein database,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 1426–1436, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. M. M. Bradford, “A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 72, no. 1-2, pp. 248–254, 1976. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. A. Brunner, E.-M. Keidel, D. Dosch, J. Kellermann, and F. Lottspeich, “ICPLQuant—a software for non-isobaric isotopic labeling proteomics,” Proteomics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 315–326, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. E. W. Deutsch, L. Mendoza, D. Shteynberg et al., “A guided tour of the trans-proteomic pipeline,” Proteomics, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1150–1159, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. T. Fukui, H. Atomi, T. Kanai, R. Matsumi, S. Fujiwara, and T. Imanaka, “Complete genome sequence of the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus kodakaraensis KOD1 and comparison with Pyrococcus genomes,” Genome Research, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 352–363, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. J. E. Elias, W. Haas, B. K. Faherty, and S. P. Gygi, “Comparative evaluation of mass spectrometry platforms used in large-scale proteomics investigations,” Nature Methods, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 667–675, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. A. Marchler-Bauer, S. Lu, J. B. Anderson et al., “CDD: a conserved domain database for the functional annotation of proteins,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. D225–D229, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. S. F. Altschul, W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman, “Basic local alignment search tool,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 215, no. 3, pp. 403–410, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. S. McGinnis and T. L. Madden, “BLAST: at the core of a powerful and diverse set of sequence analysis tools,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 32, pp. W20–W25, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. I. Schomburg, A. Chang, S. Placzek et al., “BRENDA in 2013: integrated reactions, kinetic data, enzyme function data, improved disease classification: new options and contents in BRENDA,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. D764–D772, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. A. Krogh, B. Larsson, G. Von Heijne, and E. L. L. Sonnhammer, “Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 305, no. 3, pp. 567–580, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. K. Hofmann and W. Stoffel, “TMbase—a database of membrane spanning proteins segments,” Biological Chemistry Hoppe-Seyler, vol. 374, article 166, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  72. D. Juretić, L. Zoranić, and D. Zucić, “Basic charge clusters and predictions of membrane protein topology,” Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 620–632, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. T. Kon, N. Nemoto, T. Oshima, and A. Yamagishi, “Effects of a squalene epoxidase inhibitor, terbinafine, on ether lipid biosyntheses in a thermoacidophilic archaeon, Thermoplasma acidophilum,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 184, no. 5, pp. 1395–1401, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. E. Waters, M. J. Hohn, I. Ahel et al., “The genome of Nanoarchaeum equitans: insights into early archaeal evolution and derived parasitism,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 22, pp. 12984–12988, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. U. Jahn, R. Summons, H. Sturt, E. Grosjean, and H. Huber, “Composition of the lipids of Nanoarchaeum equitans and their origin from its host Ignicoccus sp. strain KIN4/I,” Archives of Microbiology, vol. 182, no. 5, pp. 404–413, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. A. Sugai, I. Uda, Y. H. Itoh, and T. Itoh, “The core lipid composition of the 17 strains of hyperthermophilic Archaea, Thermococcales,” Journal of Oleo Science, vol. 53, pp. 41–44, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  77. A. Cario, V. Grossi, P. Schaeffer, and P. M. Oger, “Membrane homeoviscous adaptation in the piezo-hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus barophilus,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 6, article 1152, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  78. D.-E. Chang, D. J. Smalley, and T. Conway, “Gene expression profiling of Escherichia coli growth transitions: an expanded stringent response model,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 289–306, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. T. Leng, M. Pan, X. Xu, and B. Javid, “Translational misreading in Mycobacterium smegmatis increases in stationary phase,” Tuberculosis, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 678–681, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. D. Kültz, “Evolution of the cellular stress proteome: from monophyletic origin to ubiquitous function,” The Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 206, no. 18, pp. 3119–3124, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. M. Morikawa, Y. Izawa, N. Rashid, T. Hoaki, and T. Imanaka, “Purification and characterization of a thermostable thiol protease from a newly isolated hyperthermophilic Pyrococcus sp.,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 4559–4566, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  82. C. A. Reeve, A. T. Bockman, and A. Matin, “Role of protein degradation in the survival of carbon-starved Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 157, no. 3, pp. 758–763, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  83. K. K. J. Chan, S. Thompson, and D. O'Hagan, “The mechanisms of radical SAM/cobalamin methylations: an evolving working hypothesis,” ChemBioChem, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 675–677, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. K. R. Wolthers, S. E. J. Rigby, and N. S. Scrutton, “Mechanism of radical-based catalysis in the reaction catalyzed by adenosylcobalamin-dependent ornithine 4,5-aminomutase,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 50, pp. 34615–34625, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. W. A. M. Loenen, “S-adenosylmethionine: jack of all trades and master of everything?” