Clinical Study

Dexmedetomidine Pharmacokinetics in Neonates with Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy Receiving Hypothermia

Table 1

Comparison of dexmedetomidine pharmacokinetics in 7 neonates with HIE undergoing TH to literature data in normothermic, non-HIE neonates.

Subject #PresentChrysostomou [15]Greenberg [13]Potts [28]
1234567Mean ± SD or median (range)

Subject characteristics
 Gestational age (wks; days)39 5 d41 5 d37 3 d40 4 d40 6 d38 0 d39 0 d39.6 ± 1.439.1 ± 1.639 (27–40)NR
 Postnatal age (d, wks, or yrs)1.7 ± 0.5 d2.23 ± 1.60 wks6.14 (0.57–29) wks3.8 (0.02–14) yrs
 Body weight (kg)3.833.472.413.843.084.133.813.51 ± 0.543.40 ± 0.604.02 (2.00–6.00)16.1 (3.1–58.9)
 Time from birth to TH (h)4.554.784.608.503.655.784.75.22 ± 1.57NANANA

Dexmedetomidine dosing
 Time from TH to infusion start (h)49.716.212.55.523.720.713.19 ± 7.44NANANA
 Duration of infusion (h)74.068.361.865.572.554.357.364.8 ± 6.96–24VariableBolus or 8 h inf.
 Maintenance infusion rate (μg/kg/h)0.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.20.5–2.5 (max)0.4 (under age 1 yr)
 Nominal infused dose (μg/kg)24.125.918.525.914.221.422.621.8 ± 3.9NRNRNR
 Corrected infused dose (μg/kg)22.825.017.824.913.519.821.120.7 ± 3.8NANANA

Descriptive PK parameters
Cmax (pg/mL)929562501523295517433537 ± 180968 ± 1011a304 ± 49b,670 ± 128b
Tmax (h)48.024.024.024.00.248.348.331.0 ± 16.8NREnd of infusionEnd of infusion
 AUC0–∞ (ng/mL·h)47.432.325.526.019.526.421.828.4 ± 8.6NRNRNR
 CL (L/h/kg)0.4800.7750.6990.9580.6940.7520.9680.761 ± 0.1550.907 ± 0.5021.23 ± 0.080.548 ± 0.032
 MRT (h)4.0511.44.732.646.8511.36.796.84 ± 3.204.26 ± 3.901.24 ± 0.093.28 ± 0.19
Vss (L/kg)1.958.883.312.534.758.546.575.22 ± 2.624.57 ± 4.261.51c,†1.79d,†

Abbreviations: NR, not reported; NA, not applicable or available; TH, therapeutic hypothermia (33.5°C); PK, pharmacokinetics; Cmax, maximum observed plasma concentration; Tmax, time of Cmax; AUC0–∞, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity; CL, clearance based upon the infused dose corrected for sorptive loss; MRT, mean residence time; Vss, steady-state distribution volume. Note that, for all the pharmacokinetic parameters, estimates presented in the Potts et al. and Greenberg et al. columns are mean ± SD for the 7 normothermic counterparts predicted based upon the reported population pharmacokinetic models. aExtrapolated from an infusion rate of 0.2 μg/kg/h, i.e., multiplying reported mean ± SD by 2. bAverage of simulations for normothermic counterparts to each of our 7 cooled newborns without HIE at the maximum infusion rate of 0.4 μg/kg/h. cGreenberg et al. were only able to provide the population mean estimate of distribution volume because of insufficient data in the initial accumulation or washout phases of DEX infusion, i.e., no modeling of interindividual variation. dDistribution volume was scaled to body weight; hence, volume per kg did not differ between the normothermic counterparts. for a 2-tailed, 2-sample t-test between reported values for normothermic, non-HIE newborns and presently observed values for cooled newborns with HIE. for a 2-tailed, 2-sample t-test between reported values for normothermic, non-HIE newborns and presently observed values for cooled newborns with HIE. for a 2-tailed, one-sample t-test between the reported fixed value for normothermic, non-HIE newborns and presently observed values for cooled newborns with HIE.