Study 1: 541 STD clinic attendees. Study 2: 248 STD clinic attendees
Study 1: SD Bioline Syphilis and Syphicheck-WB Study 2: VisiTect Syphilis and Determine.
CS
100% of professionals rated instructions and results interpretation as easy. Study 1: reproducibility between clinic and lab professionals had agreement of 99% and kappa index >0.95% for both tests. Study 2: agreement between clinic and lab professionals was 100%. In both studies, 100% of participants were willing to wait up to 30 minutes for their results.
510 STI clinic attendees including MSW and FSW; operational characteristics were collected from 12 clinic staff and 60 clients.
Visitect
CS
Clients: 62% preferred POC strategy.
Clinic staff: 75% found test easy to use and 67% found the test easy to interpret. Clients: 93% were not deterred by the waiting time.
Clients: waiting time (7%), cost of transport (10%), opening hours (25%) or lack of trust in POC test results (3%), pain caused by finger prick (57%), and preference for venous blood (38%) collection were some barriers. Clinic staff: only half trusted its results, mostly cited reason being due to inability of the test to differentiate between old and recent syphilis leading to overtreatment and also experienced frequent discordant results between POC and confirmatory tests.
Nurses: 68.2% preferred on-site ICS over on-site RPR and off-site RPP/TPHA.
Nurses: on-site testing was acceptable and favoured over off-site testing as it allowed for prompt diagnosis, patient education, and immediate treatment.
100% found on-site ICS test easy to perform, fast, and reliable, compared to 95% who found on-site RPR time consuming, unreliable, and difficult to perform and read.
Unnecessary treatment.
89.4% of women with high-titer syphilis received treatment with ICS versus 63.9% in women tested with on-site RPR and 60.8% tested with off-site approach.
Testing with both tests was completed within the recommended 15–20 min.
3.4% of SD Bioline results were unreadable. Visibility was improved on repeat testing. Hexagon results were more clear and quick in comparison to SD Bioline.
9 of 604 (44.5%) health providers participating in the training had difficulties with near vision which did not allow them to recognize the line in the POCT" and 0.3% were colour blind and could not see the red line.
Improved treatment coverage with 91.6% receiving at least one dose of penicillin and 80% with two doses reduced a process that consisted of 27 days in 6 visits to 1 visit in one day; total screening coverage was 94.8%.
Acceptance was high, ranging from 76.0% in MSW to 57.1% bar-based FSW.
Only 2/3 of those positive with POC agreed to RPR confirmation.
Using POC, during 3-month intervention period, syphilis test uptake was 63.1%, more than 4-fold higher than the monthly average uptake of 14.3% at clinic sites during the preceding 9-month period.
Life time infection 3% active syphilis confirmed with RPR-1.2%.
South Africa (UM), Gambia (L), Tanzania (LI), China (LM), Sri Lanka (LM), Haiti (L), USA (H), Russian Federation (UM).
Evaluation panel from archived specimens.
Determine Syphilis Fast Espline TP Syphicheck-WB SD Bioline Visitect Syphilis.
CC
Multisite evaluation six kits scored on clarity of instructions, technical complexity, ease of interpretation, and equipment required but not provided. Determine scored the highest and Syphilis Fast scored the lowest. Test reproducibility variability was low.
79% preferred rapid testing at clinic to venipuncture and serology. 54% preferred self-test if it was available.
Of those who preferred POC at clinic over venipuncture and serology, reasons were immediacy of the result (32.6%), reduced pain or invasiveness (8.9%), and the convenience of not requiring a second clinic visit for test results (4.4%).
Brazil, rural (UM) China, rural Peru, rural and urban (UM) Tanzania, rural (L) Uganda, rural (L) Zambia, rural and urban (LM).
Over 100,000 ANC attendees.
China: Rapid Syphilis test Rest: SD Bioline Rapid Syphilis test.
CS
Most clients preferred a finger prick over venipuncture because of the smaller volume of blood required.
POC tests were well accepted by health care workers.
All health care workers in all sites thought POC tests were easy to perform. For instance, 82% of Ugandan health care workers reported POC tests as “very easy to perform.” Clients liked receiving results and treatment on the same day as testing rather than having to return. Almost all who tested positive received treatment: 100% in Brazil, 93.6% in China, 97% in Peru, 90.1% in Tanzania, 103.6% in Uganda, and 95.2% in Zambia.
Change in percent of population that were screened following a POCT introduction was 1.6% in Brazil’s sexually active population and 1.4% in their ANC population. Increase in screening was seen in other sites: 1.9% in China, 1.0% in Peru, 10.9% in Tanzania, 5.3% in Uganda, and 9.2% in Zambia.
Of the 4157 first-time attendees offered testing, 1117 (26.9%) accepted.
3% of refusals were due to unwillingness to undergo a finger prick due to perceived pain, discomfort, or other.
Acceptance of syphilis increase significantly by 8.0% during the POC protocol versus the standard. Compared to a historical comparison, POC protocol allowed for significantly increased treatment coverage at 16.4%.
3850 ANC attendees in intervention and 3850 in control group.
SD Bioline Syphilis.
CRT
Some women received unnecessary treatment. Some partners did not receive treatment; thus women were left at risk of reinfection.
Significantly higher number of women at intervention clinics than at control clinics were tested for syphilis at 1st visit (99% versus 79.6%). Similar result was found at 3rd trimester visit. As well, significantly higher number of infected women and their partners were treated at intervention clinics while lower number of congenital syphilis cases occurred.
All clients preferred receiving results the same day. Women were well satisfied with POC testing. Some cited reasons were time savings (88%), rapid results and no pain (77%), and counselling (42%).
Risk of intimate partner violence in case of discordant results between patient and husband. Time consuming as provider is still expected to complete their “regular” tasks. Concerns over procurement of POC tests.
Immunochromatographic strip test (ICST) used from 2007 (study conducted from 2004 to 2007).
Retrospective analysis
In comparison to RPR testing, ICST used for screening increased from 7.4% in 2007 to 77.0% () in 2009. During the same period, the syphilis screening rates among clinic attendees increased from 9.0% to 21.6% ().
60 high risk populations, 10 clinical and 2 lab staff.
Visitect Syphilis test.
CS
60% of clinical staff and 52% of clients preferred conventional over POC testing.
Acceptable to patient and laboratory technicians.
Staff: 9/12 found test instructions easy/very easy. Clients: 69% of clients found time waiting for testing as short. 68% found that POC did not cause any discomfort. 95% of patients would recommend this test to others.
6/10 clinical staff lacked confidence in POC results.
CS study, with pre-post intervention design and retrospective review.
Uganda: 90.3% tested. Zambia: 95.6% tested.
Uganda: 99.0% of those treated received STAT 9.9% of partners tested for syphilis. Zambia: 95.8% of those treated received STAT 3.0% of partners tested for syphilis.
Significantly higher number of women tested and treated and their partners tested using POC intervention versus the traditional method.
CS: cross-sectional; CC: case control; CRT: clustered randomized trial; STPOC: simultaneous triple point-of-care testing; STAT: same day testing and treatment; ICS: immunochromatographic strip; RPR: rapid plasma reagin; TPHA: Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay;L: low-income economies; LM: low-middle income economies; UM: upper-middle income economies; H: high-income economies [56]; STD: sexually transmitted diseases; FSW: female sex workers; ANC: antenatal clinic; MSM: men who have sex with men; TG: transgender; NR: not reported being member of a risk group; MV: mobile van; STI: sexually transmitted infections; MSW: male sex workers; IDU: injecting drug users.