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 330–333, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. N. C. Kyrpides and C. R. Woese, “Archaeal translation initiation revisited: the initiation factor 2 and eukaryotic initiation factor 2B α-β-δ subunit families,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 7, pp. 3726–3730, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. T. Vaupotič, P. Veranic, U. Petrovič, N. Gunde-Cimerman, and A. Plemenitaš, “HMG-CoA reductase is regulated by environmental salinity and its activity is essential for halotolerance in halophilic fungi,” Studies in Mycology, vol. 61, pp. 61–66, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. K. A. Bidle, T. E. Hanson, K. Howell, and J. Nannen, “HMG-CoA reductase is regulated by salinity at the level of transcription in Haloferax volcanii,” Extremophiles, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 49–55, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. C. D. Poulter, T. Aoki, and L. Daniels, “Biosynthesis of isoprenoid membranes in the methanogenic archaebacterium Methanospirillum hungatei,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 110, no. 8, pp. 2620–2624, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. M. Nishihara, H. Morii, and Y. Koga, “Heptads of polar ether lipids of an archaebacterium, Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum: structure and biosynthetic relationship,” Biochemistry, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 95–102, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. T. Eguchi, H. Takyo, M. Morita, K. Kakinuma, and Y. Koga, “Unusual double-bond migration as a plausible key reaction in the biosynthesis of the isoprenoidal membrane lipids of methanogenic archaea,” Chemical Communications, no. 16, pp. 1545–1546, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  92. T. Eguchi, Y. Nishimura, and K. Kakinuma, “Importance of the isopropylidene terminal of geranylgeranyl group for the formation of tetraether lipid in methanogenic archaea,” Tetrahedron Letters, vol. 44, no. 16, pp. 3275–3279, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. N. Nemoto, Y. Shida, H. Shimada, T. Oshima, and A. Yamagishi, “Characterization of the precursor of tetraether lipid biosynthesis in the thermoacidophilic archaeon Thermoplasma acidophilum,” Extremophiles, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 235–243, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. L. Villanueva, J. S. S. Damsté, and S. Schouten, “A re-evaluation of the archaeal membrane lipid biosynthetic pathway,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 438–448, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. N. Buddelmeijer and R. Young, “The essential Escherichia coli apolipoprotein N-acyltransferase (Lnt) exists as an extracytoplasmic thioester acyl-enzyme intermediate,” Biochemistry, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 341–346, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. F. Hillmann, M. Argentini, and N. Buddelmeijer, “Kinetics and phospholipid specificity of apolipoprotein N-acyltransferase,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 32, pp. 27936–27946, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. R. Hedderich, “Energy-converting [NiFe] hydrogenases from archaea and extremophiles: ancestors of complex I,” Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 65–75, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. G. J. Schut, S. L. Bridger, and M. W. W. Adams, “Insights into the metabolism of elemental sulfur by the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus: characterization of a coenzyme A-dependent NAD(P)H sulfur oxidoreductase,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 189, no. 12, pp. 4431–4441, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. W. Buckel and R. K. Thauer, “Energy conservation via electron bifurcating ferredoxin reduction and proton/Na+ translocating ferredoxin oxidation,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Bioenergetics, vol. 1827, no. 2, pp. 94–113, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. G. J. Schut, E. S. Boyd, J. W. Peters, and M. W. W. Adams, “The modular respiratory complexes involved in hydrogen and sulfur metabolism by heterotrophic hyperthermophilic archaea and their evolutionary implications,” FEMS Microbiology Reviews, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 182–203, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. P. Galliker, O. Gräther, M. Rümmler, W. Fitz, and D. Arigoni, “New structural and biosynthetic aspects of the unusual core lipids from archaebacteria,” in Vitamin B12 and B12-Proteins, K. Bernhard, D. Arigoni, and B. T. Golding, Eds., pp. 447–458, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  102. W. Fitz and D. Arigoni, “Biosynthesis of 15,16-dimethyltriacontanedioic acid (diabolic acid) from [16-2H3]- and [14-2H3]-palmitic acids,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications, no. 20, pp. 1533–1534, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Emma J. Gagen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.