Review Article

Cardiac Output Assessed by Invasive and Minimally Invasive Techniques

Table 1

Comparison of minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring techniques (CI: cardiac index, HR: heart rate, and ECG: electrocardiogram).

TechniqueAdvantagesAdditional variablesInvasivenessLimitations

LiDCO plusContinuous CO measurementSVArterial lineRequires good fidelity of arterial waveform
Useful in goal-directed therapySVVPeripheral or central venous lineCalibration affected by neuromuscular blockers
Contraindicated in lithium therapy
Requires transpulmonary lithium dilution calibration
PiCCO plusContinuous CO measurementGEDVArterial lineRequires good fidelity of arterial waveform
EVLVRequires transpulmonary thermodilution calibration
SVV
PPV
FloTrac/VigileoContinuous CO measurementSVVArterial lineRequires good fidelity of arterial waveform
No calibration required
NICOEase of useShuntEndotracheal intubationAffected by changes in dead space or V/Q matching
Ventilatory variablesValid only with P a C O 2 > 30 mmHg
BioimpedanceNoninvasiveCutaneous electrodesAffected by electrical noise, movement
Continuous CO measurementElectrode contact affected by temperature and humidity
Requires hemodynamic stability
Not useful in dysrhythmias
BioreactanceNoninvasive Continuous CO measurementCutaneous electrodes
ECOMSVEndotracheal intubationCoronary blood flow not recorded
CIElectrocautery produces interference
SVRNo fully validated human studies
HR, ECG
Ultrasound dilutionMeasures flow in ECMO and hemodialysis circuitsArterial lineFluid overload with saline injection in sensitive patients
Central venous catheterizationErrors from indicator loss in inadequate lung perfusion
Errors in the presence of septal defects
TEEUsed to evaluate cardiacSVEsophageal probeMainly used perioperatively
anatomy and function, preload, and myocardial ischemia
Esophageal DopplerUseful in goal-directed therapySVEsophageal probeMeasures only descending aortic flow
Assumptions about aortic size may be erroneous