Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Anesthesiology Research and Practice
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 4196813, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4196813
Research Article

Comparison of the Success of Two Techniques for the Endotracheal Intubation with C-MAC Video Laryngoscope Miller Blade in Children: A Prospective Randomized Study

1Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi 110029, India
2Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi 110029, India

Received 24 December 2015; Accepted 20 March 2016

Academic Editor: Ronald G. Pearl

Copyright © 2016 Renu Sinha et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. J. Holm-Knudsen and L. S. Rasmussen, “Pediatric airway management: basic aspects,” Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  2. M. Fonte, I. Oulego-Erroz, L. Nadkarni, L. Sánchez-Santos, A. Iglesias-Vásquez, and A. Rodríguez-Núñez, “A randomized comparison of the glidescope videolaryngoscope to the standard laryngoscopy for intubation by pediatric residents in simulated easy and difficult infant airway scenarios,” Pediatric Emergency Care, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 398–402, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Ł. Szarpak, Ł. Czyżewski, A. Kurowski, and Z. Truszewski, “Comparison of the TruView PCD video laryngoscope and macintosh laryngoscope for pediatric tracheal intubation by novice paramedics: a randomized crossover simulation trial,” European Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 174, no. 10, pp. 1325–1332, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. E. Fiadjoe, P. A. Stricker, R. S. Hackell et al., “The efficacy of the storz miller 1 video laryngoscope in a simulated infant difficult intubation,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1783–1786, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. Riveros, W. Sung, D. I. Sessler et al., “Comparison of the Truview PCD and the GlideScope® video laryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy in pediatric patients: a randomized trial,” Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 450–457, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. N. Nienaber, “Video laryngoscopy in paediatric anaesthesia in South Africa,” Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 363–368, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. Singh, N. Kumar, and A. Jain, “A randomized trial to compare the Truview picture capture device, C-MAC laryngoscope, and Macintosh laryngoscope in pediatric airway management,” Acta Anaesthesiolica Taiwanica, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. H. Mutlak, U. Rolle, W. Rosskopf et al., “Comparison of the TruView infant EVO2 PCD and C-MAC video laryngoscopes with direct Macintosh laryngoscopy for routine tracheal intubation in infants with normal airways,” Clinics, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 23–27, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. A. Van Zundert, R. Maassen, R. Lee et al., “A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 825–831, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Vlatten, S. Aucoin, S. Litz, B. MacManus, and C. Soder, “A comparison of the STORZ video laryngoscope and standard direct laryngoscopy for intubation in the Pediatric airway—a randomized clinical trial,” Paediatric Anaesthesia, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1102–1107, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. T. Saracoglu, Z. Eti, A. D. Kavas, and T. Umuroglu, “Straight video blades are advantageous than curved blades in simulated pediatric difficult intubation,” Paediatric Anaesthesia, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 297–302, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. L. Vanderhal, G. Berci, C. F. Simmons Jr., and M. Hagiike, “A videolaryngoscopy technique for the intubation of the newborn: preliminary report,” Pediatrics, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. e339–e346, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. Holm-Knudsen, “The difficult pediatric airway—a review of new devices for indirect laryngoscopy in children younger than two years of age,” Paediatric Anaesthesia, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 98–103, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. S. Hackell, L. D. Held, P. A. Stricker, and J. E. Fiadjoe, “Management of the difficult infant airway with the Storz Video Laryngoscope: a case series,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 763–766, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. E. Varghese and R. Kundu, “Does the Miller blade truly provide a better laryngoscopic view and intubating conditions than the Macintosh blade in small children?” Paediatric Anaesthesia, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 825–829, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. B. Achen, O. C. Terblanche, and B. T. Finucane, “View of the larynx obtained using the Miller blade and paraglossal approach, compared to that with the Macintosh blade,” Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 717–721, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus