But I Trust My Teen: Parents' Attitudes and Response to a Parental Monitoring Intervention

Table 4

Hierarchical linear growth model for teen-reported parental monitoring.

	Intervention group			Control group
Variable	Coefficient	SE	𝑃 value	Coefficient	SE	𝑃 value
Intercept	2.53			2.71
Income	.15	.037	<.001	.14	.048	.004
Teen gender (female)	.35	.103	<.001	.24	.126	.064
Linear slope (wave)	−.11	.068	.096	−.02	.101	.819
EXP	.40	.169	.017	.31	.251	.220
ATP	−.10	.034	.007	.07	.057	.219
Quadratic slope (wave)	.03	.023	.198	−.01	.033	.734
EXP	−.14	.058	.021	−.09	.087	.306

UMP: parent attitudes about the usefulness of the monitoring process; EXP: parent attitudes about the impact of monitoring on adolescent risk behavior and experimentation; ATP: parent attitudes about monitoring and the importance of adolescent trust and privacy.