Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Anesthesiology Research and Practice
Volume 2015, Article ID 971059, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/971059
Research Article

Comparison of the Disposable Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway and the Disposable I-gel in Anaesthetized, Paralyzed Adults: A Randomized Prospective Study

Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 953, Irbid 21110, Jordan

Received 15 September 2015; Revised 13 November 2015; Accepted 17 November 2015

Academic Editor: Ferenc Petak

Copyright © 2015 Khaled EL-Radaideh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. H. Lee, E. S. Kang, J. W. Jung, J. H. Park, and Y. G. Choi, “Use of the i-gel supraglottic airway device in a patient with subglottic stenosis—a case report,” Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 254–256, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. R. Ueki, N. Komasawa, K. Nishimoto, T. Sugi, M. Hirose, and Y. Kaminoh, “Utility of the Aintree Intubation Catheter in fiberoptic tracheal intubation through the three types of intubating supraglottic airways: a manikin simulation study,” Journal of Anesthesia, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 363–367, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. Gruber, S. Nabecker, P. Wohlfarth et al., “Evaluation of airway management associated hands-off time during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised manikin follow-up study,” Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, vol. 21, article 10, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. S. Sardi, M. Britto, and J. Rangel, “Comparison of postoperative throat and neck complaints after the use of the i-gel versus the traditional laryngeal mask,” Open Journal of Anesthesiology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 233–236, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. S.-K. Oh, B. G. Lim, H. Kim, and S. H. Lim, “Comparison of the clinical effectiveness between the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPA) and the laryngeal mask airway by novice personnel,” Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 136–141, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. Gibbison, T. M. Cook, and C. Seller, “Case series: protection from aspiration and failure of protection from aspiration with the i-gel airway,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 415–417, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. M. Miller, “A proposed classification and scoring system for supraglottic sealing airways: a brief review,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 1553–1559, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Singh, M. K. Yadav, S. B. Marahatta, and B. L. Shrestha, “Randomized crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask airway classic with i-gel laryngeal mask airway in the management of difficult airway in post burn neck contracture patients,” Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 348–352, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. J. Gatward, T. M. Cook, C. Seller et al., “Evaluation of the size 4 i-gel airway in one hundred non-paralysed patients,” Anaesthesia, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 1124–1130, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Foucher-Lezla, T. Lehousse, J. P. Monrigal, J. C. Granry, and L. Beydon, “Fibreoptic assessment of laryngeal positioning of the paediatric supraglottic airway device i-gel,” European Journal of Anaesthesiology, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 441–442, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. Luba and T. W. Cutter, “Supraglottic airway devices in the ambulatory setting,” Anesthesiology Clinics, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 295–314, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. I. Abd Rahman, Y. Nurlia, W. Wan Rahiza, K. Esa, M. Nadia, and A. Raha, “Comparison between the use of LMA and SLIPA in patients undergoing minor surgeries,” Journal of Surgical Academia, vol. 2, pp. 8–13, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  13. D. M. Miller and L. Camporota, “Advantage of ProSeal and SLIPA airways over tracheal tubes for gynecological laparoscopies,” Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 188–193, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. Jindal, A. Rizvi, and J. P. Sharma, “Is I-gel a new revolution among supraglottic airway devices?—a comparative evaluation,,” Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 53–58, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. G. Russo, S. Cremer, C. Eich et al., “Magnetic resonance imaging study of the in vivo position of the extraglottic airway devices i-gel and LMA-Supreme in anaesthetized human volunteers,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 109, no. 6, pp. 996–1004, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. K. M. Jackson and T. M. Cook, “Evaluation of four airway training manikins as patient simulators for the insertion of eight types of supraglottic airway devices,” Anaesthesia, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 388–393, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. K. El-Radaideh, Z. Amarin, Y. Rashdan, D. Rabadi, W. Khraise, and M. Omari, “The perilaryngeal airway and the laryngeal tube in short ophthalmic procedures in adults: a prospective randomized comparative study,” Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research, vol. 2, article 170, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Roberts, M. Mani, A. Wilkes, E. Flavell, and N. Goodwin, “A randomised crossover study comparing the disposable laryngeal mask airway Supreme with the laryngeal mask airway Proseal in unparalysed anaesthetised patients,” The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology, vol. 30, no. 2, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  19. M. Lange, T. Smul, P. Zimmermann, R. Kohlenberger, N. Roewer, and