Research Article

Valorisation of Pine Cone as an Efficient Biosorbent for the Removal of Pb(II), Cd(II), Cu(II), and Cr(VI)

Table 2

Comparison of the adsorption capacity of milled pine cone for Pb(II), Cu(II), Cd(II), and Cr(VI) with the other biosorbents.

BiosorbentsMetalsParticle sizepHConcentration (mg L-1)Dose (g L-1) (mg g-1)References

Custard appleCd(II)
Pb(II)
5
5
50-200
5-200
1.5
1.5
71
90.93
Isaac and Sivakumar [13]
Ulva lactucaCr(VI)≤0.063 mm15-50210.61El-Sikaily et al. [48]
Olive stoneCu(II)<0.250-1 mm510-300101.97Blázquez et al. [40]
Pine barkCu(II)510-3001011.94
Maize huskCu(II)1.8 mm61.21Duru et al. [9]
Pine sawdustPb(II)
Cu(II)
0.6-1.2 mm5
7
1-50
1-50
10
10
13.48
9.59
Semerjian [49]
Rice huskCd(II)<0.125 mm5.54Jabbar et al. [12]
Pine coneCd(II)720-200214.7Izanloo and Nasseri [50]
Pine coneCr(VI)110-120265.36Najim and Yasin [37]
Pine coneCu(II)
Pb(II)
5
7
50-250
50-250
3
3
18.69
23.2
Değirmen et al. [46]
Pine coneCu(II)
Pb(II)
4-8 mm5
5
5-100
5-100
10
10
6.52
17.41
Martín-Lara et al. [29]
Pine cone (P. resinosa)Cu(II)
Pb(II)
<0.15 mm5
5
10-300
10-300
10
10
9.68
17.24
Awad and Erkurt [51]
Olive stonePb(II)
Cu(II)
Cd(II)
Cr(VI)
6
6
6
2
1-10
1-10
1-10
1-10
5
5
5
10
0.581
0.557
0.3
2.345
Amar et al. [44]
Pine conePb(II)
Cu(II)
Cd(II)
Cr(VI)
5.4
5.4
5.4
2
1-500
1-500
1-500
1-500
2
2
2
2
95
33.55
50
68.03
Present study