F. Kehl, “The effectiveness and patient comfort of the novel streamlined pharynx airway liner (SLIPA) compared with the conventional laryngeal mask airway in ophthalmic surgery,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 431–434, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. T. Suhitharan and W. H. L. Teoh, “Use of extraglottic airways in patients undergoing ambulatory laparoscopic surgery without the need for tracheal intubation,” Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 436–441, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. M. Helmy, H. M. Atef, E. M. El-Taher, and A. M. Henidak, “Comparative study between I-gel, a new supraglottic airway device, and classical laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized spontaneously ventilated patients,” Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 131–136, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. I-gel User-guide, http://www.i-gel.com/igel-for-anaesthesia.
  23. A. S. Siddiqui, J. Ahmed, S. Z. Siddiqui, S. Haider, and S. A. Raza, “New single use supraglottic airway device with non-inflatable cuff and gastric tube channel,” Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 419–423, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. H. Kim, E. M. Choi, C. H. Chang, H. K. Kim, M. H. Chung, and Y. R. Choi, “Comparison of the effect-site concentrations of remifentanil for streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA) versus laryngeal mask airway SoftSeal insertion during target-controlled infusion of propofol,” Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 611–617, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. V. Trivedi and B. Patil, “A clinical comparative study of evaluation of Proseal LMA V/S I-GEL for ease of insertion and hemodynamic stability; a study of 60 cases,” The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology, vol. 27, no. 2, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. W. J. Jeon, S. Y. Cho, S. J. Baek, and K. H. Kim, “Comparison of the proseal LMA and intersurgical I-gel during gynecological laparoscopy,” Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 510–514, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. W. Donaldson, A. Abraham, M. Deighan, and P. Michalek, “I-gel vs. AuraOnce laryngeal mask for general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation in paralyzed patients,” Biomedical Papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia, vol. 155, no. 2, pp. 155–163, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  28. A. E. Halwagi, N. Massicotte, A. Lallo et al., “Tracheal intubation through the I-gel supraglottic airway versus the LMA Fastrach: a randomized controlled trial,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 152–156, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. H. M. Atef, A. M. Helmy, E. M. El-Taher, and A. M. Henidak, “Comparative study between I-gel, a new supraglottic airway device, and classical laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized spontaneously ventilated patients,” Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 583–590, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. Y. M. Choi, S. M. Cha, H. Kang et al., “The clinical effectiveness of the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPA) compared with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal during general anesthesia,” Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 450–457, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. Y. C. Woo, S. M. Cha, H. Kang et al., “Less perilaryngeal gas leakage with SLIPATM than with LMA-ProSealTM in paralyzed patients,” Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 48–54, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. A. A. Abdellatif and M. A. Ali, “Comparison of streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPATM) with the laryngeal mask airway ProSealTM for lower abdominal laparoscopic surgeries in paralyzed, anesthetized patients,” Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 5, pp. 270–276, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  33. L. Theiler, M. Gutzmann, M. Kleine-Brueggeney, N. Urwyler, B. Kaempfen, and R. Greif, “I-gel supraglottic airway in clinical practice: a prospective observational multicentre study,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 109, no. 6, pp. 990–995, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. L. G. Theiler, M. Kleine-Brueggeney, D. Kaiser et al., “Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients,” Anesthesiology, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 55–62, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. G. D. Puri, H. V. Hegde, A. Jayant, and I. Bhukal, “Haemodynamic and bispectral index response to insertion of the Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway (SLIPA): comparison with the laryngeal mask airway,” Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 404–410, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. B. Richez, L. Saltel, F. Banchereau, R. Torrielli, and A. M. Cros, “A new single use supraglottic airway device with a noninflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: an observational study of the i-gel,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 1137–1139, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. O. A. Bamgbade, W. R. Macnab, and W. M. Khalaf, “Evaluation of the i-gel airway in 300 patients,” European Journal of Anaesthesiology, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 865–866, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. Amini and M. Khoshfetrat, “Comparison of the Intersurgical Solus laryngeal mask airway and the i-gel supralaryngeal device,” Anaesthesia, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 805–809, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. I. Singh, M. Gupta, and M. Tandon, “Comparison of clinical performance of I-gel with LMA-ProsealTM in elective surgeries,” Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 53, pp. 302–305, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  40. W. Schmidbauer, S. Bercker, T. Volk, G. Bogusch, G. Mager, and T. Kerner, “Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic and ProSeal using a cadaver model,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 135–139, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  41. W.-J. Shin, Y.-S. Cheong, H.-S. Yang, and T. Nishiyama, “The supraglottic airway I-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients,” European Journal of Anaesthesiology, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 598–601, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. R. Goyal, R. N. Shukla, and G. Kumar, “Comparison of size 2 i-gel supraglottic airway with LMA-proSeal and LMA-classic in spontaneously breathing children undergoing elective surgery,” Paediatric Anaesthesia, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 355–359, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. S. Mitra, B. Das, and S. N. Jamil, “Comparison of size 2.5 i-gel with proseal LMA in anaesthetised, paralyzed children undergoing elective surgery,” North American Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 453–457, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. C. Hein, H. Owen, and J. Plummer, “Randomized comparison of the SLIPA (Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway) and the SS-LM (Soft Seal Laryngeal Mask) by medical students,” Emergency Medicine Australasia, vol. 18, no. 5-6, pp. 478–483, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. S. G. Russo, S. Cremer, T. Galli et al., “Randomized comparison of the i-gel, the LMA Supreme, and the Laryngeal Tube Suction-D using clinical and fibreoptic assessments in elective patients,” BMC Anesthesiology, vol. 12, article 18, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. G. Chauhan, P. Nayar, A. Seth, K. Gupta, M. Panwar, and N. Agrawal, “Comparison of clinical performance of the I-gel with LMA proseal,” Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 56–60, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. S. Kapoor, D. D. Jethava, P. Gupta, D. Jethava, and A. Kumar, “Comparison of supraglottic devices i-gel and LMA Fastrach as conduit for endotracheal intubation,” Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 397–402, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. T. Sanuki, S. Sugioka, N. Komasawa, R. Ueki, Y. Kaminoh, and J. Kotani, “Comparison of insertion of the modified i-gel airway for oral surgery with the LMA flexible: a manikin study,” Anesthesia Progress, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 145–149, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. P. A. Jadhav, N. P. Dalvi, and B. A. Tendolkar, “I-gel versus laryngeal mask airway-proseal: comparison of two supraglottic airway devices in short surgical procedures,” Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 221–225, 2015 (Chinese). View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. S. Saran, S. K. Mishra, A. S. Badhe, A. Vasudevan, L. B. Elakkumanan, and G. Mishra, “Comparison of i-gel supraglottic airway and LMA-ProSeal in pediatric patients under controlled ventilation,” Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 195–198, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. G. Kini, G. M. Devanna, K. R. Mukkapati, S. Chaudhuri, and D. Thomas, “Comparison of I-gel with proseal LMA in adult patients undergoing elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia without paralysis: a prospective randomized study,” Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 183–187, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. H. Kim, J. Y. Lee, S. Y. Lee, S. Y. Park, S. C. Lee, and C. J. Chung, “A comparison of i-gel and LMA Supreme in anesthetized and paralyzed children,” Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 317–322, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  53. Y. Li, Y. Xie, and X. Wei, “A novel method for SLIPA size selection, for adult patients, on the basis of chamber length,” Journal of Anesthesia, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 557–562, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. M.-S. Kim, J. H. Lee, S. W. Han, Y. J. Im, H. J. Kang, and J.-R. Lee, “A randomized comparison of the i-gel with the self-pressurized air-Q intubating laryngeal airway in children,” Paediatric Anaesthesia, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 405–412, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. D. Pant, A. Koul, B. Sharma, J. Sood, and J. Lerman, “A comparative study of Laryngeal Mask Airway size 1 vs i-gel size 1 in infants undergoing daycare procedures,” Pediatric Anesthesia, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 386–391, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. J. Brimacombe, G. Clarke, and C. Keller, “Lingual nerve injury associated with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a case report and review of the literature,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 420–423, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. J. Soliveres, J. Balaguer, M. T. Richart, J. Sánchez, and C. Solaz, “Airway morbidity after use of the laryngeal mask airway: LMA ProSeal vs. I-gel,” European Journal of Anaesthesiology, vol. 27, pp. 257–258, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. S. K. Maharjan, “I-gel for positive pressure ventilation,” Journal of the Nepal Medical Association, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 255–259, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. S. A. Ismail, N. A. Bisher, H. W. Kandil, H. A. Mowafi, and H. A. Atawia, “Intraocular pressure and haemodynamic responses to insertion of the i-gel, laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube,” European Journal of Anaesthesiology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 443–448, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus